**Official 2015 Off-Season Dynasty Completed Trades Thread** (2 Viewers)

[Dan Hindery]

A few recent trades from some of my leagues.

14 team PPR, TE 1.5 lineup 1/2/3/1 3 flex

Jonathan Stewart for

Brian Quick, 2.04, 2017 3rd

Ryan Tannehill, 1.13 for

Teddy Bridgewater, 1.09, 3.06

Stedman Bailey for

Tim Wright

Niles Paul, 2016 1st for

Bishop Sankey, Robert Turbin

12 team PPR, 1/2/3/1 1 Flex (Separate devy and rookie drafts)

Dalvin Cook for

Martellus Bennett, 2016 2nd

Jeff Janis for

Robert Turbin, 1.12

14 team RB 1 PPR, WR .75 PPR, TE 1.25 PPR 1/1/1/1 4 flex (separate devy and rookie auctions)

Kendall Wright, 2016 3rd for

Marquez North, 2016 2nd

Pierre Garcon, Terrance Williams, Robert Woods for

Adrian Peterson, Jerrick McKinnon, Dontrelle Inman

 

[ghostguy123]

Man, people aren't including important info needed to evaluate a trade now for fear of insulting a fellow owner?

I understand not wanting to be like "this team sucks, guaranteed top-4 pick". But at least give your rationale for the trade, delicately if need be (I think it has a decent chance to be a top-5 pick, etc).

Dont break those egg shells

 

[pizzatyme]

I've had 4 from 1 league alone who've made mention of the feedback in this thread. It happens.

 

[ghostguy123]

I've had 4 from 1 league alone who've made mention of the feedback in this thread. It happens.

And?

 

[JonB86]

Small one in a Superflex Devy Tiered PPR:

Gave: Cole Beasley, 2016 3rd (call it an early 4th)

Received: Mike Glennon

 

[squistion]

Man, people aren't including important info needed to evaluate a trade now for fear of insulting a fellow owner?

I understand not wanting to be like "this team sucks, guaranteed top-4 pick". But at least give your rationale for the trade, delicately if need be (I think it has a decent chance to be a top-5 pick, etc).

Exactly. This can be stated diplomatically. I would even settle for a statement that the pick is from either a potential playoff or non-playoff team (that at least narrows it down).

To say a first round pick, without any context could mean anywhere from a projected 1.01 to 1.12 and that information is pretty worthless in rending an opinion on the trade (which I thought was the purpose here).

 

[jeaton6]

I've had 4 from 1 league alone who've made mention of the feedback in this thread. It happens.

And?

Pretty obvious isn't it? If you consistently post your own trades in this thread and people view them as wins most of the time then people in your leagues aren't as apt to trade with you. Probably the reason why most times people are less specific and frankly why a lot of heavy posters in other threads don't even post here. They don't want people like you and me stating what they already know when a trade is likely heavily in their favor.

It is certainly less beneficial to the value of this thread overall but probably beneficial to their specific situation.

 

[Rockchild]

FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill

"2016 1st" means????????? Guaranteed non playoff team? Borderline? Easy playoff team? I dont like that deal at all unless it's a surefire non playoff team, cause if not, I would bet anything you could get a pick like that form someone for Cj.

I like Hill over Hopkins in the FFPC

I guess it goes to how one feels about CJ. If you like him to keep/win the job then I understand preferring him over a random 2016 1st. The way I look at it as someone not as enamored with him is that the pick still holds value one way or the other. Yes, it may be less value if he succeeds but much more than if he flounders. It goes to your risk factor with CJ.

 

[ghostguy123]

I've had 4 from 1 league alone who've made mention of the feedback in this thread. It happens.

And?

Pretty obvious isn't it? If you consistently post your own trades in this thread and people view them as wins most of the time then people in your leagues aren't as apt to trade with you. Probably the reason why most times people are less specific and frankly why a lot of heavy posters in other threads don't even post here. They don't want people like you and me stating what they already know when a trade is likely heavily in their favor. It is certainly less beneficial to the value of this thread overall but probably beneficial to their specific situation.

Hasnt stopped me or anyone else i know from making a lot of deals.

Scaredy cats, yeesh

 

[ghostguy123]

FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill

"2016 1st" means????????? Guaranteed non playoff team? Borderline? Easy playoff team? I dont like that deal at all unless it's a surefire non playoff team, cause if not, I would bet anything you could get a pick like that form someone for Cj.

I like Hill over Hopkins in the FFPC

I guess it goes to how one feels about CJ. If you like him to keep/win the job then I understand preferring him over a random 2016 1st. The way I look at it as someone not as enamored with him is that the pick still holds value one way or the other. Yes, it may be less value if he succeeds but much more than if he flounders. It goes to your risk factor with CJ.

I dont care what i personally think about a guy i am trading away. I know CJ will easily get more than a random future first.

I would bet anything that future first is anything but a true random pick.

 

[Dan Hindery]

FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill

"2016 1st" means????????? Guaranteed non playoff team? Borderline? Easy playoff team? I dont like that deal at all unless it's a surefire non playoff team, cause if not, I would bet anything you could get a pick like that form someone for Cj.

I like Hill over Hopkins in the FFPC

I guess it goes to how one feels about CJ. If you like him to keep/win the job then I understand preferring him over a random 2016 1st. The way I look at it as someone not as enamored with him is that the pick still holds value one way or the other. Yes, it may be less value if he succeeds but much more than if he flounders. It goes to your risk factor with CJ.

I dont care what i personally think about a guy i am trading away. I know CJ will easily get more than a random future first.

I would bet anything that future first is anything but a true random pick.

Agree with your point here.

Thinking about this from the other side, if I was confident that I was a playoff team with a good shot at ending up picking 1.09 or later, I would definitely trade that pick for CJ if I needed a RB (and maybe even if I didn't, because it's a good value regardless). If I really felt I could finish just about anywhere and my pick could realistically end up in the top 3, then I wouldn't make the trade.

It's an inexact science for certain, but projecting where the future pick lands is a major part of any trade like this for both parties.

 

[bostonfred]

Cj Anderson hype train in full effect now

 

[Footdude]

QQRRWWWW 3DL, 3LB, 3DB

JJ Watt

Teddy Bridgewater

For

J.Hughes

Mario Williams

1.3

1.6

2.3

 

[Ernol]

Regarding the CJ Anderson trade, the other team was a non-playoff team last year (a bottom 2 team), but has nice young pieces to build around. The team could end up converting youth to win-now and is somewhat in the process of that now. Accordingly, I did not make the trade counting on the team not making the playoffs. I went in on the assumption that the team is middle of the road. In the FFPC, a middle of the road team has a better chance to be the 1.1 than the 1.12, simply because the competition in the consolation bracket for the 6th worst team is much easier than the competition in the money bracket for the 6th best team.

Although my team is also in win-now mode, I looked at this trade specifically considering where I could park value to save for the future. Accordingly, I removed entirely this year’s production from the equation and looked only at the potential future value of the two assets. Both obviously could go up or down in value, but how far up and how far down would determine the value of the trade for me.

Lets say for argument purposes that CJ Anderson is worth the 1.6 right now. In a year from now, his value could blow up, but probably never to the level of the 1.1 (in my estimation, due to age and other factors). However, the downside for a promising RB new on the scene such as CJ Anderson is bottomless. He could lose his starter role or suffer a major injury among other things. As with most players but in particular with a RB, value tends to go down over time.

The future 1st is a much less risky asset. At worst, it can be valued no less than the 1.12 (which would be very unlikely to begin with). However, it has similar or better upside in that it could be worth as much as the 1.1 (better odds imo that this random pick will be 1.1 than CJ Anderson). For that reason, future 1sts are a great investment vehicle in dynasty (stability with upside). In addition, it does not suffer from the natural trend of players’ values going down over time.

Of course, it is CJ Anderson’s expected current production that evens out the deal, but every trade has a different purpose and for my purpose for this particular trade (saving value for the future in a safe investment), I accomplished my goal.

 

[Ernol]

FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill

"2016 1st" means????????? Guaranteed non playoff team? Borderline? Easy playoff team? I dont like that deal at all unless it's a surefire non playoff team, cause if not, I would bet anything you could get a pick like that form someone for Cj.

I like Hill over Hopkins in the FFPC

I guess it goes to how one feels about CJ. If you like him to keep/win the job then I understand preferring him over a random 2016 1st. The way I look at it as someone not as enamored with him is that the pick still holds value one way or the other. Yes, it may be less value if he succeeds but much more than if he flounders. It goes to your risk factor with CJ.

I dont care what i personally think about a guy i am trading away. I know CJ will easily get more than a random future first.

I would bet anything that future first is anything but a true random pick.

Actually, I offered the same deal to several other "who knows" teams in this league and was rejected on each other occasion (not unlike my experience in another league of mine where Ive tried to accomplish the same thing). Every league is different. What CJ Anderson could fetch in someone else's league was not relevant in my decision making process.

 

[Ernol]

Man, people aren't including important info needed to evaluate a trade now for fear of insulting a fellow owner?

I understand not wanting to be like "this team sucks, guaranteed top-4 pick". But at least give your rationale for the trade, delicately if need be (I think it has a decent chance to be a top-5 pick, etc).

Exactly. This can be stated diplomatically. I would even settle for a statement that the pick is from either a potential playoff or non-playoff team (that at least narrows it down).

To say a first round pick, without any context could mean anywhere from a projected 1.01 to 1.12 and that information is pretty worthless in rending an opinion on the trade (which I thought was the purpose here).

Interestingly, it was because the pick could be anywhere from the 1.01 to 1.12 that I did not mention the projection (although I guess I could have stated that).

 

[mzkp54]

12 team PPR:

Gave: Martavis Bryant

Got: Desean Jackson, 2.05

12 team, PPR, Full IDP, Superflex

Gave: Alfred Morris, 2.08

Got: 1.10, 3.04.

 

[squistion]

Man, people aren't including important info needed to evaluate a trade now for fear of insulting a fellow owner?

I understand not wanting to be like "this team sucks, guaranteed top-4 pick". But at least give your rationale for the trade, delicately if need be (I think it has a decent chance to be a top-5 pick, etc).

Exactly. This can be stated diplomatically. I would even settle for a statement that the pick is from either a potential playoff or non-playoff team (that at least narrows it down).

To say a first round pick, without any context could mean anywhere from a projected 1.01 to 1.12 and that information is pretty worthless in rending an opinion on the trade (which I thought was the purpose here).

Interestingly, it was because the pick could be anywhere from the 1.01 to 1.12 that I did not mention the projection (although I guess I could have stated that).

OK, if you say so, but after a decade in dynasty, I don't ever remember being in any one league that all the teams were so evenly matched that I couldn't guess who would end up near the top or the bottom the following year. Usually, I can get some feel of who the best or worse teams might be (or those in the middle).

 

[ghostguy123]

Cj Anderson hype train in full effect now

umm, huh??

 

[Ernol]

OK, if you say so, but after a decade in dynasty, I don't ever remember being in any one league that all the teams were so evenly matched that I couldn't guess who would end up near the top or the bottom the following year. Usually, I can get some feel of who the best or worse teams might be (or those in the middle).

In the FFPC, a middle of the road team could end up anywhere from 1.1 to 1.12 due to the draft pick rules. There is a consolation draft that determines picks 1-6, so the 7th place team could end up with the 1.1. Accordingly, a middle of the road team truly could end up anywhere from the 1.1 to the 1.12.

 

[ghostguy123]

Actually, I offered the same deal to several other "who knows" teams in this league and was rejected on each other occasion (not unlike my experience in another league of mine where Ive tried to accomplish the same thing). Every league is different. What CJ Anderson could fetch in someone else's league was not relevant in my decision making process.

I guess if your leagues as a whole have the 12-24 people who value CJ Anderson the least out of just about the entire dynasty community, then I suppose not.

However, you did deal him for the 1st of a team who was a bottom 2 team, in which case, that team would have to make some pretty nice moves to get into the playoffs. Getting Cj helps.

It's February. PLenty of time to try and deal to a team with some other poor team's future 1st, so as to not help the team of the 1st you are getting.

I have a feeling that you specifically are 95% sure the 1st you got will be top 6 though. So pretty confidently thinking that you gave Cj for a pretty guaranteed non playoff pick The deal seems solid.

 

[ghostguy123]

OK, if you say so, but after a decade in dynasty, I don't ever remember being in any one league that all the teams were so evenly matched that I couldn't guess who would end up near the top or the bottom the following year. Usually, I can get some feel of who the best or worse teams might be (or those in the middle).

In the FFPC, a middle of the road team could end up anywhere from 1.1 to 1.12 due to the draft pick rules. There is a consolation draft that determines picks 1-6, so the 7th place team could end up with the 1.1. Accordingly, a middle of the road team truly could end up anywhere from the 1.1 to the 1.12.

Which is why it's best to have a few of those

With your CJ deal, how many 2016 1sts do you have there now?

 

[squistion]

OK, if you say so, but after a decade in dynasty, I don't ever remember being in any one league that all the teams were so evenly matched that I couldn't guess who would end up near the top or the bottom the following year. Usually, I can get some feel of who the best or worse teams might be (or those in the middle).

In the FFPC, a middle of the road team could end up anywhere from 1.1 to 1.12 due to the draft pick rules. There is a consolation draft that determines picks 1-6, so the 7th place team could end up with the 1.1. Accordingly, a middle of the road team truly could end up anywhere from the 1.1 to the 1.12.

Fine, but for future reference, then that probably should be stated in the trade posting, as not all of us play in FFPC leagues and are not familiar with their quirky consolation draft rules. If this was The Official Dynasty FFPC Trade Thread, then such a mention would be pointless, but most of us play in standard leagues where one can give a ballpark estimate of where the pick will fall. Perhaps explaining that the future draft pick can not be determined might avoid such misunderstandings from now on.

 

[menobrown]

It's February. PLenty of time to try and deal to a team with some other poor team's future 1st, so as to not help the team of the 1st you are getting.

I think the timing was spot on. It's February but cuts are next week and he just cleared a roster spot. And since we now know this pick was a from a bottom two team it might actually assist him getting a better draft pick by improving the team so they can better compete in the draft playoffs. Sure he runs the risk that Anderson gets him in the playoffs but that's the risk we take and if he thought Anderson was all thought he'd probably not have traded him.

 

[Evil G]

12 Team PPR, QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium, 3 year contracts no salary

Team a gives: Peyton, 3.09

Team B gives: 'Burger

Not involved. Think B was insane, but am I alone in these thoughts?

 

[jeaton6]

I've had 4 from 1 league alone who've made mention of the feedback in this thread. It happens.

And?

Pretty obvious isn't it? If you consistently post your own trades in this thread and people view them as wins most of the time then people in your leagues aren't as apt to trade with you. Probably the reason why most times people are less specific and frankly why a lot of heavy posters in other threads don't even post here. They don't want people like you and me stating what they already know when a trade is likely heavily in their favor. It is certainly less beneficial to the value of this thread overall but probably beneficial to their specific situation.

Hasnt stopped me or anyone else i know from making a lot of deals. Scaredy cats, yeesh

Obviously it doesn't stop people from

MAKING deals.

 

[ghostguy123]

I've had 4 from 1 league alone who've made mention of the feedback in this thread. It happens.

And?

Pretty obvious isn't it? If you consistently post your own trades in this thread and people view them as wins most of the time then people in your leagues aren't as apt to trade with you. Probably the reason why most times people are less specific and frankly why a lot of heavy posters in other threads don't even post here. They don't want people like you and me stating what they already know when a trade is likely heavily in their favor. It is certainly less beneficial to the value of this thread overall but probably beneficial to their specific situation.

Hasnt stopped me or anyone else i know from making a lot of deals. Scaredy cats, yeesh

Obviously it doesn't stop people fromMAKING deals.

Hasnt stopped anything. Weird.Even had guys say they like to deal with me cause i say what i think rather than sugar coat my trash players.

 

[ex-ghost]

non-ppr, QRRWWTDK

Team A receives:

Gordon

2015 2.08

2016 2nd (should be early)

Team B receives:

M Bennett

M Wilson

J Huff

2015 3.06

2016 3rd

Team A has the roster space and the team to wait/risk Gordon trade.

 

[Ernol]

FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill

Another trade was just now accepted in the same FFPC league:

I gave the 2015 1.8

I received a 2016 1st rounder.

The 1st rounder could be anywhere from the 1.1 to 1.12*. It was from a team that finished in 7th last year, thanks to Adrian Peterson.

*Due to the particular rules of the FFPC, draft positions are difficult to determine. Without this context, the information I have posted is pretty worthless in rendering an opinion on the trade.

 

[maxhyde]

FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill

"2016 1st" means????????? Guaranteed non playoff team? Borderline? Easy playoff team? I dont like that deal at all unless it's a surefire non playoff team, cause if not, I would bet anything you could get a pick like that form someone for Cj.

I like Hill over Hopkins in the FFPC

I guess it goes to how one feels about CJ. If you like him to keep/win the job then I understand preferring him over a random 2016 1st. The way I look at it as someone not as enamored with him is that the pick still holds value one way or the other. Yes, it may be less value if he succeeds but much more than if he flounders. It goes to your risk factor with CJ.

I dont care what i personally think about a guy i am trading away. I know CJ will easily get more than a random future first.

I would bet anything that future first is anything but a true random pick.

Agree with your point here.

Thinking about this from the other side, if I was confident that I was a playoff team with a good shot at ending up picking 1.09 or later, I would definitely trade that pick for CJ if I needed a RB (and maybe even if I didn't, because it's a good value regardless). If I really felt I could finish just about anywhere and my pick could realistically end up in the top 3, then I wouldn't make the trade.

It's an inexact science for certain, but projecting where the future pick lands is a major part of any trade like this for both parties.

I would also say unless you are pretty sure CJ helps you make the playoffs this year why would you even trade a 1st away for him?

 

[jeaton6]

I've had 4 from 1 league alone who've made mention of the feedback in this thread. It happens.

And?

Pretty obvious isn't it? If you consistently post your own trades in this thread and people view them as wins most of the time then people in your leagues aren't as apt to trade with you. Probably the reason why most times people are less specific and frankly why a lot of heavy posters in other threads don't even post here. They don't want people like you and me stating what they already know when a trade is likely heavily in their favor. It is certainly less beneficial to the value of this thread overall but probably beneficial to their specific situation.

Hasnt stopped me or anyone else i know from making a lot of deals. Scaredy cats, yeesh

Obviously it doesn't stop people fromMAKING deals.

Hasnt stopped anything. Weird.Even had guys say they like to deal with me cause i say what i think rather than sugar coat my trash players.

Well that's fine but not really relevant to why some people don't give all details here.

 

[jeaton6]

12 team PPR:

Gave: Dez

Received: AJ Green

Not a deal I make before news of video and possible over reaction but feels like a lateral move and the safe move.

 

[Soulfly3]

12 team PPR:

Gave: Dez

Received: AJ Green

Not a deal I make before news of video and possible over reaction but feels like a lateral move and the safe move.

As mentioned in the other thread, you got the smarter, better WR.

 

[One More Rep]

12 team PPR:

Gave: Dez

Received: AJ Green

Not a deal I make before news of video and possible over reaction but feels like a lateral move and the safe move.

I would do the same for piece of mind

 

[ghostguy123]

FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill

Another trade was just now accepted in the same FFPC league:

I gave the 2015 1.8

I received a 2016 1st rounder.

The 1st rounder could be anywhere from the 1.1 to 1.12*. It was from a team that finished in 7th last year, thanks to Adrian Peterson.

*Due to the particular rules of the FFPC, draft positions are difficult to determine. Without this context, the information I have posted is pretty worthless in rendering an opinion on the trade.

Mega rebuild goin on?

 

[ghostguy123]

I've had 4 from 1 league alone who've made mention of the feedback in this thread. It happens.

And?

Pretty obvious isn't it? If you consistently post your own trades in this thread and people view them as wins most of the time then people in your leagues aren't as apt to trade with you. Probably the reason why most times people are less specific and frankly why a lot of heavy posters in other threads don't even post here. They don't want people like you and me stating what they already know when a trade is likely heavily in their favor.It is certainly less beneficial to the value of this thread overall but probably beneficial to their specific situation.

Hasnt stopped me or anyone else i know from making a lot of deals.Scaredy cats, yeesh

Obviously it doesn't stop people fromMAKING deals.

Hasnt stopped anything. Weird.Even had guys say they like to deal with me cause i say what i think rather than sugar coat my trash players.

Well that's fine but not really relevant to why some people don't give all details here.

Then why did you go on and on about people in your league being less apt to trade with you if you post everything in here?

 

[jeaton6]

I've had 4 from 1 league alone who've made mention of the feedback in this thread. It happens.

And?

Pretty obvious isn't it? If you consistently post your own trades in this thread and people view them as wins most of the time then people in your leagues aren't as apt to trade with you. Probably the reason why most times people are less specific and frankly why a lot of heavy posters in other threads don't even post here. They don't want people like you and me stating what they already know when a trade is likely heavily in their favor.It is certainly less beneficial to the value of this thread overall but probably beneficial to their specific situation.

Hasnt stopped me or anyone else i know from making a lot of deals.Scaredy cats, yeesh

Obviously it doesn't stop people fromMAKING deals.

Hasnt stopped anything. Weird.Even had guys say they like to deal with me cause i say what i think rather than sugar coat my trash players.

Well that's fine but not really relevant to why some people don't give all details here.

Then why did you go on and on about people in your league being less apt to trade with you if you post everything in here?

I never said people were less apt to trade with me or that I posted all of my trades in here.

 

[Ernol]

FFPC

I traded CJ Anderson

I received a 2016 1st rounder

Earlier this offseason, same team:

I traded Deandre Hopkins

I received Jeremy Hill

Another trade was just now accepted in the same FFPC league:

I gave the 2015 1.8

I received a 2016 1st rounder.

The 1st rounder could be anywhere from the 1.1 to 1.12*. It was from a team that finished in 7th last year, thanks to Adrian Peterson.

*Due to the particular rules of the FFPC, draft positions are difficult to determine. Without this context, the information I have posted is pretty worthless in rendering an opinion on the trade.

Mega rebuild goin on?

Not at all, I’m as interested as anyone to win this league in 2015, particularly at a $2,500 entry fee. I plan on winning.

I do prefer to have 3 or more 1sts going into the next year regardless of stage of a team (not always easy to do while still trying to win), even if it means sacrificing a little bit of win-now firepower (or what some may consider too much firepower to sacrifice). For this team, I started Year 1 (2013) with 7 future 1sts , Year 2 (2014) I acquired 3 future 1sts, and Year 3, I am good with 3 (but looking to get 4 or 5).

In the long run, those little sacrifices each year will result in powerhouse teams that continue to grow. This particular team is probably still a year or two away from that point. If I am disciplined enough to do this for every team every year, I believe I can keep my dynasty portfolio generating a nice amount of income every year.

At least that is the idea in theory.

 

[Evil G]

12 Team PPR, QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium, 3 year contracts no salary

Team A gives: Peyton, 3.09

Team B gives: 'Burger

Not involved. Think B was insane, but am I alone in these thoughts?

No reaction at all to this one?

 

[FreeBaGeL]

12 Team PPR, QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium, 3 year contracts no salary

Team a gives: Peyton, 3.09

Team B gives: 'Burger

Not involved. Think B was insane, but am I alone in these thoughts?

No reaction at all to this one?

Not perfect, but close enough. I'm assuming B was playing to win this year and thinks Peyton was hindered by an injury (not age) at the end of last season. The 3 year contracts close the gap as well as it's not like you're trading 6 years of Big Ben for 1 year of Peyton.

 

[pizzatyme]

12 Team PPR, QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium, 3 year contracts no salary

Team a gives: Peyton, 3.09

Team B gives: 'Burger

Not involved. Think B was insane, but am I alone in these thoughts?

No reaction at all to this one?

You forgot to capitalize the 'A' in Team A.

Oh, and I agree with your assessment.

 

[Evil G]

12 Team PPR, QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium, 3 year contracts no salary

Team a gives: Peyton, 3.09

Team B gives: 'Burger

Not involved. Think B was insane, but am I alone in these thoughts?

No reaction at all to this one?

Not perfect, but close enough. I'm assuming B was playing to win this year and thinks Peyton was hindered by an injury (not age) at the end of last season. The 3 year contracts close the gap as well as it's not like you're trading 6 years of Big Ben for 1 year of Peyton.

I am thinking B traded to get one year of Peyton in exchange for three from the 'Burger, and Ben will likely score as many points in that one year!

 

[FreeBaGeL]

12 Team PPR, QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium, 3 year contracts no salary

Team a gives: Peyton, 3.09

Team B gives: 'Burger

Not involved. Think B was insane, but am I alone in these thoughts?

No reaction at all to this one?

Not perfect, but close enough. I'm assuming B was playing to win this year and thinks Peyton was hindered by an injury (not age) at the end of last season. The 3 year contracts close the gap as well as it's not like you're trading 6 years of Big Ben for 1 year of Peyton.

I am thinking B traded to get one year of Peyton in exchange for three from the 'Burger, and Ben will likely score as many points in that one year!

It's certainly possible, but I'm not personally expecting Big Ben to put up a career game like he did last year and I'm expecting Peyton to be more like 1st half Peyton from last year. Well, maybe "expecting" is the wrong word there, but that's a risk I'd take.

I don't think I'm alone on that either, as early ADP for 2015 redraft leagues has Peyton as QB3 and Big Ben as QB10.

 

[Sabertooth]

Problem with Manning is that he really fell off in the second half of the season. At his age, injury concerns a major factor. During the fantasy playoffs last season Manning was QB27. With his weapons, that's scary bad. That's like Geno Smith/Josh McCown territory.

 

[eefflrat]

Dynasty $225 cap:

Team a Trades Michael Floyd $15

Team B Trades Doug Martin $20

 

[jeaton6]

Dynasty $225 cap:

Team a Trades Michael Floyd $15

Team B Trades Doug Martin $20

Floyd by a lot for me regardless of scoring or format.

 

[One More Rep]

Dynasty $225 cap:

Team a Trades Michael Floyd $15

Team B Trades Doug Martin $20

Floyd

 

[Soulfly3]

1PPR 1.5TE

Mason + 3.03 for Jordan Reed + 2.02

 

[Papa John's]

Dynasty $225 cap:

Team a Trades Michael Floyd $15

Team B Trades Doug Martin $20

Floyd .... and, robbery.

 

[eNdblu]

16tm SC w/ Tiered PPR

Gave: Latavius Murray, 1.08, 2.08

Got: 1.04, 2.16, 2016 2nd

No idea where the 2016 2nd will end up because our FA hasn't started yet and a lot can change w/ a team after FA.