This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Could be. It was 1.5 last year and has some potential breakout players that teams above it don't and made some moves to shore up RB corps. Also plays in by far the weakest division so potential to eke out some wins there they didn't get previous year. Maybe 4-8 would have been a better assessment.
Brown side i suppose considering format, i also like spiller to be a solid rb2 this year. Could go the other way depending on how cruz rehabs and how the lions use joique.
I have Hilton dead even with the 1.1 - little concern he's going catch 80 passes a year.
I'm actually in at least 2....maybe 3 leagues that do this. We've been doing it for 4 or 5 years I guess....since inception. I think most everyone likes it....especially if you have an early 4th :^ )
So team A got:
Wins the lottery getting DT then burns it immediatelly, think this trade is awful for A.
If IDP (and IDP are relevant) I'll take the side gaining three 2nds. Otherwise Tre/Cooks.One More Rep said:
I like the group of youth in a rebuild, so I get the mindset but he didn't get enough back.Hawkfire said:
They're close enough IMO. Moncrief's upside is higher but he didn't do a whole lot last year and the Colts brought in AJ so I wouldn't expect much in 2015 either.
Except they aren't really close enough for most people. Wheaton carries minimal value and there are a lot of people very high on Moncrief despite "not doing a whole lot last year".
Im trying to gauge what Riddick's value really is. Surprised to see you say he is WW material. Im not expecting him to be my RB2 this season, but with Bush gone and only Joique Bell to worry about, I think he has a chance to show what he can do this season. He did pretty well in very limited touches last year, granted almost all of his production came in the passing game. From a trade persecutive I see him as basically a sweetener on top of a deal to tip the scales. A decent RB 4 today with the potential to be a lot more in a good offense, playing on a fast track. Its not like the FF RB pool is all that deep. Guys that get 10ish touches are all going to be rostered. If he takes over the Reggie Bush role, he should see 10ish touches per game, right?
I am going to take exception to the other half of that statement.
Including rookies, his current ADP is RB18. I apologize for saying top 15 instead of top 18.Eta -- Riddick is RB52. I believe my point stands that there is significant value difference between those two.
thought we were expressing our personal opinions here.
Am I crazy for not liking this move? Teddy is a young QB, and he probably finishes in the QB1 range for at least a few seasons, maybe quite a few seasons. I could see him outscoring Charles in both the short and long term. You have Romo, so your base lineup will still have 2 QB and 2 stud RB (I'm assuming you start 2), but if one of those guys goes down you will be in big trouble. I would like this move much more in a re-draft.
More pieces and younger. I would imagine CJ is easier to drop on a rebuilder than Ball or Hillman and flipping Rivers and Lafell shouldn't be tough if you aren't looking to break the bank
I had all those same thoughts. But if one of my QBs goes down I have the flexibility of sticking Jeremy Hill or Isiah Crowell into my flex.
I see the more pieces but not the younger. I have Lafell in multiple leagues and can't even sniff a late 2 or 2016 2. I would think Ball/Hillman combo could provide better return to Anderson owner than Lafell. He gave up 3+ years from Ryan to Rivers (and a top 6 Dyno QB) and picked up a wildcard in Ridley, Dunbar who holds little trade value and the 3.4. I think he could have gotten more out of Ryan and the Ball/Hillman combo.
I am not saying it is great value for either or that I would do them in a rebuild. I would try to pick and choose which assets you sell off a little more selectively but selling everything is another method. The Ryan to Rivers deal I actually think could turn out pretty well depending where Ridley ends up. Assuming he had less than half the league to deal with for Ryan not terrible anyway.
I thought it was pretty close.
Newton/Crowell - not close
Gurley side for meblardorg said:
Are you assuming that Gurley is the 1.01? I think that would make me like the Jordan Matthews side even more. Then he'd get the better, younger receiver AND the best prospect in the draft.
Yes it's officially time to start sending out offers for DTcstu said:
