What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

**Official 2015 Off-Season Dynasty Completed Trades Thread** (4 Viewers)

There are cases where i would prefer pick 9 in a future year over pick 9 of the current year.

Depends on my roster, assets, and roster sizes. If i have a ton of firsts and plan to draft guys, the future pick could easily be preferable.
Even if it's preferable you should still get more back than just a future 9 for a current 9. Especially in a draft that is not weak. Even in a draft that was weak, the 2012 draft, I saw several teams trade late first round picks for future 1's and +.

 
There are cases where i would prefer pick 9 in a future year over pick 9 of the current year.

Depends on my roster, assets, and roster sizes. If i have a ton of firsts and plan to draft guys, the future pick could easily be preferable.
Even if it's preferable you should still get more back than just a future 9 for a current 9. Especially in a draft that is not weak. Even in a draft that was weak, the 2012 draft, I saw several teams trade late first round picks for future 1's and +.
well sure. Just saying in some cases if the facts were pick 9 this year or pick 9 next and those were my only two choices, I would take pick 9 the next year. SOME cases.

Sometimes you get more use out of a future 1st cause you can move it at the deadline for a decent player at a position of need. Just depends what you have to work with and what you have left over afterwards.

 
12 team PPR with 6 points per passing TD

Gave: Khiry Robinson and Markus Wheaton

Got: Bridgewater and 3.01
If Ingram leaves Saints I like Robinson side. If Ingram resigns Bridgewater side.
how would Ingram resign from a team when he's a free agent? Also, why would he resign when he's only 26 or so? Wouldn't it make more sense for him to re-sign?Furthermore, if Ingram doesn't resign or re-sign, but they draft Amir Abdullah in the 3rd and someone like "Buck" Allen in the 5th would this still be a good deal?
My head hurts.
mine does too because people don't understand the difference between resign and re-sign when they are almost two antonyms
 
There are cases where i would prefer pick 9 in a future year over pick 9 of the current year.

Depends on my roster, assets, and roster sizes. If i have a ton of firsts and plan to draft guys, the future pick could easily be preferable.
Even if it's preferable you should still get more back than just a future 9 for a current 9. Especially in a draft that is not weak. Even in a draft that was weak, the 2012 draft, I saw several teams trade late first round picks for future 1's and +.
you also have to weigh in that the future pick could end up top 3-4. I've seen great teams end up bombing either through bad luck going against high scoring teams every week/injuries.etc.

trading the current mid-1st for a future 1st that looks like a middle pick could either end up getting you a WAY better pick or a slightly worse one. The risk/reward really probably favors the future 1st if both classes are considered equal.

What's the worst that could happen trading pick 9 for a future 1st, you end up moving from 9 to 12 or 14 depending on your league.

What's the best thing that can happen, you move your current pick 9 for a top 3 pick the next year.

The value drop between pick 9 and 12-14 really isn't that big. The value gain from moving from pick 9 to a top 3 pick is HUGE.

 
There are cases where i would prefer pick 9 in a future year over pick 9 of the current year.

Depends on my roster, assets, and roster sizes. If i have a ton of firsts and plan to draft guys, the future pick could easily be preferable.
Even if it's preferable you should still get more back than just a future 9 for a current 9. Especially in a draft that is not weak. Even in a draft that was weak, the 2012 draft, I saw several teams trade late first round picks for future 1's and +.
you also have to weigh in that the future pick could end up top 3-4. I've seen great teams end up bombing either through bad luck going against high scoring teams every week/injuries.etc.

trading the current mid-1st for a future 1st that looks like a middle pick could either end up getting you a WAY better pick or a slightly worse one. The risk/reward really probably favors the future 1st if both classes are considered equal.

What's the worst that could happen trading pick 9 for a future 1st, you end up moving from 9 to 12 or 14 depending on your league.

What's the best thing that can happen, you move your current pick 9 for a top 3 pick the next year.

The value drop between pick 9 and 12-14 really isn't that big. The value gain from moving from pick 9 to a top 3 pick is HUGE.
Agreed. I'd trade a late 1st for a future 1st every time I have one if I could.

I realize that value-wise you potentially could get more, but if they're not selling more than the future 1st would be enough for me. 9-12 is all the same. 9 -> 2 is a massive difference.

 
12 team PPR qrwwwtff

Gave Tre Mason, Justin Hunter, 2.09

Received Davante Adams, Bryce Brown, 4.05

Banking on Cobb leaving a bit, also have 1&5 in the draft and expect to get a rb, which is devalued with this starting lineup.

Same league, not involved:

2.10 + DeSean for

1.09

 
12 team PPR qrwwwtff

Gave Tre Mason, Justin Hunter, 2.09

Received Davante Adams, Bryce Brown, 4.05

Banking on Cobb leaving a bit, also have 1&5 in the draft and expect to get a rb, which is devalued with this starting lineup.

Same league, not involved:

2.10 + DeSean for

1.09
Adams

1.9

 
12 team PPR with 6 points per passing TD

Gave: Khiry Robinson and Markus Wheaton

Got: Bridgewater and 3.01
If Ingram leaves Saints I like Robinson side. If Ingram resigns Bridgewater side.
how would Ingram resign from a team when he's a free agent? Also, why would he resign when he's only 26 or so? Wouldn't it make more sense for him to re-sign?Furthermore, if Ingram doesn't resign or re-sign, but they draft Amir Abdullah in the 3rd and someone like "Buck" Allen in the 5th would this still be a good deal?
My head hurts.
mine does too because people don't understand the difference between resign and re-sign when they are almost two antonyms
I think I would rather have a typo than be a total loser. Just sayin
I know the difference. I have a master's degree. I was tired and didn't type a dash correctly. Seriously, move on.

 
12 team standard scoring.

Team A gives C.J. Anderson, Ryan Williams

Team B gives Mark Ingram, Cody Latimer

Different league

Team A gives Jarvis Landry

Team B gives Steven Ridley

 
Just went down in a 12 Team I am in (PPR, TE Premium, IDP)

Team A gets: Davante Adams, GBP WR

Team B gets: C.J. Anderson, DEN RB

Looks like the Davante Adams train is heating up amid all these reports that have Cobb leaving.

 
FFPC

Team A- gave J. Charles and Knile Davis plus 2016 3rd (late)

Team B- gave Khiry, 2.4, 2.5, 2016 1st (top 6)

Another league

Team A- gave Macklin and 7.2

Team B- gave Marqise Lee, 2.7, 2.8, 2016 2nd (top 6)

 
Hawkfire said:
thriftyrocker said:
Hawkfire said:
Different league

Team A gives Jarvis Landry

Team B gives Steven Ridley
Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.
Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?
Slight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WR

Also. Huge difference in age.

This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley

 
Hawkfire said:
thriftyrocker said:
Hawkfire said:
Different league

Team A gives Jarvis Landry

Team B gives Steven Ridley
Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.
Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?
Slight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WR

Also. Huge difference in age.

This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley
still not sure which side you prefer
 
Hawkfire said:
thriftyrocker said:
Hawkfire said:
Different league

Team A gives Jarvis Landry

Team B gives Steven Ridley
Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.
Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?
Slight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WR

Also. Huge difference in age.

This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley
still not sure which side you prefer
So when he said "huge difference in age" did you think he meant that being older was a good thing?

 
Hawkfire said:
thriftyrocker said:
Hawkfire said:
Different league

Team A gives Jarvis Landry

Team B gives Steven Ridley
Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.
Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?
Slight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WR

Also. Huge difference in age.

This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley
still not sure which side you prefer
So when he said "huge difference in age" did you think he meant that being older was a good thing?
With age comes experience. #cougar :D

 
Hawkfire said:
thriftyrocker said:
Hawkfire said:
Different league

Team A gives Jarvis Landry

Team B gives Steven Ridley
Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.
Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?
Slight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WR

Also. Huge difference in age.

This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley
still not sure which side you prefer
So when he said "huge difference in age" did you think he meant that being older was a good thing?
With age comes experience. #cougar :D
Don't think Id give up more than a 4th for Ridley, to be quite honest... Dont even know if Id do that, Id rather try to hit a lotto pick

Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hawkfire said:
thriftyrocker said:
Hawkfire said:
Different league

Team A gives Jarvis Landry

Team B gives Steven Ridley
Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.
Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?
Slight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WR

Also. Huge difference in age.

This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley
still not sure which side you prefer
So when he said "huge difference in age" did you think he meant that being older was a good thing?
With age comes experience. #cougar :D
Don't think Id give up more than a 4th for Ridley, to be quite honest... Dont even know if Id do that, Id rather try to hit a lotto pick

Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
Mid-1st un this years class is a bit of an exaggeration IMO. I don't see that big of a discrepancy in this deal, certainly not enough to make a fuss about. There's a chance that Ridley leads a team for 2-3 years and/or that Landry's never more than a 75-900-5 type of guy, which I'm personally not all that fond of rostering.

 
Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.
Woof. Really?

In PPR he averaged 14.6ppg over the second half of the season.

As a rookie. You got some high standards... Guy looked pretty darn good... I get he takes a hit in nonPPR, but still.. not THAT big a hit

Landry showed some serious potential

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is a deal I was involved in. 12 team PPR. I gave up Adams and Mett. I'm pretty high on Robinson, but I can see some really liking Adams going forward in that offense.

  • Team A gave up Mettenberger, Zach TEN QB;Adams, Davante GBP WR
  • Team B gave up Robinson, Allen JAC WR; Year 2015 Draft Pick 1.10; Year 2016 Round 3 Draft Pick
 
After the Buffalo Trade:

Bishop Sankey

2016 First rounder

for

Lesean McCoy
Panic sell. Shady easily. Am I the only one that thinks BUF is actually a better spot for McCoy?

opensourcebeer said:
12 team PPR, start qrrwwwtfkd, best ball scoring

Team A gives: 1.05, 1.08, 1.09, Charles Johnson

Team B gives: 1.01, Matt Forte
pretty close

Really depends on my team makeup. If I need RB I want 1.01 and Forte. If I am rebuilding or short at WR probably taking the other side

jeaton6 said:
12 team PPR

Demaryius, 3.11, 2016 2 & 3

For

Watkins and Michael Floyd
Close but I'll take DT

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is a deal I was involved in. 12 team PPR. I gave up Adams and Mett. I'm pretty high on Robinson, but I can see some really liking Adams going forward in that offense.

  • Team A gave up Mettenberger, Zach TEN QB;Adams, Davante GBP WR
  • Team B gave up Robinson, Allen JAC WR; Year 2015 Draft Pick 1.10; Year 2016 Round 3 Draft Pick
Robinson side for me.

 
Here is a deal I was involved in. 12 team PPR. I gave up Adams and Mett. I'm pretty high on Robinson, but I can see some really liking Adams going forward in that offense.

  • Team A gave up Mettenberger, Zach TEN QB;Adams, Davante GBP WR
  • Team B gave up Robinson, Allen JAC WR; Year 2015 Draft Pick 1.10; Year 2016 Round 3 Draft Pick
I would take Robinson too

 
Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.
Woof. Really?

In PPR he averaged 14.6ppg over the second half of the season.

As a rookie. You got some high standards... Guy looked pretty darn good... I get he takes a hit in nonPPR, but still.. not THAT big a hit

Landry showed some serious potential
I have to agree with the previous. Landry looks like a ppr slot guy but not on the same level as Edelman or Wellker. Maybe he can get there eventually because as the WR3 on the Dolphins and not having to face any top CB's he did pretty well. I am not sure I like his chances playing outside very much as a #2WR and if the Dolphins find a way to dump Wallace too I really don't like him as a #1WR.

I wouldn't feel too comfy heading into the season with Landry as my WR2 or 3

That said I would happily trade Ridley for him

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.
Woof. Really?

In PPR he averaged 14.6ppg over the second half of the season.

As a rookie. You got some high standards... Guy looked pretty darn good... I get he takes a hit in nonPPR, but still.. not THAT big a hit

Landry showed some serious potential
He had an awful lot of targets over the second half of the season as well, and didn't do all that much with them. He averaged 9.0 ypr (which is terrible, TEs average more than that) and scored 5 TDs. He's not a playmaker and is thus replaceable. Brian Hartline once put up back to back 1,000 seasons in that offense with heavy volume.

I don't think Landry is a bad option in ppr leagues - but there's no way he's worth a mid first round pick in ppr (and that league was a standard league), and like I said he's not even worth a late first imo.

Would rather take a guy with some upside in the first. I could end up with a bust but I wouldn't cry over losing out on Landry.

ETA: I'm not really commenting on that trade. I'd take Landy over Ridley as well, but in a standard league I don't think it was any huge blunder to take a chance on Ridley.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team PPR dynasty

Gave: Moncrief, Zach Stacy, 2.6

Got: 1.3, 3.5

I might have sent this out in an altered state. Didn't even remember sending it :oldunsure: ...that being said, good move for this team or no?

Current Roster (we start 1qb, 2rb, 3wr, 1te, 1 flex at rb/wr/te):

RG3, Foles

Lacy, J. Hill, Morris, Spiller, K. Davis

Maclin, Fitz, V-Jax, Wright, Latimer, Cruz, Hawkins

Reed, Ertz

Picks 1.3, 1.6, 2.2, 3.5

 
12 team PPR dynasty

Gave: Moncrief, Zach Stacy, 2.6

Got: 1.3, 3.5

I might have sent this out in an altered state. Didn't even remember sending it :oldunsure: ...that being said, good move for this team or no?

Current Roster (we start 1qb, 2rb, 3wr, 1te, 1 flex at rb/wr/te):

RG3, Foles

Lacy, J. Hill, Morris, Spiller, K. Davis

Maclin, Fitz, V-Jax, Wright, Latimer, Cruz, Hawkins

Reed, Ertz

Picks 1.3, 1.6, 2.2, 3.5
You should do more altered state trading. I think that worked out in your favor

 
FFPC

Team A- gave J. Charles and Knile Davis plus 2016 3rd (late)

Team B- gave Khiry, 2.4, 2.5, 2016 1st (top 6)

Another league

Team A- gave Macklin and 7.2

Team B- gave Marqise Lee, 2.7, 2.8, 2016 2nd (top 6)
Any thoughts here?
Hard to believe a guy trading for Charles/Davis is going to be out of the playoffs. I will take the Charles side.

Maclin unless I am rebuilding. Then I suppose I could be tempted by all the swings at the homerun derby

 
FFPC

Team A- gave J. Charles and Knile Davis plus 2016 3rd (late)

Team B- gave Khiry, 2.4, 2.5, 2016 1st (top 6)

Another league

Team A- gave Macklin and 7.2

Team B- gave Marqise Lee, 2.7, 2.8, 2016 2nd (top 6)
Any thoughts here?
I like it a lot for Team A, because I believe whenever Charles is done, Davis is going to be a heck of a good RB in that system. So much up in the air with Khiry right now anyway.

 
Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.
Woof. Really?

In PPR he averaged 14.6ppg over the second half of the season.

As a rookie. You got some high standards... Guy looked pretty darn good... I get he takes a hit in nonPPR, but still.. not THAT big a hit

Landry showed some serious potential
He had an awful lot of targets over the second half of the season as well, and didn't do all that much with them. He averaged 9.0 ypr (which is terrible, TEs average more than that) and scored 5 TDs. He's not a playmaker and is thus replaceable. Brian Hartline once put up back to back 1,000 seasons in that offense with heavy volume.

I don't think Landry is a bad option in ppr leagues - but there's no way he's worth a mid first round pick in ppr (and that league was a standard league), and like I said he's not even worth a late first imo.

Would rather take a guy with some upside in the first. I could end up with a bust but I wouldn't cry over losing out on Landry.

ETA: I'm not really commenting on that trade. I'd take Landy over Ridley as well, but in a standard league I don't think it was any huge blunder to take a chance on Ridley.
I disagree that Landry is not a playmaker. His 84 receptions (#14 among WRs) on 112 targets (#31 among WRs) for a rookie looks pretty good to me - and that is a very respectable 75% catch rate.

I think people are getting way too hung up over the 9.0 YPC number. There may be other explanations for it outside of the contention that he really isn't that good. Reminds me of his critics last year who predicted he would be a bust by pointing to his combine numbers (EBF even went so far as to say that he could get off the couch and put up better numbers than Landry in most of the categories).

From the responses here, looks like I can get him fairly cheaply again this year. I would give a late 1st anytime for a solid move-the-chains WR in a PPR league.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I disagree that Landry is not a playmaker. His 84 receptions (#14 among WRs) on 112 targets (#31 among WRs) for a rookie looks pretty good to me - and that is a very respectable 75% catch rate.

I think people are getting way too hung up over the 9.0 YPC number. There may be other explanations for it outside of the contention that he really isn't that good. Reminds me of his critics last year who predicted he would be a bust by pointing to his combine numbers (EBF even went so far as to say that he get off the couch and put up better numbers than Landry in most of the categories).

From the responses here, looks like I can get fairly cheaply again this year. I would give a late 1st anytime for a solid move-the-chains WR in a PPR league.
84 catches for 758 yards is not play making. if you get the ball that much a play maker would go well over 1000 yards he was well under it.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top