buck naked
Footballguy
You hope its tonight.Tonight we find out where his Hall of Fame career begins : )
Last edited by a moderator:
You hope its tonight.Tonight we find out where his Hall of Fame career begins : )
Titans selected Washington RB Bishop Sankey with the No. 54 overall pick in the 2014 NFL draft.
Sankey is the first running back off the board. No. 54 is the farthest the first runner has ever fallen. Sankey (5-foot-9 1/2, 209) turned pro as a third-year junior after rushing for 3,496 yards and 37 TDs on 644 carries (5.43 YPC), adding 65 career catches. He broke Corey Dillon's school record for single-season rushing yards (1,870) in 2013, and ran 4.49 at the Combine, impressing with a 10-foot-6 broad jump and outstanding times in the short shuttle (4.00) and three-cone drill (6.75). Sankey's measurables don't show up consistently on film, however, where his burst, tackle breaking and vision underwhelm. Perhaps an NFL conditioning program and position coach can maximize his t-shirt-and-shorts athleticism. Ultimately, we see him as a poor man's Gio Bernard. He'll strike lightning next to Shonn Greene's slow thunder, and could win the starting job outright.
NEW YORK -- The Titans have tapped one of their biggest needs here in the second round of the 2014 NFL Draft.
With the No. 54 overall selection, Tennessee grabbed Washington running back Bishop Sankey to bolster a backfield that won't have the services of Chris Johnson for the first time since 2007.
The stock for backs has never been lower, with the Sankey pick marking the latest a runner's been selected in the history of the NFL Draft.
While many scouts saw Carlos Hyde as this year's top back, Sankey fits well into a Titans offense that wants more versatility out of its ground game.
"He's tougher than (expletive)," one scout told Bob McGinn of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, going so far as to compare Sankey to a Hall of Famer, saying: "He's got a little bit of Emmitt Smith in him."
There are some questions about his size, with the 5-foot-9 Sankey weighing in at just 209 pounds, but his quickness helped him break Napoleon Kaufman's touchdown record at Washington.
With only Shonn Greene, Jackie Battle and Leon Washington on the roster, Sankey looms as a juicy fantasy prospect who should see plenty of opportunity as a rookie.
The latest "Around The League Podcast" provides instant reaction to all the wild happenings in the first round of the 2014 NFL Draft.
Yes, absolutely. Depends on league format but in standard scoring I think he will go 1 overall more often than Watkins or Evans.Do you think he'll push Watkins for #1 overall in rookie drafts this fall?
Take that fast-twitch! 1.01I like it, but only because it means other people will be burning high rookie picks on him.
![]()
That being said, Greene is pretty bad and this was the best RB situation on the market. No reason why he can't do something resembling a Zac Stacy in 2014.
I do think Greene will be a little harder to nudge aside than D-Rich/Pead though.
Id hate to take that chance, then watch them draft Gurley, Yeldon, Gordon, Davis, etc. next yearDo you think he'll push Watkins for #1 overall in rookie drafts this fall?
agreed.I like it, but only because it means other people will be burning high rookie picks on him.
![]()
That being said, Greene is pretty bad and this was the best RB situation on the market. No reason why he can't do something resembling a Zac Stacy in 2014.
I do think Greene will be a little harder to nudge aside than D-Rich/Pead though.
they traded down with Philly though.Tenn traded up to select him as the 1st RB off the board. I think he has no issues pushing Greene aside and the job is his unless something crazy happens. Maybe he loses some GL/Short yardage work due to his size and power. Otherwise, this is a dream situation for anyone high on Sankey prior to the draft. Tenn already has a great oline in place and drafted Lewan to bolster it more. He was my top rated RB going in, this widens the gap.
but he is talented, shrugDrafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
nice.Has anyone yet mentioned the fact that Bishop can only run diagonally?
I'm leaning towards Hyde myself....For Dynasty, I still like Hyde (in San Fran) better.
I posted this previously in this thread when considering landing spots. Greene is almost a certainty for the short yardage / goal line role. Then there's McCluster... they've been on record saying he'll be playing RB for the Titans and the Woodhead role is a fit for him. So if we're going off of what was done in SD, that leaves Sankey for the Mathews role which isn't bad at all. He'll get the ball between the 20's and have limited receptions. In PPR it definitely handicaps him, but in non-PPR he's got value for sure.but he is talented, shrugDrafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
McCluster & green are scrubs, role players.I posted this previously in this thread when considering landing spots. Greene is almost a certainty for the short yardage / goal line role. Then there's McCluster... they've been on record saying he'll be playing RB for the Titans and the Woodhead role is a fit for him. So if we're going off of what was done in SD, that leaves Sankey for the Mathews role which isn't bad at all. He'll get the ball between the 20's and have limited receptions. In PPR it definitely handicaps him, but in non-PPR he's got value for sure.but he is talented, shrugDrafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
ETA: Talent is limited with this one, IMO.
...he's the first rb taken in the draft. This isn't Lamar Miller or Daniel ThomasDrafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
Scrubs can still be impact guys too.McCluster & green are scrubs, role players.I posted this previously in this thread when considering landing spots. Greene is almost a certainty for the short yardage / goal line role. Then there's McCluster... they've been on record saying he'll be playing RB for the Titans and the Woodhead role is a fit for him. So if we're going off of what was done in SD, that leaves Sankey for the Mathews role which isn't bad at all. He'll get the ball between the 20's and have limited receptions. In PPR it definitely handicaps him, but in non-PPR he's got value for sure.but he is talented, shrugDrafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
ETA: Talent is limited with this one, IMO.
true it may impact Sankey while he gets up to speed and acclimated, but the cream rises
That's a concern for me. Greene is fine, they need someone for short yardage and to share carries, but a RB who cuts into Sankey's receptions will hurt his fantasy value.Scrubs can still be impact guys too.
McCluster is not someone you want to sleep on this season, IMO. As a Charger fan, you know that the Woodhead role is a potential gold mine at RB. That may have more to do with Mathews than it did offensive philosophy, but I don't think it's a stretch to put McCluster in that role and keep Sankey on the sidelines on third down or certain passing situations.
Blake Bortles was the first QB taken. Doesn't mean much....he's the first rb taken in the draft. This isn't Lamar Miller or Daniel ThomasDrafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
I've never read that he will solely play RB for the Titans.I posted this previously in this thread when considering landing spots. Greene is almost a certainty for the short yardage / goal line role. Then there's McCluster... they've been on record saying he'll be playing RB for the Titans and the Woodhead role is a fit for him. So if we're going off of what was done in SD, that leaves Sankey for the Mathews role which isn't bad at all. He'll get the ball between the 20's and have limited receptions. In PPR it definitely handicaps him, but in non-PPR he's got value for sure.but he is talented, shrugDrafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
ETA: Talent is limited with this one, IMO.
http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/nfl/titans/2014/04/05/tennessee-titans-chris-johnson-jim-wyatt/7363405/I've never read that he will solely play RB for the Titans.I posted this previously in this thread when considering landing spots. Greene is almost a certainty for the short yardage / goal line role. Then there's McCluster... they've been on record saying he'll be playing RB for the Titans and the Woodhead role is a fit for him. So if we're going off of what was done in SD, that leaves Sankey for the Mathews role which isn't bad at all. He'll get the ball between the 20's and have limited receptions. In PPR it definitely handicaps him, but in non-PPR he's got value for sure.but he is talented, shrugDrafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
ETA: Talent is limited with this one, IMO.
Whisenhunt has said he's intrigued by his ability to play different positions.
Dexter McCluster was signed the first day of free agency, and though he was primarily a receiver/returner for much of his time with the Chiefs, the Titans plan to line him up at running back.
Battle is fine for short yardage. When he was ineffective, the line stunk, and he about literally went down fighting.That's a concern for me. Greene is fine, they need someone for short yardage and to share carries, but a RB who cuts into Sankey's receptions will hurt his fantasy value.Scrubs can still be impact guys too.
McCluster is not someone you want to sleep on this season, IMO. As a Charger fan, you know that the Woodhead role is a potential gold mine at RB. That may have more to do with Mathews than it did offensive philosophy, but I don't think it's a stretch to put McCluster in that role and keep Sankey on the sidelines on third down or certain passing situations.
Wyatt (who I do love) went a little far with that sentence or maybe it's just the offseason and we're jumping on it...idk...http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/nfl/titans/2014/04/05/tennessee-titans-chris-johnson-jim-wyatt/7363405/I've never read that he will solely play RB for the Titans.I posted this previously in this thread when considering landing spots. Greene is almost a certainty for the short yardage / goal line role. Then there's McCluster... they've been on record saying he'll be playing RB for the Titans and the Woodhead role is a fit for him. So if we're going off of what was done in SD, that leaves Sankey for the Mathews role which isn't bad at all. He'll get the ball between the 20's and have limited receptions. In PPR it definitely handicaps him, but in non-PPR he's got value for sure.but he is talented, shrugDrafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
ETA: Talent is limited with this one, IMO.
Whisenhunt has said he's intrigued by his ability to play different positions.
Dexter McCluster was signed the first day of free agency, and though he was primarily a receiver/returner for much of his time with the Chiefs, the Titans plan to line him up at running back.
Not so with RBsctrlaltdefeat said:Drafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
Sankey was the first RB taken in the 2014 NFL Draft.A lot of Footballguys Hater-ation on Bishop Sankey's future prospects...
LAMMEY - Says Bishop Sankey is not special/not creative and is a part-time player (says he has a little Ronnie Hillman in him who he liked quite a bit)
BLOOM - Is lukewarm on Sankey - says he is adequate and not special - a backup RB in the NFL
WALDMAN - Ranks Sankey as his 10th rated RB pre-draft - sides with the opinion that he is a committee guy and probably not a featured starter. He does also say he could develop into a full-time starter in a gap scheme, but not if he goes to a team that runs in a zone blocking scheme.
It's not that he landed in a great situation, he was also drafted highly, 2.22. (54th overall).ctrlaltdefeat said:Drafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
The professionals have spoken.I cant reach through the interwebs and put something in front of you that you can touch and feel. My apologies.There we agree. None of your comments have been backed up by anything that is tangible.I don't think we're really getting anywhere at this point. I'm just not a fan.
Seriously though, I cant really quantify Sankey' lack of talent. We all know the numbers and measurables. I know what I see and I'm attempting to explain it. I'm excited to see what the Professionals think of him and then to see what he can actually do in the NFL . I'll eat my crow if it comes to it.
Of course you do...duaneok66 said:agreed.I like it, but only because it means other people will be burning high rookie picks on him.
![]()
That being said, Greene is pretty bad and this was the best RB situation on the market. No reason why he can't do something resembling a Zac Stacy in 2014.
I do think Greene will be a little harder to nudge aside than D-Rich/Pead though.
Just because he went first doesn't mean anything. Proof will be on the field. I moved Sankey to RB1 based on situation but odds of me targeting him at 2 or 3 is slim. This class as a whole is one big bag of mediocrity. Being the best mediocre player is still a mediocre player. Not sure the payoff will be worth the price. I could be wrong but only time will tell.Sankey was the first RB taken in the 2014 NFL Draft.A lot of Footballguys Hater-ation on Bishop Sankey's future prospects...
LAMMEY - Says Bishop Sankey is not special/not creative and is a part-time player (says he has a little Ronnie Hillman in him who he liked quite a bit)
BLOOM - Is lukewarm on Sankey - says he is adequate and not special - a backup RB in the NFL
WALDMAN - Ranks Sankey as his 10th rated RB pre-draft - sides with the opinion that he is a committee guy and probably not a featured starter. He does also say he could develop into a full-time starter in a gap scheme, but not if he goes to a team that runs in a zone blocking scheme.
actually it does.... you new to this?ctrlaltdefeat said:Blake Bortles was the first QB taken. Doesn't mean much.DaveL said:...he's the first rb taken in the draft. This isn't Lamar Miller or Daniel Thomasctrlaltdefeat said:Drafting situation over talent rarely works out. Moving a guy up because he lands in TN will backfire.
BoltzNBrew - You want some crow too?There is more than enough to go around...This. I don't know how or why anybody can have such a hard on over any of the RB's in this class.Meh.
This. First RB taken in an extremely mediocre class and people are putting him ahead of potential stud WRs. Overreacting to his combine performance was only the beginning it seems.Just because he went first doesn't mean anything. Proof will be on the field. I moved Sankey to RB1 based on situation but odds of me targeting him at 2 or 3 is slim. This class as a whole is one big bag of mediocrity. Being the best mediocre player is still a mediocre player. Not sure the payoff will be worth the price. I could be wrong but only time will tell.Sankey was the first RB taken in the 2014 NFL Draft.A lot of Footballguys Hater-ation on Bishop Sankey's future prospects...
LAMMEY - Says Bishop Sankey is not special/not creative and is a part-time player (says he has a little Ronnie Hillman in him who he liked quite a bit)
BLOOM - Is lukewarm on Sankey - says he is adequate and not special - a backup RB in the NFL
WALDMAN - Ranks Sankey as his 10th rated RB pre-draft - sides with the opinion that he is a committee guy and probably not a featured starter. He does also say he could develop into a full-time starter in a gap scheme, but not if he goes to a team that runs in a zone blocking scheme.
Baked or Fried?How does that ignore functionality work again?This. First RB taken in an extremely mediocre class and people are putting him ahead of potential stud WRs. Overreacting to his combine performance was only the beginning it seems.Just because he went first doesn't mean anything. Proof will be on the field. I moved Sankey to RB1 based on situation but odds of me targeting him at 2 or 3 is slim. This class as a whole is one big bag of mediocrity. Being the best mediocre player is still a mediocre player. Not sure the payoff will be worth the price. I could be wrong but only time will tell.Sankey was the first RB taken in the 2014 NFL Draft.A lot of Footballguys Hater-ation on Bishop Sankey's future prospects...
LAMMEY - Says Bishop Sankey is not special/not creative and is a part-time player (says he has a little Ronnie Hillman in him who he liked quite a bit)
BLOOM - Is lukewarm on Sankey - says he is adequate and not special - a backup RB in the NFL
WALDMAN - Ranks Sankey as his 10th rated RB pre-draft - sides with the opinion that he is a committee guy and probably not a featured starter. He does also say he could develop into a full-time starter in a gap scheme, but not if he goes to a team that runs in a zone blocking scheme.
Good God, give it a rest.Baked or Fried?How does that ignore functionality work again?This. First RB taken in an extremely mediocre class and people are putting him ahead of potential stud WRs. Overreacting to his combine performance was only the beginning it seems.Just because he went first doesn't mean anything. Proof will be on the field. I moved Sankey to RB1 based on situation but odds of me targeting him at 2 or 3 is slim. This class as a whole is one big bag of mediocrity. Being the best mediocre player is still a mediocre player. Not sure the payoff will be worth the price. I could be wrong but only time will tell.Sankey was the first RB taken in the 2014 NFL Draft.A lot of Footballguys Hater-ation on Bishop Sankey's future prospects...
LAMMEY - Says Bishop Sankey is not special/not creative and is a part-time player (says he has a little Ronnie Hillman in him who he liked quite a bit)
BLOOM - Is lukewarm on Sankey - says he is adequate and not special - a backup RB in the NFL
WALDMAN - Ranks Sankey as his 10th rated RB pre-draft - sides with the opinion that he is a committee guy and probably not a featured starter. He does also say he could develop into a full-time starter in a gap scheme, but not if he goes to a team that runs in a zone blocking scheme.
Unfortunately ignore doesn't work when you quote him. I guess I'll respond now that I see he's been attempting to antagonize me.Good God, give it a rest.Baked or Fried?How does that ignore functionality work again?This. First RB taken in an extremely mediocre class and people are putting him ahead of potential stud WRs. Overreacting to his combine performance was only the beginning it seems.Just because he went first doesn't mean anything. Proof will be on the field. I moved Sankey to RB1 based on situation but odds of me targeting him at 2 or 3 is slim. This class as a whole is one big bag of mediocrity. Being the best mediocre player is still a mediocre player. Not sure the payoff will be worth the price. I could be wrong but only time will tell.Sankey was the first RB taken in the 2014 NFL Draft.A lot of Footballguys Hater-ation on Bishop Sankey's future prospects...
LAMMEY - Says Bishop Sankey is not special/not creative and is a part-time player (says he has a little Ronnie Hillman in him who he liked quite a bit)
BLOOM - Is lukewarm on Sankey - says he is adequate and not special - a backup RB in the NFL
WALDMAN - Ranks Sankey as his 10th rated RB pre-draft - sides with the opinion that he is a committee guy and probably not a featured starter. He does also say he could develop into a full-time starter in a gap scheme, but not if he goes to a team that runs in a zone blocking scheme.
Crow for what? Being realistic and not letting my ego blur reality?BoltzNBrew - You want some crow too?There is more than enough to go around...This. I don't know how or why anybody can have such a hard on over any of the RB's in this class.Meh.