One More Rep
Footballguy
DT for me12 team PPR
Demaryius, 3.11, 2016 2 & 3
For
Watkins and Michael Floyd
DT for me12 team PPR
Demaryius, 3.11, 2016 2 & 3
For
Watkins and Michael Floyd
Even if it's preferable you should still get more back than just a future 9 for a current 9. Especially in a draft that is not weak. Even in a draft that was weak, the 2012 draft, I saw several teams trade late first round picks for future 1's and +.There are cases where i would prefer pick 9 in a future year over pick 9 of the current year.
Depends on my roster, assets, and roster sizes. If i have a ton of firsts and plan to draft guys, the future pick could easily be preferable.
well sure. Just saying in some cases if the facts were pick 9 this year or pick 9 next and those were my only two choices, I would take pick 9 the next year. SOME cases.Even if it's preferable you should still get more back than just a future 9 for a current 9. Especially in a draft that is not weak. Even in a draft that was weak, the 2012 draft, I saw several teams trade late first round picks for future 1's and +.There are cases where i would prefer pick 9 in a future year over pick 9 of the current year.
Depends on my roster, assets, and roster sizes. If i have a ton of firsts and plan to draft guys, the future pick could easily be preferable.
mine does too because people don't understand the difference between resign and re-sign when they are almost two antonymsMy head hurts.how would Ingram resign from a team when he's a free agent? Also, why would he resign when he's only 26 or so? Wouldn't it make more sense for him to re-sign?Furthermore, if Ingram doesn't resign or re-sign, but they draft Amir Abdullah in the 3rd and someone like "Buck" Allen in the 5th would this still be a good deal?If Ingram leaves Saints I like Robinson side. If Ingram resigns Bridgewater side.12 team PPR with 6 points per passing TD
Gave: Khiry Robinson and Markus Wheaton
Got: Bridgewater and 3.01
you also have to weigh in that the future pick could end up top 3-4. I've seen great teams end up bombing either through bad luck going against high scoring teams every week/injuries.etc.Even if it's preferable you should still get more back than just a future 9 for a current 9. Especially in a draft that is not weak. Even in a draft that was weak, the 2012 draft, I saw several teams trade late first round picks for future 1's and +.There are cases where i would prefer pick 9 in a future year over pick 9 of the current year.
Depends on my roster, assets, and roster sizes. If i have a ton of firsts and plan to draft guys, the future pick could easily be preferable.
Agreed. I'd trade a late 1st for a future 1st every time I have one if I could.you also have to weigh in that the future pick could end up top 3-4. I've seen great teams end up bombing either through bad luck going against high scoring teams every week/injuries.etc.Even if it's preferable you should still get more back than just a future 9 for a current 9. Especially in a draft that is not weak. Even in a draft that was weak, the 2012 draft, I saw several teams trade late first round picks for future 1's and +.There are cases where i would prefer pick 9 in a future year over pick 9 of the current year.
Depends on my roster, assets, and roster sizes. If i have a ton of firsts and plan to draft guys, the future pick could easily be preferable.
trading the current mid-1st for a future 1st that looks like a middle pick could either end up getting you a WAY better pick or a slightly worse one. The risk/reward really probably favors the future 1st if both classes are considered equal.
What's the worst that could happen trading pick 9 for a future 1st, you end up moving from 9 to 12 or 14 depending on your league.
What's the best thing that can happen, you move your current pick 9 for a top 3 pick the next year.
The value drop between pick 9 and 12-14 really isn't that big. The value gain from moving from pick 9 to a top 3 pick is HUGE.
Adams12 team PPR qrwwwtff
Gave Tre Mason, Justin Hunter, 2.09
Received Davante Adams, Bryce Brown, 4.05
Banking on Cobb leaving a bit, also have 1&5 in the draft and expect to get a rb, which is devalued with this starting lineup.
Same league, not involved:
2.10 + DeSean for
1.09
mine does too because people don't understand the difference between resign and re-sign when they are almost two antonymsMy head hurts.how would Ingram resign from a team when he's a free agent? Also, why would he resign when he's only 26 or so? Wouldn't it make more sense for him to re-sign?Furthermore, if Ingram doesn't resign or re-sign, but they draft Amir Abdullah in the 3rd and someone like "Buck" Allen in the 5th would this still be a good deal?If Ingram leaves Saints I like Robinson side. If Ingram resigns Bridgewater side.12 team PPR with 6 points per passing TD
Gave: Khiry Robinson and Markus Wheaton
Got: Bridgewater and 3.01
I know the difference. I have a master's degree. I was tired and didn't type a dash correctly. Seriously, move on.I think I would rather have a typo than be a total loser. Just sayin
I'm on your side here bubI know the difference. I have a master's degree. I was tired and didn't type a dash correctly. Seriously, move on.I think I would rather have a typo than be a total loser. Just sayin
Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.Different league
Team A gives Jarvis Landry
Team B gives Steven Ridley
Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.Different league
Team A gives Jarvis Landry
Team B gives Steven Ridley
Ingram/Latimer12 team standard scoring.
Team A gives C.J. Anderson, Ryan Williams
Team B gives Mark Ingram, Cody Latimer
Different league
Team A gives Jarvis Landry
Team B gives Steven Ridley
Adams even if Cobb staysJust went down in a 12 Team I am in (PPR, TE Premium, IDP)
Team A gets: Davante Adams, GBP WR
Team B gets: C.J. Anderson, DEN RB
Looks like the Davante Adams train is heating up amid all these reports that have Cobb leaving.
Watkins and Floyd, not difficult for me, which shows people have differing values!jeaton6 said:12 team PPR
Demaryius, 3.11, 2016 2 & 3
For
Watkins and Michael Floyd
If you are still high on FLoyd then that definitely makes sense.Watkins and Floyd, not difficult for me, which shows people have differing values!jeaton6 said:12 team PPR
Demaryius, 3.11, 2016 2 & 3
For
Watkins and Michael Floyd
Cheap for Vjax12 team PPR dynasty
Gave: 3.4 rookie pick
Got: V-Jax
Hoping Winston gives him a bump
Same hereyeah I'll take Vjax for a 3rd any day, and I dont even like Vjax
Slight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WRHawkfire said:Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?thriftyrocker said:Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.Hawkfire said:Different league
Team A gives Jarvis Landry
Team B gives Steven Ridley
Agree. If that's VJax's value right now then I'm buying.yeah I'll take Vjax for a 3rd any day, and I dont even like Vjax
still not sure which side you preferSlight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WRHawkfire said:Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?thriftyrocker said:Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.Hawkfire said:Different league
Team A gives Jarvis Landry
Team B gives Steven Ridley
Also. Huge difference in age.
This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley
So when he said "huge difference in age" did you think he meant that being older was a good thing?still not sure which side you preferSlight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WRHawkfire said:Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?thriftyrocker said:Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.Hawkfire said:Different league
Team A gives Jarvis Landry
Team B gives Steven Ridley
Also. Huge difference in age.
This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley
With age comes experience. #cougarSo when he said "huge difference in age" did you think he meant that being older was a good thing?still not sure which side you preferSlight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WRHawkfire said:Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?thriftyrocker said:Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.Hawkfire said:Different league
Team A gives Jarvis Landry
Team B gives Steven Ridley
Also. Huge difference in age.
This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley
Don't think Id give up more than a 4th for Ridley, to be quite honest... Dont even know if Id do that, Id rather try to hit a lotto pickWith age comes experience. #cougarSo when he said "huge difference in age" did you think he meant that being older was a good thing?still not sure which side you preferSlight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WRHawkfire said:Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?thriftyrocker said:Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.Hawkfire said:Different league
Team A gives Jarvis Landry
Team B gives Steven Ridley
Also. Huge difference in age.
This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley![]()
Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
Mid-1st un this years class is a bit of an exaggeration IMO. I don't see that big of a discrepancy in this deal, certainly not enough to make a fuss about. There's a chance that Ridley leads a team for 2-3 years and/or that Landry's never more than a 75-900-5 type of guy, which I'm personally not all that fond of rostering.Don't think Id give up more than a 4th for Ridley, to be quite honest... Dont even know if Id do that, Id rather try to hit a lotto pickWith age comes experience. #cougarSo when he said "huge difference in age" did you think he meant that being older was a good thing?still not sure which side you preferSlight difference being #35 at RB and being #35 at WRHawkfire said:Dynasty League Football website has them each ranked as #35 at their position, today, before we know where Ridley lands or how he recovers from ACL tear. If you feel this is lopsided, which side and why?thriftyrocker said:Even in standard that's pretty inexplicable.Hawkfire said:Different league
Team A gives Jarvis Landry
Team B gives Steven Ridley
Also. Huge difference in age.
This is another one of those trades that truly would have me throwing a fit in my head... and to the owner who signed up ridley![]()
Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
Woof. Really?Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
Panic sell. Shady easily. Am I the only one that thinks BUF is actually a better spot for McCoy?After the Buffalo Trade:
Bishop Sankey
2016 First rounder
for
Lesean McCoy
pretty closeopensourcebeer said:12 team PPR, start qrrwwwtfkd, best ball scoring
Team A gives: 1.05, 1.08, 1.09, Charles Johnson
Team B gives: 1.01, Matt Forte
Close but I'll take DTjeaton6 said:12 team PPR
Demaryius, 3.11, 2016 2 & 3
For
Watkins and Michael Floyd
Robinson side for me.Here is a deal I was involved in. 12 team PPR. I gave up Adams and Mett. I'm pretty high on Robinson, but I can see some really liking Adams going forward in that offense.
- Team A gave up Mettenberger, Zach TEN QB;Adams, Davante GBP WR
- Team B gave up Robinson, Allen JAC WR; Year 2015 Draft Pick 1.10; Year 2016 Round 3 Draft Pick
I would take Robinson tooHere is a deal I was involved in. 12 team PPR. I gave up Adams and Mett. I'm pretty high on Robinson, but I can see some really liking Adams going forward in that offense.
- Team A gave up Mettenberger, Zach TEN QB;Adams, Davante GBP WR
- Team B gave up Robinson, Allen JAC WR; Year 2015 Draft Pick 1.10; Year 2016 Round 3 Draft Pick
I have to agree with the previous. Landry looks like a ppr slot guy but not on the same level as Edelman or Wellker. Maybe he can get there eventually because as the WR3 on the Dolphins and not having to face any top CB's he did pretty well. I am not sure I like his chances playing outside very much as a #2WR and if the Dolphins find a way to dump Wallace too I really don't like him as a #1WR.Woof. Really?Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
In PPR he averaged 14.6ppg over the second half of the season.
As a rookie. You got some high standards... Guy looked pretty darn good... I get he takes a hit in nonPPR, but still.. not THAT big a hit
Landry showed some serious potential
He had an awful lot of targets over the second half of the season as well, and didn't do all that much with them. He averaged 9.0 ypr (which is terrible, TEs average more than that) and scored 5 TDs. He's not a playmaker and is thus replaceable. Brian Hartline once put up back to back 1,000 seasons in that offense with heavy volume.Woof. Really?Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
In PPR he averaged 14.6ppg over the second half of the season.
As a rookie. You got some high standards... Guy looked pretty darn good... I get he takes a hit in nonPPR, but still.. not THAT big a hit
Landry showed some serious potential
...that being said, good move for this team or no?You should do more altered state trading. I think that worked out in your favor12 team PPR dynasty
Gave: Moncrief, Zach Stacy, 2.6
Got: 1.3, 3.5
I might have sent this out in an altered state. Didn't even remember sending it...that being said, good move for this team or no?
Current Roster (we start 1qb, 2rb, 3wr, 1te, 1 flex at rb/wr/te):
RG3, Foles
Lacy, J. Hill, Morris, Spiller, K. Davis
Maclin, Fitz, V-Jax, Wright, Latimer, Cruz, Hawkins
Reed, Ertz
Picks 1.3, 1.6, 2.2, 3.5
Any thoughts here?FFPC
Team A- gave J. Charles and Knile Davis plus 2016 3rd (late)
Team B- gave Khiry, 2.4, 2.5, 2016 1st (top 6)
Another league
Team A- gave Macklin and 7.2
Team B- gave Marqise Lee, 2.7, 2.8, 2016 2nd (top 6)
Hard to believe a guy trading for Charles/Davis is going to be out of the playoffs. I will take the Charles side.Any thoughts here?FFPC
Team A- gave J. Charles and Knile Davis plus 2016 3rd (late)
Team B- gave Khiry, 2.4, 2.5, 2016 1st (top 6)
Another league
Team A- gave Macklin and 7.2
Team B- gave Marqise Lee, 2.7, 2.8, 2016 2nd (top 6)
I like it a lot for Team A, because I believe whenever Charles is done, Davis is going to be a heck of a good RB in that system. So much up in the air with Khiry right now anyway.Any thoughts here?FFPC
Team A- gave J. Charles and Knile Davis plus 2016 3rd (late)
Team B- gave Khiry, 2.4, 2.5, 2016 1st (top 6)
Another league
Team A- gave Macklin and 7.2
Team B- gave Marqise Lee, 2.7, 2.8, 2016 2nd (top 6)
I disagree that Landry is not a playmaker. His 84 receptions (#14 among WRs) on 112 targets (#31 among WRs) for a rookie looks pretty good to me - and that is a very respectable 75% catch rate.He had an awful lot of targets over the second half of the season as well, and didn't do all that much with them. He averaged 9.0 ypr (which is terrible, TEs average more than that) and scored 5 TDs. He's not a playmaker and is thus replaceable. Brian Hartline once put up back to back 1,000 seasons in that offense with heavy volume.Woof. Really?Not in a standard league (which that league was) - heck I wouldn't even trade a late first for him in a ppr league. Guy averaged 9.0 ypc. He's not a great fantasy option outside of ppr leagues and even there he's a WR3/4.Landry would be a mid 1st round pick if he was placed back in this year's rookie draft
In PPR he averaged 14.6ppg over the second half of the season.
As a rookie. You got some high standards... Guy looked pretty darn good... I get he takes a hit in nonPPR, but still.. not THAT big a hit
Landry showed some serious potential
I don't think Landry is a bad option in ppr leagues - but there's no way he's worth a mid first round pick in ppr (and that league was a standard league), and like I said he's not even worth a late first imo.
Would rather take a guy with some upside in the first. I could end up with a bust but I wouldn't cry over losing out on Landry.
ETA: I'm not really commenting on that trade. I'd take Landy over Ridley as well, but in a standard league I don't think it was any huge blunder to take a chance on Ridley.
84 catches for 758 yards is not play making. if you get the ball that much a play maker would go well over 1000 yards he was well under it.I disagree that Landry is not a playmaker. His 84 receptions (#14 among WRs) on 112 targets (#31 among WRs) for a rookie looks pretty good to me - and that is a very respectable 75% catch rate.
I think people are getting way too hung up over the 9.0 YPC number. There may be other explanations for it outside of the contention that he really isn't that good. Reminds me of his critics last year who predicted he would be a bust by pointing to his combine numbers (EBF even went so far as to say that he get off the couch and put up better numbers than Landry in most of the categories).
From the responses here, looks like I can get fairly cheaply again this year. I would give a late 1st anytime for a solid move-the-chains WR in a PPR league.