trader jake
Footballguy
Earlier Rubio said "the constitution is not a living document"? Ugh.
Kind of hoping that line of thought was ending after today's events.
Kind of hoping that line of thought was ending after today's events.
But, appointing a new judge is not an "issue" at all. It's the law of the land. 40/40/20 is the breakdown and the people in the "20" are not dumb people. One party holds up the law of the land from happening, that party is held accountable. November will be a landslide if either party holds this up. 125 days seems to be the number of days of a vacancy. Good luck with the "hold out" rhetoric.Not buying it.. the country is as close to 50/50 now as it was during the Bush vs. Gore year and I don't see one issue changing that no matter how big/nasty the battle gets in the media IF that happens.And, if this happens, you won't like the result. Which would be a Dem rout in the elections.On the other hand if nominates a far left leaning judge and tries to force them in by saying the republicans need to do their job.. well then.. see you next year.![]()
If they appoint a liberal to take Scalia's place -- the GOP as a party is dead. It will not survive.But, appointing a new judge is not an "issue" at all. It's the law of the land. 40/40/20 is the breakdown and the people in the "20" are not dumb people. One party holds up the law of the land from happening, that party is held accountable. November will be a landslide if either party holds this up. 125 days seems to be the number of days of a vacancy. Good luck with the "hold out" rhetoric.Not buying it.. the country is as close to 50/50 now as it was during the Bush vs. Gore year and I don't see one issue changing that no matter how big/nasty the battle gets in the media IF that happens.And, if this happens, you won't like the result. Which would be a Dem rout in the elections.On the other hand if nominates a far left leaning judge and tries to force them in by saying the republicans need to do their job.. well then.. see you next year.![]()
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/13/mitch-mcconnell-supreme-court-vacancy-should-be-filled-after-election/=![]()
I don't think anyone wants some far lefty. However, no matter who Obama nominates, they won't be anywhere near Scalia in the political spectrum. That will bother some Righties but, I believe, the majority of people understand what does need to happen. The extremists will say otherwise and that is who we will be hearing in the next few days.If they appoint a liberal to take Scalia's place -- the GOP as a party is dead. It will not survive.
Every four years people complain about the quality of the candidates, but this time around, it has to be the worst everSaintsInDome2006 said:This is the highest of high stakes elections.
All chips to middle of the table.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uafScAiaC44You're assuming he makes it onto the stage during introductions.Is there a reason Ben Carson will be standing up there tonight?
I'm not familiar with this "delay clause." Please help me out with the Article/Section you are referencingI love the Constitution. It gives the Senate the power to delay. There is nothing unconstitutional about it.Why do you hate the Constitution?McConnell is an idiot. But hopefully he doesn't #### this up. Maybe for once in his life he can actually get something right.McConnell is an idiot. Priebus is scum. This party sucks. The Senate better do their job.
We can wait until next year for an appointment.
I missed Carly, they could have used her whole Cruella DeVille vibeIt was terrible
On that part I think you are wrong.. The majority of people have no idea what "needs to happen"..I don't think anyone wants some far lefty. However, no matter who Obama nominates, they won't be anywhere near Scalia in the political spectrum. That will bother some Righties but, I believe, the majority of people understand what does need to happen. The extremists will say otherwise and that is who we will be hearing in the next few days.If they appoint a liberal to take Scalia's place -- the GOP as a party is dead. It will not survive.
And if they hold it all up?bolzano said:It would be political suicide for any GOP senator to confirm Obama's replacement for Scalia, as he (or she) would almost certainly be primaried from the right, and lose. Ain't gonna happenrude classless thugs said:CSPAN @cspan
Pres Reagan "to fulfill our constitutional obligation of restoring" #SCOTUS to full strength http://cs.pn/243FKyr
- I think this reveals the actual core support of Trump fans.Nate Silver Verified account @NateSilver538
Debate winner (CBS/GfK poll):
Rubio 32%
Trump 24%
Kasich 19%
Cruz 12%
Carson 8%
Bush 5%
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-who-won-the-cbs-news-republican-debate-2016/ …
His strategy to stay out of the fray may be working.Wow love to see Kasich at 19% in that poll regarding the winner of the debate. Hope his message is taken to heart and translates to votes and the crazies aren't allowed to run the asylum
Post-Iowa with the whole Cruz kerfuffle there actually was a big influx of $ into his campaign believe it or not.Is there a reason Ben Carson will be standing up there tonight?but his ego won't let him quit. His quote the other day was "I'm in it unti I win"
![]()
YepFor those who believe it's a grift, well there's still scraps on the table to be had.
-QG
Anyone do the math on how many states Trump can qualify for if they take the nomination away from him at the convention? Obviously it can't be 50 but I am curious. Also curious if there are provisions for either uncommitted elector slates or stand-ins as a proxy.bolzano said:The establishment/ political pundits are pushing the narrative that Trump/ Cruz would put the senate at risk due to their unpopularity with independents. That being said, I think that they are ignoring the possibility that Trump's base (or Cruz's) will not turn out for Rubio, Jeb, or Kasich.If the GOP isn't careful they're going to lose the Senate as well as the Presidency.
Anyone have a feeling how a Trump nomination would affect the down-ticket races? What about Cruz?
This was never an issue before, it's just Trumpites inventing conspiracies.I am fascinated about how candidates have been able to stack debate audiences at times - Rand Paul was very good at this, particularly in the Vega$ debate. You'd think if they could game a ticketing process so effectively they'd be better at running a campaign but alas that has not been shown to be the case.
-QG
GOPe http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/14/rnc-under-fire-over-debate-audience-stacking-as-local-gop-chairman-confirms-party-donors-get-debate-tickets/This was never an issue before, it's just Trumpites inventing conspiracies.I am fascinated about how candidates have been able to stack debate audiences at times - Rand Paul was very good at this, particularly in the Vega$ debate. You'd think if they could game a ticketing process so effectively they'd be better at running a campaign but alas that has not been shown to be the case.
-QG
That's so odd.... GOP contributors and volunteers at a GOP debate, what thuh.....http://m.wyff4.com/news/loyal-supporters-of-gop-granted-tickets-to-debate-in-greenville/37950532GOPe http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/14/rnc-under-fire-over-debate-audience-stacking-as-local-gop-chairman-confirms-party-donors-get-debate-tickets/This was never an issue before, it's just Trumpites inventing conspiracies.I am fascinated about how candidates have been able to stack debate audiences at times - Rand Paul was very good at this, particularly in the Vega$ debate. You'd think if they could game a ticketing process so effectively they'd be better at running a campaign but alas that has not been shown to be the case.
-QG
The senate has always been in play. Dems have 10 seats up for grabs that they currently hold. There is only one (Nevada) that appears to be in play. Although I have heard Colorado might be in play. The rest are considered very safe.If the GOP isn't careful they're going to lose the Senate as well as the Presidency.
Anyone have a feeling how a Trump nomination would affect the down-ticket races? What about Cruz?
Agree, if he ends up last out of the 5. Bush ends up 5th in the state he said he would be strong, has to be time to close the tent up.Shula-holic said:Hard to believe some of the polls are showing Kasich ahead of Bush in SC. If Bush were to finish behind Kasich in a state like SC, I know he still has some money, but what would be the point in going on?
I know lots of people who would consider themselves part of the conservative base. I've yet to find one that admits to liking Cruz. No idea what you're talking about.bolzano said:At what cost? Rubio's ad hominems against Cruz (e.g., calling him a liar, challenging his Hispanic card) likely played well to the average, low information voter, but it's going to hurt him with the conservative base, most of whom are Cruz supporters or, at the very least, view him favorably.SaintsInDome2006 said:Nate Silver Verified account @NateSilver538
Debate winner (CBS/GfK poll):
Rubio 32%
Trump 24%
Kasich 19%
Cruz 12%
Carson 8%
Bush 5%
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-who-won-the-cbs-news-republican-debate-2016/ …
Yeah, conservatives don't like Cruz. Generally, humans don't like Cruz. I'm still bewildered by the fact the there are people actually voting for him.I know lots of people who would consider themselves part of the conservative base. I've yet to find one that admits to liking Cruz. No idea what you're talking about.bolzano said:At what cost? Rubio's ad hominems against Cruz (e.g., calling him a liar, challenging his Hispanic card) likely played well to the average, low information voter, but it's going to hurt him with the conservative base, most of whom are Cruz supporters or, at the very least, view him favorably.SaintsInDome2006 said:Nate Silver Verified account @NateSilver538
Debate winner (CBS/GfK poll):
Rubio 32%
Trump 24%
Kasich 19%
Cruz 12%
Carson 8%
Bush 5%
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-who-won-the-cbs-news-republican-debate-2016/ …
I have to say I'm surprised by the favorability numbers for Trump.bolzano said:Then the "conservatives" you know are not representative of the conservative base, or even the GOP.I know lots of people who would consider themselves part of the conservative base. I've yet to find one that admits to liking Cruz. No idea what you're talking about.bolzano said:At what cost? Rubio's ad hominems against Cruz (e.g., calling him a liar, challenging his Hispanic card) likely played well to the average, low information voter, but it's going to hurt him with the conservative base, most of whom are Cruz supporters or at the very least view him favorably.SaintsInDome2006 said:Nate Silver Verified account @NateSilver538
Debate winner (CBS/GfK poll):
Rubio 32%
Trump 24%
Kasich 19%
Cruz 12%
Carson 8%
Bush 5%
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-who-won-the-cbs-news-republican-debate-2016/ …![]()
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/269229-poll-over-4-in-10-back-trump-nationwideTrump is also viewed favorably by more than 6 in 10 of his party’s voters, pollsters found. He has a 67 percent favorability rating; Rubio's is 62 percent, and Cruz's is 61 percent.
He's still alive in the sweepstakes. And while Jeb seems to be striving to outlast everyone to be the lone governor in the race I don't think Kasich is going anywhere.I like Kasich, but what difference does it make how well he's doing if he's 20 points behind Trump? (Same for everybody else.)
A whole lot of tea party types support Cruz. He is seen as an uncompromising, anti-establishment ideologue. That's what they like. Carson's a snoozer, Trump is a liberal playing conservative for votes, and the rest are establishment. I think a bunch of people are seriously underestimating Cruz.Yeah, conservatives don't like Cruz. Generally, humans don't like Cruz. I'm still bewildered by the fact the there are people actually voting for him.I know lots of people who would consider themselves part of the conservative base. I've yet to find one that admits to liking Cruz. No idea what you're talking about.bolzano said:At what cost? Rubio's ad hominems against Cruz (e.g., calling him a liar, challenging his Hispanic card) likely played well to the average, low information voter, but it's going to hurt him with the conservative base, most of whom are Cruz supporters or, at the very least, view him favorably.SaintsInDome2006 said:Nate Silver Verified account @NateSilver538
Debate winner (CBS/GfK poll):
Rubio 32%
Trump 24%
Kasich 19%
Cruz 12%
Carson 8%
Bush 5%
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-who-won-the-cbs-news-republican-debate-2016/
I don't see it.timschochet said:"Damn it's time to get serious?" That would help Rubio
"Damn it's time to get serious?" That would help Rubio
He's not going to be the nominee if he can't top 30-40 in any state.All the polls show Trump increasing his lead this morning, not just in South Carolina but in every state as well. Hard to see how Trump will not be the Republican nominee.