That's nothing to be embarrassed about at all. Wimbledon is awesome and the final was absolutely epic.It's terrible. I watched Wimbledon.
Let me say that again.
I watched Wimbledon
That's nothing to be embarrassed about at all. Wimbledon is awesome and the final was absolutely epic.It's terrible. I watched Wimbledon.
Let me say that again.
I watched Wimbledon
Oh I agree. But still.That's nothing to be embarrassed about at all. Wimbledon is awesome and the final was absolutely epic.
Dude, couldn't you find a rugby game or an Australian football game? At least watch a Soul game.It's terrible. I watched Wimbledon.
Let me say that again.
I watched Wimbledon
agree....i watched baseball....my son lasted about 4 pitches.....this is boring......It's terrible. I watched Wimbledon.
Let me say that again.
I watched Wimbledon
you were privileged to watch a great match.It's terrible. I watched Wimbledon.
Let me say that again.
I watched Wimbledon
Anytime I see or hear anyone talking about the eagles they’re saying how this is a super bowl quality rosterhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/theeagleswire.usatoday.com/2019/07/17/eagles-espn-power-ranking-carson-wentz/amp/
Pumped for this year and the years to come with this roster!
As we know well....anything can happen but I’m pretty psyched about this roster and where the franchise is right now.Anytime I see or hear anyone talking about the eagles they’re saying how this is a super bowl quality roster
Zach Berman is now with them from the INKY. If you get a chance read the article on how the Eagles offense came to be with Pederson from Andy Reid. It's a hell of a read and gives a lot of depth how Pederson and the staff knew a lot about Wentz already.i got a subscription to the athletic when they brought on some good MMA guys too. i'm sure it isn't in great taste to post from paid subscriptions, but honestly the writers they have there are top notch. anyway, Bo Wulf had a mailbag, and someone wrote in a question about "What if the Eagles never got Chip Kelly?" Definitely a fun question, and here is part of the answer:
Hide contents
Behind door No. 2, the Eagles hire Gus Bradley. Without having to play the most snaps in the league, the Eagles’ defense is better than expected under Bradley. Earl Wolff is never pressured to play through an injury that would end his career and the Eagles never sign Malcolm Jenkins. Michael Vick stays healthy, DeSean Jackson is never traded and the Eagles win the NFC East in Bradley’s first season. But after two disappointing follow-up seasons, offensive coordinator Jedd Fisch usurps Bradley as head coach as rumors swirl about Roseman pulling the strings for his college roommate. After Vick’s final season, Roseman trades all the way up to the third pick in the 2017 NFL Draft and selects Deshaun Watson as the team’s quarterback of the future. The Eagles make the playoffs in 2017 and 2018 but lose in the playoffs both seasons to Carson Wentz’s Dallas Cowboys.
reading that scenario is probably one of the most horrifying possible answers i have ever seen. Would be fun with Watson vs. Wentz for years, but man it could be disheartening too
And the year we actually won it, they were saying we'd be lucky to get 9 wins. So I take it with a grain of salt.Skeletore Eh said:Anytime I see or hear anyone talking about the eagles they’re saying how this is a super bowl quality roster
Waste of a roster spot.Sproles is back on a one year deal.
is it though? Despite his age, he could still be good in the return game as well as catching passes out of the backfield. Not to mention the wealth of knowledge he would be able to pass on to the younger backs(no other real vets outside of Howard and his 3 years of action).Waste of a roster spot.
He hasn’t been anything in the return game for quite some time now. He’s also only played 9 games the past two seasons and at 36 I can’t imagine he has much, if anything left.is it though? Despite his age, he could still be good in the return game as well as catching passes out of the backfield. Not to mention the wealth of knowledge he would be able to pass on to the younger backs(no other real vets outside of Howard and his 3 years of action).
He isn't going to make the team just because its Darren sproles, if he winds up on the game day roster, its because he earned it. Putting him on the 90 man offseason roster is an easy call to see what he has left in the tank and to bleed as much of his knowledge into the younger players at RB.
fair enough. His injuries have been more freak than anything else the last couple years, but I wouldn't consider him "injury prone". But I understand what you're saying. I'd say they carry 4 and possibly 5 RB(1 as mainly a returner possibly). I still like the pickup to at least let those younger guys soak up as much knowledge as they can from him. If he is RB4 or 5 come 53 man roster, honestly, so be it, more time for the younger RBs to learn. (I still think he will need to earn it though)He hasn’t been anything in the return game for quite some time now. He’s also only played 9 games the past two seasons and at 36 I can’t imagine he has much, if anything left.
I have the opposite take for if he makes the team too. If he makes it, it will be because he’s a veteran guy IMO. I’d much rather let some of the younger guys battle for that 3rd and possible 4th spot.
What a waste of a roster spot. He's becoming the New Brett Favre. Just retire alreadySproles is back on a one year deal.
They got a couple of guys who can do it. Scott, DeSean, Thompkins, as well as Clement. There's others on the roster who have done it but that was just off the top of my head.is it though? Despite his age, he could still be good in the return game as well as catching passes out of the backfield. Not to mention the wealth of knowledge he would be able to pass on to the younger backs(no other real vets outside of Howard and his 3 years of action).
He isn't going to make the team just because its Darren sproles, if he winds up on the game day roster, its because he earned it. Putting him on the 90 man offseason roster is an easy call to see what he has left in the tank and to bleed as much of his knowledge into the younger players at RB.
No guarantee he makes it through camp. He'll have to show he's still better.Waste of a roster spot.
In many ways the Eagles would be better off if he can’t make the team because guys like Sanders, Howard, Clement and Scott are too good to cut.No guarantee he makes it through camp. He'll have to show he's still better.
Agreed. Sproles is there to push those guys and be a veteran fall back if one of them gets hurt or sucks. I think those 4 are the group though in the end.In many ways the Eagles would be better off if he can’t make the team because guys like Sanders, Howard, Clement and Scott are too good to cut.
I agree, as long as he is outplayed to get there. I would also prefer for him not to make the team honestly, that means to me the younger ones who did showed they were superior to him. I stand by my point that he has to earn his way on, he won't just be given a spot. We can't discount the knowledge or leadership of Sproles either. Its a big deal for team chemistry. And lets not forget that sanders has been battling injury issues all offseason (our receiving back) and Scotts hype was early(and cooled since) and centered around his returner ability. I think if sproles beats out Scott, its for return duties and as a safety net if sanders isn't healthy or doesn't get up to speed fast enough because of his injury. Clement is what he is, a solid NFL backup. Scott can be put on the practice squad for a year if need be. Knowing this will be Sproles last year and a year to hone his game, maybe he doesn't jump to another offer.In many ways the Eagles would be better off if he can’t make the team because guys like Sanders, Howard, Clement and Scott are too good to cut.
I'm not saying he's as talented as Sporles but we kind of have his skillset in Scott already. I get some of the reasons for liking bring Sproles back but some of these like he can help the young guys and such well could they have not just said hey we would like you to come help out but theres no role on the actual team to play we can bring you back in an advisory/coach type role and see how that goes. At this point Sproles is the NFL's new Brett Favre without all the drama of will he or won't he retire.Deamon said:I think we keep 5. I think we did that once before a couple years ago, didn't we? With the special teams factor of Scott, it justifies 5.
Howard
Sanders
Scott
Sproles
Clement/Smallwood/Adams can battle it out for the final spot. We don't need multiple of these guys.
I think what it really boils down to is "does Sproles still have enough in the tank to beat out Scott and shows that he deserves to be on the roster", not just for his wealth of knowledge.I'm not saying he's as talented as Sporles but we kind of have his skillset in Scott already. I get some of the reasons for liking bring Sproles back but some of these like he can help the young guys and such well could they have not just said hey we would like you to come help out but theres no role on the actual team to play we can bring you back in an advisory/coach type role and see how that goes. At this point Sproles is the NFL's new Brett Favre without all the drama of will he or won't he retire.
The whole return thing we got guys who can do it including DeSean to return punts. Sproles hasn't had a PR TD in the last 4 yrs now. He was fairly underwhelming at it and you could tell he's lost a step or two as I saw guys making plays on him that prime SProles you'd have some serious concerns the defender may have broken both ankles on the play. Same thing with Vick I saw, I remember him doing his usual run around the pocket don't get killed Schtick and rolled to his left and started to run for the First down marker. This DE (I can't remember his name) tackles him barely by the legs and shoelaces. This DE was not known for his athleticism by any means so the play was kind of surprising. Prime Vick would've beaten the guy and the DE is left tackling AIR 5 seconds after committing to the play and Vick is 20 yards down field by now. Point is Sproles is no where near the guy he once was and that speed was a major factor If they wanted a Sproles replacement Austin Ekler was that guy to get.
I dont think Clement is a lock at all. I think we take 5 and 2 of Clement/Smallwood/Sproles make the team. Adams/Pump are out.I think what it really boils down to is "does Sproles still have enough in the tank to beat out Scott and shows that he deserves to be on the roster", not just for his wealth of knowledge.
Currently on the 90 man roster, he is a teacher to the younger guys and insurance that can play in the return game and as a 3rd down back in case of any preseason injuries. Sanders isn't healthy yet. Scott has not done enough to secure his roster spot either. I really hope both of those things change through training camp though.
I think currently, Howard/Sanders/Clement are locks for the roster.
If they keep 5, Smallwood/Adams are the 2 on the outside looking in I'd think. if they keep 4 its smallwood/adams and either Scott or sproles looking in too.
Plus it's not like our RB coach use to the play the position either and pretty dam good at it tooI think you guys are underestimating Pederson's man-crush for Sproles. Unless he's absolutely awful, I think he's a lock to make the roster. I hope I'm wrong because I also think this is a waste, but I think that's the reality. Also how much veteran guidance can he really give? RB is one of the easiest positions, which is why rookies RBs can have an impact so quickly compared to other positions.
I think you guys are underestimating Pederson's man-crush for Sproles. Unless he's absolutely awful, I think he's a lock to make the roster.
I'm more concerned about taking touches away from Sanders, assuming he's as good as the team hopes. Also I'm a Smallwood fan, like the way he plays. Agreed about Clements and Adams.I mean who'd we really care if he beats out? Clements? Adams? Smallwood? Sorry they're JAG. Appreciate that Clement had 2 good plays in the Super Bowl, but you can't live off that forever.
The only way he takes touches away from sanders is if he were hurt or didn't pick up the offense quick enough. Sproles fills more holes incase of those situations than anyone else can. Its a safe/smart move at RB4 or 5.I'm more concerned about taking touches away from Sanders, assuming he's as good as the team hopes. Also I'm a Smallwood fan, like the way he plays. Agreed about Clements and Adams.
I think people are underrating Clement and Adams. Quite frankly I was more impressed with Corey Clement when he was at Wisconsin then I ever was with Miles Sanders one inconsistent year at PSU. Maybe I'm being biased on Adams as I use to watch the kid in HS but the dude is talented. My theory is maybe he's not the fit profile wise for the Eagles offense and would be better utilized on another team. Clement has become a better pass blocker and many underrated his pass catching skills as a back as he didn't do a ton of it in college. I'd rather they keep Clement over Sproles who in the last 2 yrs you wouldn't be able to say you can consistently rely on plus he's done very little to impress anyone over the last few yrs.I mean who'd we really care if he beats out? Clements? Adams? Smallwood? Sorry they're JAG. Appreciate that Clement had 2 good plays in the Super Bowl, but you can't live off that forever.
The fact that Sanders didn't practice much in rookie camp before getting hurt is concerning. At where they picked him and given his position he should've been on the field. Gut feeling for me says once Sidney Jones is off the team next year Sanders is gonna be my new punching bag of names to go after somehow or way.The only way he takes touches away from sanders is if he were hurt or didn't pick up the offense quick enough. Sproles fills more holes incase of those situations than anyone else can. Its a safe/smart move at RB4 or 5.
agreed completely. I'm not expecting a "redshirt year" for him or anything, but it may take him until mid season to truly claim the full #2 RB spot based solely off of this offseason so far.The fact that Sanders didn't practice much in rookie camp before getting hurt is concerning. At where they picked him and given his position he should've been on the field. Gut feeling for me says once Sidney Jones is off the team next year Sanders is gonna be my new punching bag of names to go after somehow or way.
I've been of the belief if you are drafted that high at a position you can make an impact early that easily then maybe you shouldn't have been drafted that high if you can't grasp it. RB is one of the easiest positions to learn in the NFL. The Eagles offense playbook from what I've been told isn't the Andy Reid West Coast terminology rocket science it was when the first few yrs and given the hybrid West Coast spread style Pederson has implemented the terminology is a lot easier these days for players to grasp. If you want a good read on the foundation of the offense the Athletic if you are a member had a great article last August I even linked the article on here gives some good insight.agreed completely. I'm not expecting a "redshirt year" for him or anything, but it may take him until mid season to truly claim the full #2 RB spot based solely off of this offseason so far.
I think the opposite, that most overrate them both. Specifically, Clement as a pass catcher and blocker that is healthy, and Adams as a roster-worthy RB.I think people are underrating Clement and Adams. Quite frankly I was more impressed with Corey Clement when he was at Wisconsin then I ever was with Miles Sanders one inconsistent year at PSU. Maybe I'm being biased on Adams as I use to watch the kid in HS but the dude is talented. My theory is maybe he's not the fit profile wise for the Eagles offense and would be better utilized on another team. Clement has become a better pass blocker and many underrated his pass catching skills as a back as he didn't do a ton of it in college. I'd rather they keep Clement over Sproles who in the last 2 yrs you wouldn't be able to say you can consistently rely on plus he's done very little to impress anyone over the last few yrs.
I actually think a ton of people overrate Sproles these days. He's a great buy but he's the new Brett Favre. Just retire already. You've won a SB and the last 2 yrs have ended do to severe injuries. If he wants to come back as some sort of camp adviser or something or another team role they can give him then great. I want these young players getting all the chance they can and reps possible, Bringing in a 36-37 yrs old guy who if he makes the team is probably out for the year by week 5 is just stealing valuable reps for these guys. I think people are afraid to say anything bad about Sproles but honestly it's selfishness at this point. He hasn't done anything special in the last 3 yrs. The Pitt game with the over 150 yds receiving was his best game and that was 3 yrs ago. If they wanted a Veteran RB then why just not sign Frank Gore or bring Blount back?The Noid said:I think the opposite, that most overrate them both. Specifically, Clement as a pass catcher and blocker that is healthy, and Adams as a roster-worthy RB.
Clement has averaged 1.2 catches/game in 27 regular season games, on 1.5 targets. He hasn't done a ton of it in the NFL, to prove anything, either. His 2017 playoffs could be a glimpse, or it could be an aberration. A 36 year-old, that's smaller and lighter than him, immediately vaulted past him as the best pass-protecting RB on the roster, and he's coming off a more severe injury than Sproles had last year (and still hasn't been on the practice field yet this year.)
Adams was historically bad last year on short yardage:
3rd/4th down, =<2 yards to go: 10 carries, 3 yards, 0 TD, 0 first downs (0.0 conversion percentage)
That's an average of 10.8 inches gained when given the chance to make a key conversion. A football is 11.5 inches, btw. Add that to the fact that he's a pass-blocking liability, isn't a good pass catcher, and has an injury history and I don't see why he gets any hype in today's NFL where skilled RBs aren't even getting drafted.
There's no "wasted roster spot" when the rosters are at 90. If Sproles makes the 53, it will probably be because he wasn't outperformed by guys like Clement, Adams, Smallwood, Scott or Pumphrey (or some of those guys got injured.) And if he is outperformed because one or more of those guys step-up, then I hope they do the right thing and move on from him.
Will be ready to quote this when the lil guy scores his first td this year.I actually think a ton of people overrate Sproles these days. He's a great buy but he's the new Brett Favre. Just retire already. You've won a SB and the last 2 yrs have ended do to severe injuries. If he wants to come back as some sort of camp adviser or something or another team role they can give him then great. I want these young players getting all the chance they can and reps possible, Bringing in a 36-37 yrs old guy who if he makes the team is probably out for the year by week 5 is just stealing valuable reps for these guys. I think people are afraid to say anything bad about Sproles but honestly it's selfishness at this point. He hasn't done anything special in the last 3 yrs. The Pitt game with the over 150 yds receiving was his best game and that was 3 yrs ago. If they wanted a Veteran RB then why just not sign Frank Gore or bring Blount back?
It's July, what else is there to do?I dont get all the back and forth over our 4th or 5th string rb.
Should I rent a house near the Sugar House? I see you guys call it fishtown? relatively safe area? anything else near there?Sugar House seems to be the most trendy. Not sure about the others though.
There's a Goose Island brew pub right across the street from Sugar House. And a comedy club.Should I rent a house near the Sugar House? I see you guys call it fishtown? relatively safe area? anything else near there?
Or should I get a place just off of South Street? gonna be wanting bars and restaurants
I think I read somewhere that they only get on a plane once in the 2nd halfdidn't really look at the schedule before now. i gotta be honest, it is super manageable.
The toughest stretch opponent-wise is CHI, NE, SEA, all of which are at home and have a bye in the middle.
They've got 4 of the 5 on the road before that, but they are not terrible (@GB, @MIN, @DAL, @BUF)
Playing the NFC North and AFC East are probably about as good as you can get. No west coast trips. Honestly, I would guess that the Eagles might have the fewest miles traveled in the league. (WAS and NYG might beat them, though. Amazingly, none of the NFC East's games against the NFC West are on the road.)
That would make sense. Last 8 games have 3 road games and 2 are nyg and was.I think I read somewhere that they only get on a plane once in the 2nd half
Blame Bryce Harper.Long Ball Larry said:They've got 4 of the 5 on the road before that, but they are not terrible (@GB, @MIN, @DAL, @BUF)