[icon]
Insoxicated
And.... It's almost like some people are willfully ignoring clear cut science on this, despite having been wrong just about every step of the way.It's almost like some people are rooting for doom and gloom.
.
And.... It's almost like some people are willfully ignoring clear cut science on this, despite having been wrong just about every step of the way.It's almost like some people are rooting for doom and gloom.
Crazy. My father is double vaxxed with no booster and got covid in summer. His wife is currently positive. So far so good but we will see if that changes in a few days. He keeps claiming he's "super immune".Two of my good friends just tested positive for COVID for the second time within the last week. Both double vaxxed Pfizer this summer with no booster.
Zach: 32 M / case #1 May 2020 / Pfizer Jab #2 September / Symptomatically Positive #2 this past Friday.
Belal: 45 M / Case #1 Oct 2020 / Pfizer Jab #2 April / Symptomatically positive #2 Sunday PM
edit to correct B's case and jab date
He's not. Omicron is the real deal.He keeps claiming he's "super immune".
From what I've read, hybrid immunity with a booster is the best you get.He's not. Omicron is the real deal.
Did you add the “vaccinated” part there? I don’t see in this article that they say anything about that.NFL claims their data shows only symptomatic vaccinated individuals spread Covid.
Big if true. They probably have about as good of data as anyone with the amount of testing and level of contact tracing they do.
It’s omicron. A whole lot of omicron, with a smattering of residual delta.humpback said:For our resident medical experts, what do you think is causing spikes in hospitalizations in some areas? If omicron is supposed to be much less severe, is it possible the hospitalizations are still from the delta wave and the new cases are driven by omicron?
I'm in Maryland, where we have one of the highest vaccination rates in the country, yet hospitalizations have tripled over the last ~5 weeks to a level we haven't seen since January, pre-vaccines.
To clarify, you probably don’t know any (or very few) people with SYMPTOMATIC covid who developed SYMPTOMATIC covid again. What you don’t know is how many people had asymptomatic covid/minimally symptomatic upper respiratory tract infection, but were never officially diagnosed with covid, who developed reinfection.Coach Morris Buttermaker said:My daughter organized her college ski trip .... 1100 went, 450 got Covid (all tested by the college every day). 100% vaxxed, 75%+ boosted. Similar stories. Very few who had covid before got it again.
I mentioned it in a subsequent post but they just said today that only 40% of the cases sampled in Maryland are omicron. Unvaccinated adults (9%) account for 75% of the hospitalizations.It’s omicron. A whole lot of omicron, with a smattering of residual delta.
Odd. When I first read it I swear it was focusing more on vaccinated asymptomatic people.Did you add the “vaccinated” part there? I don’t see in this article that they say anything about that.
And he had had COVID once before. Seems like his natural immunity didn't protect him.jobarules said:There's still only been one death in the US as far as I know and the guy was unvaxxed.
When was the booster? Just curious of timingMy friends wife just tested positive. She was boosted too.
Yeah, one of my team members in NY just tested positive. He and his wife were boosted 10 days ago. Both positive now, along with their 3-year old. Very mild symptoms.My friends wife just tested positive. She was boosted too.
Thx for sharing, I didn’t see this. It’s pretty consistent with what we are seeing and hearing from multiple countries and studies. At this point we know thatI read some headline that the booster only protects for 10 weeks. I'll try and find the article.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/how-long-does-booster-protection-omicron-covid-last-study-2021-12%3famp
If it turns out booster only prevents symptomatic infection for 10 weeks but we still get protection against severe covid for longer I think I'll hold off on future boosters for now.Thx for sharing, I didn’t see this. It’s pretty consistent with what we are seeing and hearing from multiple countries and studies. At this point we know that
1) vaccine efficacy for preventing symptomatic Covid decreases steadily over the span of 2-3 months
2) vaccine efficacy for preventing serious illness, hospitalization or death holds up well through 4 months and likely beyond
3) we will have boosters every 4-6 months for awhile
At least those are my takeaways so far. And I’m totally fine with getting a booster every 4-6 months.
Thanks again for the link. Merry Christmas!
So technically still inside the 14 day window....if that still is a thing. Wonder if people are getting the booster and thinking all good without the "wait time"Yeah, one of my team members in NY just tested positive. He and his wife were boosted 10 days ago. Both positive now, along with their 3-year old. Very mild symptoms.
Yep, and per usual, the headline/way it's presented is a bit misleading- the effectiveness lessens, but it's still far more effective than no booster (especially Moderna).Thx for sharing, I didn’t see this. It’s pretty consistent with what we are seeing and hearing from multiple countries and studies. At this point we know that
1) vaccine efficacy for preventing symptomatic Covid decreases steadily over the span of 2-3 months
2) vaccine efficacy for preventing serious illness, hospitalization or death holds up well through 4 months and likely beyond
3) we will have boosters every 4-6 months for awhile
At least those are my takeaways so far. And I’m totally fine with getting a booster every 4-6 months.
Thanks again for the link. Merry Christmas!
Immunocompromised? SureIf you have immunocompromised people you may be around or unvaccinated kids, you should treat this outbreak like it’s March of 2020. Odds of you getting and spreading seems high with current levels.
Sorry I missed thisWhen was the booster? Just curious of timing
I would be more concerned about kids less than 2yrs old, but still.Immunocompromised? Sure
Unvaxxed kids? Nah
I don't need 100% efficacy to think a policy is wise/advisable.Ignoring the whole rant above, I do agree with the "you must show vaccine proof to eat in this restaurant" mandate seems completely useless with Omicron.
Europe sounds like Hawaii, except places where tourists predominate. Kinda surprised San Fran isn’t on board with masking.The difference between EU and here were apparent right after exiting customs. Any public indoor area, FFP2 masks are required in DE. At SFO, while most were masked, many are waiting outside of customs maskless. Of all the places to exercise a little bit more caution...
Wouldn't a test negative to enter a restaurant policy make more sense than a vax proof policy during omicron? The former does not exist in NYC. The latter does.I don't need 100% efficacy to think a policy is wise/advisable.
To me, absent the ability to digitally validate by vaccine shot / boost status, I'm okay with the vax or negative test mandate for dining / entertainment.
Plus while I'm not in favor of mandates for employment, I have no issue with an "inconvenience tax" on antivaxxers... limiting their ability to participate in certain social components of society.![]()
Assuming infinite rapid testing capacity? Perhaps. Issues I see with this:Wouldn't a test negative to enter a restaurant policy make more sense than a vax proof policy during omicron? The former does not exist in NYC. The latter does.
1. Agree with this. They should've been mass producing the at home test kits using the Defense Production Act and had them widely available this way restaurant owners can have them available for all customers.Assuming infinite rapid testing capacity? Perhaps. Issues I see with this:
1) Testing Capacity is already insufficient. Adding this requirement would dramatically increase stress on that system.
2) The same people who ##### about vaccine requirements would also piss and moan about the testing requirement. Generally most of them are just miserable people looking for an excuse to whine.
I think I disagree with the bolded. A non-vaxxed has been proven to spread more/longer than a vaxxed. I think I'm better off taking chances with the vaxxed.1. Agree with this. They should've been mass producing the at home test kits using the Defense Production Act and had them widely available this way restaurant owners can have them available for all customers.
2. Agreed 100%. I don't care about those people. I'm just talking about what's safer AT THIS POINT.
IMO RIGHT NOW I'd rather be around a non-vaxxed person who has a recent negative test than a fully vaxxed and boosted person who has not been tested. The former is definitely safer during this Omicron wave.
I think his point is really that right now, he values a negative test more than vaccinated. At least if you have a negative test, you probably aren't spreading covid around. But since Omicron is hitting vaccinated and boosted people, a vaccinated person can still be spreading this.I think I disagree with the bolded. A non-vaxxed has been proven to spread more/longer than a vaxxed. I think I'm better off taking chances with the vaxxed.IMO RIGHT NOW I'd rather be around a non-vaxxed person who has a recent negative test than a fully vaxxed and boosted person who has not been tested. The former is definitely safer during this Omicron wave.
Change my mind. What makes you say the last sentence?
Obviously it depends on how recent the test was but if they had a negative test they took 15 min ago how can they spread it?I think I disagree with the bolded. A non-vaxxed has been proven to spread more/longer than a vaxxed. I think I'm better off taking chances with the vaxxed.
Change my mind. What makes you say the last sentence?
I’ve not seen that proven conclusively, but the mechanism is biologically plausible.I don't remember if this was ever proven conclusively, but I do recall some discussion a couple months back about the fact that all of the vaccines we have so far are delivered intramuscularly, which might mean they do a better job protecting the virus from colonizing the lungs, but not as good a job of protecting the nose and throat. According to this theory, that was why we were seeing a lot of breakthrough infections with cold symptoms among the vaccinated but not a lot of the serious lung issues. (It was also put forward as an argument for the development of intranasal spray boosters to supplement shots).
Anyone know what the current thinking is on that theory? @Terminalxylem @Doug B @Biff84
Are you talking about testing at the restaurant? Aren't infected already going to be there for 15-30 minutes before being shown to be positive? If not at the restaurant, how do you differentiate results for a test taken today vs a test taken 1 month ago?Wouldn't a test negative to enter a restaurant policy make more sense than a vax proof policy during omicron? The former does not exist in NYC. The latter does.
Testing at the restaurant would be phenomenal. Next best thing would be one positive test 24 hours prior. I'm sure they can develop some app that takes your positive test result from an at home test as verifies if it was done 24 hours before.Are you talking about testing at the restaurant? Aren't infected already going to be there for 15-30 minutes before being shown to be positive? If not at the restaurant, how do you differentiate results for a test taken today vs a test taken 1 month ago?
Better than being intubated and permanent lung damage or death.Enjoy the boosters. In another year, you're gonna need a backpack & IV drip.
Have you kept up with the posts from people who remain unvaccinated? I’d rather risk covid.I think I disagree with the bolded. A non-vaxxed has been proven to spread more/longer than a vaxxed. I think I'm better off taking chances with the vaxxed.
Change my mind. What makes you say the last sentence?
Because it’s out of necessity rather than data. There is still remains a risk in days 7-10. How much is uncertain but it’s likely decreased in that time period. For health care workers their benefit to the pandemic exceeds that risk. Not to mention they are more likely to be wearing high quality masks. From what I’ve heard, many other essential business are likely to adopt the policy.Here is another inconsistency that drives me nuts. The CDC just announced a 7 day quarantine period vs the 10 day period for healthcare workers. I understand WHY they did it but do healthcare workers recover from covid quicker than the rest of the population? Why not just change the quarantine period to 7 days for all?
Perhaps the benefit of getting healthcare workers back to work when there is a shortage outweighs the benefit of being extra careful with recovery time.Here is another inconsistency that drives me nuts. The CDC just announced a 7 day quarantine period vs the 10 day period for healthcare workers. I understand WHY they did it but do healthcare workers recover from covid quicker than the rest of the population? Why not just change the quarantine period to 7 days for all?