What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** COVID-19 CoronaVirus Thread. Fresh epidemic fears as child pneumonia cases surge in Europe after China outbreak. NOW in USA (26 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure why I'm even bothering responding to this but there's a reddit thread on this.

That video is a sham and a complete fake. The guy is not a Pfizer exec or anything of the sort. No R&D director would say the things he is or speak that way.

That people believe this nonsense is frightening.
"We have lots of theories, just no proof" for the win. Given it PV and knowing the history there, the whole thing is likely a huge "deep fake" event :D

Ron D has his minions everywhere trying to turn attention away from himself and his operation to any/everyone else :hophead:
 
her notes on yesterday's VRBPAC meeting:
A very information-dense, but short article. Picked up a few things I didn't know:

- I wasn't aware that newborns were quite as susceptible to COVID hospitalizations as they apparently are (roughly the same as the age 65-74 cohort). I had thought that generally, when anyone very young got COVID, they skated right on through it (as is typically the case for RSV, though it can scare the bejeebuz out of parents!).

- That pharma companies could (and should) be doing more to test the immunity boosts of their vaccines. Dr. Jetelina writes:

A common theme throughout the pandemic FDA meetings is that “it’s too hard to measure anything other than antibodies” and “we don’t have the data needed to make a decision.” The FDA could require sponsors to do detailed investigations, e.g. assessing lymph nodes, bone marrow, and breakthroughs. This would help us understand immunity better, so we can make better recommendations.

- That there's really no more debate in the vaccine-research community about the value of the bivalent vaccine. Dr. Jetelina does lay out the devil's advocate position first, and then:

There is a problem with [bivalent vaccine] data though: people who got the bivalent vaccine are likely very different, in environment and behaviors (like masking), from people who didn’t get the bivalent vaccine. So, we don’t know if this difference in outcomes results from the vaccine, per se.
Moderna surprised us today with new data, though: a randomized trial in the U.K. They randomly gave people the original vaccine or the bivalent vaccine (BA.1 formula) as a booster. The bivalent vaccine did better. This really put the debate to rest.

- I was surprised she expressed hope that dang-near "magic" vaccines can be developed:

There are clearly limitations to the vaccines. We can do better. An NIH presenter said they are focusing on new vaccines that are
  • Variant proof;
  • Longer lasting; and/or
  • Have enhanced ability to block infection/transmission.
This will take time, though, without an Operation Warp Speed 2.0-level investment or global collaboration. In addition, unlike the first generation mRNA vaccines, we don’t have decades of groundwork. We are really starting from scratch, and it will take time to understand what works and why.


One thing I do disagree with Dr. Jetelina about is that she believes that seasonal COVID patterns are not yet apparent:

The FDA thinks it’s already seeing seasonal patterns. (I disagree, although we agree this will eventually happen.)

Going by confirmed case counts, there have been both distinct winter peaks AND late summer/early fall peaks. This winter's peak, sadly, seems to be manifesting as as a rise in COVID deaths** more than as a sharp rise in confirmed case counts (which have risen, but mildly).

** 7-day average deaths of 286 on 11/29/2022 and 553 on 1/13/2023. Death numbers are being reported about 2 weeks in arrears, so at present the rise in deaths is still ongoing and has not shown signs of peaking.
 
Last edited:
One thing I do disagree with Dr. Jetelina about is that she believes that seasonal COVID patterns are not yet apparent:
That surprised me as well. We've been remarking on the seasonality for quite some time. Just upthread we discussed this, pointing to 3 years worth of data.

NYS Hospitalizations Over Time

Just a cursory examination of this chart reveals the nature of the seasonality in NYS.

Actually, reflecting on that a bit more. COVID is seasonal, but it's also regional. Just looking at overall stats for the country or the world may not uncover the nature of the seasonality, because peaks and valleys can be, and are, regional. It's probably important to understand the seasonality trends in one's own region to best assess the times where it spreads most and prepare/react accordingly.

So to her point, if she's looking at trends globally for example, she may not being seeing the seasonal patterns that can clearly emerge when focusing down on the regional data.
 
her notes on yesterday's VRBPAC meeting:
A very information-dense, but short article. Picked up a few things I didn't know:

- I wasn't aware that newborns were quite as susceptible to COVID hospitalizations as they apparently are (roughly the same as the age 65-74 cohort). I had thought that generally, when anyone very young got COVID, they skated right on through it (as is typically the case for RSV, though it can scare the bejeebuz out of parents!).

- That pharma companies could (and should) be doing more to test the immunity boosts of their vaccines. Dr. Jetelina writes:

A common theme throughout the pandemic FDA meetings is that “it’s too hard to measure anything other than antibodies” and “we don’t have the data needed to make a decision.” The FDA could require sponsors to do detailed investigations, e.g. assessing lymph nodes, bone marrow, and breakthroughs. This would help us understand immunity better, so we can make better recommendations.

- That there's really no more debate in the vaccine-research community about the value of the bivalent vaccine. Dr. Jetelina does lay out the devil's advocate position first, and then:

There is a problem with [bivalent vaccine] data though: people who got the bivalent vaccine are likely very different, in environment and behaviors (like masking), from people who didn’t get the bivalent vaccine. So, we don’t know if this difference in outcomes results from the vaccine, per se.
Moderna surprised us today with new data, though: a randomized trial in the U.K. They randomly gave people the original vaccine or the bivalent vaccine (BA.1 formula) as a booster. The bivalent vaccine did better. This really put the debate to rest.

- I was surprised she expressed hope that dang-near "magic" vaccines can be developed:

There are clearly limitations to the vaccines. We can do better. An NIH presenter said they are focusing on new vaccines that are
  • Variant proof;
  • Longer lasting; and/or
  • Have enhanced ability to block infection/transmission.
This will take time, though, without an Operation Warp Speed 2.0-level investment or global collaboration. In addition, unlike the first generation mRNA vaccines, we don’t have decades of groundwork. We are really starting from scratch, and it will take time to understand what works and why.


One thing I do disagree with Dr. Jetelina about is that she believes that seasonal COVID patterns are not yet apparent:

The FDA thinks it’s already seeing seasonal patterns. (I disagree, although we agree this will eventually happen.)

Going by confirmed case counts, there have been both distinct winter peaks AND late summer/early fall peaks. This winter's peak, sadly, seems to be manifesting as as a rise in COVID deaths** more than as a sharp rise in confirmed case counts (which have risen, but mildly).

** 7-day average deaths of 286 on 11/29/2022 and 553 on 1/13/2023. Death numbers are being reported about 2 weeks in arrears, so at present the rise in deaths is still ongoing and has not shown signs of peaking.
We also know case counts are undercounted these days. I think wastewater will be the only semi-reliable "case count" metric going forward, and even with that, we have portions of the country that wastewater doesn't account for.

My take on her "seasonality" take (which I have also seen from some other epidemiologists, not just her) is that A) we are seeing multiple waves per year still; when at first, at least for myself and IIRC discussion early on in this thread, the hope was that we would reach a point of "a Covid season" comparable to flu season. Right now that Covid season seems to be, what, 2-3 months every 2-3 months?

And B )... Also worth noting, IMO, that even with the undercount on cases, that even if the peak was lower, the "sea floor" never really came back down to a baseline level in the post-Omicron era, and, over time, is trending upward not downward.
 
My take on her "seasonality" take (which I have also seen from some other epidemiologists, not just her) is that A) we are seeing multiple waves per year still; when at first, at least for myself and IIRC discussion early on in this thread, the hope was that we would reach a point of "a Covid season" comparable to flu season. Right now that Covid season seems to be, what, 2-3 months every 2-3 months?

And B )... Also worth noting, IMO, that even with the undercount on cases, that even if the peak was lower, the "sea floor" never really came back down to a baseline level in the post-Omicron era, and, over time, is trending upward not downward.

I see -- I didn't necessarily understand "seasonality" to mean "one peak per year".

You are correct about COVID's current "sea floor" being substantially higher than it was pre-Delta. I wonder if that is a direct manifestation of the predominant variant's replication speed? If the pre-Delta variants' replication speed is expressed as 1, Delta's as ~1,200, and original Omicron's as ~1,200,000 ... then there is a discernable logarithmic relationship between replication speed and COVID's "sea floor".
 
I wasn't aware that newborns were quite as susceptible to COVID hospitalizations as they apparently are (roughly the same as the age 65-74 cohort). I had thought that generally, when anyone very young got COVID, they skated right on through it (as is typically the case for RSV, though it can scare the bejeebuz out of parents!).
One of the commenters on Dr. Jetelina's article makes a good point about infants getting COVID:

Fred
15 hr ago

True but death rate is still far lower, little kids are hospitalized for oxygen support and fluids etc but are far more likely to pull through. Hospitalization of kids is traumatic but that is a difference.
 
Also a point of discussion (in the long twitter thread recap of the meeting above) re: seasonality... They mentioned how they guess based on prediction for season flu vaccines, and when they "miss," the flu seasons are worse. "Missing" on a Covid season would be bad. Which is, I think, why many in the field are critiquing the variant-chasing strategy.
 
Also a point of discussion (in the long twitter thread recap of the meeting above) re: seasonality... They mentioned how they guess based on prediction for season flu vaccines, and when they "miss" the flu seasons are worse. "Missing" on a Covid season would be bad. Which is, I think, why many in the field are critiquing the variant-chasing strategy.

One major difference though is the timing of the decisions. For COVID, it will be decided in June with vaccines ready in September. The mRNA vaccines allow for such quick production on a large scale, that this can work if mutations slow a bit more and/or we stay in this Omicron lineage (which has been over a year now).

Flu, they decide with MUCH more lead time and are guessing what will make it to the northern hemisphere. Whereas the June decision will be based on closer to real time what is circulating.
 
Yeah, if I'm putting myself at risk of falling off a mountain or drowning from the vaccine, I really don't want them to be missing.
 
Also a point of discussion (in the long twitter thread recap of the meeting above) re: seasonality... They mentioned how they guess based on prediction for season flu vaccines, and when they "miss" the flu seasons are worse. "Missing" on a Covid season would be bad. Which is, I think, why many in the field are critiquing the variant-chasing strategy.

One major difference though is the timing of the decisions. For COVID, it will be decided in June with vaccines ready in September. The mRNA vaccines allow for such quick production on a large scale, that this can work if mutations slow a bit more and/or we stay in this Omicron lineage (which has been over a year now).

Flu, they decide with MUCH more lead time and are guessing what will make it to the northern hemisphere. Whereas the June decision will be based on closer to real time what is circulating.
Right, and that was included in the discussion as well. I believe Pfizer and Moderna, IIRC, indicated their estimated time was 100 days from lab to pharmacy. Though I am not sure how that tracks with the last update. I think it was Novovax that indicated closer to 6 months, which the committee acknowledged is not a sustainable model for this approach.
 
Also a point of discussion (in the long twitter thread recap of the meeting above) re: seasonality... They mentioned how they guess based on prediction for season flu vaccines, and when they "miss" the flu seasons are worse. "Missing" on a Covid season would be bad. Which is, I think, why many in the field are critiquing the variant-chasing strategy.

One major difference though is the timing of the decisions. For COVID, it will be decided in June with vaccines ready in September. The mRNA vaccines allow for such quick production on a large scale, that this can work if mutations slow a bit more and/or we stay in this Omicron lineage (which has been over a year now).

Flu, they decide with MUCH more lead time and are guessing what will make it to the northern hemisphere. Whereas the June decision will be based on closer to real time what is circulating.
Yeah...this is a big difference. Florida will always be able to tell you exactly which one is coming to the rest of the country in the fall. We are crazy like that. For flu, we have to rely on other parts of the world and what they experienced. The crazy 'Murica Floridians will be doing a service to the country in a completely bass akwards way :lol:
 
Also for the record, none of those vitamin cocktails have been shown to prevent respiratory infections, or promote recovery from them. Airborne settled a big false advertising case based on their misleading claims.

Supplements only help people with pre-existing deficiencies. Admittedly, our diets collectively suck. Vitamin intake isn’t up to snuff for everyone, especially for D (mostly from sun exposure) and E. But even data for vitamin D supplements for covid is inconclusive.

If anyone has seen well designed studies showing otherwise, I’d love to be educated. B vitamins in particular seem to have found their way into a bunch of “energy” products in the last decade or so.
The B vitamins in Airborne do provide an energy boost which is what GoBirds was desiring.
Yeah, I understand. TMK there’s not even data suggesting B vitamins boost energy, though that’s certainly a vague concept to quantify.

But I’m open to reading evidence which proves otherwise.
I only have anecdotal evidence, works for me ymmv.
Was very helpful, thanks my friend.
 
Vax mob revolt in progress...

Scott Adams (Dilbert cartoonist and former vax mobber)...

@ScottAdamsSays
Wait until you find out all documentaries are persuasive, including the ones that are wrong.🤯

Dark Horse got everything right. You knew by listening to the podcast, but I got all caught up in the wrong field of science that says humans can't do what you did.
Quote Tweet
MN 2 TX
@TXYuppie
·
Jan 26
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
All good brother. It happened to a ton of folks. Just start tuning into Dark Horse now. It will help clarify a bunch of stuff for you.

They got it right
They weren’t lucky
They reasoned their way there
The want to help you.

Tune in.
5:35 AM · Jan 27, 2023
·
254.9K
Views

---

Dark Horse podcast will set you free, friends.

The drum beat GROWS.
 
It's been three years and people still don't understand that the US has seasonal temperature variations between northern states and southern states.
This is exactly right. Florida has consistently told us in June/July what is to come to the rest of the country in the winter. I'm well beyond the personal choice stuff. People can do whatever they want. If they don't care about doing the correct thing, why should I? that's fine by me. It sucks that they continue to put our healthcare workers through this. They are the guinea pigs one way or the other in terms of attempting to predict what is to come during the winter in the rest of the country. Their choices, their decisions. I have no sympathy left now and empathy flew out the window probably a year and a half ago. All that's left is to sit back and watch personal responsibility come home to roost. Like I said before, with the advent of these new vaccines, they'll likely be doing the country a service and completely unaware that they are. The irony there is REALLY thick. :lol:
 
It's been three years and people still don't understand that the US has seasonal temperature variations between northern states and southern states.
This is exactly right. Florida has consistently told us in June/July what is to come to the rest of the country in the winter. I'm well beyond the personal choice stuff. People can do whatever they want. If they don't care about doing the correct thing, why should I? that's fine by me. It sucks that they continue to put our healthcare workers through this. They are the guinea pigs one way or the other in terms of attempting to predict what is to come during the winter in the rest of the country. Their choices, their decisions. I have no sympathy left now and empathy flew out the window probably a year and a half ago. All that's left is to sit back and watch personal responsibility come home to roost. Like I said before, with the advent of these new vaccines, they'll likely be doing the country a service and completely unaware that they are. The irony there is REALLY thick. :lol:
The reason why Florida gets surges ahead of the rest of the country is because it's hot there in the summer and that's when people are indoors. It's been like this through the whole pandemic.
 
It's been three years and people still don't understand that the US has seasonal temperature variations between northern states and southern states.
This is exactly right. Florida has consistently told us in June/July what is to come to the rest of the country in the winter. I'm well beyond the personal choice stuff. People can do whatever they want. If they don't care about doing the correct thing, why should I? that's fine by me. It sucks that they continue to put our healthcare workers through this. They are the guinea pigs one way or the other in terms of attempting to predict what is to come during the winter in the rest of the country. Their choices, their decisions. I have no sympathy left now and empathy flew out the window probably a year and a half ago. All that's left is to sit back and watch personal responsibility come home to roost. Like I said before, with the advent of these new vaccines, they'll likely be doing the country a service and completely unaware that they are. The irony there is REALLY thick. :lol:
The reason why Florida gets surges ahead of the rest of the country is because it's hot there in the summer and that's when people are indoors. It's been like this through the whole pandemic.
Fully and completely aware. We're also a good indicator of severity because of how few are actually fully vaccinated.
 
It's been three years and people still don't understand that the US has seasonal temperature variations between northern states and southern states.
This is exactly right. Florida has consistently told us in June/July what is to come to the rest of the country in the winter. I'm well beyond the personal choice stuff. People can do whatever they want. If they don't care about doing the correct thing, why should I? that's fine by me. It sucks that they continue to put our healthcare workers through this. They are the guinea pigs one way or the other in terms of attempting to predict what is to come during the winter in the rest of the country. Their choices, their decisions. I have no sympathy left now and empathy flew out the window probably a year and a half ago. All that's left is to sit back and watch personal responsibility come home to roost. Like I said before, with the advent of these new vaccines, they'll likely be doing the country a service and completely unaware that they are. The irony there is REALLY thick. :lol:
The reason why Florida gets surges ahead of the rest of the country is because it's hot there in the summer and that's when people are indoors. It's been like this through the whole pandemic.
Fully and completely aware. We're also a good indicator of severity because of how few are actually fully vaccinated.
 
Anyone who (1) hadn't had a COVID vaccine shot in -- charitably -- ~12 months or so and (2) hasn't ever had COVID ... those people shouldn't count as "vaccinated" today.

EDIT: My hope is that a ton of unrecognized people actually fall into bucket (2). That we can sorta confirm (or work out mathematically with checkable facts) that something like 7 in 10 Americans have had COVID at some level (asymptomatic or not) ... but from a God's-eye view, it's more like 96% of Americans.
 
Anyone who (1) hadn't had a COVID vaccine shot in -- charitably -- ~12 months or so and (2) hasn't ever had COVID ... those people shouldn't count as "vaccinated" today.

EDIT: My hope is that a ton of unrecognized people actually fall into bucket (2). That we can sorta confirm (or work out mathematically with checkable facts) that something like 7 in 10 Americans have had COVID at some level (asymptomatic or not) ... but from a God's-eye view, it's more like 96% of Americans.
I'm sure Commish appreciates the help, but this doesn't salvage his talking point from two years ago. Your observation applies to vaccine uptake in all states, not just the one that he's picking on for partisan reasons.
 
Anyone who (1) hadn't had a COVID vaccine shot in -- charitably -- ~12 months or so and (2) hasn't ever had COVID ... those people shouldn't count as "vaccinated" today.

EDIT: My hope is that a ton of unrecognized people actually fall into bucket (2). That we can sorta confirm (or work out mathematically with checkable facts) that something like 7 in 10 Americans have had COVID at some level (asymptomatic or not) ... but from a God's-eye view, it's more like 96% of Americans.
I'm sure Commish appreciates the help, but this doesn't salvage his talking point from two years ago. Your observation applies to vaccine uptake in all states, not just the one that he's picking on for partisan reasons.
Partisan? He lives there
 
Anyone who (1) hadn't had a COVID vaccine shot in -- charitably -- ~12 months or so and (2) hasn't ever had COVID ... those people shouldn't count as "vaccinated" today.

EDIT: My hope is that a ton of unrecognized people actually fall into bucket (2). That we can sorta confirm (or work out mathematically with checkable facts) that something like 7 in 10 Americans have had COVID at some level (asymptomatic or not) ... but from a God's-eye view, it's more like 96% of Americans.
I'm sure Commish appreciates the help, but this doesn't salvage his talking point from two years ago. Your observation applies to vaccine uptake in all states, not just the one that he's picking on for partisan reasons.
Partisan? He lives there
meh....he can believe what he wants to like the rest instead of engaging in good faith. It's easier, whatever. Reality is, I DO live here and we have really good local news groups that I take at their word these days. I'll also take 3 years of history showing that Florida has been a fantastic indicator for what states not in the south are likely to expect during the winter. Not just in type, but in severity as well. I'll be completely honest in one regard though. I have NO idea how any of these sites come up with their numbers for states...especially ones like Florida who refuse to report on numbers. I don't have an account on that site, so I can't see their sources, but I generally thought once the revolt by states happened last August/Sept/Oct, that these stats pretty much went out of date immediately. The last time I was out on the Johns Hopkins site (Oct/Nov) we were struggling to clear the 72% mark for "vaccinated" and less than 10% had bivalent....not nearly enough to debunk my "talking point from two years ago". Are states back to reporting again? Genuine question. I'll also throw out there the fact that even when Florida WAS reporting, they would NOT report on those who weren't permanent residents of the state which is almost 10ish% of our population from October through April/May.
 
Anyone who (1) hadn't had a COVID vaccine shot in -- charitably -- ~12 months or so and (2) hasn't ever had COVID ... those people shouldn't count as "vaccinated" today.

EDIT: My hope is that a ton of unrecognized people actually fall into bucket (2). That we can sorta confirm (or work out mathematically with checkable facts) that something like 7 in 10 Americans have had COVID at some level (asymptomatic or not) ... but from a God's-eye view, it's more like 96% of Americans.
I'm sure Commish appreciates the help, but this doesn't salvage his talking point from two years ago. Your observation applies to vaccine uptake in all states, not just the one that he's picking on for partisan reasons.
Partisan? He lives there
meh....he can believe what he wants to like the rest instead of engaging in good faith. It's easier, whatever. Reality is, I DO live here and we have really good local news groups that I take at their word these days. I'll also take 3 years of history showing that Florida has been a fantastic indicator for what states not in the south are likely to expect during the winter. Not just in type, but in severity as well. I'll be completely honest in one regard though. I have NO idea how any of these sites come up with their numbers for states...especially ones like Florida who refuse to report on numbers. I don't have an account on that site, so I can't see their sources, but I generally thought once the revolt by states happened last August/Sept/Oct, that these stats pretty much went out of date immediately. The last time I was out on the Johns Hopkins site (Oct/Nov) we were struggling to clear the 72% mark for "vaccinated" and less than 10% had bivalent....not nearly enough to debunk my "talking point from two years ago". Are states back to reporting again? Genuine question. I'll also throw out there the fact that even when Florida WAS reporting, they would NOT report on those who weren't permanent residents of the state which is almost 10ish% of our population from October through April/May.
I showed you statistics on state-by-state vaccination rates. Citing evidence in support of one's position is good-faith argumentation. Doubling down after somebody corrects you isn't.
 
More on the slimiest of slimy Pfizer doctors... Until now, I thought he was just some schmuck research executive. Nope, he is that and also an actual Medical Doctor. Talk about a profession that keeps taking reputational hits since the Covid Era began...

Thorough background on Dr. Jordan Trishton Walker...

Not sure why I'm even bothering responding to this but there's a reddit thread on this.

That video is a sham and a complete fake. The guy is not a Pfizer exec or anything of the sort. No R&D director would say the things he is or speak that way.

That people believe this nonsense is frightening.

Pfizer Responds to Research Claims


Released at 8p on a Friday. Zero MSM coverage, of course. And also zero denial that Jordon Walker is/was who he claimed to be in the Project Veritas videos.

That people believe Pfizer about anything is frightening.
 
I have NO idea how any of these sites come up with their numbers for states...especially ones like Florida who refuse to report on numbers. I don't have an account on that site, so I can't see their sources, but I generally thought once the revolt by states happened last August/Sept/Oct, that these stats pretty much went out of date immediately.
Data from Florida comes out weekly on Worldometers. I don't know if that's vetted and distributed by the state of Florida, or else is collected by other means (e.g. from healthcare/hospital systems directly).
 
I have NO idea how any of these sites come up with their numbers for states...especially ones like Florida who refuse to report on numbers. I don't have an account on that site, so I can't see their sources, but I generally thought once the revolt by states happened last August/Sept/Oct, that these stats pretty much went out of date immediately.
Data from Florida comes out weekly on Worldometers. I don't know if that's vetted and distributed by the state of Florida, or else is collected by other means (e.g. from healthcare/hospital systems directly).
I'm not seeing vaccinations on there. But given the comments above, I went back to JHU (pretty much the only place I ever took/take numbers from through this whole fiasco) and it seems like there are parts they are providing and parts they aren't. Testing is officially out the window but has nothing to do with my assertion. They also do a straight-up vaccination % without counting X, not counting Y, half counting Z etc. It continues to be just as I described above. Just cracking 71% vaccinated. We will continue to be a great indicator, in June/July, for what is to come in the winter in a bunch of the rest of the country. Our vaccine numbers are plenty low to give us a good idea of the severity and the like. I'd tell people to look across the entirety of the south for severity, but Florida has, by far, the best set of hospitals and treatment of them, Alabam, Miss, LA, etc etc....severity likely won't be as accurate in those places as it will Florida and what the rest of the country with similar resources will be able to handle
 
Last edited:
I showed you statistics on state-by-state vaccination rates. Citing evidence in support of one's position is good-faith argumentation. Doubling down after somebody corrects you isn't.
Sorry...not following. My position was two fold:

1. We've always been a good indicator of what is to come in the winter. You seem to agree with that.
2. Our set of unvaccinated individuals is plenty large enough to also help with guessing severity.

You gave me a list of all the states and the rates as determined by that site. What is it saying that contradicts my assertions here?


This is the site I use(d) through the whole thing. I thought they had shut it down, but it seems to be just the testing stuff they can't get their hands on anymore, which isn't part of either of my assertions.
 
I have NO idea how any of these sites come up with their numbers for states...especially ones like Florida who refuse to report on numbers. I don't have an account on that site, so I can't see their sources, but I generally thought once the revolt by states happened last August/Sept/Oct, that these stats pretty much went out of date immediately.
Data from Florida comes out weekly on Worldometers. I don't know if that's vetted and distributed by the state of Florida, or else is collected by other means (e.g. from healthcare/hospital systems directly).
I'm not seeing vaccinations on there.
My mistake -- Worldometers does not show vaccination data. I thought you were saying that Florida was not publicly reporting any COVID numbers at all (confirmed cases, deaths,etc.).

Besides the states that have gone to weekly reporting, there HAVE been a few states that have either stopped reporting confirmed case numbers or else are two or more weeks behind. Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee are three. I want to say Kansas and South Carolina are also behind right now.
 
I have NO idea how any of these sites come up with their numbers for states...especially ones like Florida who refuse to report on numbers. I don't have an account on that site, so I can't see their sources, but I generally thought once the revolt by states happened last August/Sept/Oct, that these stats pretty much went out of date immediately.
Data from Florida comes out weekly on Worldometers. I don't know if that's vetted and distributed by the state of Florida, or else is collected by other means (e.g. from healthcare/hospital systems directly).
I'm not seeing vaccinations on there.
My mistake -- Worldometers does not show vaccination data. I thought you were saying that Florida was not publicly reporting any COVID numbers at all (confirmed cases, deaths,etc.).

Besides the states that have gone to weekly reporting, there HAVE been a few states that have either stopped reporting confirmed case numbers or else are two or more weeks behind. Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee are three. I want to say Kansas and South Carolina are also behind right now.
To be honest, I DID think that. They already do "residents only". That might be true everywhere now though which, if true, gives me even less confidence in the numbers overall. The other thing I have to remember is to be specific in my words as we have very different parts of this state. For example, the state might be reporting 70% vaccinated, but our local (regional) number is <50%. I need to work on remembering that my local situation isn't all over the state.
 
It's been three years and people still don't understand that the US has seasonal temperature variations between northern states and southern states.
This is exactly right. Florida has consistently told us in June/July what is to come to the rest of the country in the winter. I'm well beyond the personal choice stuff. People can do whatever they want. If they don't care about doing the correct thing, why should I? that's fine by me. It sucks that they continue to put our healthcare workers through this. They are the guinea pigs one way or the other in terms of attempting to predict what is to come during the winter in the rest of the country. Their choices, their decisions. I have no sympathy left now and empathy flew out the window probably a year and a half ago. All that's left is to sit back and watch personal responsibility come home to roost. Like I said before, with the advent of these new vaccines, they'll likely be doing the country a service and completely unaware that they are. The irony there is REALLY thick. :lol:
The reason why Florida gets surges ahead of the rest of the country is because it's hot there in the summer and that's when people are indoors. It's been like this through the whole pandemic.
Fully and completely aware. We're also a good indicator of severity because of how few are actually fully vaccinated.

Site not working but I'll bring up that Florida is unique in that they have a lot of elderly that skew vax numbers. Vax numbers among the general population are generally comparatively quite low.
 
Drum. Beat. Grows...

Oh good. Yet another YouTube professor with an earth-shattering opinion but no, you know, peer-reviewed data. The only drum beat that's growing is the list of people who realize they can turn a profit by sucking in gullible people who "do their own research".
 
Here's the weird part. This is his quote from an article not too long ago. So I don't know what to make of it

Retsef Levi, professor of operations management at the MIT Sloan School of Management and one of the authors of the study, told Reuters via email that the correlation they found did not prove causality.

“Let me emphasize that I do not support any interpretation of the paper as a proof that the vaccine has caused this increase in EMS calls,” Levi said. “The paper only calls to check the matter broadly and explore all possible causes.
 
Last edited:
Drum. Beat. Grows...

Oh good. Yet another YouTube professor with an earth-shattering opinion but no, you know, peer-reviewed data. The only drum beat that's growing is the list of people who realize they can turn a profit by sucking in gullible people who "do their own research".

MIT Professor and Drug Safety Analytics Specialist

“I have more than 30 years of experience as a practitioner and an academic in using data and analytics to assess and manage risk, particularly in the context of health systems health policies, as well as the management of safety and quality of manufacturing of biologic drugs,” said Levi.
 
Here's the weird part. This is his quote from an article not too long ago. So I don't know what to make of it

Retsef Levi, professor of operations management at the MIT Sloan School of Management and one of the authors of the study, told Reuters via email that the correlation they found did not prove causality.

“Let me emphasize that I do not support any interpretation of the paper as a proof that the vaccine has caused this increase in EMS calls,” Levi said. “The paper only calls to check the matter broadly and explore all possible causes.

Link to that article.
 
Here's the weird part. This is his quote from an article not too long ago. So I don't know what to make of it

Retsef Levi, professor of operations management at the MIT Sloan School of Management and one of the authors of the study, told Reuters via email that the correlation they found did not prove causality.

“Let me emphasize that I do not support any interpretation of the paper as a proof that the vaccine has caused this increase in EMS calls,” Levi said. “The paper only calls to check the matter broadly and explore all possible causes.
Everyone has a theory....the echo chamber is getting louder. That's about it. Well, that and people are realizing they can generate quite a bit of ad revenue on youtube
 
At this point ... COVID-related information that's ONLY on YouTube and not in the scientific press or at least mainstream old-line news sources (esp of pre-Internet vintage) ... that information can be summarily considered as BS. Never, ever anything to see there. Always wrong. Always.

Utter tripe this sentiment. Good luck with the corrupted, captured MSM narratives.

And BTW, there was nothing 'wrong' about that article. Sorry, not sorry that it scared you.
 
At this point ... COVID-related information that's ONLY on YouTube and not in the scientific press or at least mainstream old-line news sources (esp of pre-Internet vintage) ... that information can be summarily considered as BS. Never, ever anything to see there. Always wrong. Always.
Can't help but wonder how many billions people have generated in this space throwing out this sort of stuff. Always follow the money, right? :lol:
 
Everyone has a theory....the echo chamber is getting louder. That's about it. Well, that and people are realizing they can generate quite a bit of ad revenue on youtube
Their ad revenue goes up with more views, too, so anyone posting links to those Youtube sites elsewhere helps them make money.
 
At this point ... COVID-related information that's ONLY on YouTube and not in the scientific press or at least mainstream old-line news sources (esp of pre-Internet vintage) ... that information can be summarily considered as BS. Never, ever anything to see there. Always wrong. Always.
Can't help but wonder how many billions people have generated in this space throwing out this sort of stuff. Always follow the money, right? :lol:

😆 How many billions did Pfizer and Moderna grift off U.S. taxpayers?
 
Excellent Newsweek article on what went wrong the last three years...

It's not an "article". It's an opinion piece. It's also mostly fabrications, but beyond that it amounts to "we should have let the lunatics help make the decisions".

ar·ti·cle
/ˈärdək(ə)l/

noun
1.
a particular item or object.
"small household articles"

2.
a piece of writing included with others in a newspaper, magazine, or other print or online publication.
"an article about middle-aged executives"

🤣🤣🤣
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top