What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Donald Trump for President thread (5 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
71%- 71%!!! of registered Republicans doubt President Obama's citizenship. 

Against that kind of of ignorance (and yes I will add, racism) what's the point in trying to have a discussion? 

 
It's not hilarious, the laughter you experience is your own uncomfortable feelings knowing you are electing Hilary Clinton as our next President when you could have voted for the GOP candidate but can't get past yourself/ego to go do the right thing and return this country back to the people. 

I can't wait to see more expansion of social welfare and Clitomacare or whatever it renames itself. 

It's gonna be so much fun to dish out more money to finance a bunch of people who don't like me to begin with, America baby!
Seems to me that electing the candidate who gets the most votes is, by definition, giving the country to the people.

 
My understanding is he is going to offer all of the illegals a job building the wall.......from the south side.
What do you think about the new plan for an invisible fence?  There is the outstanding question about how we convince the Mexicans to wear shock collars of course. Trump's plan to affix "bling" to lure in the Mexican people might work given their well-known love of such thing, but I also think we should consider his supporters' suggestion that we tell the Mexicans they're getting vaccinated for something.  You can evaluate it for yourself here (4:30-6:10).

 
Is it openly known if Trump hires people to troll for him on the internet? I understand some of the posters in here just have a lot of time on their hands, or are simply  misguided and/or confused, but it sure seems like a lot of new posters/lurkers show up with bizarrely obtuse arguments that seem crafted and twisted by design.  

It's been established that Trump's campaign has some possible Putin ties, from his rhetoric, actions (That RNC platform edit was something...) right to members of his campaign staff, so is he further pulling a Putin by utilizing internet trolls? Trump has expressed open admiration with how Putin handles himself, and I could easily see his campaign staff that had ties to Russia/Ukraine suggesting the notion of utilizing trolls. 

A lot of the comments in here are very reminiscent in tone and style of the bizarre trolling you see in the comment sections on many articles about Russia/Ukraine.

 
Surely they must know that he was born in one of the 57 states of these great United States
This is why the Trump fans get picked on in here. Trump says stupid stuff nearly every day but you guys just fly on by. But Obama has a slip of the tongue and it's something to hang your hat on for years. Now you know damn well that Obama is smart enough to know how many states our country actually has. But instead of addressing the actual point made about birthers, you instead run around the question to schtick it up.

 
This is why the Trump fans get picked on in here. Trump says stupid stuff nearly every day but you guys just fly on by. But Obama has a slip of the tongue and it's something to hang your hat on for years. Now you know damn well that Obama is smart enough to know how many states our country actually has. But instead of addressing the actual point made about birthers, you instead run around the question to schtick it up.
It's pretty unrealistic to expect them to make an intelligent and well thought out case for Trump to be President when Trump himself and his entire campaign have proven completely unable to do so. Schtick is all they have from the very top on down.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it openly known if Trump hires people to troll for him on the internet? I understand some of the posters in here just have a lot of time on their hands, or are simply  misguided and/or confused, but it sure seems like a lot of new posters/lurkers show up with bizarrely obtuse arguments that seem crafted and twisted by design.  

It's been established that Trump's campaign has some possible Putin ties, from his rhetoric, actions (That RNC platform edit was something...) right to members of his campaign staff, so is he further pulling a Putin by utilizing internet trolls? Trump has expressed open admiration with how Putin handles himself, and I could easily see his campaign staff that had ties to Russia/Ukraine suggesting the notion of utilizing trolls. 

A lot of the comments in here are very reminiscent in tone and style of the bizarre trolling you see in the comment sections on many articles about Russia/Ukraine.
You want to get poked by an umbrella - because that is how you get poked with an umbrella. 

It is commonly known the FBG is a front for the KGB - they train their trolls here.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Football Freak said:
Is it openly known if Trump hires people to troll for him on the internet? I understand some of the posters in here just have a lot of time on their hands, or are simply  misguided and/or confused, but it sure seems like a lot of new posters/lurkers show up with bizarrely obtuse arguments that seem crafted and twisted by design.  

It's been established that Trump's campaign has some possible Putin ties, from his rhetoric, actions (That RNC platform edit was something...) right to members of his campaign staff, so is he further pulling a Putin by utilizing internet trolls? Trump has expressed open admiration with how Putin handles himself, and I could easily see his campaign staff that had ties to Russia/Ukraine suggesting the notion of utilizing trolls. 

A lot of the comments in here are very reminiscent in tone and style of the bizarre trolling you see in the comment sections on many articles about Russia/Ukraine.
Does he pay? Because I could use the cash. Just open up a new email account on AOL and go to town on the Yahoo! comments boards

 
Ditka Butkus said:
Ministry of Pain said:
It's not hilarious, the laughter you experience is your own uncomfortable feelings knowing you are electing Hilary Clinton as our next President when you could have voted for the GOP candidate but can't get past yourself/ego to go do the right thing and return this country back to the people. 

I can't wait to see more expansion of social welfare and Clitomacare or whatever it renames itself. 

It's gonna be so much fun to dish out more money to finance a bunch of people who don't like me to begin with, America baby!
Being the first woman president is one thing but providing healthcare to only women is just plain wrong...
Not only that, but just that one body part?

I understand it's a small but major part, I like to give it as much attention as possible.  But you gotta care for other parts of the body as well.  Nips at the very min. 

 
Flying Spaghetti Monster said:
You want to get poked by an umbrella - because that is how you get poked with an umbrella. 

It is commonly known the FBG is a front for the KGB - they train there trolls here.  
Well, crap. Clearly, I didn't think this though. Nice knowing you all.

 
igbomb said:
This is why the Trump fans get picked on in here. Trump says stupid stuff nearly every day but you guys just fly on by. But Obama has a slip of the tongue and it's something to hang your hat on for years. Now you know damn well that Obama is smart enough to know how many states our country actually has. But instead of addressing the actual point made about birthers, you instead run around the question to schtick it up.
You mean like the leftists did to Dan Quayle and the word potato?

 
The Football Freak said:
Is it openly known if Trump hires people to troll for him on the internet? I understand some of the posters in here just have a lot of time on their hands, or are simply  misguided and/or confused, but it sure seems like a lot of new posters/lurkers show up with bizarrely obtuse arguments that seem crafted and twisted by design.  

It's been established that Trump's campaign has some possible Putin ties, from his rhetoric, actions (That RNC platform edit was something...) right to members of his campaign staff, so is he further pulling a Putin by utilizing internet trolls? Trump has expressed open admiration with how Putin handles himself, and I could easily see his campaign staff that had ties to Russia/Ukraine suggesting the notion of utilizing trolls. 

A lot of the comments in here are very reminiscent in tone and style of the bizarre trolling you see in the comment sections on many articles about Russia/Ukraine.


тгчмр тче мдй то шои !

 
The Football Freak said:
Is it openly known if Trump hires people to troll for him on the internet? I understand some of the posters in here just have a lot of time on their hands, or are simply  misguided and/or confused, but it sure seems like a lot of new posters/lurkers show up with bizarrely obtuse arguments that seem crafted and twisted by design.  

It's been established that Trump's campaign has some possible Putin ties, from his rhetoric, actions (That RNC platform edit was something...) right to members of his campaign staff, so is he further pulling a Putin by utilizing internet trolls? Trump has expressed open admiration with how Putin handles himself, and I could easily see his campaign staff that had ties to Russia/Ukraine suggesting the notion of utilizing trolls. 

A lot of the comments in here are very reminiscent in tone and style of the bizarre trolling you see in the comment sections on many articles about Russia/Ukraine.
I love how the official democratic spin to all the emails that get released about Hillary is that they come from the Puppet Master Putin.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
massraider said:
Seems like only a few months ago he was bragging about $2 billion in free media coverage.  

Whatsamatta, Donny?  You don't likey what that mean old media is saying about you?
You get what you pay for?

 
cstu said:
How can you work with minority students and feel this way? 
I'm just being honest and also abstract in talking way outside of my classroom. Those BLM folks in major cities don't want nothing to do with MOP, CSTU, Sho, or anyone else who wants to debate back and forth in here. 

MOP Story: Last year I had a parent show up in FSU gear on parents night. The first month of the school year my room is decked out in Univ of Miami gear from the ceiling to the floor, the door is UM, the sports posters of all the teams hang around, because I want the students to start thinking about something nobody talks about with them and that's of course going to college..."I am straight out of the 305" that's my opening greeting to the parents.

Parent: I hate Miami and the Canes!   :lol:

MOP: I want to thank you for coming out tonight and supporting little Johnny(I didn't say lil Johnny). (minute or two of small talk pass) I hear the test scores have not been so good. (Heads nodding) What if we could get those numbers turned around and start winning in the classroom like these 2 schools (point to Miami gear and FSU jersey) have been winning on the gridiron for the last 30 years? Like the school I came from in Miami where we increased the test scores a whole bunch. (That whole thing is eerily Trump I know)

Parent: We've had a lot of well meaning folks here but nothing changes. Our kids just can't grasp math and we can't help them. 

MOP: OK so what if we change the culture around here from can't to can? And what if we stop... 

Parent: Sir...Sir? If you can get lil Johnny to pass math I'll wear your Canes gear

MOP: Picture of all of us with your son holding his passing test and you decked out in Canes gear?

Parent: That's what I'm saying...

MOP: Deal

And I have the picture...Johnny went from a 27 to a 77 in under 6 weeks. 

Just because they don't like most Caucasians that walk in the door doesn't mean I am any less optimistic we can get along, I just have to earn their trust. And I do that by getting results and not sending a lot of work home for the parents. My worst nightmare are the helicopter moms/parents. Truth be told, the real reason I like poverty stricken schools is for the most part the parents don't interfere with much I do. My grading system is built to pass every kid, who isn't going to like that? I'll tell you who...other teachers, "How is Frederick passing your class?"

If that's racist then I'm guilty. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Polls Polls Polls!

Missouri Monmouth Poll: Trump: 44% Clinton: 43% Johnson: 8% (Romney won Missouri by 10% in 2012.)

St. Leo University has Clinton up in Florida by 14%, but they only get a C+ rating from 538 FWIW: Link

Virginia: Roanoke University: Clinton: 48% Trump: 32% Johnson: 8%. Virginia looks EXTRA rigged this year.

However, Clinton looks like she lost her grip on Utah: Public Policy Polling
Five Thirty Eight flagged this a day or two ago- it's weird that Clinton seems to be doing so much better on state polls than on national polls.   A Democrat with a 5 or 6 point national lead, which seems to be the consensus these days, should not be running one point behind in Missouri and 16 (!) points ahead in Virginia. 

 
He did hire a number of posters to troll for him here, but you'll notice the volume has plummeted. That's because they were never paid.
Heh.  I didn't mean hired specifically for this site, just people that were hired in general who eventually made their way here.  Guys like DFSguy and AAA allstars seemed to go a bit past just partisan posting, and it got me wondering.  There seem to be a lot of people in the thread that are very up on the election, so I was just asking if it was an already known thing. 

Now if you'll excuse me, there's an umbrella salesman at my front door. Odd, it isn't raining today...

 
The Football Freak said:
Is it openly known if Trump hires people to troll for him on the internet? I understand some of the posters in here just have a lot of time on their hands, or are simply  misguided and/or confused, but it sure seems like a lot of new posters/lurkers show up with bizarrely obtuse arguments that seem crafted and twisted by design.  

It's been established that Trump's campaign has some possible Putin ties, from his rhetoric, actions (That RNC platform edit was something...) right to members of his campaign staff, so is he further pulling a Putin by utilizing internet trolls? Trump has expressed open admiration with how Putin handles himself, and I could easily see his campaign staff that had ties to Russia/Ukraine suggesting the notion of utilizing trolls. 

A lot of the comments in here are very reminiscent in tone and style of the bizarre trolling you see in the comment sections on many articles about Russia/Ukraine.
:confused:

I bet 70% of the comments in here are Clinton fanboys bashing Trump. Believe me , it's true 

 
timschochet said:
Yesterday I offered 8 reasons why Republicans were more ignorant these days than Democrats. Here is a 9th one: 

http://www.bobcesca.com/poll-most-republicans-are-still-birthers/

9. A strong majority of Republicans, against all evidence, continue to believe that Barack Obama was not born in the United States. 
Can you repost your list?  I can't find it.

And, by chane, do you actually read about this "poll" before you posted it as cannon?  I'm curious.

 
Five Thirty Eight flagged this a day or two ago- it's weird that Clinton seems to be doing so much better on state polls than on national polls.   A Democrat with a 5 or 6 point national lead, which seems to be the consensus these days, should not be running one point behind in Missouri and 16 (!) points ahead in Virginia. 
Not that strange considering Clinton has been heavily advertising in swing states, has been doing appearances in swing states, and has lots of paid and volunteer staffers in swing states.  Trump didn't have any ads until last week, has few staffers, and has been doing rallies in Connecticut and Texas and Mississippi.

 
igbomb said:
This is why the Trump fans get picked on in here. Trump says stupid stuff nearly every day but you guys just fly on by. But Obama has a slip of the tongue and it's something to hang your hat on for years. Now you know damn well that Obama is smart enough to know how many states our country actually has. But instead of addressing the actual point made about birthers, you instead run around the question to schtick it up.
Now you know damn well that you don't make billions of dollars by being an idiot.....

 
Yep. No way to prove anything. Besides that, we know tim is a Hillary fanboy, and posts a lot. Other than that, not sure who else would be considered a fanboy.
Did you forget about the Twitter bot? Those 2 are fanboys , the rest I'll categorize as anti trump 

 
How many hands do you need to count the gutless Trumpallos that won't be posting here after November?

Are any anti-Trumpers just trolls that will run and hide in a few months?

Shall we make a list, and revisit?

 
Now you know damn well that you don't make billions of dollars by being an idiot.....
Pretty sure you don't need to be smart to inherit wealth, guy. If he had simply invested his inheritance in an index fund when he got it, he'd be ahead of where he is today. It's been covered dozens of times. Listen to the guy talk -- he's a straight up moron.

 
Pretty sure you don't need to be smart to inherit wealth, guy. If he had simply invested his inheritance in an index fund when he got it, he'd be ahead of where he is today. It's been covered dozens of times. Listen to the guy talk -- he's a straight up moron.
:lmao:  You have to be at the top of the rankings. 

 
Pretty sure you don't need to be smart to inherit wealth, guy. If he had simply invested his inheritance in an index fund when he got it, he'd be ahead of where he is today. It's been covered dozens of times. Listen to the guy talk -- he's a straight up moron.
This is like the sixth time you have called me guy.,..chum....

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top