oohhhhhh.... not bad random 2.Random 2:
19+(20-21) = +18
Used:
OFF: CIN, BUF, TEN, LAR, WASH, DEN
DEF: WSH, NE, CAR, SEA, OAK, TEN
Week 7:
Offense: New Orleans
Defense: Los Angeles Rams
-QG
Nope, looks like a good omen.Arodin said:Used:
Off: NO, LAC, KC, NE, CIN, ATL
Def: BAL, LAC, MIN, JAC, TEN, HOU
Week 7:
O: LAR
? DEN
Continuing to seek out contrarian plays (ie not whatever cdwood picked) to gain some ground.
Oddly, the new board software was perfectly fine showing D and : when I copied and pasted last week’s entry, but immediately changed it to a shocked face when I picked Denver. Bad omen?
I see that happened to others too. I absolutely despise the trend toward our technology acting like they know what we want to type and forcing it on us. Is D followed by colon now impossible to produce without iso codes?
I think you're actually plus 85, not plus 82 BEFORE this week. You were plus 62 then had patriots (43) - Packers (30). But definitely higher than the 62 you were given by @Arodin82
Used
O: DET, WAS, TB, NOS, PIT, NE
? BAL, LAC, CLE, JAX, TEN, GB
Week 7
O: falcons
? colts (partly because I can't bring myself to pick against my Titans but mostly because I already took the chargers)
@Arodin @-OZ- I think this is the issue. He put 82 here, but it should be 62+(Pats-Pack=13) so should say 75 here, not 82.82
Used
O: DET, WAS, TB, NOS, PIT, NE
? BAL, LAC, CLE, JAX, TEN, GB
Week 7
O: falcons
? colts (partly because I can't bring myself to pick against my Titans but mostly because I already took the chargers)