What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** Official Baseball Wagering Thread *** (1 Viewer)

I am *******Officaly*********** getting ####### discouraged here :rolleyes: :hot:

YTD 48/44/4parlay 7/10units +25Today I like all of the dog plays. The only one that is not a dog play is Az. Az has been a very streaky team and I like them to sweep the series here. As soon as Az loses I will lay off as it will probably be a 4-5 game losing streak. We will see if this pattern continues.Like I said the rest are Dog Plays.Col +125LAD +110SD +138TB +118Cleve +111Az+100
 
that TB loss hurt

0-1 today after 2-1 yesterday

IF I have plays for tomorrow I will figure them out this evening as I will not have a chance to get anything out tomorrow with work commitments all day.

Updated Record:

Parlays 1-2 +10.5 units

Totals 27-29-3 -4.65 units

Sides 30-21 +15.13 units

Chase Plays (Which are not part of the above):

17-8 +15.21 units

Total:+36.09 units

 
Shake zula, you're betting home run-lines, and in parlays to boot. Quite frankly, you shouldn't expect to win.

Arizona, for instance, was 8 - 4 on this homestand coming into tonight. 6 of those were by 1 run; yet there you go laying 1.5 just because you want a bigger possible payoff.

Not trying to bust your balls man (I lost tonight also), but the above is not what Marshall Plan would call "strong sports betting", if you know what I mean.

 
Shake zula, you're betting home run-lines, and in parlays to boot. Quite frankly, you shouldn't expect to win.

Arizona, for instance, was 8 - 4 on this homestand coming into tonight. 6 of those were by 1 run; yet there you go laying 1.5 just because you want a bigger possible payoff.

Not trying to bust your balls man (I lost tonight also), but the above is not what Marshall Plan would call "strong sports betting", if you know what I mean.
Generally people that bet these will go broke, so eventually they may learn. Maybe not. They think by turning their favorite into a dog this is +EV in the longrun. It's not our money Sonny, so why try to teach them. I've given up by now, it's useless.

 
Shake zula, you're betting home run-lines, and in parlays to boot. Quite frankly, you shouldn't expect to win.

Arizona, for instance, was 8 - 4 on this homestand coming into tonight. 6 of those were by 1 run; yet there you go laying 1.5 just because you want a bigger possible payoff.

Not trying to bust your balls man (I lost tonight also), but the above is not what Marshall Plan would call "strong sports betting", if you know what I mean.
Generally people that bet these will go broke, so eventually they may learn. Maybe not. They think by turning their favorite into a dog this is +EV in the longrun. It's not our money Sonny, so why try to teach them. I've given up by now, it's useless.
:lmao: Please stick to your word MP and take a hike.....

 
Shake zula, you're betting home run-lines, and in parlays to boot. Quite frankly, you shouldn't expect to win.

Arizona, for instance, was 8 - 4 on this homestand coming into tonight. 6 of those were by 1 run; yet there you go laying 1.5 just because you want a bigger possible payoff.

Not trying to bust your balls man (I lost tonight also), but the above is not what Marshall Plan would call "strong sports betting", if you know what I mean.
Generally people that bet these will go broke, so eventually they may learn. Maybe not. They think by turning their favorite into a dog this is +EV in the longrun. It's not our money Sonny, so why try to teach them. I've given up by now, it's useless.
:mellow: Please stick to your word MP and take a hike.....
Sure thing. Good luck, you'll need it. :o
 
Shake zula, you're betting home run-lines, and in parlays to boot. Quite frankly, you shouldn't expect to win.

Arizona, for instance, was 8 - 4 on this homestand coming into tonight. 6 of those were by 1 run; yet there you go laying 1.5 just because you want a bigger possible payoff.

Not trying to bust your balls man (I lost tonight also), but the above is not what Marshall Plan would call "strong sports betting", if you know what I mean.
Generally people that bet these will go broke, so eventually they may learn. Maybe not. They think by turning their favorite into a dog this is +EV in the longrun. It's not our money Sonny, so why try to teach them. I've given up by now, it's useless.
:scared: Please stick to your word MP and take a hike.....
He wont. If I had a dollar for every time he said he was done I would not have to gamble.
 
RedRaiders said:
Jefferson the Caregiver said:
RedRaiders said:
What's the redsox line for tonight?
+130 last I checked.
That's pretty tempting to back them with Wakefield on the mound. Halladay or not - Jays are struggling.
I always liked knuckleballers plus money - chaos theory in effect.
Wakefield is a tough one, he either pitches damn good or he gets licked...."It should also be noted that Halladay's teams are 10-2 in May, 23-6 against division opponents and 27-7 on artificial turf when he takes the mound.Since 2003, Tim Wakefield is 18-23 with a 4.63 ERA on the road and has a 4.81 ERA in the month of May. Moreover, Wakefield has a 5.09 ERA in Toronto since 2003 and a career 4.51 ERA at Rogers Centre.This season, Halladay has compiled a 1-0 record with a 2.93 ERA in two starts against Boston and went 4-0 with a 2.28 ERA overall last month."I like the Jays to snap out of their losing streak tonight with their ace on the mound.
 
RedRaiders said:
Jefferson the Caregiver said:
RedRaiders said:
What's the redsox line for tonight?
+130 last I checked.
That's pretty tempting to back them with Wakefield on the mound. Halladay or not - Jays are struggling.
I always liked knuckleballers plus money - chaos theory in effect.
Wakefield is a tough one, he either pitches damn good or he gets licked...."It should also be noted that Halladay's teams are 10-2 in May, 23-6 against division opponents and 27-7 on artificial turf when he takes the mound.Since 2003, Tim Wakefield is 18-23 with a 4.63 ERA on the road and has a 4.81 ERA in the month of May. Moreover, Wakefield has a 5.09 ERA in Toronto since 2003 and a career 4.51 ERA at Rogers Centre.This season, Halladay has compiled a 1-0 record with a 2.93 ERA in two starts against Boston and went 4-0 with a 2.28 ERA overall last month."I like the Jays to snap out of their losing streak tonight with their ace on the mound.
Interesting stuff, although you are using Wakefield since 2003 but Halladay for just this year to support your side. This season Wakefield has a 1.78 ERA on the road and has already won @ Toronto.
 
RedRaiders said:
Jefferson the Caregiver said:
RedRaiders said:
What's the redsox line for tonight?
+130 last I checked.
That's pretty tempting to back them with Wakefield on the mound. Halladay or not - Jays are struggling.
I always liked knuckleballers plus money - chaos theory in effect.
Wakefield is a tough one, he either pitches damn good or he gets licked...."It should also be noted that Halladay's teams are 10-2 in May, 23-6 against division opponents and 27-7 on artificial turf when he takes the mound.Since 2003, Tim Wakefield is 18-23 with a 4.63 ERA on the road and has a 4.81 ERA in the month of May. Moreover, Wakefield has a 5.09 ERA in Toronto since 2003 and a career 4.51 ERA at Rogers Centre.This season, Halladay has compiled a 1-0 record with a 2.93 ERA in two starts against Boston and went 4-0 with a 2.28 ERA overall last month."I like the Jays to snap out of their losing streak tonight with their ace on the mound.
:bag:
 
I put in tommorows early

Chc +108

Cinn +102

Parlay Az -118, SF/Col O10.5 -110

Az bet is a homer bet. I like Webb but as I said earlier in this thread Az has been very streaky I really think you should wait until they win a game and then jump on them. If this year is showing anything it is that they go on losing/winning streaks of 4-5 games a clip.

I bet on them any way :hey:

 
Booked these early:

I can't figure out why Hill is a dog so I am taking Chicago Cubs +109:

2 units

I like the starters to fuel the over: SF/COL O 10.5 -105: 2 units

GLTA

 
Chase plays for the weekend:

CUBS and STL

Mil and Detroit may fit the system as well - I need saturday's lines; If they are dogs on SAT they will qualify as they are already Friday dogs and are likely Sunday Dogs. The ? mark remains for Saturday. I will update as travel permits although I ought to have a chance this afternoon

GLTA

 
VERY LUCKY to hit the over and stay even for the day....

Updated Record:

Parlays 1-2 +10.5 units

Totals 28-29-3 -2.65 units

Sides 30-21 +15.13 units

Chase Plays (Which are not part of the above):

17-9 +13.21 units

Total:+36.09 units

 
I agree with AB we were lucky to hit the over in Col. I am not even sure how it happened. Last I checked I thought we were done and I woke up this AM to see I hit my parlay :lmao:

YTD 50/51/4 (I think this is the first time I fell under 500 this year :thumbdown: )

parlay 8/10

units + 24 (the 8/10 parlays and betting primarily dogs has kept this number respectable)

 
I have two chase plays

Chicago +122 - risking 2 units

STL +125 - risking 1 unit

Nice hit on the Parlay Prosposis. :lmao: I have just been treading water myself for the last several days. :tfp:

GLTA

 
Back on track, let's get some today...

New York Mets +110

San Francisco Giants -110

Los Angeles Angels -110

Cleveland Indians -116

Cleveland Indians/Oakland Athletics under 9 +100

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

 
1-1 yesterday but the Cubs were a two unit play - I have now flushed four units on the Cubs in the last 2 days. They remain a chase play, but I may not play it today :confused:

Updated Record:

Parlays 1-2 +10.5 units

Totals 28-29-3 -2.65 units

Sides 30-21 +15.13 units

Chase Plays (Which are not part of the above):

18-10 +12.46 units

Total:+35.34 units

 
Two total plays today:

TB/TOR O 10.5 - 105

LAA/TEX O 10.5 - 115

All of these teams can score runs, and none of the starters are very good.

GLTA

 
Split on the day - I was too much of a chicken to play the Cubs, either that or I was exercising smart money managment. Either way, I did not make my 4 units back on the cubs :confused:

GLTA

 
I like Pittsburgh tonight -113- Gorzelanny has been sharp all year and Florida is just reeling right now. They are coming off a sweep at the hands of the Nats and catch a Pirates team who broke out against the Braves yesterday. Think the Bucs take this one.

 
:yucky: Just got back from AC....what did I miss? Bankroll is nice and flush now so I can throw it down the drain on baseball betting.
 
After a promising start the over is going down in flames..........

added the following:

FLA -110: Seems to me the book is begging you to take Pitt. I'll take the D-train to get on track tonight

MIL +110 - nice odds here on two evenly matched pitchers and with Milwaukee playing out of their minds

CHC + 140 - Nice odds on the Cubbies here IMHO

GTLA

 
Updated Record:

Parlays 1-2 +10.5 units

Totals 28-30-3 -3.65 units

Sides 30-24 +12.03 units

Chase Plays (Which are not part of the above):

18-10 +12.46 units

Total:+31.24 units

0-4 tonight :thumbup:

I am thinking I may join Prosposis in taking a few days off. I have more than doubled by bankroll since getting back in at the start of March Madness and may take a couple of days or weeks off. We shall see.

GLTA

 
Like the Cubs (Zambrano) tonight +130 vs the Mets. I have been waiting for a spot to play Zambrano and I like him a lot at this price today. He was sharp in his last outing vs the Cards so the signs are there that he is about to heat up.

We should have a lot more later. 2-2 yesterday, we are about to turn the corner again.

 
Like the Cubs (Zambrano) tonight +130 vs the Mets. I have been waiting for a spot to play Zambrano and I like him a lot at this price today. He was sharp in his last outing vs the Cards so the signs are there that he is about to heat up.

We should have a lot more later. 2-2 yesterday, we are about to turn the corner again.
My partner likes the Cubs as wellWe have lost twice on Zambrano this year and we look for him too make it happen tonight

 
Detroit Tigers

J. Verlander +121

Same reason I liked Wakefield as a dog last start I don't mind betting against him as a chalk, this guy is chaos theory in the flesh. Verlander + odds is another thing to look at. I think the Tigers can bounce back after their Dice K-ing last night.

 
Detroit TigersJ. Verlander +121 Same reason I liked Wakefield as a dog last start I don't mind betting against him as a chalk, this guy is chaos theory in the flesh. Verlander + odds is another thing to look at. I think the Tigers can bounce back after their Dice K-ing last night.
Got a feeling you are correct. I think Detroit is the right side tonight.
 
Detroit TigersJ. Verlander +121 Same reason I liked Wakefield as a dog last start I don't mind betting against him as a chalk, this guy is chaos theory in the flesh. Verlander + odds is another thing to look at. I think the Tigers can bounce back after their Dice K-ing last night.
Got a feeling you are correct. I think Detroit is the right side tonight.
Found this elsewhere (Statfox - Oskiem) on Detroit/Boston: - just offering food for thought..._____________________________________________________________________________Boston Red Sox (-129) over Detroit Tigers**ActionBoston is a profitable 12-5 at home this season where they are batting .305 (.391 obp) and scoring 6.6 runs per game. Moreover, Boston is 16-8 at night (.364 obp), 19-8 against right-handed pitching (.351 obp) and have won 6 of their last 7 games (.333 avg./.412 obp/7.9 rpg).Meanwhile, Boston's bullpen has been excellent this season as evidenced by its 2.34 ERA and 1.219 WHIP. Tim Wakefield has been outstanding as well as he has put together a 1.79 ERA and 1.103 WHIP this season, while posting a 1.40 ERA and 1.086 WHIP over his last three starts.Finally, the last time Justin Verlander traveled to Boston, he was shelled for 5 earned runs and 6 hits over 6 innings of work........__________________________________________________________________________________GLTA
 
Detroit TigersJ. Verlander +121 Same reason I liked Wakefield as a dog last start I don't mind betting against him as a chalk, this guy is chaos theory in the flesh. Verlander + odds is another thing to look at. I think the Tigers can bounce back after their Dice K-ing last night.
Got a feeling you are correct. I think Detroit is the right side tonight.
Found this elsewhere (Statfox - Oskiem) on Detroit/Boston: - just offering food for thought..._____________________________________________________________________________Boston Red Sox (-129) over Detroit Tigers**ActionBoston is a profitable 12-5 at home this season where they are batting .305 (.391 obp) and scoring 6.6 runs per game. Moreover, Boston is 16-8 at night (.364 obp), 19-8 against right-handed pitching (.351 obp) and have won 6 of their last 7 games (.333 avg./.412 obp/7.9 rpg).Meanwhile, Boston's bullpen has been excellent this season as evidenced by its 2.34 ERA and 1.219 WHIP. Tim Wakefield has been outstanding as well as he has put together a 1.79 ERA and 1.103 WHIP this season, while posting a 1.40 ERA and 1.086 WHIP over his last three starts.Finally, the last time Justin Verlander traveled to Boston, he was shelled for 5 earned runs and 6 hits over 6 innings of work........__________________________________________________________________________________GLTA
:mellow: I read the same post earlier on another board.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top