Woah Belgium escaped a PKTaking forever for this VAR
I think the simple and easy way of looking at it is that provided Morocco at least ties (they're up and looking good) then Belgium is through with a win and Croatia is through with a win or draw.Take a look at QG post. There’s. A lotBoth Morocco and Croatia are through with a win or a draw, right?
And Belgium only goes through with a win?
I passed out trying to understand the 48-team scenario posts and only just now recoveredTake a look at QG post. There’s. A lotBoth Morocco and Croatia are through with a win or a draw, right?
And Belgium only goes through with a win?
kudos for the attempt. I just blanked out and moved on.I passed out trying to understand the 48-team scenario posts and only just now recoveredTake a look at QG post. There’s. A lotBoth Morocco and Croatia are through with a win or a draw, right?
And Belgium only goes through with a win?
It would be so easy to use feet on the ground as where to measure. And it makes sense.
My thoughts exactly. This is not what VAR should be used for. That is litterally a finger length offside (never mind that he can't even use the finger in the sport)
It would be so easy to use feet on the ground as where to measure. And it makes sense.
My thoughts exactly. This is not what VAR should be used for. That is litterally a finger length offside (never mind that he can't even use the finger in the sport)
How do they continually get this simple stuff wrong when trying to improve the rules?
Correct call under the rules and the use of VAR gets it correct. I don't fault VAR or am annoyed by it.
It would be so easy to use feet on the ground as where to measure. And it makes sense.
My thoughts exactly. This is not what VAR should be used for. That is litterally a finger length offside (never mind that he can't even use the finger in the sport)
How do they continually get this simple stuff wrong when trying to improve the rules?
They took Weah's goal away against Iran because his shoulder was 5 millimeters ahead but his feet were behind. This drives me nuts.
The one today is really causing an uproar from all over. Maybe some day FIFA will fix this obvious error in the rule.
VAR shouldn't be used for getting calls correct under the rules?? If yes, that makes no sense.
My thoughts exactly. This is not what VAR should be used for. That is litterally a finger length offside (never mind that he can't even use the finger in the sport)
VAR shouldn't be used for getting calls correct under the rules?? If yes, that makes no sense.
My thoughts exactly. This is not what VAR should be used for. That is litterally a finger length offside (never mind that he can't even use the finger in the sport)
The standard for changing any other call through VAR is that the call on the field must be clearly and obviously erroneous. I think that standard should also be applied to the use of VAR in offside calls in that I don't think VAR should be used to determine offside if the margin of the infraction is indetectable to the human eye in the run of play.VAR shouldn't be used for getting calls correct under the rules?? If yes, that makes no sense.
My thoughts exactly. This is not what VAR should be used for. That is litterally a finger length offside (never mind that he can't even use the finger in the sport)
I think that's a poor intent. I think an objectively better intent for the use of VAR is to get calls correct - especially in a sport where one score is massive.VAR shouldn't be used for getting calls correct under the rules?? If yes, that makes no sense.
My thoughts exactly. This is not what VAR should be used for. That is litterally a finger length offside (never mind that he can't even use the finger in the sport)
The entire original premise of VAR was to only be used for clear and obvious errors. It was never intended to go back into plays and nit pick down to a grain of sand of granularity using a 3d rendered video. It has been slowly but surely working its way into what we have today which was never the intent of using VAR.
oh what a miss by Lukaku!!!
No.Or to put it another way. Obviously, I was rooting fervently for the US against Iran. But try this thought experiment. Imagine that Weah's goal in first-half stoppage time was actually scored by Taremi for Iran in second-half stoppage time to send Iran through to the knockouts and send the US home. Even with all the motivation in the world to want that call to go the US's way, I simply can't imagine that I would be bemoaning the refs "screwing" the US if that goal were to be given.
Because in my 45 years of watching soccer, that goal has never been clearly and obviously offside. I've seen close calls like that called offside, but only because at the finest margins it's always been a judgment call (although the guidance has stated for a while that the offensive player gets the benefit of the doubt on judgment calls).
At least it's nice to see Martinez took the "Jordan under Dean Smith" shackles off of DeBruyne.
He also has a Lamar Odom vibe both in appearance and in living up to his natural abilities.In the history of names, Romelu Lukaku is way up in the fun to say rankings.
Canada almost drew level, header off the bar
Or to put it another way. Obviously, I was rooting fervently for the US against Iran. But try this thought experiment. Imagine that Weah's goal in first-half stoppage time was actually scored by Taremi for Iran in second-half stoppage time to send Iran through to the knockouts and send the US home. Even with all the motivation in the world to want that call to go the US's way, I simply can't imagine that I would be bemoaning the refs "screwing" the US if that goal were to be given.
Because in my 45 years of watching soccer, that goal has never been clearly and obviously offside. I've seen close calls like that called offside, but only because at the finest margins it's always been a judgment call (although the guidance has stated for a while that the offensive player gets the benefit of the doubt on judgment calls).
Lukaku may not sleep for a week