Right. We should be hyping the FBG/SP favorites like Crowell and Seastrunk as top 20 players even though they were Undrafted and 6th rounders in this mediocre class.Just because he went first doesn't mean anything. Proof will be on the field. I moved Sankey to RB1 based on situation but odds of me targeting him at 2 or 3 is slim. This class as a whole is one big bag of mediocrity. Being the best mediocre player is still a mediocre player. Not sure the payoff will be worth the price. I could be wrong but only time will tell.Sankey was the first RB taken in the 2014 NFL Draft.A lot of Footballguys Hater-ation on Bishop Sankey's future prospects...
LAMMEY - Says Bishop Sankey is not special/not creative and is a part-time player (says he has a little Ronnie Hillman in him who he liked quite a bit)
BLOOM - Is lukewarm on Sankey - says he is adequate and not special - a backup RB in the NFL
WALDMAN - Ranks Sankey as his 10th rated RB pre-draft - sides with the opinion that he is a committee guy and probably not a featured starter. He does also say he could develop into a full-time starter in a gap scheme, but not if he goes to a team that runs in a zone blocking scheme.
Fully AwareJust don't flip the bat too much or people are going to throw at your head...
Scoring?Currently in a rookie draft (2 conferences) and one draft is at 1.07 and the other is at 1.08 and Sankey still on the board in both drafts. (Hyper Active 1 dynasty leagues made up of FBGs). Is everyone on drugs, or does that tell you something different?
PPR / Standard scoring QB = 4 pts passing TDs. RB/WR/TE 1 pt per reception with 1 pt per 10 yards rush / recScoring?Currently in a rookie draft (2 conferences) and one draft is at 1.07 and the other is at 1.08 and Sankey still on the board in both drafts. (Hyper Active 1 dynasty leagues made up of FBGs). Is everyone on drugs, or does that tell you something different?
Edit - nevermindScoring?Currently in a rookie draft (2 conferences) and one draft is at 1.07 and the other is at 1.08 and Sankey still on the board in both drafts. (Hyper Active 1 dynasty leagues made up of FBGs). Is everyone on drugs, or does that tell you something different?
Yes to start 1 rb min, no to scoring. it's 1 pt per reception for RB/TE/WREdit - nevermindScoring?Currently in a rookie draft (2 conferences) and one draft is at 1.07 and the other is at 1.08 and Sankey still on the board in both drafts. (Hyper Active 1 dynasty leagues made up of FBGs). Is everyone on drugs, or does that tell you something different?
That tells me everyone is on drugs.Currently in a rookie draft (2 conferences) and one draft is at 1.07 and the other is at 1.08 and Sankey still on the board in both drafts. (Hyper Active 1 dynasty leagues made up of FBGs). Is everyone on drugs, or does that tell you something different?
Hyde went 6th in one.That tells me everyone is on drugs.Currently in a rookie draft (2 conferences) and one draft is at 1.07 and the other is at 1.08 and Sankey still on the board in both drafts. (Hyper Active 1 dynasty leagues made up of FBGs). Is everyone on drugs, or does that tell you something different?
With PPR scoring, it makes more sense. This draft has a lot of good WRs.
Have any other RBs went ahead of him?
I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.Looks like Brewtown got this one right and a most of you can't handle it.
I knew somebody would say this. We can speculate all we want about which teams had him ranked as the top RB and which didn't. The irrefutable fact is that he was the first RB taken. We can do the same speculation with every player, at every position.I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.Looks like Brewtown got this one right and a most of you can't handle it.
I preferred Hyde and Mason to Sankey - but with that said if I was in position to draft a RB I probably would lean towards Sankey now since it wasn't like I had those other two miles ahead of Sankey. Then again, I dont think either one of those RBs landed in awful spots either - both have potential to move to the top of the depth chart soon.
That's a little crazy.Hyde went 6th in one.Have any other RBs went ahead of Sankey?
I hope you're not suggesting that we wait to see these RBs play in the NFL before determining who's best.I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.
Yes, I can see them adding that to the combine drills.
If it doesn't work out in the NFL, he can join the circus.
If you were in a draft that allowed so many college players, would you take Melvin Gordon and Mike Davis over Carlos Hyde and Sankey? The reason I ask is that would tell us a lot on how people feel about Hyde and Sankey really.I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.Looks like Brewtown got this one right and a most of you can't handle it.
I preferred Hyde and Mason to Sankey - but with that said if I was in position to draft a RB I probably would lean towards Sankey now since it wasn't like I had those other two miles ahead of Sankey. Then again, I dont think either one of those RBs landed in awful spots either - both have potential to move to the top of the depth chart soon.
Gordon and Davis >>> Sankey >> HydeIf you were in a draft that allowed so many college players, would you take Melvin Gordon and Mike Davis over Carlos Hyde and Sankey? The reason I ask is that would tell us a lot on how people feel about Hyde and Sankey really.I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.Looks like Brewtown got this one right and a most of you can't handle it.
I preferred Hyde and Mason to Sankey - but with that said if I was in position to draft a RB I probably would lean towards Sankey now since it wasn't like I had those other two miles ahead of Sankey. Then again, I dont think either one of those RBs landed in awful spots either - both have potential to move to the top of the depth chart soon.
I checked about 9 DWFC dynasty championship leagues rookie drafts right now - start 2 RB, ppr. Sankey went in 3rd or 4th in all but 1, where he went 6th.Currently in a rookie draft (2 conferences) and one draft is at 1.07 and the other is at 1.08 and Sankey still on the board in both drafts. (Hyper Active 1 dynasty leagues made up of FBGs). Is everyone on drugs, or does that tell you something different?
Edited: Only have to start 1 RB and up to 4.
Scoring is 1 PPR for RB/TE/WR.
1 min RB leagues are slanted away from the spot anyway.Yes to start 1 rb min, no to scoring. it's 1 pt per reception for RB/TE/WREdit - nevermindScoring?Currently in a rookie draft (2 conferences) and one draft is at 1.07 and the other is at 1.08 and Sankey still on the board in both drafts. (Hyper Active 1 dynasty leagues made up of FBGs). Is everyone on drugs, or does that tell you something different?
It's his arrogance and rubbing peoples noses in it that I don't like. Props for calling him the best in the class and that he was the first RB taken. I had Hyde 1 and Sankey 2. Add Hill and 3 RB went 4 picks apart. in the middle of the 2nd round. Just because Sankey went first doesn't mean he'll be #1 when all is said and done.I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.Looks like Brewtown got this one right and a most of you can't handle it.
I preferred Hyde and Mason to Sankey - but with that said if I was in position to draft a RB I probably would lean towards Sankey now since it wasn't like I had those other two miles ahead of Sankey. Then again, I dont think either one of those RBs landed in awful spots either - both have potential to move to the top of the depth chart soon.
The way I see it, he's the best RB in the class until someone proves otherwise (oddly enough) like a reigning champ. Generally, 2-3 games in, we are calling someone else the best RB in their class. The stats will prove who is best. We do usually give them the title though for the summer.I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.Looks like Brewtown got this one right and a most of you can't handle it.
I preferred Hyde and Mason to Sankey - but with that said if I was in position to draft a RB I probably would lean towards Sankey now since it wasn't like I had those other two miles ahead of Sankey. Then again, I dont think either one of those RBs landed in awful spots either - both have potential to move to the top of the depth chart soon.
In fairness there was a pretty hefty debate last year regarding Gio's draft position and whether than meant that he was the best....The way I see it, he's the best RB in the class until someone proves otherwise (oddly enough) like a reigning champ. Generally, 2-3 games in, we are calling someone else the best RB in their class. The stats will prove who is best. We do usually give them the title though for the summer.I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.Looks like Brewtown got this one right and a most of you can't handle it.
I preferred Hyde and Mason to Sankey - but with that said if I was in position to draft a RB I probably would lean towards Sankey now since it wasn't like I had those other two miles ahead of Sankey. Then again, I dont think either one of those RBs landed in awful spots either - both have potential to move to the top of the depth chart soon.
IMO It doesn't get any better than Sylvester Croom as a RB coach. He's had three 2000 yard backs and his list of RBs who did well under him is a very nice resume.What do we know about Whiz the OC and RBs coaches at TENN and their track record developing and utilising their RBs?
We should claim definitively before they play a down who the best RB in this class is? We, fantasy owners, surely need to speculate who is the best RB before they play a down of course.I hope you're not suggesting that we wait to see these RBs play in the NFL before determining who's best.I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.
Because, that would obviously be crazy talk.
The difference compared to the Chargers is at QB. Locker has never been consistent or consistently healthy. Unless Clipboard Jesus is the second coming of Kurt Warner or Tyler Wilson actually can play the backup situation can best be described as dire.IMO It doesn't get any better than Sylvester Croom as a RB coach. He's had three 2000 yard backs and his list of RBs who did well under him is a very nice resume.What do we know about Whiz the OC and RBs coaches at TENN and their track record developing and utilising their RBs?
He is one of the few Whisenhunt kept from the previous staff.
Sure someone can say "what about soandso" and that's fine, but Croom is one of the best.
For offense, the Titans aren't built like the Cards, Chargers, or Steelers. Whisenhunt brought in some former head coaches to be positional coaches and wants them around for input. Most have them running San Diego's offense last year with some modifications. What those exactly will be....time will tell.
I've mocked our league and I'm pretty sure this is what is going to happen in ours. I have Sankey at either 7 or 8 simply because those at the top of the draft have serious WR needs and not RB needs. One will take Ebron and one will take QB.Hyde went 6th in one.That tells me everyone is on drugs.Currently in a rookie draft (2 conferences) and one draft is at 1.07 and the other is at 1.08 and Sankey still on the board in both drafts. (Hyper Active 1 dynasty leagues made up of FBGs). Is everyone on drugs, or does that tell you something different?
With PPR scoring, it makes more sense. This draft has a lot of good WRs.
Have any other RBs went ahead of him?
Well we don't know on Hunter either with limited time and the Chargers had a lot of giant redwoods at WR for so many years now.The difference compared to the Chargers is at QB. Locker has never been consistent or consistently healthy. Unless Clipboard Jesus is the second coming of Kurt Warner or Tyler Wilson actually can play the backup situation can best be described as dire.IMO It doesn't get any better than Sylvester Croom as a RB coach. He's had three 2000 yard backs and his list of RBs who did well under him is a very nice resume.What do we know about Whiz the OC and RBs coaches at TENN and their track record developing and utilising their RBs?
He is one of the few Whisenhunt kept from the previous staff.
Sure someone can say "what about soandso" and that's fine, but Croom is one of the best.
For offense, the Titans aren't built like the Cards, Chargers, or Steelers. Whisenhunt brought in some former head coaches to be positional coaches and wants them around for input. Most have them running San Diego's offense last year with some modifications. What those exactly will be....time will tell.
You have OBJ going over Cooks at 1.03?Sankey had production very near the top of all RBs in the nation last year, plus excellent production the year before. At the combine, Sankey had the best measurables. He was the first RB taken. And he landed in what was considered the best RB situation for a rookie to land in. I really don't see what's not to like about him. Is he going to end up being ADP? Probably not. Could he end up being a lot like Matt Forte? Absolutely - and I would take that all day long! Could he be similar to Gio Bernard? I could see that too, although I think Sankey is a better runner and Gio is a better receiver.
I only play in PPR leagues (some .5 ppr for RBs), and I expect him to come off the board around 1.04, after Watkins, Evans, and Beckham. If he fell to me at the 1.08 pick I would be pumped, but it ain't gonna happen.
Personally, I do, but I can see a good argument either way. One of my leagues has already started drafting, and OBJ went 1.03. If I were sitting at the 1.04 pick, I would expect to be choosing between Sankey and either Cooks or OBJ.You have OBJ going over Cooks at 1.03?Sankey had production very near the top of all RBs in the nation last year, plus excellent production the year before. At the combine, Sankey had the best measurables. He was the first RB taken. And he landed in what was considered the best RB situation for a rookie to land in. I really don't see what's not to like about him. Is he going to end up being ADP? Probably not. Could he end up being a lot like Matt Forte? Absolutely - and I would take that all day long! Could he be similar to Gio Bernard? I could see that too, although I think Sankey is a better runner and Gio is a better receiver.
I only play in PPR leagues (some .5 ppr for RBs), and I expect him to come off the board around 1.04, after Watkins, Evans, and Beckham. If he fell to me at the 1.08 pick I would be pumped, but it ain't gonna happen.
Gio was praised here a lot last year.Sankey had production very near the top of all RBs in the nation last year, plus excellent production the year before. At the combine, Sankey had the best measurables. He was the first RB taken. And he landed in what was considered the best RB situation for a rookie to land in. I really don't see what's not to like about him. Is he going to end up being ADP? Probably not. Could he end up being a lot like Matt Forte? Absolutely - and I would take that all day long! Could he be similar to Gio Bernard? I could see that too, although I think Sankey is a better runner and Gio is a better receiver.
I only play in PPR leagues (some .5 ppr for RBs), and I expect him to come off the board around 1.04, after Watkins, Evans, and Beckham. If he fell to me at the 1.08 pick I would be pumped, but it ain't gonna happen.
Not only was he was the 4th RB in the draft that year, but that same year the Saints took a 1st round WR. With Brees in his prime... Not only situation has to do with the other. Titans had completely different running backs and staff, who cares about 2007?I like Sankey, but the other side of the coin is the Titans also drafted another "heir apparent" rb who had a great combine in the 2nd round of the 2007 draft. How did that work out?
a lot of hype in that post. A lot of "greats". If he was that "great" then he would have been a top 10 pick.Plus he has great "work ethic" and is a good guy.
Great production, athleticism, measurables, great work ethic and heart!
That's a good combination.
Many of you may want to reconsider drafting your 3rd or 4th WR before Sankey!!!
Whateves - he was the first RB taken. You sound like you are related to EBF. Are you his first or second cousin?a lot of hype in that post. A lot of "greats". If he was that "great" then he would have been a top 10 pick.Plus he has great "work ethic" and is a good guy.
Great production, athleticism, measurables, great work ethic and heart!
That's a good combination.
Many of you may want to reconsider drafting your 3rd or 4th WR before Sankey!!!
No - my analysis is that he is cash money and gonna roll up the NFL (I said that before the draft).So now your analysis is that he is the first RB taken so he is "great"?
Okay.
Hell, I could beat out Shonn Greene and I'm 54 years old with an artificial hip.Kinda surprised this wasn't posted yet, sorry if it was and I missed it:
Shonn Greene Has Surgery
Veteran running back Shonn Greene was already facing an uncertain role after the Tennessee Titans selected the 2014 NFL Draft's first running back, Bishop Sankey, at No. 54 overall.
Now Greene has another obstacle to lead-back duties.
The 28-year-old back is expected to miss the entirety of theTitans' organized team activities this spring after undergoing surgery on his right knee, the Tennessean's Jim Wyatt reports.
This is the same knee that required arthroscopic surgery last September, forcing Greene to miss five games.
Greene complained of soreness and experienced swelling in the knee after the Titans' recent three-day minicamp, per Wyatt.
It's a troubling sign, as new coach Ken Whisenhunt is counting on Greene to team with Sankey and Dexter McCluster in a three-pronged attack to replace Chris Johnson in the backfield.
If Sankey impresses coaches in offseason practices, Greene could find himself tumbling down the depth chart by the time he returns to the field for training camp.
With Eddie Lacy winning ROY?msommer said:In fairness there was a pretty hefty debate last year regarding Gio's draft position and whether than meant that he was the best....We all know how that turned outBri said:The way I see it, he's the best RB in the class until someone proves otherwise (oddly enough) like a reigning champ. Generally, 2-3 games in, we are calling someone else the best RB in their class. The stats will prove who is best. We do usually give them the title though for the summer.Dr. Octopus said:I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.jurb26 said:Looks like Brewtown got this one right and a most of you can't handle it.
I preferred Hyde and Mason to Sankey - but with that said if I was in position to draft a RB I probably would lean towards Sankey now since it wasn't like I had those other two miles ahead of Sankey. Then again, I dont think either one of those RBs landed in awful spots either - both have potential to move to the top of the depth chart soon.
![]()
Got it in one.With Eddie Lacy winning ROY?msommer said:In fairness there was a pretty hefty debate last year regarding Gio's draft position and whether than meant that he was the best....We all know how that turned outBri said:The way I see it, he's the best RB in the class until someone proves otherwise (oddly enough) like a reigning champ. Generally, 2-3 games in, we are calling someone else the best RB in their class. The stats will prove who is best. We do usually give them the title though for the summer.Dr. Octopus said:I like Sankey, but this doesn't mean he's the best RB in the class. It only means one team (as far as we know) also thinks he's the best RB in the class.jurb26 said:Looks like Brewtown got this one right and a most of you can't handle it.
I preferred Hyde and Mason to Sankey - but with that said if I was in position to draft a RB I probably would lean towards Sankey now since it wasn't like I had those other two miles ahead of Sankey. Then again, I dont think either one of those RBs landed in awful spots either - both have potential to move to the top of the depth chart soon.
![]()