Unfortunately this is how it's going to continue to go. Studies take a lot of time, and this virus changes quickly- by the time the study is done, we've very likely moved on to multiple variants from the one just studied. The current variants may behave similarly in some ways and differently in others, but we won't really know until long after it's burned through in most cases. It's one of the many reasons why we're still struggling to combat this, the virus is always a step or two ahead of us. It's also difficult to separate out variants in studies when multiple are circulating at the same time.This is a good study, but along with most that I see these days does not include data from the Omicron wave. I understand this one was measuring Long COVID, so it couldn't be completely current, but I keep seeing information from various studies and various reports that does not include Omicron. Omicron changed things.
We still don't have Omicron-specific info on things like:
There are dozens of questions like this that I would like to see answers to. Anyone else frustrated by this? Most studies just say COVID-19 does X. Can we please get separation of data for Omicron?
- Does Omicron change the fact that outdoors is safer than indoors, and if so, by how much?
- Does Omicron's highly contagious nature change the amount of time in an exposure needed to infect individuals?
- Is it really less severe disease than earlier variants or not? It seems to be.
- Is it actually less likely than earlier variants to infect the lungs? This also seems to be true, but how much?
- Are masks less effective with Omicron? N95s?
I also think part of it is that people are much more hesitant to give their opinions/recommendations now without a lot of concrete evidence in fear of the backlash if they turn out to be "wrong" (or things change). It's just a difficult situation all around.