What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2016 Presidential Race Thread*** Debate #3 TONIGHT! (2 Viewers)

Maurile Tremblay said:
Yeah, this is the subject of the James O'Keefe video, which I had been ignoring because it's James O'Keefe. But after watching Donna Brazille fumble her way through the interview by Megyn Kelly, I'm no longer inclined to dismiss it out of hand.
Click to expand...
it 's the truth.

Lying, cheating, whatever it takes is now the mainstream.

 
If we're going to just concede that both of them are YUGE liars it's painfully obvious that Hillary is better at it.

 
Trump has that open border card so what does he do?  He talks about Hillary wanting to build a wall.

Really.  He is such a half-wit.

 
I liked how Trump tried to use Ginsburg.

It's the one thing Ginsburg has said in year's that Republicans agree with.

Either they don't know what you are talking about or they disagree with you.  Idiot.

 
Aerial Assault said:
The Commish said:
awwww...timmy has a friend...now you're not the only one who terribly hacks the term "false equivalency"....two peas in a pod :lol:   
Click to expand...
It's "false equivalence," not "false equivalency."  As such a huge practitioner of it I would think you would at least get the term right.  Weird!   
Click to expand...
This shtick is Donald and Hillary all wrapped up into one...well done.  The pivot away from the point (very Hillary)  that I haven't attempted to equate anything to focus on the semantics that mean nothing (very Donald Trump).  Kinda wish I stuck around last night to see more :lol:  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Leeroy Jenkins said:
Yea. What was hos point? Hillary wants a wall and obama has deported more than any president in 50 years. How does that help him?
Click to expand...
Because Hillary was saying how outlandish it is to build a wall and deport illegals...even though she favored building a "fence" and Obama has deported more people than any other president - something like 2.5 million if I remember correctly.

It shows her flip-flopping on the issues if it can be used for political fodder.

 
Jrodicus said:
Because Hillary was saying how outlandish it is to build a wall and deport illegals...even though she favored building a "fence" and Obama has deported more people than any other president - something like 2.5 million if I remember correctly.

It shows her flip-flopping on the issues if it can be used for political fodder.
Click to expand...
No.  It shows that there is a reasonable way to accomplish immigration reform that addresses the major concerns (and that Obama has been doing a good job) without uprooting families and fragmenting the country and a whole demographic. 

 
Leeroy Jenkins said:
No.  It shows that there is a reasonable way to accomplish immigration reform that addresses the major concerns (and that Obama has been doing a good job) without uprooting families and fragmenting the country and a whole demographic. 
Click to expand...
Definitely need to worry about not fragmenting the illegal immigrant demographic.  We need their votes.

 
Now imagine if any of the other Republicans had suggested that we build a fence instead of a wall during the primaries.

[trumpkins] IT'S NOT THE SAME! NOT EVEN CLOSE! PLUS IT JUST SOUNDS WEIRD TO CHANT "BUILD THAT FENCE!" [/trumpkins]

 
pecorino said:
This, to me, is incredible. That Trump can even muster 20% of votes is an indictment of just how unlikable Hillary is, our frustrations with politicians, and the failure of our public education system. 
Click to expand...
Anybody else but Trump running and Clinton may have had to drop out of the race and be replaced with all the corruption leaks. That Mrs. Clinton is going to win is almost incomprehensible to any logical person due to all her baggage. My 2 daughters are voting for the first time ever and they do not like Trump....but they despise Mrs. Clinton and view her as a despicable liar...so both are voting Johnson.  Of course Johnson has no chance but if any year a "good" third party candidate had a chance it would have been this year.

 
[scooter] said:
Now imagine if any of the other Republicans had suggested that we build a fence instead of a wall during the primaries.

[trumpkins] IT'S NOT THE SAME! NOT EVEN CLOSE! PLUS IT JUST SOUNDS WEIRD TO CHANT "BUILD THAT FENCE!" [/trumpkins]
Click to expand...
It probably would have been more like, "See!  They agree with Trump!  They want a wall, fence, or whatever, but they haven't gotten it done.  Trump will get it built!"

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Donald doesn't have a haymaker. Never had one. He's a tomato can.
Click to expand...
Headed for the political equivalent of Palookaville after a knockout, semi-consciously picked up from the canvas like a limp rag doll, wheezing through smashed ribs and mumbling he got robbed of the title and wants to appeal the decision as he chokes on pieces of his broken, bloody teeth.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
snogger said:
:goodposting: If Hillary wins, The GOP and those that support Trump better hope he's antic's don't give the Senate and House back to the Dem's or we are all in for a world of hurt.
Click to expand...
Oh, goodness, I couldn't agree more!  The country's economy historically struggles so with Democratic presidents in charge, the current Democrat in the Oval Office is wildly and historically unpopular, and the "world of hurt" provided by a Democratic Senate would include securing a liberal majority on the Supreme Court that would actually imperil the ability of corporations to control and influence daily life in this country, which would be terrible!

Or . . . wait . . . .    

 
I really hope that Trump kills the RNC this election.  Gives Hillary the needed votes to ram through the supreme court nominee.  Also, pull the RNC to the middle.  Maybe the RNC will realize that radicals are Killin their  party.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aerial Assault said:
Oh, goodness, I couldn't agree more!  The country's economy historically struggles so with Democratic presidents in charge, the current Democrat in the Oval Office is wildly and historically unpopular, and the "world of hurt" provided by a Democratic Senate would include securing a liberal majority on the Supreme Court that would actually imperil the ability of corporations to control and influence daily life in this country, which would be terrible!

Or . . . wait . . . .    
Click to expand...
Last time the Democrats controlled all 3 We got the wonderful ACA which is crashing and burning and taking the rest of us with it.

BTW.. Just so you know, I'd feel the same way if the Republicans were going to gain control of all 3.

Either Party in Full control puts me in this guys place :scared:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SHIZNITTTT said:
I really hope that Trump kills the RNC this election.  Gives Hillary the needed votes to ram through the supreme court nominee.  Also, pull the RNC to the middle.  Maybe the RNC will realize that radicals are Killin their  party.  
Click to expand...
I'm still going with my initial feelings that if/when Hillary wins, the current nominee for the Supreme Court will be approved as fast as they can.. The Republicans fully supported the nominee the last time he came up.

The only reason they haven't approved him is because Obama nominated him.. But 99.9% sure they are more worried what she'll nominate and sooner or later that open spot has to be filled.

If she wins and the Republicans keep control of the Senate and House and they don't approve him, then we easily could be looking at 2 to 4 years before we have a full court again. :oldunsure:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
snogger said:
I'm still going with my initial feelings that if/when Hillary wins, the current nominee for the Supreme Court will be approved as fast as they can.. The Republicans fully supported the nominee the last time he came up.

The only reason they haven't approved him is because Obama nominated him.. But 99.9% sure they are more worried what she'll nominate and sooner or later that open spot has to be filled.

If she wins and the Republicans keep control of the Senate and House and they don't approve him, then we easily could be looking at 2 to 4 years before we have a full court again. :oldunsure:
Click to expand...
I really doubt this. It's been lost in the Presidential race fireworks, but Americans have been really pissed at Congress for the last few years -- the last approval rating I saw for Congress as a whole was 11% or something. And it's largely due to BS like refusing to even hold hearings on Garland.

 
Coeur de Lion said:
I really doubt this. It's been lost in the Presidential race fireworks, but Americans have been really pissed at Congress for the last few years -- the last approval rating I saw for Congress as a whole was 11% or something. And it's largely due to BS like refusing to even hold hearings on Garland.
Click to expand...
As I said, if they keep control and DON'T approve the current nominee, I just don't see Hillary nominating anyone that they would approve.. Thus it could be 2 years until the next election before anything happens as I don't see her comprising enough to nominate someone they would approve.. :oldunsure:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Doctor Detroit
2016-17 CFB Bowl Games thread: Bama vs ClemPson for all the marbles
31 32 33
Replies
2K
Views
34K
bigmarc27
bigmarc27
squistion
***Official Trump 2/28/17 Congressional Address Thread***
3 4 5
Replies
221
Views
7K
Riversco
Riversco
HellToupee
***Official*** Joe Biden 2016 Presidential Thread
Replies
35
Views
2K
That one guy
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top