What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official 2016 GOP thread: Is it really going to be Donald Trump?? (1 Viewer)

SIDA! said:
sho nuff said:
How much of this country do you think want the "real reform" that you want?

I guess then, by what you are saying is it does not matter who gets elected, real reform that you want likely won't make its way thru congress.
I think the majority of the country is much more lenient than I am. I think the majority of the GOP is more lenient than I am in general.

But here is the crux of the issue and I touched on this in the Trump thread a little bit ago.

Us hardliners haven't budged. But because our government has refused to act on this issue more and more people who would normally be more "compassionate" so to speak are drifting over to our side. Even if they think Trump is a little too harsh or what not...they see everybody else as "do nothing" and they have reached a tipping point where they would rather crack and whip and be too harsh than continue to do nothing.

Even the most lenient parent can snap and blow up on their kid if the little #### pushes hard and long enough, you know?

Here is what I would want:

1. Secure and closely monitored border (doesn't mean building a wall)

2. Crack down on employers

3. Deportation of illegal aliens here, especially criminals.

----

After this has been done, and I won't accept the promise that my government will do border and employer enforcement simultaneously, I would be open to discussions about legalizing those still here. But I am never going to support pathway to citizenship and do not believe they deserve it, should be rewarded with it, or need it for that matter.

I think many Americans are open to the following:

1. Allowing those here to stay if the government seriously demonstrates they are serious about making this the last and final "amnesty" push. I think they will fall for the fried ice cream though and that is my biggest concern.

2. I think most Americans are cool with the idea of a "guest worker" program if it is a true guest worker program. What I mean by that is farmers or what not are allowed to bring in laborers...but not their families and the laborers must return each year to their country.

3. I also think most Americans are in support of making the immigration process more fair, efficient and less bureaucratic. I think most Americans don't mind the idea of even allowing more to come in now legally than already are.

Let me get back to Kasich. I have a particular affinity for him going back to his days in Congress following the 94 takeover and the Contract with America. I have been wanting him to run for president for a few cycles. I still think fondly of him and generally love everything about the guy from a policy standpoint.

There is nobody in this race that I trust more than him to take a hatchet to spending and to get our fiscal house in order. I was really crushed when he started parroting the open borders stuff. He gave off a lot of the "immigration speak" that raises red flags in our circles.

In the other thread about Trump, YankeeFan and I have a little back and forth going. Kasich is a guy who I think could theoretically clean up the GOP and get our house back in order so to speak. But...he needs to find religion when it comes to immigration.

Even if he tacked right but not as right as Trump...and really build his credibility on the subject I think he could have (maybe still do) some damage in this election.
On immigration, I agree with cracking down on employers and deporting criminals. The rest...going to be a tough and expensive task.

I agree on Kasich fiscally...and here is the thing, I think you and a few others are overrating immigration as an issue and basically putting it above the fiscal problems in this country.

Basically disqualifying Kasich because of immigration (that you agree won't likely get the real reform anyway).

Meanwhile you are supporting Trump who seems to ha e zero clue about the fiscal issues and whose proposals about immigration will cost a ton.

 
sho nuff

But it goes beyond immigration so you are over simplifying it to a degree.

Yes. Immigration is a huge issue for me. But my hatred towards my party extends to a vast array of issues. Most notably bigger, more expansive government, deficits, etc

If my party was actually advancing conservative principles but falling short on immigration then my anger wound be much less intense and I wouldn't be motivated to vote for Trump at all. I would seek out a real GOPer.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
bouncing back and forth between CNN and Fox...literally his name is mentioned every 30 seconds.

Crazy how he just completely disrupted the process like this...that is brilliance.

 
Compared to the Democrats, the Republican rhetoric has become super ugly.
I thought Mike Huckabee said the most truthful words of anyone when he attacked how the country was run by money, early on in the debate.
Its truthful to the extent that the country has always been run by money throughout our entire existence. So what?
Thank You for the opp to respond. It bothers me and a lot of folks who are starting to understand history and the way the money traces back and the damage that it has caused for a long time. It's OK if it isn't a top 3 issue for you right now Tim.

You have a lot of knowledge, the history threads, presidents, you almost never hear from me in there, it's interesting to read your work or interpretation of other's work. I hope at some point you can sit down and see the horrors of the banking system in this country and one day maybe we can discuss Andrew Jackson and his dealing with the central banks in 1836. He decided to not renew the charter and they in turn dried up currency and made Jackson look like a fool when in fact it was one of his crowning achievements or should have been. History books cover that just a bit different but the banks took away as much American currency as they could.

Folks are tired of the banks, they should have been given a death sentence but Obama bailed them out. Folks are still a little touchy on this issue and haven't gotten much satisfaction from the guy in office now.

 
sho nuff

But it goes beyond immigration so you are over simplifying it to a degree.

Yes. Immigration is a huge issue for me. But my hatred towards my party extends to a vast array of issues. Most notably bigger, more expansive government, deficits, etc

If my party was actually advancing conservative principles but falling short on immigration then my anger wound be much less intense and I wouldn't be motivated to vote for Trump at all. I would seek out a real GOPer.
So, you are so angry at your party over such issues, you are supporting a candidate whose platform thus far will expand government and run up higher deficits.

Again, some disconnect going on...your reasoning for Trump seems completely illogical.

 
CNN running a little collage of excerpts from diff candidates. Hilary and Sanders were 2nd adn 3rd to last but Trump was the last one to speak and it is a very presidential looking picture of him behind a podium saying with loud confidence saying...

"We can't afford to be so nice folks"

I really believe that one sentence has big meaningful impact for a lot of folks.A lot of the other candidates talk in riddles. Trump keeps to 1 syllable words mostly and he is talking directly to YOU in the homes. Folks Folks Folks...he isn't talking to the rich. It's easy to read that excerpt or hear him say those words and everyone understands what he means immediately.

I think he continues to run an amazing campaign, would like to know who is charge of it because they seem to know what they are doing. I don't see Trump as a true GOP and I don't believe he is going to be running a conservative campaign trying to get the hard right to like him. he is after the middle 1/3, the independents or swing voters and getting as many of the GOP as he can by taking their nomination. If Trump thought he could win as a Democrat he would have run that way. I'm serious.

 
Compared to the Democrats, the Republican rhetoric has become super ugly.
I thought Mike Huckabee said the most truthful words of anyone when he attacked how the country was run by money, early on in the debate.
Haw, and look at him now. Standing next to Mr. Moneybags begging to be allowed on the $ Train.
I have to agree with you Saints but I thought his words were what was important.

 
bouncing back and forth between CNN and Fox...literally his name is mentioned every 30 seconds.

Crazy how he just completely disrupted the process like this...that is brilliance.
Have they mentioned the fact he dodged the draft or that he is taking all the money from tonight's event into his own Foundation?

No?

 
Compared to the Democrats, the Republican rhetoric has become super ugly.
I thought Mike Huckabee said the most truthful words of anyone when he attacked how the country was run by money, early on in the debate.
Haw, and look at him now. Standing next to Mr. Moneybags begging to be allowed on the $ Train.
I have to agree with you Saints but I thought his words were what was important.
I'll go with actions.

 
bouncing back and forth between CNN and Fox...literally his name is mentioned every 30 seconds.

Crazy how he just completely disrupted the process like this...that is brilliance.
Have they mentioned the fact he dodged the draft or that he is taking all the money from tonight's event into his own Foundation?

No?
Nope, not sure why they would...he is being interviewed now on CNN, you should tune in.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff

But it goes beyond immigration so you are over simplifying it to a degree.

Yes. Immigration is a huge issue for me. But my hatred towards my party extends to a vast array of issues. Most notably bigger, more expansive government, deficits, etc

If my party was actually advancing conservative principles but falling short on immigration then my anger wound be much less intense and I wouldn't be motivated to vote for Trump at all. I would seek out a real GOPer.
So, you are so angry at your party over such issues, you are supporting a candidate whose platform thus far will expand government and run up higher deficits.

Again, some disconnect going on...your reasoning for Trump seems completely illogical.
I can definitely understand and respect how anyone might feel that my position is illogical or disconnected. I struggle with it myself.

In my shoes, I see two options:

1. Continue trying to work within the system so to speak and hope that they (the establishment) finally gets it, or

2. Blow it up and let the chips fall where they may

I think you have written you are a Republican or used to be. Forgive me if my recollection is off...my notebook isn't all that great anymore.

So, I am presuming that you and I see eye to eye on some major issues. With respect to option 1...what hope do I realistically have?

I ask because I have lived through the following:

A. GOP control of the white house and congress from 2000-2006 (nothing happened on immigration and massive expansion of government)

B. GOP recently regained control of Congress (nothing happened and massive expansion of government)

C. Eric Cantor got destroyed in his primary by a no-name that was outspent 40-1 because he supported amnesty (GOP didn't get the message)

D. Numerous attempts to unseat Boehner (GOP didn't get the message)

E. Boehner finally dethroned (GOP tries to install McCarthy and didn't get the message)

F. Ryan steps on the grenade and now he under threat of being primaried like Cantor (GOP still doesn't seem to get the message)

G. Trump speaks on these issues that resonate with the GOP voters (GOPe bends over backwards to sabotage, mock, ridicule Trump and his followers)

Suppose for a second that Trump is the worst candidate to ever promote conservative values. Assume that you think he is the ultimate joke of a candidate. That your own party has to be filled with brain dead morons if they would ever vote this clown show of a candidate.

When that candidate wins...do you not think that that sends a message? This is the question I ask myself.

Because after A thru G above... I am not optimistic that a vote for Rubio fixes the problem, you know what I mean?

 
sho nuff

But it goes beyond immigration so you are over simplifying it to a degree.

Yes. Immigration is a huge issue for me. But my hatred towards my party extends to a vast array of issues. Most notably bigger, more expansive government, deficits, etc

If my party was actually advancing conservative principles but falling short on immigration then my anger wound be much less intense and I wouldn't be motivated to vote for Trump at all. I would seek out a real GOPer.
So, you are so angry at your party over such issues, you are supporting a candidate whose platform thus far will expand government and run up higher deficits.Again, some disconnect going on...your reasoning for Trump seems completely illogical.
I can definitely understand and respect how anyone might feel that my position is illogical or disconnected. I struggle with it myself.In my shoes, I see two options:

1. Continue trying to work within the system so to speak and hope that they (the establishment) finally gets it, or

2. Blow it up and let the chips fall where they may

I think you have written you are a Republican or used to be. Forgive me if my recollection is off...my notebook isn't all that great anymore.

So, I am presuming that you and I see eye to eye on some major issues. With respect to option 1...what hope do I realistically have?

I ask because I have lived through the following:

A. GOP control of the white house and congress from 2000-2006 (nothing happened on immigration and massive expansion of government)

B. GOP recently regained control of Congress (nothing happened and massive expansion of government)

C. Eric Cantor got destroyed in his primary by a no-name that was outspent 40-1 because he supported amnesty (GOP didn't get the message)

D. Numerous attempts to unseat Boehner (GOP didn't get the message)

E. Boehner finally dethroned (GOP tries to install McCarthy and didn't get the message)

F. Ryan steps on the grenade and now he under threat of being primaried like Cantor (GOP still doesn't seem to get the message)

G. Trump speaks on these issues that resonate with the GOP voters (GOPe bends over backwards to sabotage, mock, ridicule Trump and his followers)

Suppose for a second that Trump is the worst candidate to ever promote conservative values. Assume that you think he is the ultimate joke of a candidate. That your own party has to be filled with brain dead morons if they would ever vote this clown show of a candidate.

When that candidate wins...do you not think that that sends a message? This is the question I ask myself.

Because after A thru G above... I am not optimistic that a vote for Rubio fixes the problem, you know what I mean?
Sorry, I'm not for pushing a joke candidate that might #### us for 4 years to "blow it all up".

I don't think we should okay games with the presidency.

 
Big Chris, can we hold you accountable for sitting drinking tea with a bunch of retirees in Manchester while the state was under two feet of snow??

 
Every time Marco Rubio speaks I turn the channel after about 10 seconds. I cannot listen to him finish a thought. Apocolyptic came flying out of his mouth...yikes.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top