What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

"Official" Donald Trump for President: Great Wall of Mexico (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
BustedKnuckles said:
technically he already has 2 of the 3 and is now working on the 3rd 
Click to expand...
We were talking about him as president and his foreign policy. His money is meaningless as president. He'd still have the hot babe but he'd have to work on the rest.

eta - ie he's supposed to be making US wealthier and more powerful.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Donald on Fox this morning: Chris Wallace informed him that NATO nations had lost 1000 soldiers fighting with us against AQ, the Taliban and terrorism in Afghanistan.

He refused to acknowledge it.

 
The General said:
That should be pretty black and white. What is his argument?
Click to expand...
That NATO has no role in fighting terrorism. He says that with no foundation and he just ignores the facts. NATO also has a counter terrorism task force in Europe which actively coordinates intelligence gathering and police/military response. It's a total lie or just plain ignorance.

 
The General said:
That should be pretty black and white. What is his argument?
Click to expand...
A) We don't know that, we don't know that, that's not a fact.  Have we seen their birth certificates?

B)  Well, I just know what's on the internet

C) That's not a lot, really.  I mean,  come on now.  In the big scheme of....listen, I have a nice brain for these things, if I was there, I mean, listen....I have friends in these countries, top people, like you wouldn't believe.  And they tell me, we're talking about some of the best minds there, important people--I won't tell you who--and they say those numbers, well, let me say, I have questions about these numbers, OK?  OK?  Do I have to spell it out?  It should seem pretty obvious, at least it is to me, but I don't know, I usually can see things before other people, I've been that way since forever.  

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
That NATO has no role in fighting terrorism. He says that with no foundation and he just ignores the facts. NATO also has a counter terrorism task force in Europe which actively coordinates intelligence gathering and police/military response. It's a total lie or just plain ignorance.
Click to expand...
That's pretty bad by Donald standards. 

 
massraider said:
A) We don't know that, we don't know that, that's not a fact.  Have we seen their birth certificates?

B)  Well, I just know what's on the internet

C) That's not a lot, really.  I mean,  come on now.  In the big scheme of....listen, I have a nice brain for these things, if I was there, I mean, listen....I have friends in these countries, top people, like you wouldn't believe.  And they tell me, we're talking about some of the best minds there, important people--I won't tell you who--and they say those numbers, well, let me say, I have questions about these numbers, OK?  OK?  Do I have to spell it out?  It should seem pretty obvious, at least it is to me, but I don't know, I usually can see things before other people, I've been that way since forever.  
Click to expand...
I actually believe that any of these could be what he said word for word as a response.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Donald on Fox this morning: Chris Wallace informed him that NATO nations had lost 1000 soldiers fighting with us against AQ, the Taliban and terrorism in Afghanistan.

He refused to acknowledge it.
Click to expand...
Chris should have shown him a website with the information.

 
Trump fans probably should get in here and fill up the page with a bunch of random links.

The draft dodger not acknowledging deaths on the battle field to make some bizarre point is pretty scummy even by Trump standards.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Donald on Fox this morning: Chris Wallace informed him that NATO nations had lost 1000 soldiers fighting with us against AQ, the Taliban and terrorism in Afghanistan.

He refused to acknowledge it.
Click to expand...
It wouldn't matter if NATO had 10000000 soldiers fighting terrorism. It's unnecessary because Trump alone can defeat them. 

 
Ilov80s said:
They have pissed away what could have been a slam dunk. If it played like a more traditional primary, I think we would see Rubio on the victory lap with favorability numbers at least at what Romney had last election if not closer to McCain. 
Click to expand...
The CIA term for this is 'blowback'. The GOP courted the dim-witted vote for decades and are now paying the price.

 
The General said:
Trump fans probably should get in here and fill up the page with a bunch of random links.

The draft dodger not acknowledging deaths on the battle field to make some bizarre point is pretty scummy even by Trump standards.
Click to expand...
Don't worry...I'm sure dfsguy will be on the case later.  :lol:  

 
Kasich on This Week completely dodging abortion questions.  Won't even answer if Doctors should be punished.  Played the tough guy role with George - "Look, I've said what I have to say.  next question".  This guy is more of a skirt that some of the Lefties in here.

 
Higgs said:
Kasich on This Week completely dodging abortion questions.  Won't even answer if Doctors should be punished.  Played the tough guy role with George - "Look, I've said what I have to say.  next question".  This guy is more of a skirt that some of the Lefties in here.
Click to expand...
So Trump is just not being a skirt when he answers questions with ridiculous answers? It's not that he's uniformed, unprepared, ignorant on the issue, etc. 

 
Higgs said:
Kasich on This Week completely dodging abortion questions.  Won't even answer if Doctors should be punished.  Played the tough guy role with George - "Look, I've said what I have to say.  next question".  This guy is more of a skirt that some of the Lefties in here.
Click to expand...
I liked when Trump as asked if he had been in a relationship with someone that had an abortion in his swinging single days, and he said, 'that's an interesitng question.  Next question.'

That's about as much of a yes as you can get.  That's almost more of a yes than a 'yes'.

Ask your daughter if she has had sex with her boyfriend.  If she said, 'that's an interesting question.  Next question.'---would you feel good about that answer?

 
Higgs said:
Kasich on This Week completely dodging abortion questions.  Won't even answer if Doctors should be punished.  Played the tough guy role with George - "Look, I've said what I have to say.  next question".  This guy is more of a skirt that some of the Lefties in here.
Click to expand...
Your vitriol towards Kasich is really kind of strange.  

ETA - Since swc is mia, I'll kindly ask you to take that to the bank, bromigo.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Higgs said:
Can you expound?  I'm genuinely interested.  If abortion is illegal, and is murder, then a woman who has an abortion shouldn't be punished?  How does that make any sense?
Click to expand...
Sub question:

How do you have any idea which ridiculous answer The General is referring to?  He has several answer on abortions.  If you include backtracks, I think we're right a baker's dozen.

 
massraider said:
I liked when Trump as asked if he had been in a relationship with someone that had an abortion in his swinging single days, and he said, 'that's an interesitng question.  Next question.'

That's about as much of a yes as you can get.  That's almost more of a yes than a 'yes'.

Ask your daughter if she has had sex with her boyfriend.  If she said, 'that's an interesting question.  Next question.'---would you feel good about that answer?
Click to expand...
:lmao:  You're funny.  The guy has given more interviews, answered more questions, and been more transparent than any candidate in history.  By far.  I don't blame him one bit for clamming up after the silly "controversy" this week.

 
Captain Cranks said:
Your vitriol towards Kasich is really kind of strange.  
Click to expand...
Not at all.  I'm a fair guy.  I really liked the hug moment he had with that unstable supporter at the rally a couple months ago.  That was nice.  And I do like the guy's experience and his fiscal policies.  But he's annoying as all get up in interviews.

 
Higgs said:
:lmao:  You're funny.  The guy has given more interviews, answered more questions, and been more transparent than any candidate in history.  By far.  I don't blame him one bit for clamming up after the silly "controversy" this week.
Click to expand...
He hasn't chosen to clam up, and he will continue to talk.  He has chosen to clam up on that particular subject.  I wonder why that is.

Actually, I can't believe that there hasn't already been a woman coming forward, talking about how she had an abortion, an amazing abortion, the best abortion anyone has ever seen.  

 
massraider said:
He hasn't chosen to clam up, and he will continue to talk.  He has chosen to clam up on that particular subject.  I wonder why that is.

Actually, I can't believe that there hasn't already been a woman coming forward, talking about how she had an abortion, an amazing abortion, the best abortion anyone has ever seen.  
Click to expand...
So can you provide a logical answer to my specific question I posed to General?  I'll wait...

 
Cling-on Trump supporters just look like abused spouses at this point.  It's really kind of sad that you keep trying to substantiate this guy's beatings.  

 
Captain Cranks said:
Cling-on Trump supporters just look like abused spouses at this point.  It's really kind of sad that you keep trying to substantiate this guy's beatings.  
Click to expand...
You too are welcome to loosen up your skirt and give me a good reason why Trump's answer on abortion was ridiculous.  You know, other than because the media told you so.

 
Higgs said:
So can you provide a logical answer to my specific question I posed to General?  I'll wait...
Click to expand...
Really, how do you get from my statement, to answering some weird hypothetical to The General, when you weren't even sure that was what he was referring to?

Can you explain that?  I'll wait.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Donald on Fox this morning: Chris Wallace informed him that NATO nations had lost 1000 soldiers fighting with us against AQ, the Taliban and terrorism in Afghanistan.

He refused to acknowledge it.
Click to expand...
It wouldn't matter if NATO had 10000000 soldiers fighting terrorism. It's unnecessary because Trump alone can defeat them. 

 
Higgs said:
You too are welcome to loosen up your skirt and give me a good reason why Trump's answer on abortion was ridiculous.  You know, other than because the media told you so.
Click to expand...
Cute.  

Well, I'm pro-choice, so it's going to be a bit tough for me to defend the conservative opinion on abortion, but I'll give it a shot.  The pro-life movement considers the woman to be turning to abortion doctors in desperation.  Therefore, they're considered to be suffering and already being punished with shame and guilt.  The compassionate pro-lifer doesn't want to double down with legal punishment too.  It's the doctors, or the provider of the services that should be punished.  At least that's my understanding of it.  

I can tell you that there are a couple of women in my life who have had abortions and it's something they struggle with even years later.  

 
massraider said:
Really, how do you get from my statement, to answering some weird hypothetical to The General, when you weren't even sure that was what he was referring to?

Can you explain that?  I'll wait.
Click to expand...
I asked him a very specific question.  I'll ask it again.  If abortion is illegal, and is murder, then a woman who has an abortion shouldn't be punished?  How does that make any sense?

Since I posed the question it's been crickets in here.

 
Higgs said:
I asked him a very specific question.  I'll ask it again.  If abortion is illegal, and is murder, then a woman who has an abortion shouldn't be punished?  How does that make any sense?

Since I posed the question it's been crickets in here.
Click to expand...
Do you think drug users should be punished? 

 
Higgs said:
I asked him a very specific question.  I'll ask it again.  If abortion is illegal, and is murder, then a woman who has an abortion shouldn't be punished?  How does that make any sense?

Since I posed the question it's been crickets in here.
Click to expand...
Who gives a ####?  We stop the thread until someone answers this one question you want answered??  When no one suggested the opposite?  

Why don't you just skip ahead?  Assume someone gives you the answer you want, and you can launch into your opinion.  Save yourself a click or two.  

By the way, since Trump has since walked back that answer, you should ask Trump that same question.

 
Freaking head of the GOP is on CNN right now saying 'Of course we don't want to prosecute women for abortions'.

But you want to have a debate about it?  Yeesh.

 
Captain Cranks said:
Cute.  

Well, I'm pro-choice, so it's going to be a bit tough for me to defend the conservative opinion on abortion, but I'll give it a shot.  The pro-life movement considers the woman to be turning to abortion doctors in desperation.  Therefore, they're considered to be suffering and already being punished with shame and guilt.  The compassionate pro-lifer doesn't want to double down with legal punishment too.  It's the doctors, or the provider of the services that should be punished.  At least that's my understanding of it.  

I can tell you that there are a couple of women in my life who have had abortions and it's something they struggle with even years later.  
Click to expand...
Well I commend you for at least being brave enough to give an answer.  Now as to that answer...

It's complete and utter nonsense.  You want to absolve women of any responsibility for murdering an innocent human because of the guilt and suffering they'd likely experience?  Yeah, nothing ridiculous with that position.  :lmao:

 
massraider said:
Who gives a ####?  We stop the thread until someone answers this one question you want answered??  When no one suggested the opposite?  

Why don't you just skip ahead?  Assume someone gives you the answer you want, and you can launch into your opinion.  Save yourself a click or two.  

By the way, since Trump has since walked back that answer, you should ask Trump that same question.
Click to expand...
Exactly.  You're a coward.  Good look on you.   :thumbup:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Ministry of Pain
For those starting a Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program with family or friends
Replies
11
Views
505
Hoh
H
B Maverick
Router Suggestions
Replies
4
Views
172
gianmarco
gianmarco
Todem
Official Rush “Fifty Something Tour” Thread
2
Replies
93
Views
2K
Ghost Rider
Ghost Rider

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top