Just be happy with your 40. ? another proposal - eliminate the option to just take "whoever plays Buffalo" or whatever team has the weakest offense and defense.Proposal for next year: a bonus (10 or 20 points?) for picking a "perfect" week (highest O, lowest D).
? I'll take the meaning of life (42)100 (pretty sure the score listed for me in the week 7 thread is wrong)
Used
O: DET, WAS, TB, NOS, PIT, NE, ATL
D. BAL, LAC, CLE, JAX, TEN, GB, IND
Week 8
O: Texans
D. Patriots
you should be +103 before this week (see previous thread)100 (pretty sure the score listed for me in the week 7 thread is wrong)
Used
O: DET, WAS, TB, NOS, PIT, NE, ATL
D. BAL, LAC, CLE, JAX, TEN, GB, IND
Week 8
O: Texans
D. Patriots
Won't have time to double check the whole spreadsheet till later in the week, so owners should be keeping up with their own scores and letting me know of issues. I did see your note in the previous week. Thanks to that I did catch a week where PZ's progress was not recorded.you should be +103 before this week (see previous thread)
Yep this is correct. Seems like we were all wrong on this haha. You had him at 80 on the last standings, he thought it was 100, I thought 103, but it was actually 93 haha.Won't have time to double check the whole spreadsheet till later in the week, so owners should be keeping up with their own scores and letting me know of issues. I did see your note in the previous week. Thanks to that I did catch a week where PZ's progress was not recorded.
This is what I have thus far for OZ:
-OZ-
DET BAL 17 3 14 14
WAS LAC 9 20 -11 3
TB CLE 27 17 10 13
NO JAC 33 12 21 34
PIT TEN 41 13 28 62
NE GB 43 30 13 75
ATL IND 23 5 18 93
That puts him at 93 going into the week. If someone can show me where the other missing 10 is, I'd appreciate it. If not I'll recheck the scores themselves later in the week.
It's all good, and I appreciate the heads up when I goof. Seems I forgot to calculate his 13 points last week, which threw things off. Glad we got it straightened out.Yep this is correct. Seems like we were all wrong on this haha. You had him at 80 on the last standings, he thought it was 100, I thought 103, but it was actually 93 haha.
You are correct. I logged your Week 2 as NO/Balt, probably because of the way we format these (showing old and new picks) making week 2 particularly challenging to enter. Some of us put our old picks first, some last. In Week 2 there is only 1 set of each.CHECK MY SCORE BELOW
Used
Off: NO, Rams, KC, Chargers,Pitt, ATL, CIN
Def: Balt, Hous, Minn, GB, Ten, NYJ, COLTS
1. NO 40 BALT 3 37 37
2.RAMS 34 HOUS 20 14 51
3.KC 38 MINN 27 11 62
4. CHRG 29 GB 0 29 91
5. PITT 41 TEN 13 28 119
6.ATL 34 NYJ 34 0 119
7. CIN 10 COLTS 5 5 124