What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (4 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You sure you want to go there? The pear shaped loser guarantees all kinds of bs that spews out of her mouth and NONE of it will come to fruition.

Here we go: “I will rewrite the tax code so it rewards hard work and investments here at home, not quick trades or stashing profits overseas.” TOTAL BS, won't even touch it.

“We will unleash a new generation of entrepreneurs and small business owners by providing tax relief, cutting red tape and making it easier to get a small-business loan.” NEVER GONNA HAPPEN. In fact she won't even remember saying that one.

“I will give new incentives to companies that give their employees a fair share of the profits their hard work earns.” ABSOLUTE CLASSIC. Anyone even remotely believing this BS needs to get their head examined.

I could go on all day.


 
Rankstr@rankstr 3m3 minutes ago
ABCNews: Trump Walks Back Tax Plan, Saying 'I'm Allowed to Change'... #2016 #DonaldTrump http://rankstr.com/item/10316472/tw …


Trump has rejected his own tax plan.

 
The last Dem to win in Georgia?  Clinton, 1992.
I don't think the old rules are going to apply to this election.  I really don't.  I could easily see a Trump winning a lot of Northern states that used to go Democrat, and at the same time could see Hillary winning some Southern states that used to go Republican.  This is a completely different game today.  It's like trying to handicap a pro football game and bringing up a a head to head matchup from 10 years ago when there wasn't one player from either team on the roster back then.

 
What about the "Unity Pledge?"   Bush and Graham are not backing Trump.   Ryan wanting something from Trump before backing him?   BUT!!!, on the upside that nutjob Palin is backing Trump.  Does Trump really want her support? 
The Loyalty Pledge only says "I will endorse the nominee", not "I will endorse the presumptive nominee". Trump isn't the nominee yet.

If Bush and Graham bash Donald through July 18, then stay silent through November 7, then endorse Donald on November 8, then they would have fulfilled their obligations under the Loyalty Pledge.

 
I don't think the old rules are going to apply to this election.  I really don't.  I could easily see a Trump winning a lot of Northern states that used to go Democrat, and at the same time could see Hillary winning some Southern states that used to go Republican.  This is a completely different game today.  It's like trying to handicap a pro football game and bringing up a a head to head matchup from 10 years ago when there wasn't one player from either team on the roster back then.
Same old rules, Perot, Wallace, Thurmond, killed one of the two main parties' chances at the top of the ticket and down ticket, what's changed except that this time it's an actual party label behind the name.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Loyalty Pledge only says "I will endorse the nominee", not "I will endorse the presumptive nominee". Trump isn't the nominee yet.

If Bush and Graham bash Donald through July 18, then stay silent through November 7, then endorse Donald on November 8, then they would have fulfilled their obligations under the Loyalty Pledge.
PATHETIC! 

 
screw him.  The voters have spoken.  You're the Chairman of the Convention.  Support the candidate the voters have chosen or be cast aside by those voters.  pretty simple.
Paul Ryan seems to me like an honest dude. He ran for office pledged to conservative principles of government that he firmly believes in. Now he is being asked to abandon those principles. 

He can, and should refuse to do so. It does not matter that "the voters have spoken" as you claim. We don't live in a direct democracy. The Founding Fathers gave us representatives serving terms of office because they wanted our leaders to make more informed decisions than the general public acting on a whim. It was the danger of populism and a Donald Trump that they were trying to prevent. 

 
The Loyalty Pledge only says "I will endorse the nominee", not "I will endorse the presumptive nominee". Trump isn't the nominee yet.

If Bush and Graham bash Donald through July 18, then stay silent through November 7, then endorse Donald on November 8, then they would have fulfilled their obligations under the Loyalty Pledge.
PATHETIC! 
Yes, it is indeed pathetic that Donald and his supporters don't understand what the pledge actually says.

 
Yes, it is indeed pathetic that Donald and his supporters don't understand what the pledge actually says.
Can you go do some more crappy research on how many delegates Donald will get? Also please throw some more asterisks around. Donald will keep winning all the way to the white house.

 
called <> spoke to

:shrug:

Keep trying saints, you're convincing nobody.


“I was blindsided a little bit, because he spoke to me three weeks ago, and it was a very nice call, a very encouraging call,” Mr. Trump told NBC’s “Meet the Press” in an interview that will air on Sunday. “I was doing well. He called me, I think, to congratulate me about New York, ’cause I won by massive numbers.”

... On “Meet the Press,” Mr. Trump said of the purported phone call: “He called me to congratulate me. Couldn’t have been nicer.”
But a spokesman for Mr. Ryan said Saturday that such a call never took place.

...Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Mr. Ryan, said in an email: “They talked in March about our agenda but not since then.” A spokeswoman for Mr. Trump did not respond to an email asking for details.\


GOP primary in NY was in mid April, so actually yeah Trump's flat out lying.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No he's not.

The same rhetoric was used when Reagan started making a splash.  He's moving to the middle, deal with it.
When did Reagan do a spin around rejection of his own tax plan and promise to raise the minimum wage?

What's the point of supporting Trump when you're just grabbing on to thin air, support what?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's anti-abortion and somewhere to the right of Phyllis Schafley. Whoops, no he's not, he likes the law the way it is. Nm.

You'll be getting a flat tax and encouraging small business. Nope, nm.

Totally against raising the minimum wage. Actually wait he's for raising it. Nm.

Wants to rip down Obamacare. Wants to provide universal coverage. Nm.

If you're a GOP candidate how are you supporting the guy who stands against every rung in your candidacy except immigration, and even if he does support what you support he might just change his mind if asked the right/wrong way?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you're a GOP candidate how are you supporting the guy who stands against every rung in your candidacy except immigration, and even if he does support what you support he might just change his mind if asked the right/wrong way?
Because you're betting that he'll be right of Hillary, which is the only measurement that matters.

 
Here's the really beautiful thing if you're a run of the mill GOP Congressman.

Your opponent can likely show Trump saying something on either side of every issue, then juxtapose your face with it. Awesome. The voters who support the conservative position can stay home, the people who support the moderate/liberal position can just vote for the actual Democrat.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because you're betting that he'll be right of Hillary, which is the only measurement that matters.
And that would be wrong. 

Hillary is a traditional American Democrat, which since 1933, means that she believes that government should aid capitalism but not fight it, and that good government should involve itself in trying to help social ills. She is also a believer in the Henry Luce theory of the "American century", which since 1945 means that America is the preeminent country in the world and is fundamentally committed to liberty around the globe, to the freedom of people's and trade, and opposition to dictatorships, human want, and terror. 

Donald Trump is neither to the right nor the left of Hillary. He is neither liberal nor conservative. His only stable views are for authoritarianism and isolationism. All of his other positions are "fluid". 

 
On what? Immigration? He's even said that's negotiable, but what else?
You don't need me to regurgitate all of his stances. 

Has he ben muddying the waters to move to the middle??  Is he left of Hillary on topics like trade and aspects of foreign policy?   Of course, deal with it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And that would be wrong. 

Hillary is a traditional American Democrat, which since 1933, means that she believes that government should aid capitalism but not fight it, and that good government should involve itself in trying to help social ills. She is also a believer in the Henry Luce theory of the "American century", which since 1945 means that America is the preeminent country in the world and is fundamentally committed to liberty around the globe, to the freedom of people's and trade, and opposition to dictatorships, human want, and terror. 

Donald Trump is neither to the right nor the left of Hillary. He is neither liberal nor conservative. His only stable views are for authoritarianism and isolationism. All of his other positions are "fluid". 
He's a nationalist folks. Nationalists from Chavez to that bad guy who we shall not name had left of center views.

Trump has said he will "stop" companies from leaving the country. That folks is far - far - to the left of Sanders, that is Chavezism right there, no exaggeration, presuming you think he means it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's anti-abortion and somewhere to the right of Phyllis Schafley. Whoops, no he's not, he likes the law the way it is. Nm.

You'll be getting a flat tax and encouraging small business. Nope, nm.

Totally against raising the minimum wage. Actually wait he's for raising it. Nm.

Wants to rip down Obamacare. Wants to provide universal coverage. Nm.

If you're a GOP candidate how are you supporting the guy who stands against every rung in your candidacy except immigration, and even if he does support what you support he might just change his mind if asked the right/wrong way?
He's not Hilary

 
Donald Trump is neither to the right nor the left of Hillary. He is neither liberal nor conservative.
And I don't think Trump supporters care either way.  What has been "conservative" over the last 20 years has failed them.  What has been "liberal" has failed them as well.

The paradigm is shifting.  The people's support is empowering Trump to change the Republican party.  I don't understand why this is so difficult to comprehend.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And I don't think Trump supporters care either way.  What has been "conservative" over the last 20 years has failed them.  What has been "liberal" has failed them as well.

The paradigm is shifting.  The people's support is empowering Trump to change the Republican party.  I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand.
Then don't make the claim he will be to the right of Hillary. He won't.

 
And I don't think Trump supporters care either way.  What has been "conservative" over the last 20 years has failed them.  What has been "liberal" has failed them as well.

The paradigm is shifting, I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand.
It isn't. What YOU don't seem to understand is that Trump supporters are a minority of the public, and that this will be proven in November. Yes the paradigm has shifted for you and other Republican voters who chose this guy as your standard bearer, but in the bigger scheme of things you are going to be shown to be irrelevant. So enjoy the next few months, Cinderella,  because midnight is approaching. 

 
Being that it's Mother's Day, it's a great reminder that women have a role in raising the children, cooking and cleaning. They should not be in politics or announcing sporting events. 

Happy Mother's Day!

 
It isn't. What YOU don't seem to understand is that Trump supporters are a minority of the public, and that this will be proven in November.
This is a dumb statement Tim, every candidate doesn't have a majority of the public support right now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes the paradigm has shifted for you and other Republican voters who chose this guy as your standard bearer, but in the bigger scheme of things you are going to be shown to be irrelevant. So enjoy the next few months, Cinderella,  because midnight is approaching. 
Even if Trump doesn't win, his supporters have forced a paradigm shift.  They have brought to life several issues that have previously not been appropriately addressed by either side.  Issues like 

1) the notion that we should not be the world police without proper backing

2) free trade agreements have hurt middle class jobs

3) the delegate system is corrupt and needs to be overhauled

4) superpacs are bad

5) we have serious immigration issues

6) The Repubican party was socially too far right for the evolving demographics

And there are more...

There are a number of wins here that will have lasting impact on American politics.  You'd be a fool to believe otherwise. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even if Trump doesn't win, his supporters have forced a paradigm shift.  They have brought to life several issues that have previously not been appropriately addressed by either side.  Issues like 

1) the notion that we should not be the world police without proper backing

2) free trade agreements have hurt middle class jobs

3) the delegate system is corrupt and needs to be overhauled

4) superpacs are bad

5) we have serious immigration issues

6) The Repubican party was socially too far right for the evolving demographics

And there are more...

There are a number of wins here that will have lasting impact on American politics.  You'd be a fool to believe otherwise. 
You honestly think the Republican Party is going to be more like the Democrats after this?

 
Paul Ryan seems to me like an honest dude. He ran for office pledged to conservative principles of government that he firmly believes in. Now he is being asked to abandon those principles. 

He can, and should refuse to do so. It does not matter that "the voters have spoken" as you claim. We don't live in a direct democracy. The Founding Fathers gave us representatives serving terms of office because they wanted our leaders to make more informed decisions than the general public acting on a whim. It was the danger of populism and a Donald Trump that they were trying to prevent. 
Bull####. I've had to pinch my nose several times over the years getting on board with the Republican nominee.  It's their turn.  That's what it means to be in a political party.  You rally around the nominee, even if you disagree with him on some issues.

The voters have spoken.  Trump is the Republican nominee.  Get on board or find another party.  Spoiled ####### brats, all of them.

 
And I don't think Trump supporters care either way. What has been "conservative" over the last 20 years has failed them. What has been "liberal" has failed them as well.

The paradigm is shifting. The people's support is empowering Trump to change the Republican party. I don't understand why this is so difficult to comprehend.
Because the paradigm shift is being engineered by someone suffering from mental ######ation.

 
Even if Trump doesn't win, his supporters have forced a paradigm shift.  They have brought to life several issues that have previously not been appropriately addressed by either side.  Issues like 

1) the notion that we should not be the world police without proper backing

2) free trade agreements have hurt middle class jobs

3) the delegate system is corrupt and needs to be overhauled

4) superpacs are bad

5) we have serious immigration issues

6) The Repubican party was socially too far right for the evolving demographics

And there are more...

There are a number of wins here that will have lasting impact on American politics.  You'd be a fool to believe otherwise. 
You actually bring up some good points. But many of these points align with the Democratic party. So, instead of the Republicans shifting to the left, you will just see Republicans defecting to the Democratic party, just as Southern Democrats did when they defected to the Republican party in 1948.

As of 2015, this country was 48% Democrat (or lean-Democrat) and 39% is Republican (or lean-Republican). Even if just 5% of current Republicans defect to the left, it will be devastating not only to the Republican party, but to conservative ideology in general.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You actually bring up some good points. But many of these points align with the Democratic party. So, instead of the Republicans shifting to the left, you will just see Republicans defecting to the Democratic party, just as Southern Democrats did when they defected to the Republican party in 1948.

As of 2015, this country was 48% Democrat (or lean-Democrat) and 39% is Republican (or lean-Republican). Even if just 5% of current Republicans defect to the left, it will be devastating not only to the Republican party, but to conservative ideology in general.
I disagree about a mass defection, but it is a plausible outcome.

 
Even if Trump doesn't win, his supporters have forced a paradigm shift.  They have brought to life several issues that have previously not been appropriately addressed by either side.  Issues like 

1) the notion that we should not be the world police without proper backing

2) free trade agreements have hurt middle class jobs

3) the delegate system is corrupt and needs to be overhauled

4) superpacs are bad

5) we have serious immigration issues

6) The Repubican party was socially too far right for the evolving demographics

And there are more...

There are a number of wins here that will have lasting impact on American politics.  You'd be a fool to believe otherwise. 
Good points, lets hope so.

 
Even if Trump doesn't win, his supporters have forced a paradigm shift.  They have brought to life several issues that have previously not been appropriately addressed by either side.  Issues like 

1) the notion that we should not be the world police without proper backing

2) free trade agreements have hurt middle class jobs

3) the delegate system is corrupt and needs to be overhauled

4) superpacs are bad

5) we have serious immigration issues

6) The Repubican party was socially too far right for the evolving demographics

And there are more...

There are a number of wins here that will have lasting impact on American politics.  You'd be a fool to believe otherwise. 
Great great post.  For this reason alone trump has been a good thing. 

 
Palin is the funniest thing going right now, even better than the Don

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top