What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just realized Trump will have to give a concession speech.

Honestly can't even imagine how that'll go. 

 
Skoo said:
I just realized Trump will have to give a concession speech.

Honestly can't even imagine how that'll go. 
Click to expand...
"I ran the best campaign.  Really, so many people have told me I should have won.  I should have spent more money on the campaign.  I could have - I have so much money.  Its true.  I have a lot of money.  More money than any other presidential candidate.  Its true.  NBC's begging me to come back, so I might...I might...do another season of the "The Apprentice".  I don't know yet.  Maybe I'll write a book about the campaign... Lyin' Ted and Little Marco.  It'll be the best book.  Because I use the best words.  Really, its true.  I know so many words, its unbelievable how many words I know.  Is somebody booing!?  Get him out.  Get him outta here!  Don't hurt him.  But back in the day people would have knocked him out.  What's wrong with us today that we can't just knock somebody out?  Don't hurt him, please.  But if you do, I'll pay your legal bills.  I can because I have so much money.  Its unbelievable how much money I have."

 
HellToupee said:
You seem smart. You know he didn't create the school. His name was licensed . Doesn't exonerate him , you put your name on something you need to be careful. You make it seem like Donald gathered the family to start the school with nefarious intentions
Click to expand...
Is this then another piece of evidence of Drumpf's business acumen? Of him playing chess against checkers?

 
Amused to Death said:
"I ran the best campaign.  Really, so many people have told me I should have won.  I should have spent more money on the campaign.  I could have - I have so much money.  Its true.  I have a lot of money.  More money than any other presidential candidate.  Its true.  NBC's begging me to come back, so I might...I might...do another season of the "The Apprentice".  I don't know yet.  Maybe I'll write a book about the campaign... Lyin' Ted and Little Marco.  It'll be the best book.  Because I use the best words.  Really, its true.  I know so many words, its unbelievable how many words I know.  Is somebody booing!?  Get him out.  Get him outta here!  Don't hurt him.  But back in the day people would have knocked him out.  What's wrong with us today that we can't just knock somebody out?  Don't hurt him, please.  But if you do, I'll pay your legal bills.  I can because I have so much money.  Its unbelievable how much money I have."
Click to expand...
10/10

 
BroncoFreak_2K3 said:
These anti-Trump protests out in CA are a pathetic display from the Left.
Click to expand...
By far the worst thing I've seen in this nasty election cycle.  Only Fox News is giving it the coverage it deserves.  Think about it, a guy gets sucker punched by a Trump supporter at a rally and it's 24x7 news coverage on all the stations for weeks.  No blood, just a sucker punch from an 80 year old guy.  Meanwhile several Trump supporters are beaten bloody last week, a girl is pelted with eggs and hit with a bottle, an 8 year old girl is pepper sprayed...  But because they are Trump supporters the violence is excused.  I'll tell yah, something very bad is going to happen.  The police aren't protecting people and the anti-Trump violence isn't dissipating any.  Sooner or later one of these Leftie d-bags is going to #### with the wrong person and someone will get shot.  If the cops can't protect people I don't blame them for arming up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's been going on since Chicago.  Nothing tonight, but that crap from last week was the worst political violence since the 60's.  And the Left blamed Trump.  Peaceful supporters going to a rally... Despicable ####.  http://youtu.be/38s-Cmf9qR4. And cops doing nothing.  Told to stand down so as not to provoke the riots getting worse.  

 
Higgs said:
It's been going on since Chicago.  Nothing tonight, but that crap from last week was the worst political violence since the 60's.  And the Left blamed Trump.  Peaceful supporters going to a rally... Despicable ####.  http://youtu.be/38s-Cmf9qR4. And cops doing nothing.  Told to stand down so as not to provoke the riots getting worse.  
Click to expand...
Ok thanks for some reason I thought y'all meant something was going on live.

Yeah it's a bad development.

However it might be worthwhile to recall statements by Trump & Stone about possible protests at the RNCC if he did not get the nomination. How was that different?

 
Hmmm. Help me out guys.  Trump is wrong for insinuating that the race of a judge / trier of fact is irrelevant, right?  A Mexican American Judge has no inherent racial bias, right?  Same hold true for a jury?  What if Trump was complaining that a jury full of Mexicans rendered a biased verdict against him?  Same thing?

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Ok thanks for some reason I thought y'all meant something was going on live.

Yeah it's a bad development.

However it might be worthwhile to recall statements by Trump & Stone about possible protests at the RNCC if he did not get the nomination. How was that different?
Click to expand...
Other than the fact that it was words rather than actual violent actions that hurt people?  Really Saint?  There really should be no conditions on condemning this violence.

 
Higgs said:
Hmmm. Help me out guys.  Trump is wrong for insinuating that the race of a judge / trier of fact is irrelevant, right?  A Mexican American Judge has no inherent racial bias, right?  Same hold true for a jury?  What if Trump was complaining that a jury full of Mexicans rendered a biased verdict against him?  Same thing?
Click to expand...
Are you still trying this?

 
Higgs said:
Other than the fact that it was words rather than actual violent actions that hurt people?  Really Saint?  There really should be no conditions on condemning this violence.
Click to expand...
They're not mutually exclusive, just a question. No obviously no violence occurred considering it was a few months away at the time. I did take it that Stone & Trump were suggesting there could be violence and that it might be justified.

 
Higgs said:
Hmmm. Help me out guys.  Trump is wrong for insinuating that the race of a judge / trier of fact is irrelevant, right?  A Mexican American Judge has no inherent racial bias, right?  Same hold true for a jury?  What if Trump was complaining that a jury full of Mexicans rendered a biased verdict against him?  Same thing?
Click to expand...
Is the jury actual Mexicans or just some guys from Indiana that look Mexicany?

 
Higgs said:
Hmmm. Help me out guys.  Trump is wrong for insinuating that the race of a judge / trier of fact is irrelevant, right?  A Mexican American Judge has no inherent racial bias, right?  Same hold true for a jury?  What if Trump was complaining that a jury full of Mexicans rendered a biased verdict against him?  Same thing?
Click to expand...
It is illegal to remove a potential juror based upon their ethnicity or gender.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
They're not mutually exclusive, just a question. No obviously no violence occurred considering it was a few months away at the time. I did take it that Stone & Trump were suggesting there could be violence and that it might be justified.
Click to expand...
I already opined on this back then and said it was a dumb, stupid and potential wreckless comment.  Nice to see your focus on a statement that never materialized rather than actual violence that is going on regularly.

 
trogg78 said:
Is the jury actual Mexicans or just some guys from Indiana that look Mexicany?
Click to expand...
The jury is just like the judge - Mexican American, born in the USA but Mexican heritage.  Wrong to assert that a jury's racial makeup should have no bearing on the verdict rendered?

 
Higgs said:
I already opined on this back then and said it was a dumb, stupid and potential wreckless comment.  Nice to see your focus on a statement that never materialized rather than actual violence that is going on regularly.
Click to expand...
That's ok just curious what your take was.

Obviously I agree on the CA protests. No one in America should ever be attacked or have to run to save themselves for attending a political event.

 
sho nuff said:
Your hypothetical questions are ridiculous and pretty irrelevant.
Click to expand...
And your ducking of the questions makes you chicken-####.  Maybe you can change your mind in a couple hours though and challenge me to a debate tomorrow on hot dogs. :lmao:

 
tone1oc said:
It's not top secret stuff being leaked, this is a conference call with media surrogates.   It's only controversial or leak worthy because Trump is saying crazy stuff. 
Click to expand...
It's a conference call with supporters to get on the same page and basically every stupid thing trump said got leaked. Somebody on the inside is out for him. 

 
Higgs said:
And your ducking of the questions makes you chicken-####.  Maybe you can change your mind in a couple hours though and challenge me to a debate tomorrow on hot dogs. :lmao:
Click to expand...
Maybe you can make more irrelevant questions and then insult people for not answering stupid questions that have no bearing on anything.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Well who was on the call besides Trump staff & surrogates and how'd the memo get out?
Click to expand...
During the Krazy Katrina segment she said "they" assumed media would be listening in on the call.

 
Higgs said:
Nope.  I asked a question.  Answer it with an answer, not another question.  Unless of course you're a gobbler like sho and the rest.
Click to expand...
I did answer your question.  You're not allowed to remove jurors based upon race.  Anymore than you're allowed to remove a judge based upon his race.  So if Trump wanted to be a bigot and claim his case were sunk because of the racial makeup of his jury, it would be just as repugnant as his attacks on Judge Curiel.  If you yourself weren't a racist, you might understand this.

 
3C's said:
That wasn't a question. Holy #### this is stupid.
Click to expand...
You just can't help yourself, can you?  By the way, you see that little squiggly thing after "you"?  It's called a question mark.  There are five of them in my original question.  You are free to answer the question.  I'll rephrase the hypothetical.  Is it ok to challenge a ruling made by a jury based on its racial makeup?  Yes or no?

 
Higgs said:
Nope.  I asked a question.  Answer it with an answer, not another question.  Unless of course you're a gobbler like sho and the rest.
Click to expand...
Wait I think DParker did answer the question. The answer is no it wouldn't make any difference if it was a jury and Donald could not remove jurors for race any more than Curiel.

 
Higgs said:
The jury is just like the judge - Mexican American, born in the USA but Mexican heritage.  Wrong to assert that a jury's racial makeup should have no bearing on the verdict rendered?
Click to expand...
So is that what jury selection is for?  Can't have too many Mexicans.

 
Higgs said:
You just can't help yourself, can you?  By the way, you see that little squiggly thing after "you"?  It's called a question mark.  There are five of them in my original question.  You are free to answer the question.  I'll rephrase the hypothetical.  Is it ok to challenge a ruling made by a jury based on its racial makeup?  Yes or no?
Click to expand...
Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean it wasn't given.  HTH.

 
dparker713 said:
I did answer your question.  You're not allowed to remove jurors based upon race.  Anymore than you're allowed to remove a judge based upon his race.  So if Trump wanted to be a bigot and claim his case were sunk because of the racial makeup of his jury, it would be just as repugnant as his attacks on Judge Curiel.  If you yourself weren't a racist, you might understand this.
Click to expand...
Well read this, racist.  Looking forward to seeing the upcoming mental gymnastics from you, dimples.   :lmao: . http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/23/479166026/supreme-court-orders-new-trial-for-black-death-row-inmate-convicted-by-all-white

 
Ok Higgs I have a couple questions for you:

- will Justice Sotomayor have to remove herself from all cases involving any decision by Trump?

- and if Curiel is so biased why didn't he deny Trump's request to move the trial until after the election?

 
Higgs said:
Well read this, racist.  Looking forward to seeing the upcoming mental gymnastics from you, dimples.   :lmao: . http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/23/479166026/supreme-court-orders-new-trial-for-black-death-row-inmate-convicted-by-all-white
Click to expand...
Did you even read the article?  The supreme court basically ruled that there was racist jury tampering.  Nothing about this supports your logical fallacy that the decision was founded based on the color of the skin of the jurors.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Higgs said:
Well read this, racist.  Looking forward to seeing the upcoming mental gymnastics from you, dimples.   :lmao: . http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/23/479166026/supreme-court-orders-new-trial-for-black-death-row-inmate-convicted-by-all-white
Click to expand...
Did you read it?

It says what others said...new trial because "because the prosecution deliberately excluded African-Americans from the jury based on their race."

You should really go to bed and sleep off two bad days for you.

 
timschochet said:
Higgs just admit it was racism and move on. Your arguments are making you look foolish, no offense. 
Click to expand...
Amazing not one person in this forum can see what I'm trying to do here, which is highlight the double standards at play here.  If race matters in one scenario (the link I provided in the case where a white jury was believed to be biased and incapable of rendering a fair verdict) then why doesn't it matter in Trump's case?

Long story short - identity politics SUCKS.  End it.  ALL.  Until then don't complain when you see the same type nonsense coming from Trump.

Get it?  Now go ahead and pleasure yourself to this picture.  I downloaded it just for you on your big night.  http://static1.squarespace.com/static/51c946cde4b0f05142538988/5278a958e4b085eb5a855185/53080c0be4b0b726cf0ddc9b/1429145910638/Hillary+Pantsuit.jpg?format=1000w

 
Higgs said:
Well read this, racist.  Looking forward to seeing the upcoming mental gymnastics from you, dimples.   :lmao: . http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/05/23/479166026/supreme-court-orders-new-trial-for-black-death-row-inmate-convicted-by-all-white
Click to expand...
Did you even read that?  He got a new trial not because his jury was all white.  He got a new trial because race was used to exclude potential jurors.  Had he happened to get an all white jury, there is no problem.  When the prosecution deliberately excludes jurors based on race then there is a violation of the defendant's Constitutional rights.  Damn, this is pretty simple stuff.  Can you really not understand the distinction?  I feel sad for you.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Yo Mama
**** OFFICIAL FFA 2025-2026 Fake NBA Draft **** - Happy Ranks-Giving!!
19 20 21
Replies
1K
Views
14K
Master of Subservience
Master of Subservience
DA RAIDERS
Pick a fantasy team for the Tour de France. There will be prizes!
Replies
35
Views
3K
DA RAIDERS
DA RAIDERS
kutta
***Official 2025 Footballguy T-Shirt Exchange - OCT 12 SHIPPING DEADLINE (extended 2 weeks)***
3 4 5
Replies
226
Views
7K
Dennis Castro
Dennis Castro

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Back
Top