I don't understand the logic of the "go back to work" plan from several different angles.
First, does Trump have that authority? Seems to me mayors and governors are the ones who have called for and are (somewhat) enforcing sheltering in place. If Trump says go back to work, will Newsom and Breed follow suit in the Bay Area? I find that extremely unlikely.
Second, let's say that people do go back to work. People return to the coffee houses, start flying again, taking busses and subways to work. Yes, some work from home more than previously, but essentially people are out and about again. People's buying habits return to normal, stores are stocked normally, people go back to restaurants, slowly. But many of us are still infected, knowingly and not.
So I go back to work, healthy, and catch COVID when I go to my office kitchen. I'm asymptomatic, and I bring it home and give it to my wife, and later that day, my mother, and the next day, some of my staff at work. Suddenly, we show symptoms, as does my wife, so we stay home sick. And my mom is sick, so she can't take care of our kids. Hmmm, what are we going to do about that problem.
Meanwhile, my mom sees a friend and passes on COVID to her, who brings it back to her nursing home, where it spreads like wildfire over the next couple weeks.
Oh, and by the way, schools are still closed here in California. What are we doing about childcare? We're trying to divide and conquer with other parents, but none of them want our kids, and we don't really want theirs. And we can't find anybody to support daycare, never mind we are not in a great position to pay for that. We're worried about our jobs and attempting to save, not blast through our savings.
Multiply the above scenario time a million.
I understand the need for metrics. I work for the government after all. But a "return to work" plan seems extremely dangerous and I just don't see how in can be implemented without overwhelming our healthcare system, and without a $#^(ton of misery.