What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Dallas Cowboys (1 Viewer)

Ariakis said:
If Shayne Graham hits the open market the Cowboys should consider him.
:goodposting: I also wouldnt mind seeing Nick Folk given an opportunity to compete to win back his starting role. He was so money 2007-2008 then after an injury he sucked in 2009. I am inclined to believe he wasnt totally healthy.
 
Ariakis said:
If Shayne Graham hits the open market the Cowboys should consider him.
I would much rather see the Cowboys focus on a player that spends more time on the field with their limited free agency options where high dollars are concerned. I'm not real sure what kind of dollars Graham would command, but reliable kickers can be found elsewhere. This is an area where Dallas really misses former kicking coach Steve Hoffman. The guy could drum up a kicker from nearly anywhere on the planet.Obviously, a left tackle would be a prime candidate if one was to emerge. On top of that, it would really free up their options with that 27th pick in the first round if they could land one. They would be in great position to grab that key player that inevitably falls into the back of the first round no matter the position. Could be anybody, you never know, but there's always at least one. It could even be a guy like Taylor Mays. You know, there's always that guy on the board when the Cowboys are up and you say or think, "I understand the pick, but it sure would have been nice to grab______________."Food for thought.
 
Ariakis said:
If Shayne Graham hits the open market the Cowboys should consider him.
I would much rather see the Cowboys focus on a player that spends more time on the field with their limited free agency options where high dollars are concerned. I'm not real sure what kind of dollars Graham would command, but reliable kickers can be found elsewhere. This is an area where Dallas really misses former kicking coach Steve Hoffman. The guy could drum up a kicker from nearly anywhere on the planet.Obviously, a left tackle would be a prime candidate if one was to emerge. On top of that, it would really free up their options with that 27th pick in the first round if they could land one. They would be in great position to grab that key player that inevitably falls into the back of the first round no matter the position. Could be anybody, you never know, but there's always at least one. It could even be a guy like Taylor Mays. You know, there's always that guy on the board when the Cowboys are up and you say or think, "I understand the pick, but it sure would have been nice to grab______________."Food for thought.
Andy correct me if I'm wrong but cant the Cowboys sign an unlimited number of free agents so long as their contract is under 3 million a year and are allowed to sign one player at a max deal.
 
Ariakis said:
If Shayne Graham hits the open market the Cowboys should consider him.
I would much rather see the Cowboys focus on a player that spends more time on the field with their limited free agency options where high dollars are concerned. I'm not real sure what kind of dollars Graham would command, but reliable kickers can be found elsewhere. This is an area where Dallas really misses former kicking coach Steve Hoffman. The guy could drum up a kicker from nearly anywhere on the planet.Obviously, a left tackle would be a prime candidate if one was to emerge. On top of that, it would really free up their options with that 27th pick in the first round if they could land one. They would be in great position to grab that key player that inevitably falls into the back of the first round no matter the position. Could be anybody, you never know, but there's always at least one. It could even be a guy like Taylor Mays. You know, there's always that guy on the board when the Cowboys are up and you say or think, "I understand the pick, but it sure would have been nice to grab______________."

Food for thought.
Andy correct me if I'm wrong but cant the Cowboys sign an unlimited number of free agents so long as their contract is under 3 million a year and are allowed to sign one player at a max deal.
You are correct. That's what I was getting at with the bolded above. With an uncapped season upon us, there may be some teams willing to throw more than the 3 mil a year to Graham. I don't know. It's uncharted territory as far as the NFL is concerned and it's really hard to say how some teams might approach it. We could very well see some crazy dollars being thrown around with the limited number of unrestricted free agents available. It's not that I wouldn't welcome Graham, I'm just afraid that somebody might very well outbid the Cowboys knowing that Dallas has that $3 million ceiling, so to speak.

We're going to see some different strategies being played out this offseason in regards to the different parameters placed on the elite eight. The other 24 teams will most certainly be using that to their advantage. Look at the Redskins, for instance. Don't you think little Danny Snyder would love to simply offer Graham $3.25 million a year for obvious reasons? They need a kicker too, ya know. This is the kind of thing that Dallas will be contending with.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ariakis said:
If Shayne Graham hits the open market the Cowboys should consider him.
I would much rather see the Cowboys focus on a player that spends more time on the field with their limited free agency options where high dollars are concerned. I'm not real sure what kind of dollars Graham would command, but reliable kickers can be found elsewhere. This is an area where Dallas really misses former kicking coach Steve Hoffman. The guy could drum up a kicker from nearly anywhere on the planet.Obviously, a left tackle would be a prime candidate if one was to emerge. On top of that, it would really free up their options with that 27th pick in the first round if they could land one. They would be in great position to grab that key player that inevitably falls into the back of the first round no matter the position. Could be anybody, you never know, but there's always at least one. It could even be a guy like Taylor Mays. You know, there's always that guy on the board when the Cowboys are up and you say or think, "I understand the pick, but it sure would have been nice to grab______________."

Food for thought.
Andy correct me if I'm wrong but cant the Cowboys sign an unlimited number of free agents so long as their contract is under 3 million a year and are allowed to sign one player at a max deal.
You are correct. That's what I was getting at with the bolded above. With an uncapped season upon us, there may be some teams willing to throw more than the 3 mil a year to Graham. I don't know. It's uncharted territory as far as the NFL is concerned and it's really hard to say how some teams might approach it. We could very well see some crazy dollars being thrown around with the limited number of unrestricted free agents available. It's not that I wouldn't welcome Graham, I'm just afraid that somebody might very well outbid the Cowboys knowing that Dallas has that $3 million ceiling, so to speak.

We're going to see some different strategies being played out this offseason in regards to the different parameters placed on the elite eight. The other 24 teams will most certainly be using that to their advantage. Look at the Redskins, for instance. Don't you think little Danny Snyder would love to simply offer Graham $3.25 million a year for obvious reasons? They need a kicker too, ya know. This is the kind of thing that Dallas will be contending with.
I see what your saying but its a dangerous gamble because I anticipate a CBA being agreed upon in the future meaning that all teams will have to once again have to meet a hard salary cap after this upcoming year.
 
I think most teams are going to be tight with their spending with the uncertainty of what the new CBA will be like (the Redskins owner might be the exception here).

If they keep Roy, they need to treat him like Parcells would, tear into him during every practice and get your money's worth by making an example of him if he doesn't earn his check on the field.

 
Mock drafts predict Cowboys will take tackle or safety

11:01 AM CST on Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Compiled from Staff Reports

The NFL draft is April 22-24, but it's never too early to start thinking what the Cowboys might be looking for in the first round. Dallas owns the No. 27 pick.

Dallas Morning News writer Todd Archer says the Cowboys' three needs are offensive line, safety, wide receiver.

Hopefully, Jerry Jones and Co. have learned not to draft receivers in the first round (cough: Detroit Lions).

Drafting offensive line help might make the most sense. Left tackle Flozell Adams will be entering his 13th season if he comes back. Left guard Kyle Kosier will be in the final year of his contract. The backups are unrestricted or restricted free agents. Finding a tackle for the future is never a bad bet.

But many drafts also like Earl Thomas at a free safety spot. Some highlights of recent mock drafts' picks for the Cowboys first-rounder:

Draftcountdown.com– FS Earl Thomas (Texas): At first glance the Cowboys don't appear to have many major, glaring holes on their depth chart. This is especially true after the emergence of Miles Austin at wide receiver. However, the safety position has been a problem in Dallas for years now and it sounds like they intend to make bringing in an upgrade a priority this off-season. Not only did the Cowboys rank 20th in the league in pass defense but they were also 26th in interceptions so a playmaker like Earl Thomas of Texas would be a welcomed addition. The Longhorns usually do a good job of keeping their underclassmen in school but Thomas was coming off such an impressive redshirt sophomore campaign that he just couldn't resist the lure of the pros. Thomas doesn't have great size but he is very athletic and rangy with a nose for the ball and a real playmaking streak. After the appalling performance of their offensive line in a playoff loss to Minnesota, the Cowboys could definitely be in the market for a blocker such as Idaho's Mike Iupati here as well. A five-technique defensive end like Jared Odrick of Penn State could also be an option, especially since Marcus Spears is going to be a free agent next year. As a darkhorse don't completely rule out a wide receiver either. Roy Williams' struggles have been well documented so no one knows what his future holds and there should be some great pass catchers on the board to choose from late in round one.

SI.com(Don Banks) – G-OT Mike Iupati (Idaho): The Cowboys offensive line needs help in light of its playoff-game meltdown at Minnesota, and Iupati is a prospect who really helped himself with his showing in this week's Senior Bowl practices. He has good feet and plays with a mean streak. Another intriguing possibility that can't be overlooked for Dallas is if USC safety Taylor Mays tumbles to No. 27. But the offensive line should take priority.

Profootballweekly.com – FS Earl Thomas (Texas): The inability to cover the deep middle exposed the Cowboys' defense against the Vikings in the playoffs, and Thomas' range and playmaking ability on the back half could complete the defense.

FoxSports.com(Peter Schrager) – OT Bruce Campbell (Maryland): Though not confirmed by the AP, I'm fairly sure Flozell Adams and Marc Colombo's jockstraps are still lying around the Metrodome 50-yard line. Neither player is getting any younger and the Dallas offensive line needs some reinforcements. Doug Free's shown glimpses, but there's got to be more. Some of the things I've read have Campbell as high as a Top 10 pick. I was never that impressed with him at Maryland, but think the Cowboys would be pleased to see him sitting there at 27. And I'm putting this out there now – can we call him Bruce "Evil Dead" Campbell? Or Bruce "Old Spice commercials" Campbell? One of the best actors of the past 20 years deserves to be mentioned somehow after each and every pancake block by this kid.

CBSSports (Ron Rang) – G-OT Mike Iupati (Idaho):The Cowboys haven't spent a first-round pick on the offensive line since 1989, but may elect to do so with valued backups Montrae Holland and Cory Procter potentially entering free agency. Iupati struggled with his footwork during the Senior Bowl, itself, but his combination of size, strength and foot quickness made him one of the best players on the field during the week of practices. Iupati could step right in for Dallas at guard. Some believe he'll eventually slide out to left tackle.

CBSSports (Chad Reuter) – OLB Sean Weatherspoon (Missouri): Veteran Keith Brooking brought some intensity to the Cowboys defense, and Weatherspoon is a similar player with better athleticism. The former Tiger's performance in the Senior Bowl may have earned him a spot in the first round.

Scouts Inc. (Todd McShay) – S Nate Allen (South Florida): Allen is far from a first-round lock, but the Cowboys need to improve their athleticism at safety, and Allen has the right combination of speed and fluidity in coverage to help fix the problem.

nfldraftblitz.com – FS Earl Thomas (Texas): The 'Boys often expect their safeties to run with receivers in tight man-to-man coverage and this could be the best safety in this class at achieving that. Another possibility here is Bruce Campbell, but we'll stick with the best player on our board.

KFFL.com – G-OT Mike Iupati (Idaho): Upgrades Kyle Kosier's spot. Can play OT if needed – a mauler that fits in with the rest of DAL's lumbering OL.

 
FoxSports.com(Peter Schrager) – OT Bruce Campbell (Maryland): Though not confirmed by the AP, I'm fairly sure Flozell Adams and Marc Colombo's jockstraps are still lying around the Metrodome 50-yard line. Neither player is getting any younger and the Dallas offensive line needs some reinforcements. Doug Free's shown glimpses, but there's got to be more. Some of the things I've read have Campbell as high as a Top 10 pick. I was never that impressed with him at Maryland, but think the Cowboys would be pleased to see him sitting there at 27. And I'm putting this out there now – can we call him Bruce "Evil Dead" Campbell? Or Bruce "Old Spice commercials" Campbell? One of the best actors of the past 20 years deserves to be mentioned somehow after each and every pancake block by this kid.
Isn't Bruce Campbell in BurnNotice as well? Evil Dead sounds good... Burn Notice is definitely better than "Old Spice Commercials" LOL
 
I dont think Dallas can win with Romo and it's not just because he was bad in the Vikings game.
This is a silly statement after what he's shown this past season. Dallas wasn't the best team this year but Romo played as well as you can ask for considering losing his top WR at the beginning of the year.It's hard to win the SB, only 1 team does it every year so to say a blanket statement like that is easy. Odds are, you're right but Romo is one of the best QB's in the league.Dallas needs to improve in the secondary and offensive line. They didn't have many injuries this year and you can't count on that every year.
 
Finally I have an hour to compose some thoughts and get others to weigh in on your draft/FA observations.

Free Agency: I'll make this quick. We won't sign anyone of huge importance. We have an already strong team without glaring holes. There does not seem to be any positions that would be easily fixed with a FA signing. I think we will kick the tires on Dansby (ILB), but ultimately land him with a near 30M (guaranteed money) price tag.

Draft: I have looked at this a few ways. First trying to guess at our needs or what makes the most sense for our first 3 picks. Here are my thoughts in no particular order:

OT- It makes sense as Flo is on the decline and getting OLD.

OG- Possibly, Kosier is solid but we might be able to land a premier OG with the first pick we have. We also have the project Brewster who missed all of last season.

WR-Many people are calling for a WR. I don't see it happening. Roy will be back, Austin isn't going anywhere and then we have a decent group remaining with Crayton, Hurd and the emerging Ogletree. I see Ogleree getting more playing time next year but no big shake ups at this position.

SS/FS- Sensabaugh was a great pickup and solidified the SS position. He can actually cover and was also a decent tackler. No change there. FS is were I have issues. Hamlin= 0 picks. Yes he is veteran and was pretty good at not giving up any big plays this year. However, on the other hand he also didn't make any big plays either. To take this defense to the next level they need big plays from the FS position.

DL- Perhaps a back-up for Ratliffe? What will happen with Spears/Bowen? I see this is a wait and see. My gut tells me this will get worked out and not be a big issue

ILB-Brady is fine and Brooking was a pleasure to watch. Brooking is of course getting long in the tooth. However, I don't see anyone taking away either spot and we already have a ton of LB's who we don't know a lot about. Williams especially comes to mind.

OLB-Wow. Hello Mr. Spencer of the second half of the year. You and Ware will wreak havoc for years to come. Not a team need.

Corner-Mike Jenkins is a baller. Scandrick took a tiny step backwards this year and Newman remains an incosistent performer. Some weeks he is off the charts good and then in an instant can look completely lost. Overall this is a strong area and does not need much attention in the early rounds despite being a premium position.

QB- No need.

RB- Despite some trade rumours all 3 are back and are a team strength.

TE- Bennett was a HUGE disapointment after the camp he had. Phillips looks promising and Jason is Jason. I still maintain he (witten) has lost step. Son't get me wrong though, he is still a force.

FB-Not a pick you make in the first 3 rounds

K-See FB comments

My list of team needs

1) OT-It's the premier position and most impotant on the field next to a QB. It's time especially after the Minny game. Free looked solid to me, but I think he is Columbo's replacement NOT Flo's.

2) FS-Hamlin is OK, but OK doesn't win Championships

3) OG-Many will argue it's ILB. For me the deciding factor to choose OG is for depth. We have some LB's in our system that might work out. However, look at our O-line depth. Where is it? Brewster might pan out-He might not. This team was fortunate to be pretty healthy aside from Columbo going down.

4)ILB-It's still a need but OG is more important

5) DE/NT-Depending on what happens with Spears/Bowen et all.

The next challenge is to get value at your draft spot. I have more questions then answers at this point.

-How many of the OT's will be gone already?

-Iupati, will he be gone? Do we really take a OG at 27?

-Do we really just take BPA regardless of position? I somehow doubt this.

-Earl Thomas will he be there?

-Is Mays a good fit us? (I love him more then most-but don't think he is a good fit for us)

-Do we look at trading up a few spots to get an impact player. For once, I actually think this is more and more a possibility this year. I'm not talking moving up 15 spots or anything-but it would not suprise me to see us go up say 5-7 spots.

Right now...(I'll change 3 times before the draft in all likelyhood) I think we are targeting Earl Thomas.

 
Bankerguy, I generally agree with your assessment. An elite OG/C at 27 would be nice. I'm liking Pouncey more and more. I see the argument for a playmaking safety. DE could also be a significant issue if we lose more than 1 of Spears/Hatcher/Bowen.

I do disagree with you about Mays. I see Roy Williams Jr. there.

 
RFA instead of franch on Austin. It could save them a lot but the 1st & 3rd instead of 2 1sts may tempt someone to bid with some sort of poison pill that the Cowboys can't match.

 
Bankerguy, I generally agree with your assessment. An elite OG/C at 27 would be nice. I'm liking Pouncey more and more. I see the argument for a playmaking safety. DE could also be a significant issue if we lose more than 1 of Spears/Hatcher/Bowen.I do disagree with you about Mays. I see Roy Williams Jr. there.
To be fair, Roy Williams was the best safety I ever saw since Ronnie Lott until Roy got fat, rich, and lazy.
 
RFA instead of franch on Austin. It could save them a lot but the 1st & 3rd instead of 2 1sts may tempt someone to bid with some sort of poison pill that the Cowboys can't match.
I don't really think so. Being an uncapped year I can't imagine what kind of pill would accomplish that.Jerry has never been bashful about opening his checkbook either. I'm not sweating it.I do find it interesting that they chose to go with the 1st and 3rd tender as opposed to two 1sts.My thought for this reasoning is two-fold.1. *Less money tendered. The Cowboys have already expressed that they don't plan to spend big money in free agency.2. I think they might be doing a little fishing. A team would be more apt to consider interest with the 1st and 3rd rather than two 1sts. Point being, more and more teams are shying away from the money required to sign a top 5 pick, or even top 10. If the right team in the right draft position were to strike, it might just be worth considering. Rookie pool money is different from free agency money, and the Cowboys have already stated that their focus is more on the draft than free agency.*ETA: The tender for money for a 1st and a 3rd is $3.1 million. The tender money for two 1sts would be around $9.5 million.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bankerguy, I generally agree with your assessment. An elite OG/C at 27 would be nice. I'm liking Pouncey more and more. I see the argument for a playmaking safety. DE could also be a significant issue if we lose more than 1 of Spears/Hatcher/Bowen.
It's looking like at the very least they will be tendering Spears, Hatcher, Bowen, and Sensabaugh in addition to Austin.After that it gets murky.
 
The Cowboys are keeping a watchful eye on the Antrel Rolle (FS) situation in Arizona.

Rolle is due a $4 million roster bonus if he is on the roster March 5th, and the Cardinals want to restructure him to a new contract before then. It's possible and probably likely they will release him if they can't come to terms.

Obtaining Rolle would allow the Cowboys to release Ken Hamlin.

ETA: Rolle is scheduled for a 2010 base salary of just over $8 million.

This would count as the lone big money free agent signing the Cowboys are afforded under the Final 8 rule.

From AZCardinals.com-

– Antrel Rolle and the team have talked contract, but this close to Rolle’s magic date — he’s due that giant $4 million roster bonus next week — I expect him to be released into the open market. What that means is anyone’s guess. The Cardinals believe Rolle would like to come back, but again, it’s all relative when it comes to dollars.

One of the other problems in the Rolle situation: When you’re talking numbers with a guy, I don’t see how the Cards can want to jump him over the deal Adrian Wilson just signed last season (I wouldn’t think Adrian would be all that excited about that either). Does that automatically set a ceiling for Rolle?

http://blog.azcardinals.com/2010/02/21/two...seasons-course/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it too much to ask for us to start dominating on both sides of the ball at the line of scrimmage? That's all I ask.

 
The Broncos have assigned first-round restricted free agent tenders to Brandon Marshall and Kyle Orton.

Orton won't get much interest, but as ESPN's Adam Schefter points out, Denver has essentially extended an "invitation" for teams (mostly at the back end of the draft) to sign Marshall to an offer sheet. Should the Broncos not match, they'd receive that team's first-round pick as compensation. The club is clearly willing to move on without Marshall by opting against giving him the first- and third-round tender. The Ravens should have immediate interest, and we wouldn't rule out the Cowboys, Patriots, or Bengals making a move.

Related: Ravens, Bengals, Cowboys, Patriots

Anyone hear any news on Marshall? I doubt that the Cowboys would consider this but you never know. I see Marshall going to the Ravens for their #1 pick

 
I'd take a young sure thing over a 50/50 chance at landing the real thing. I assume adding Marshall wouldn't be overkill with too many mouths to feed but on paper that would give us enough threats to attack any defense. The downside is giving up on an OT of the future or whatever else they would draft and hope worked out. You can add solid OL in the 2nd though.

 
I'd take a young sure thing over a 50/50 chance at landing the real thing. I assume adding Marshall wouldn't be overkill with too many mouths to feed but on paper that would give us enough threats to attack any defense. The downside is giving up on an OT of the future or whatever else they would draft and hope worked out. You can add solid OL in the 2nd though.
Yeah Dallas really needs to add some OL youth
 
I would much rather give up a 3rd for Anquan Boldin than a 1st for Brandon Marshall.

That is, if the Cowboys are really even looking in such a direction.

Personally, I'm not really sold on it and question Schefter grouping the Cowboys among the others to have interest in Marshall. They already have several million tied up in RW and wish to sign Austin to a longterm contract as well.

This and the fact that they intend to get Ogletree more involved and it just doesn't compute.

Romo isn't in dire need for more targets. He needs better protection to get them the ball.

 
Boldin for a 3rd has to be a joke. What's the story why they aren't asking for MUCH more?
Big fat contract + 3rd Rd pick for BoldinNot saying it's not worth it...he's so worth it (both the 3rd and the $). But, it's not as though he comes with a soft contract in hand. Would love to see Boldin as a Cowboy, but...don't imagine it'll happen.
 
I too doubt we are interested in Boldin. We would have entirely too much cash at the WR position. They are hoping Ogletree/Hurd can step up and challenge Roy.

 
I too doubt we are interested in Boldin. We would have entirely too much cash at the WR position. They are hoping Ogletree/Hurd can step up and challenge Roy.
Entirely too much cash at WR is due to the devastating RW deal. He does not look like he will get it together anytime soon, so...Can Ogletree/Hurd challenge him? Perhaps. But, that's a very low bar we are setting, while wasting valuable time with an already-solid, playoff-ready team. An offense that featured Romo-Felix-Boldin-Austin-Witten would be ridiculous. At what cost? A 3rd and more money. The 3rd, in isolation this year, isn't really a big deal. The money is, but in what context?
 
I too doubt we are interested in Boldin. We would have entirely too much cash at the WR position. They are hoping Ogletree/Hurd can step up and challenge Roy.
Entirely too much cash at WR is due to the devastating RW deal. He does not look like he will get it together anytime soon, so...Can Ogletree/Hurd challenge him? Perhaps. But, that's a very low bar we are setting, while wasting valuable time with an already-solid, playoff-ready team. An offense that featured Romo-Felix-Boldin-Austin-Witten would be ridiculous. At what cost? A 3rd and more money. The 3rd, in isolation this year, isn't really a big deal. The money is, but in what context?
I agree to a point.The problem is that we can't keep dumping money into the position. Right now we have to roll with what we have. We have holes at or a lack of depth at other key positions such as:OLFSD LineILBThe trick is to get more out of our current group of WR's while addressing other areas on the team.Just my $0.02.
 
I have no clue about the ramifications of the uncapped year, but can't we just cut our losses by cutting Roy, then signing Bolden?

 
I have no clue about the ramifications of the uncapped year, but can't we just cut our losses by cutting Roy, then signing Bolden?
Yes. No cap imapct for cutting players this year. They still get paid any $$ contractually owed them - for example the Panthers cut Jake Delhomme but still have to pay him the $12.5M left of the guaranteed money in the contract he signed last year.
 
I have no clue about the ramifications of the uncapped year, but can't we just cut our losses by cutting Roy, then signing Bolden?
Yes. No cap imapct for cutting players this year. They still get paid any $$ contractually owed them - for example the Panthers cut Jake Delhomme but still have to pay him the $12.5M left of the guaranteed money in the contract he signed last year.
So couldn't we conceivably cut everybody and resign them to ultra cap friendly deals? Obviously you would only want to do this with players like Ware, Romo, Witten, Felix. :sharkmove:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I too doubt we are interested in Boldin. We would have entirely too much cash at the WR position. They are hoping Ogletree/Hurd can step up and challenge Roy.
Entirely too much cash at WR is due to the devastating RW deal. He does not look like he will get it together anytime soon, so...Can Ogletree/Hurd challenge him? Perhaps. But, that's a very low bar we are setting, while wasting valuable time with an already-solid, playoff-ready team. An offense that featured Romo-Felix-Boldin-Austin-Witten would be ridiculous. At what cost? A 3rd and more money. The 3rd, in isolation this year, isn't really a big deal. The money is, but in what context?
I agree to a point.The problem is that we can't keep dumping money into the position. Right now we have to roll with what we have. We have holes at or a lack of depth at other key positions such as:OLFSD LineILBThe trick is to get more out of our current group of WR's while addressing other areas on the team.Just my $0.02.
You're absolutely right Hat Trick. Romo put up huge numbers last year, breaking his own franchise records from 2007, with the current group of receivers, and you can't forget the TEs. Several of these players have room to grow (Austin, Bennett, Phillips, Ogletree). Maybe RW does improve to a degree this offseason, who knows, and Crayton is as solid a WR3 as you'll find. In any case we are just fine in this area and the positions you point out are the same ones I find on my own prescription pad.
 
I had an opportunity to speak with Randy White today. I asked him his thoughts on what positions he felt the Cowboys should address this offseason. Of course, offensive tackle was the first words out of his mouth. After that, he said cornerback. Said Newman is hurt too much and is getting old. From there he went to MLB and spoke at length about the position and Bradie James. Not a big fan. He said you need to have a dominant force there and that James just doesn't provide enough. He even got a little animated about it.

 
Andy Herron said:
I had an opportunity to speak with Randy White today. I asked him his thoughts on what positions he felt the Cowboys should address this offseason. Of course, offensive tackle was the first words out of his mouth. After that, he said cornerback. Said Newman is hurt too much and is getting old. From there he went to MLB and spoke at length about the position and Bradie James. Not a big fan. He said you need to have a dominant force there and that James just doesn't provide enough. He even got a little animated about it.
I like James a lot, but he is pretty slow and doesn't have good lateral movement. I still have yet to figure out why on Gods green Earth we traded Anthony Henry away for Kitna. I have posted this thought several times. I am just astonished on why nobody thought that was a colossally poor decision. Safety is even a bigger concern. I would rather have Roy Williams back there still. The guys we have back there can't cover either, at least Williams would stick somebody from time to time, something none of them are even capable of doing. I think Oline is a concern, however, I blame the coaching staff for what happened in the playoff game.The coaching staff is great if what they have game planed works. If it doesn't work, there seems to be absolutely zero ability to make changes during a game. There are never any halftime adjustments.
 
I saw Dallas signed WR Titus Ryan in January. He sounds like strictly a return man. This could relieve Felix from return duties which would not bother me one bit. We need Felix to put 100% into the RB position.

 
Andy Herron said:
I had an opportunity to speak with Randy White today. I asked him his thoughts on what positions he felt the Cowboys should address this offseason. Of course, offensive tackle was the first words out of his mouth. After that, he said cornerback. Said Newman is hurt too much and is getting old. From there he went to MLB and spoke at length about the position and Bradie James. Not a big fan. He said you need to have a dominant force there and that James just doesn't provide enough. He even got a little animated about it.
I like James a lot, but he is pretty slow and doesn't have good lateral movement. I still have yet to figure out why on Gods green Earth we traded Anthony Henry away for Kitna. I have posted this thought several times. I am just astonished on why nobody thought that was a colossally poor decision.

Safety is even a bigger concern. I would rather have Roy Williams back there still. The guys we have back there can't cover either, at least Williams would stick somebody from time to time, something none of them are even capable of doing.

I think Oline is a concern, however, I blame the coaching staff for what happened in the playoff game.

The coaching staff is great if what they have game planed works. If it doesn't work, there seems to be absolutely zero ability to make changes during a game. There are never any halftime adjustments.
You have to be drunk there is no way you could possibly think this. Dallas had enjoyed the best safety play since Woodson this past year. Granted they werent dominant but they made it where you didnt hear their name which is a good thing. I think Hamlin is overrated but he is still mediocre all things considered. Roy Williams is garbage do you remember when the bengals lost to the broncos on a fluke play? Yea it was your man Roy letting someone get behind him and score the hail mary td, pathetic. Im so glad he is gone.
 
Andy Herron said:
I had an opportunity to speak with Randy White today. I asked him his thoughts on what positions he felt the Cowboys should address this offseason. Of course, offensive tackle was the first words out of his mouth. After that, he said cornerback. Said Newman is hurt too much and is getting old. From there he went to MLB and spoke at length about the position and Bradie James. Not a big fan. He said you need to have a dominant force there and that James just doesn't provide enough. He even got a little animated about it.
Gotta love the Manster. I totally agree about James. I have never been a fan and I believe he is one most over rated Cowboys ever. He is absolutely brutal in coverage. Just watch any of the Giants game from last year. They know it and constantly throw short and over the middle.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Herron said:
I had an opportunity to speak with Randy White today. I asked him his thoughts on what positions he felt the Cowboys should address this offseason. Of course, offensive tackle was the first words out of his mouth. After that, he said cornerback. Said Newman is hurt too much and is getting old. From there he went to MLB and spoke at length about the position and Bradie James. Not a big fan. He said you need to have a dominant force there and that James just doesn't provide enough. He even got a little animated about it.
I like James a lot, but he is pretty slow and doesn't have good lateral movement. I still have yet to figure out why on Gods green Earth we traded Anthony Henry away for Kitna. I have posted this thought several times. I am just astonished on why nobody thought that was a colossally poor decision. Safety is even a bigger concern. I would rather have Roy Williams back there still. The guys we have back there can't cover either, at least Williams would stick somebody from time to time, something none of them are even capable of doing.
The Anthony Henry trade for Kitna had a few different angles. For one, Henry was going into the final year of his contract that carried an astronomical cap number. His age was another factor. They wanted to get younger in the secondary altogether. As for Kitna, it was two-fold. They obviously needed an upgrade over Brad Johnson, and bringing Kitna in also afforded them to gain further familiarity with the then newly acquired Roy Williams as to helping build some chemistry between Williams and Romo. Not that it ever came to fruition, but I think that that was their intentions.As for the safety position, the Cowboys aren't getting the turnover production from that position that they desire. I think they only got one or two INTs from that spot all of last season. Not good enough. They obviously like Sensabaugh, but are looking to replace Ken Hamlin one way or another. Right now Alan Ball and Mike Hamlin are the leading candidates, but they may do some shopping here. Right now Earl Thomas is all the buzz, but they would probably have to move up to get him. I wouldn't rule out a free agent signing here either.
 
Andy Herron said:
I had an opportunity to speak with Randy White today. I asked him his thoughts on what positions he felt the Cowboys should address this offseason. Of course, offensive tackle was the first words out of his mouth. After that, he said cornerback. Said Newman is hurt too much and is getting old. From there he went to MLB and spoke at length about the position and Bradie James. Not a big fan. He said you need to have a dominant force there and that James just doesn't provide enough. He even got a little animated about it.
Gotta love the Manster. I totally agree about James. I have never been a fan and I believe he is one most over rated Cowboys ever. He is absolutely brutal in coverage.
Ya, I agree too. And you're right, he is way overrated.I'll probably see Randy again this week. Any suggestions as to what else I might ask?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One possible scenario to watch that might play out (with my own take and speculation).

-Gerald Sensabaugh has 3 visits scheduled and we could very well lose him.

-We all already know that Hamlin has to go.

-If we lost Hamlin and Sensabaugh here is what would happen (imo)

1) We get a 2nd round pick for the loss of Sensabaugh based on his tender)

2) We sign ballhawk OJ Atogwe for nothing.

3) We target Earl Thomas in the draft. I believe we would have to use that extra second to move up the few spots to get him.

Newman/Atogwe/Thomas/Jenkins :shock:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Herron said:
I had an opportunity to speak with Randy White today. I asked him his thoughts on what positions he felt the Cowboys should address this offseason. Of course, offensive tackle was the first words out of his mouth. After that, he said cornerback. Said Newman is hurt too much and is getting old. From there he went to MLB and spoke at length about the position and Bradie James. Not a big fan. He said you need to have a dominant force there and that James just doesn't provide enough. He even got a little animated about it.
Gotta love the Manster. I totally agree about James. I have never been a fan and I believe he is one most over rated Cowboys ever. He is absolutely brutal in coverage.
Ya, I agree too. And you're right, he is way overrated.I'll probably see Randy again this week. Any suggestions as to what else I might ask?
Um yeah...I got tons of stuff. Although here is what I'd like to know:-His thoughts on Spencer. What his ceiling is.-I would like to know what he thinks of each of our O-line. Who is the weakest link. Thoughts on Free.-Could you ask him to give Roy Williams a shot in the mouth from me? TIA.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One possible scenario to watch that might play out (with my own take and speculation).-Gerald Sensabaugh has 3 visits scheduled and we could very well lose him. -We all already know that Hamlin has to go. -If we lost Hamlin and Sensabaugh here is what would happen (imo)1) We get a 2nd round pick for the loss of Sensabaugh based on his tender)2) We sign ballhawk OJ Atogwe for nothing.3) We target Earl Thomas in the draft. I believe we would have to use that extra second to move up the few spots to get him.Newman/Atogwe/Thomas/Jenkins :popcorn:
I like it.Keep in mind that if we lose a free agent in such a manner (Sensabaugh in this scenario), it allows the Cowboys to sign a FA to an identical contract that Sensabaugh would sign. To add, the "Final Eight Rule" does not apply here. With that in mind, the Cowboys would only let somebody get signed away if they had a capable backup plan in place.
 
Andy Herron said:
I had an opportunity to speak with Randy White today. I asked him his thoughts on what positions he felt the Cowboys should address this offseason. Of course, offensive tackle was the first words out of his mouth. After that, he said cornerback. Said Newman is hurt too much and is getting old. From there he went to MLB and spoke at length about the position and Bradie James. Not a big fan. He said you need to have a dominant force there and that James just doesn't provide enough. He even got a little animated about it.
Gotta love the Manster. I totally agree about James. I have never been a fan and I believe he is one most over rated Cowboys ever. He is absolutely brutal in coverage.
Ya, I agree too. And you're right, he is way overrated.I'll probably see Randy again this week. Any suggestions as to what else I might ask?
Um yeah...I got tons of stuff. Although here is what I'd like to know:-His thoughts on Spencer. What his ceiling is.-I would like to know what he thinks of each of our O-line. Who is the weakest link. Thoughts on Free.-Could you ask him to give Roy Williams a shot in the mouth from me? TIA.
Good stuff. Thanks.I think I'll go with some of that.
 
Found this...some good points by Dr Vela.

Blogging the Boys

By Rafael Vela

Study this passage from a Seattle Times story on WR Brandon Marshall, who visited the team today:

As for whether Marshall will be staying in Seattle, expect this to be the first step in a what could be a longer process... Do not expect the sides to negotiate or sign an offer sheet because that would offer no room for negotiation in the compensation the Broncos would receive.

Now, look at this passage from the Baltimore Sun on the Ravens need to recoup draft picks:

The lower-than-expected tenders to three restricted free agents (Clayton, offensive tackle Jared Gaither and quarterback Troy Smith) seem like the Ravens are enticing teams to make them offers for these players.

Finally, a passage from the Miami Herald:

Another restricted free agent safety is Indy's Antoine Bethea. The guy was a Pro Bowl player, if you recall. The draft pick compensation on him is substantial -- a first round pick. But one would supposed the team could always work a trade with the Colts rather than give up the first-round selection. (Maybe a second-rounder?)

Three beat writers making the same general claim, which appear to confirm a point I raised yesterday. The tenders placed on players are not absolute unless the player signs an offer sheet which is not matched. The tenders appear to represent starting points in negotiations. Lots of people have wondered why the Seahawks would entertain signing Brandon Marshall to an offer sheet, when doing so would mean forfeiting the 6th overall pick in the draft. The linked passage suggests why -- Seattle has no intention of surrendering that pick for Marshall.

The Seahawks may have to give up their early 2nd rounder or the Broncos may insist on the second 1st-round pick the Seahawks possess -- it was originally Denver's pick and they may enjoy getting it back. If a deal comes off the compensation for Marshall will be negotiated. One can assume that Seattle would then get permission to negotiate a long-term deal with Marshall, He would then sign that contract with the Broncos, and he and that contract would then be dealt to the Seahawks for the agreed upon pick(s).

This scenario is likely to be played out more and more once the big name free agents settle, and many of them have already found new addresses, or re-signed with the old teams.

When you read the stories on Gerald Sensabaugh and wonder if a team would give up a 2nd for him, temper that enthusiasm. Plenty of teams may want him -- if the Cowboys are willing to deal him for a lower price.

The same is likely true for every young tendered RFA who looks to have a future. The biggest question will be what the "real" compensation should be?

The NFL has taken a major step towards NBA-dom. If this produces more trades, the uncapped system could produce more fan interest.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Found this...some good points by Dr Vela.

Blogging the Boys

By Rafael Vela

Study this passage from a Seattle Times story on WR Brandon Marshall, who visited the team today:

As for whether Marshall will be staying in Seattle, expect this to be the first step in a what could be a longer process... Do not expect the sides to negotiate or sign an offer sheet because that would offer no room for negotiation in the compensation the Broncos would receive.

Now, look at this passage from the Baltimore Sun on the Ravens need to recoup draft picks:

The lower-than-expected tenders to three restricted free agents (Clayton, offensive tackle Jared Gaither and quarterback Troy Smith) seem like the Ravens are enticing teams to make them offers for these players.

Finally, a passage from the Miami Herald:

Another restricted free agent safety is Indy's Antoine Bethea. The guy was a Pro Bowl player, if you recall. The draft pick compensation on him is substantial -- a first round pick. But one would supposed the team could always work a trade with the Colts rather than give up the first-round selection. (Maybe a second-rounder?)

Three beat writers making the same general claim, which appear to confirm a point I raised yesterday. The tenders placed on players are not absolute unless the player signs an offer sheet which is not matched. The tenders appear to represent starting points in negotiations. Lots of people have wondered why the Seahawks would entertain signing Brandon Marshall to an offer sheet, when doing so would mean forfeiting the 6th overall pick in the draft. The linked passage suggests why -- Seattle has no intention of surrendering that pick for Marshall.

The Seahawks may have to give up their early 2nd rounder or the Broncos may insist on the second 1st-round pick the Seahawks possess -- it was originally Denver's pick and they may enjoy getting it back. If a deal comes off the compensation for Marshall will be negotiated. One can assume that Seattle would then get permission to negotiate a long-term deal with Marshall, He would then sign that contract with the Broncos, and he and that contract would then be dealt to the Seahawks for the agreed upon pick(s).

This scenario is likely to be played out more and more once the big name free agents settle, and many of them have already found new addresses, or re-signed with the old teams.

When you read the stories on Gerald Sensabaugh and wonder if a team would give up a 2nd for him, temper that enthusiasm. Plenty of teams may want him -- if the Cowboys are willing to deal him for a lower price.

The same is likely true for every young tendered RFA who looks to have a future. The biggest question will be what the "real" compensation should be?

The NFL has taken a major step towards NBA-dom. If this produces more trades, the uncapped system could produce more fan interest.
Good find. This is just the kind of thing I was pointing out in post #66, point #2.
 
My $.02

1. WR- I dont think WR is a need position at all. Miles Austin, Patrick Crayton, Kevin Ogletree, Sam Hurd, Roy Williams. Five starting WR right there, in no particular order. I love Austin and Crayton, Ogletree has real potential, Hurd was an up and comer just a season ago and Roy Williams, is well, Roy Williams.

2. OL- no question this is the biggest concern. Can the Cowboys cut Flozell this season without huge ramifications? I wouldn't mind seeing them go into the preseason with the two guys they have at T and grab a 1st rounder to learn behind them.

3. Safety- huge need as well. I am not as down on Hamlin/Sensabugh as a lot of others I guess. I think they did ok last year. Some blown coverages here and there but overall I think they are B- type guys. Whoever said they wanted Roy Williams back is out of their mind or has a really short memory. That guy was brutal. I do love Thomas, especially since I am a Longhorn fan and I totally agree about Mays, not a guy that I want in coverage.

I also read that someone said the Cowboys cant win a superbowl with Romo. Really? I totally disagree. Everyone wants to pin everything on Romo when they lose and give him NONE of the credit when they win. Doesnt help that Jason Garrett has no idea how to change up the game plan when what he is doing isnt working. Not to mention the offensive line was getting beat like a dog and Romo had no time to do anything. No one could have been successful under those conditions.

 
And...I would like to see a big time kicker for the Cowboys. When was the last time the Cowboys had a clutch kicker? Shane Graham is no longer clutch in my opinion.

Folk signed elsewhere I believe... would have liked to see if he could get back to form.

 
And...

Huge props to Andy, Bankerguy and Ridgelake. Three of the best posters here and I generally come here to read your posts specifically. I dont always agree with you guys but I always respect your opinions and the work you do here for free!

Thanks guys!

 
And...Huge props to Andy, Bankerguy and Ridgelake. Three of the best posters here and I generally come here to read your posts specifically. I dont always agree with you guys but I always respect your opinions and the work you do here for free! Thanks guys!
Thank you! I appreciate the kudos and most certainly share them with Bankerguy/Hat Trick as well as Ridgelake and anybody else that can contribute.I, for one, and I know I've mentioned this before, but I have a great degree of passion for the Cowboys. I grew up playing sports with football being the most predominant by far (as a WR and CB) and didn't move here from Ohio just to see how flat Texas was.I don't have the same amount of resources that I had a couple of years ago, but I do have a few of them still lingering. I take great pride in offering whatever information and insight I can provide, and it's good to get the kind of feedback that you have provided here. I know that at times I post with too much heart, but where else can I express my true feelings about a team I absolutely love? I wear my emotions on my sleeve, but as long as that sleeve is reminiscent of a Cowboys jersey, I'm o.k. with it. Again, as I've said before, I will never mislead Cowboys fans as I see it. That's the best I can do. I'm as honest a person as you'll ever find. I know that in last year's offseason thread several questioned me when I said that the Cowboys would be BETTER without T.O. and others along with the infusion of younger talent. The so-called experts ranked them to finish 3rd in the division. I never promised a Super Bowl, but I did promise they would be better. We all know how that played out, don't we? :lmao: Andy
 
And...Huge props to Andy, Bankerguy and Ridgelake. Three of the best posters here and I generally come here to read your posts specifically. I dont always agree with you guys but I always respect your opinions and the work you do here for free! Thanks guys!
Yup, both of those other posters are fantastic. Andy as mentioned for his passion and Ridge for his common sense and ability to balance being a fan and being objective. He is my personal fav...hands down.I wish I was able to post as much as I have in the past. However, with a new job and limited compuer access my contributions are limited to weekends and the odd evenings. I do try to check in daily but honestly sometimes I don't have much time to post. It's nice to be respected as a knowledgable Cowboys fan especially since I am Canadian and never set foot in the state of Texas (YET). I'm glad that hasn't affected your opinion of me-as it has with some others. I've been told that I can't possible know as much as someone who is from Texas. I say balls. The internet has been a great equalizer for the distance and as my wife would agree...I have spent entirely too much time reading and watching everything I can on Cowboys. I grew up on Football and the Cowboys. My father was a Lions fan (poor *******-RIP Dad) but I'll never forget the first game I ever watched on TV as a young boy. That game was "The Catch". It was the first time I felt the sting and disapointment of a loss when cheering for a team. On the other hand the first Superbowl was an incredible feeling and it the subsequent 2 were great, but not like that first one. Dallas is in an interesting spot. There looks like there is a window of time where it looks like this team could win it's 6th Superbowl and I am eagerly awaiting the draft and coming year. This tean is CLOSE.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top