JerseyToughGuys
Tough Guy
Ya, that's exactly the same thing." I could have gone to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and killed the real bird with one stone"
John Kerry - our nation's chief diplomat
Ya, that's exactly the same thing." I could have gone to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and killed the real bird with one stone"
John Kerry - our nation's chief diplomat
https://twitter.com/zackbeauchamp/status/763091715947388929
Video of Trump suggesting someone shoot Hillary before she can choose judges, as is the right of a president.
Actually, what you mean is that you "couldn't care less".It's autocorrect, I damn well know that. I'm on an Internet message board where I get quoted more than anymore poster here.
I respond quick. I could care less about grammar, I'm not writing a paper. I'm responding to the 10+ quotes I get every 10 minutes.
Gonna be a rough" I could have gone to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and killed the real bird with one stone"
John Kerry - our nation's chief diplomat
He's a hard-boiled detective who doesn't play by the rules... but he gets results.Who is McGarnicle
Stupid thing to say. Definitely not voting for him now.http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/08/08/will-smith-hopes-america-can-cleanse-trump-supporters/amp/
Will Smith, in typical hypocritical and intolerant liberal fashion, calls for a cleansing in America.
He would make Hitler and the KKK proud.
John Harwood So will they interview Trump on this? They sure as hell would if you or I tweeted that, right?
The constitution was purposefully designed to be messed with.You don't mess with the constitution.
Let me rephrase. McGarnicle and OPM have been MIA for a while now. In what form are they currently posting? This Soootch character and the dude with the shoes as his avatar feel strangely familiar.McGarnicle has been using that name for quite a while. If it is an alias, it's a well established one.
Who even remembers Trump accusing Clinton of getting that Iranian scientist killed or that his wife is a plagiarizing illegal immigrant?How can we get this NAMBLA stuff out of the news...oh, I know, Ill just basically call for supporters to shoot either judges or Hillary.
Yeah...that will work.
How can we get this NAMBLA stuff out of the news...oh, I know, Ill just basically call for supporters to shoot either judges or Hillary.
Yeah...that will work.
Who even remembers Trump accusing Clinton of getting that Iranian scientist killed or that his wife is a plagiarizing illegal immigrant?
It was the top story at 6PMHow does FoxNews not even cover his crazy statements? Nothing on their site. Amazing.
For all of us unless Gary Johnson can pull off a miracleGonna be a roughthree monthseight years for you, guy...
The bed of nails defense.Or his admiration of Putin and other links to Russian businesses.
Or claiming Hillary Clinton invented ISIS.
Or didn't know anything about David Duke.
So, Rove!, want to take a stab at explaining away what your man Trump just said?For all of us unless Gary Johnson can pull off a miracle
He made an unforgivable joke in the spirit of John Kerry and what Hillary not so jokingly suggested in 2008 with respect to the California primary and Robert Kennedy.So, Rove!, want to take a stab at explaining away what your man Trump just said?
Trump voter: "I like Trump because he says exactly what he means."
Trump: 'Somebody shoot my opponent'
...
Trump voter: 'He didn't mean that'
pretty muchHey, you just quoted Rove! before he even postedTrump voter: "I like Trump because he says exactly what he means."
Trump: 'Somebody shoot my opponent'
...
Trump voter: 'He didn't mean that'
'd up thing that I think I just read that Trump which is so vile it would result in any normal human being locked up for 10 years actually happen?But Trump's campaign denied that he was suggesting violence, instead saying the real estate mogul was referencing the power gun rights advocates have at the voting booth.
Kind of funny how you're riffing on the fact that Trump says EXACTLY what he means and then you post something he didn't EXACTLY (or actually) say.Trump voter: "I like Trump because he says exactly what he means."
Trump: 'Somebody shoot my opponent'
...
Trump voter: 'He didn't mean that'
QUESTIONER: With regard to the October surprise, what would be your forecast on that given what Julian Assange has intimated he's going to do?
ROGER STONE: Well, it could be any number of things. I actually have communicated with Assange. I believe the next tranche of his documents pertain to the Clinton Foundation but there's no telling what the October surprise may be.
In Stone's defense, most of the things he says are lies.I have to hand it to Trump and the Trumpettes, I'm linking to Media Matters but yep sure enough it's live video so it counts:
https://mediamatters.org/video/2016/08/09/roger-stone-confirms-hes-communication-julian-assange/212261
This is pretty much bordering on if not stepping in being a principle to a crime.
How so? Bill Maher did an interview with Assange. Jill Stein had Assange address the Green Party convention....I have to hand it to Trump and the Trumpettes, I'm linking to Media Matters but yep sure enough it's live video so it counts:
https://mediamatters.org/video/2016/08/09/roger-stone-confirms-hes-communication-julian-assange/212261
This is pretty much bordering on if not stepping in being a principle to a crime.
The Democrats should tell her to stop " helping"
I was going for funny, thanks!Kind of funny how you're riffing on the fact that Trump says EXACTLY what he means and then you post something he didn't EXACTLY (or actually) say.
Well now who's just making #### up?
agree...and the Rs have it coming if they don't disavow him (which they should have done a long time ago).It's too late. He's done. There will be a growing wave of endorsement retractions. Saw something earlier that 54 GOP house districts are currently in play. This is the whole shooting match in the next 48 hours. Presidency, house, senate all going dem if Ryan doesn't get his head out of his ### and disassociate from the top of the ticket today.
Actually accuracy lies in the eye of the beholder, or maybe the ear and brains of the beholder in this case. Even the crusty old guy in red in the background when he said was like "oh god, he didn't just say that"Funny, yes. Accurate...not so much.
Has anyone disavowed Hillary for inviting a Taliban supporter and father of a radical Islamic terrorist to sit in the VIP section of her speech last night?agree...and the Rs have it coming if they don't disavow him (which they should have done a long time ago).
Don't you find it the least bit hypocritical that HRC supporters (that would be you) who will infer absolutely ZERO about HRC herself despite the presence of blinding smoke, will go ahead and infer all kinds of stuff about everyone else?Actually accuracy lies in the eye of the beholder, or maybe the ear and brains of the beholder in this case. Even the crusty old guy in red in the background when he said was like "oh god, he didn't just say that"
That you are positing that the inference of most that he meant it as someone shoot HRC (as a joke or not) is a made up thing is not at all accurate.
What in the actual fsck are you talking about?Don't you find it the least bit hypocritical that HRC supporters (that would be you) who will infer absolutely ZERO about HRC herself despite the presence of blinding smoke, will go ahead and infer all kinds of stuff about everyone else?
Don't you find it the least bit hypocritical that HRC supporters (that would be you) who will infer absolutely ZERO about HRC herself despite the presence of blinding smoke, will go ahead and infer all kinds of stuff about everyone else?
He wasn't invited.Has anyone disavowed Hillary for inviting a Taliban supporter and father of a radical Islamic terrorist to sit in the VIP section of her speech last night?
Didn't think so. How do you spell liberal? H y p o c r i t e.
Please, not until we get at least one debate. Just one is all I ask. He can quit after that.This is really stretching the definition of "inference". It's blatantly obvious what he meant by that. The only thing worth debating now is whether this should force him out of the race. I don't think it will, but it should.
I agree, that was for arguments sake.. Point is, most took it in the context as a thinly veiled threat at HRCThis is really stretching the definition of "inference". It's blatantly obvious what he meant by that. The only thing worth debating now is whether this should force him out of the race. I don't think it will, but it should.