What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (29 Viewers)

Just way overpaid:

Traded:
1.02, 1.04, 1,07
for
1.01
I would hurt myself rushing to trade Bijan for that.
Having drafted Eddie Lacey and Trent Richardson at 1.01 in the past, I would as well.
And this is why there's always that small part of me that just wants to sell all firsts, because whiffs happen all up and down the round. It's why I'm trying like hell to trade the 1.12 for CWatson, or Burks, or Dotson.

Signed,
Guy that took Ruggs at 1.11
 
Just way overpaid:

Traded:
1.02, 1.04, 1,07
for
1.01
I would hurt myself rushing to trade Bijan for that.
Having drafted Eddie Lacey and Trent Richardson at 1.01 in the past, I would as well.
And this is why there's always that small part of me that just wants to sell all firsts, because whiffs happen all up and down the round. It's why I'm trying like hell to trade the 1.12 for CWatson, or Burks, or Dotson.

Signed,
Guy that took Ruggs at 1.11
It is all a matter of preference but I did get Waddle and Jefferson at 1.08 in back-to-back years so I like taking my shots as I'd much prefer one of those guys than Dotson, Burks, or Watson. I get it though, there is always a chance you get Ruggs.
 
Just way overpaid:

Traded:
1.02, 1.04, 1,07
for
1.01
I would hurt myself rushing to trade Bijan for that.
Having drafted Eddie Lacey and Trent Richardson at 1.01 in the past, I would as well.
And this is why there's always that small part of me that just wants to sell all firsts, because whiffs happen all up and down the round. It's why I'm trying like hell to trade the 1.12 for CWatson, or Burks, or Dotson.

Signed,
Guy that took Ruggs at 1.11
It is all a matter of preference but I did get Waddle and Jefferson at 1.08 in back-to-back years so I like taking my shots as I'd much prefer one of those guys than Dotson, Burks, or Watson. I get it though, there is always a chance you get Ruggs.
The cheapest way to acquire a stud is through the rookie draft. It won’t always work out but it’s an advantage when it does.
 
Just way overpaid:

Traded:
1.02, 1.04, 1,07
for
1.01
I would hurt myself rushing to trade Bijan for that.
Having drafted Eddie Lacey and Trent Richardson at 1.01 in the past, I would as well.
And this is why there's always that small part of me that just wants to sell all firsts, because whiffs happen all up and down the round. It's why I'm trying like hell to trade the 1.12 for CWatson, or Burks, or Dotson.

Signed,
Guy that took Ruggs at 1.11
It is all a matter of preference but I did get Waddle and Jefferson at 1.08 in back-to-back years so I like taking my shots as I'd much prefer one of those guys than Dotson, Burks, or Watson. I get it though, there is always a chance you get Ruggs.
It is a short bench league so studs are more important. Would have obviously made room for all the first rounders I gave up, but now don’t have to drop some end of bench stashes.
Still leaves me with 1.01, 1.03, 1.05
 
Last edited:
Just way overpaid:

Traded:
1.02, 1.04, 1,07
for
1.01
I would hurt myself rushing to trade Bijan for that.
Having drafted Eddie Lacey and Trent Richardson at 1.01 in the past, I would as well.
And this is why there's always that small part of me that just wants to sell all firsts, because whiffs happen all up and down the round. It's why I'm trying like hell to trade the 1.12 for CWatson, or Burks, or Dotson.

Signed,
Guy that took Ruggs at 1.11
It is all a matter of preference but I did get Waddle and Jefferson at 1.08 in back-to-back years so I like taking my shots as I'd much prefer one of those guys than Dotson, Burks, or Watson. I get it though, there is always a chance you get Ruggs.
It is a short bench league so studs are more important. Would have obviously made room for all the first rounders I gave up, but now don’t have to drop some end of bench stashes.
Still leaves me with 1.01, 1.03, 1.05
Just keeps getting better and better for you. nicely done.
 
Just way overpaid:

Traded:
1.02, 1.04, 1,07
for
1.01
I would hurt myself rushing to trade Bijan for that.
Having drafted Eddie Lacey and Trent Richardson at 1.01 in the past, I would as well.
And this is why there's always that small part of me that just wants to sell all firsts, because whiffs happen all up and down the round. It's why I'm trying like hell to trade the 1.12 for CWatson, or Burks, or Dotson.

Signed,
Guy that took Ruggs at 1.11
It is all a matter of preference but I did get Waddle and Jefferson at 1.08 in back-to-back years so I like taking my shots as I'd much prefer one of those guys than Dotson, Burks, or Watson. I get it though, there is always a chance you get Ruggs.
It is a short bench league so studs are more important. Would have obviously made room for all the first rounders I gave up, but now don’t have to drop some end of bench stashes.
Still leaves me with 1.01, 1.03, 1.05
That's a great position to be in. Bijan, a QB and your choice of RB that rises to the top or best WR available.
 
Just way overpaid:

Traded:
1.02, 1.04, 1,07
for
1.01
I would hurt myself rushing to trade Bijan for that.
Having drafted Eddie Lacey and Trent Richardson at 1.01 in the past, I would as well.
And this is why there's always that small part of me that just wants to sell all firsts, because whiffs happen all up and down the round. It's why I'm trying like hell to trade the 1.12 for CWatson, or Burks, or Dotson.

Signed,
Guy that took Ruggs at 1.11
It is all a matter of preference but I did get Waddle and Jefferson at 1.08 in back-to-back years so I like taking my shots as I'd much prefer one of those guys than Dotson, Burks, or Watson. I get it though, there is always a chance you get Ruggs.
It is a short bench league so studs are more important. Would have obviously made room for all the first rounders I gave up, but now don’t have to drop some end of bench stashes.
Still leaves me with 1.01, 1.03, 1.05
That's a great position to be in. Bijan, a QB and your choice of RB that rises to the top or best WR available.
Since it is 1QB I will be taking Bijan. Gibbs/ my WR1 and who knows
 
FFPC SuperFlex

I gave Mike Williams, 2024 4th
I got Miles Sanders, 2023 3rd

Fell from the sky IDK

Give me Sanders…the two players are similar in that you never know if they will blow up or disappear…they are more quality depth than starters…in this situation I will default to the RB position as it is much easier to find another WR like Williams…also, Sanders is a FA and does have the potential to end up somewhere that could be a better fantasy fit.
 
FFPC single QB

1.03, 2024 1st, 2024 2nd (both late, I’m coming off a 3peat and still strong)

For

1.08, 2.01, 2024 1st (lock top 4, team is awful and only scored 1300 points this year)

I really like the depth of this draft but don’t have big separation after the first two picks. Feels like it gives me a good chance to snag two really useful players and the 1st is going to be a great trade chip in season if I want to use it.

Only slight hesitation was to maybe wait until closer to the draft in case somebodies value pops at 1.03 but it kinda feels like the opposite is happening right now.
 
FFPC standard (cut down date March 31st)

David Montgomery, Antonio Gibson, and Courtland Sutton
For
Pick 1.11, Donta Foreman, and Elijah Mitchell
 
FFPC single QB

1.03, 2024 1st, 2024 2nd (both late, I’m coming off a 3peat and still strong)

For

1.08, 2.01, 2024 1st (lock top 4, team is awful and only scored 1300 points this year)

I really like the depth of this draft but don’t have big separation after the first two picks. Feels like it gives me a good chance to snag two really useful players and the 1st is going to be a great trade chip in season if I want to use it.

Only slight hesitation was to maybe wait until closer to the draft in case somebodies value pops at 1.03 but it kinda feels like the opposite is happening right now.
I think I like getting 1.08 and the high future 1st
 
FFPC single QB

1.03, 2024 1st, 2024 2nd (both late, I’m coming off a 3peat and still strong)

For

1.08, 2.01, 2024 1st (lock top 4, team is awful and only scored 1300 points this year)

I really like the depth of this draft but don’t have big separation after the first two picks. Feels like it gives me a good chance to snag two really useful players and the 1st is going to be a great trade chip in season if I want to use it.

Only slight hesitation was to maybe wait until closer to the draft in case somebodies value pops at 1.03 but it kinda feels like the opposite is happening right now.
You mention that you have a gap after your 2nd rookie but what if the guy drafting in the two slot likes someone else or has positional needs and your #2 slips to 3. My only suggestion would be to wait until 1.03
is on the clock then revisit this trade with this owner and see if any other owners come out of the woodwork with a strong(er) offer. I too find myself getting antsy and trying to move 1st rounders before it’s needed out of fear that offers won’t be there but I don’t think this trade is going anywhere…
 
This is basically Javonte + Pittman for ETN... for Rebuild, I would need to see how JW's recovery goes if he will ever recover the same burst/step he had. I like ETN > JavW but it looks even to me.
I think if Breece Hall's recovery give Robinson time to do something, ETN side for a Win-Now looks good move.
 
\
Interesting trade...you can see the thought process of both teams...Hill, ARob and James Robinson are non-factors to me so it comes down to Javonte/Pittman for Etienne so this trade really comes down to what you think of Pittman which I think you will have varying opinions...I would do this for Etienne as I don't like to deal with RBs coming back from ACLs and I am not high on Pittman...as long as that Owner has solid WR depth I would do it...it could come back to bite you but as long as Etienne plays at least like he did last year I am OK with that risk.
 
FFPC single QB

1.03, 2024 1st, 2024 2nd (both late, I’m coming off a 3peat and still strong)

For

1.08, 2.01, 2024 1st (lock top 4, team is awful and only scored 1300 points this year)

I really like the depth of this draft but don’t have big separation after the first two picks. Feels like it gives me a good chance to snag two really useful players and the 1st is going to be a great trade chip in season if I want to use it.

Only slight hesitation was to maybe wait until closer to the draft in case somebodies value pops at 1.03 but it kinda feels like the opposite is happening right now.
You mention that you have a gap after your 2nd rookie but what if the guy drafting in the two slot likes someone else or has positional needs and your #2 slips to 3. My only suggestion would be to wait until 1.03
is on the clock then revisit this trade with this owner and see if any other owners come out of the woodwork with a strong(er) offer. I too find myself getting antsy and trying to move 1st rounders before it’s needed out of fear that offers won’t be there but I don’t think this trade is going anywhere…

You’re probably right. I feel a twinge of regret for not waiting. There’s always a chance Gibbs is there at 3 which would be upsetting. Reason I pulled the trigger is because getting that future 1st is always a high priority for me in the off-season. I try to make that move every year and it’s worked out incredibly well, so getting what I want in an offer and not accepting didn’t feel right either. Definitely can see the merit of waiting but I’m content with it.
 

It’s be interesting to know if roster spots played any motivation as it’s basically a 2 for 1 as others pointed out. If I’m rebuilding, probably go with the Javonte side. If contending, ETN pretty easily. I really don’t know what to make of Javonte moving forward as it was a rough one for ACLs and he was already not a plus athlete.

In a vacuum I have more confidence in the Etienne side for preserving value. Another subpar season and no one will care about Pittman, Javonte a big question mark, while Jacksonville seems to be ascending.
 

It’s be interesting to know if roster spots played any motivation as it’s basically a 2 for 1 as others pointed out. If I’m rebuilding, probably go with the Javonte side. If contending, ETN pretty easily. I really don’t know what to make of Javonte moving forward as it was a rough one for ACLs and he was already not a plus athlete.

In a vacuum I have more confidence in the Etienne side for preserving value. Another subpar season and no one will care about Pittman, Javonte a big question mark, while Jacksonville seems to be ascending.
I have the value essentially as a free Michael Pittman. :shrug:
 

It’s be interesting to know if roster spots played any motivation as it’s basically a 2 for 1 as others pointed out. If I’m rebuilding, probably go with the Javonte side. If contending, ETN pretty easily. I really don’t know what to make of Javonte moving forward as it was a rough one for ACLs and he was already not a plus athlete.

In a vacuum I have more confidence in the Etienne side for preserving value. Another subpar season and no one will care about Pittman, Javonte a big question mark, while Jacksonville seems to be ascending.
I have the value essentially as a free Michael Pittman. :shrug:

Not me. I definitely value Etienne a lot more than JW.

I’m not saying I’d make that exact trade if I’m either side, especially the JW side. I’d probably shop for different asset(s), but a year from now I think Etienne will be worth the same or more as he is now. I don’t feel that way about Javonte and never really bought him being a worth a top 2 round startup pick either. Pittman I like but he needs a QB to arrive and boost his stats immediately or he’s gonna be considered a fantasy JAG.
 

It’s be interesting to know if roster spots played any motivation as it’s basically a 2 for 1 as others pointed out. If I’m rebuilding, probably go with the Javonte side. If contending, ETN pretty easily. I really don’t know what to make of Javonte moving forward as it was a rough one for ACLs and he was already not a plus athlete.

In a vacuum I have more confidence in the Etienne side for preserving value. Another subpar season and no one will care about Pittman, Javonte a big question mark, while Jacksonville seems to be ascending.
I have the value essentially as a free Michael Pittman. :shrug:

Not me. I definitely value Etienne a lot more than JW.

I’m not saying I’d make that exact trade if I’m either side, especially the JW side. I’d probably shop for different asset(s), but a year from now I think Etienne will be worth the same or more as he is now. I don’t feel that way about Javonte and never really bought him being a worth a top 2 round startup pick either. Pittman I like but he needs a QB to arrive and boost his stats immediately or he’s gonna be considered a fantasy JAG.
I don’t disagree about Pitman, but I see ETN and Javonte Williams current values as almost identical. I have ETN and probably would not trade him straight up for Williams due to the injury. But from what I have seen in trades, Williams value is extremely close

So if I had to choose one side or another, I would take the Williams side and immediately flip Pittman for a player I like more. I believe that side of the trade is pure profit.
 

It’s be interesting to know if roster spots played any motivation as it’s basically a 2 for 1 as others pointed out. If I’m rebuilding, probably go with the Javonte side. If contending, ETN pretty easily. I really don’t know what to make of Javonte moving forward as it was a rough one for ACLs and he was already not a plus athlete.

In a vacuum I have more confidence in the Etienne side for preserving value. Another subpar season and no one will care about Pittman, Javonte a big question mark, while Jacksonville seems to be ascending.
I have the value essentially as a free Michael Pittman. :shrug:

Not me. I definitely value Etienne a lot more than JW.

I’m not saying I’d make that exact trade if I’m either side, especially the JW side. I’d probably shop for different asset(s), but a year from now I think Etienne will be worth the same or more as he is now. I don’t feel that way about Javonte and never really bought him being a worth a top 2 round startup pick either. Pittman I like but he needs a QB to arrive and boost his stats immediately or he’s gonna be considered a fantasy JAG.
I don’t disagree about Pitman, but I see ETN and Javonte Williams current values as almost identical. I have ETN and probably would not trade him straight up for Williams due to the injury. But from what I have seen in trades, Williams value is extremely close

So if I had to choose one side or another, I would take the Williams side and immediately flip Pittman for a player I like more. I believe that side of the trade is pure profit.

Agree to disagree. I am extremely careful about which RBs I invest in and JW at his current price is just completely off my board, which he pretty much has been from the time he was drafted. Etienne is an RB that I would actually consider at his current price tag. Huge disparity between the two for me.
 

It’s be interesting to know if roster spots played any motivation as it’s basically a 2 for 1 as others pointed out. If I’m rebuilding, probably go with the Javonte side. If contending, ETN pretty easily. I really don’t know what to make of Javonte moving forward as it was a rough one for ACLs and he was already not a plus athlete.

In a vacuum I have more confidence in the Etienne side for preserving value. Another subpar season and no one will care about Pittman, Javonte a big question mark, while Jacksonville seems to be ascending.
I have the value essentially as a free Michael Pittman. :shrug:
I disagree with the free Pittman valuation. I don't trust JW's return from injury and think his 2023 will be very similar to Dobbins 2022. Based on that I have ETN much higher in value and I am not sure if PIttman makes up that difference. If we knew JW would be close to 100% for 2023 then it would be closer and I likely lean that way but with what I know today I would still take the ETN side.
 
Last edited:

It’s be interesting to know if roster spots played any motivation as it’s basically a 2 for 1 as others pointed out. If I’m rebuilding, probably go with the Javonte side. If contending, ETN pretty easily. I really don’t know what to make of Javonte moving forward as it was a rough one for ACLs and he was already not a plus athlete.

In a vacuum I have more confidence in the Etienne side for preserving value. Another subpar season and no one will care about Pittman, Javonte a big question mark, while Jacksonville seems to be ascending.
I have the value essentially as a free Michael Pittman. :shrug:
I disagree with the free Pittman valuation. I don't trust JW's return from injury and think his 2023 will be vary similar to Dobbins 2022. Based on that I have ETN much higher in value and I am not sure if PIttman makes up that difference. If we knew JW would be close to 100% for 2023 then it would be closer and I likely lean that way but with what I know today I would still take the ETN side.
As an ETN shareholder, as I said… I certainly would not trade him for Javonte Williams, I’m just saying what I’ve seen in terms of trades on the various sites. Javonte still holds quite a bit of value.

I am also not very high on Pittman, and for the same reasons.

Irony: just before ETN returned to practice, I traded Pittman for him. Looking back I’m super happy with that deal.
 
12 team ppr QB/2RB/3WR/TE/FL

Team A gave

Team B gave
In a one quarterback league, I am having trouble seeing a ton of value for any of these players, so I guess I’ll take the side with the picks.
Maybe the info that SF GM Lynch called Tom Brady to "chat" ... just to touch base with him and "check his retirement status" ??
Kamara = Suspended
Stafford = IR
Picks are the only real value to the obvious observer... but who knows what shakes out
 
12 team ppr QB/2RB/3WR/TE/FL

Team A gave

Team B gave
Looks like Kamara for 2.12 and future 2nd. Roster size and team makeup would matter, but I have been shopping Kamara on a FFPC BB team and I am taking it.
I would not move in for that on the two FFPC teams I have him but to your point on the bolded they are both contending teams whose major weakness is RB depth. Which is the major reason I got stuck holding him longer then I normally do, needed him. I think I'd pay that for him in at least one league, only I could not do it until after we could expand rosters.
 
FFPC single QB

1.03, 2024 1st, 2024 2nd (both late, I’m coming off a 3peat and still strong)

For

1.08, 2.01, 2024 1st (lock top 4, team is awful and only scored 1300 points this year)

I really like the depth of this draft but don’t have big separation after the first two picks. Feels like it gives me a good chance to snag two really useful players and the 1st is going to be a great trade chip in season if I want to use it.

Only slight hesitation was to maybe wait until closer to the draft in case somebodies value pops at 1.03 but it kinda feels like the opposite is happening right now.
I usually prefer to wait until after the NFL draft but these are types of deals I love. Good move but would think it would have been available a little later too.
 
FFPC single QB

1.03, 2024 1st, 2024 2nd (both late, I’m coming off a 3peat and still strong)

For

1.08, 2.01, 2024 1st (lock top 4, team is awful and only scored 1300 points this year)

I really like the depth of this draft but don’t have big separation after the first two picks. Feels like it gives me a good chance to snag two really useful players and the 1st is going to be a great trade chip in season if I want to use it.

Only slight hesitation was to maybe wait until closer to the draft in case somebodies value pops at 1.03 but it kinda feels like the opposite is happening right now.
I usually prefer to wait until after the NFL draft but these are types of deals I love. Good move but would think it would have been available a little later too.
It's a risk type of move. Love it
 
FFPC single QB

1.03, 2024 1st, 2024 2nd (both late, I’m coming off a 3peat and still strong)

For

1.08, 2.01, 2024 1st (lock top 4, team is awful and only scored 1300 points this year)

I really like the depth of this draft but don’t have big separation after the first two picks. Feels like it gives me a good chance to snag two really useful players and the 1st is going to be a great trade chip in season if I want to use it.

Only slight hesitation was to maybe wait until closer to the draft in case somebodies value pops at 1.03 but it kinda feels like the opposite is happening right now.
I usually prefer to wait until after the NFL draft but these are types of deals I love. Good move but would think it would have been available a little later too.
It's a risk type of move. Love it

Yep. Made the same kind of move last year in our old league and it netted me Bijan :)
 
FFPC single QB

1.03, 2024 1st, 2024 2nd (both late, I’m coming off a 3peat and still strong)

For

1.08, 2.01, 2024 1st (lock top 4, team is awful and only scored 1300 points this year)

I really like the depth of this draft but don’t have big separation after the first two picks. Feels like it gives me a good chance to snag two really useful players and the 1st is going to be a great trade chip in season if I want to use it.

Only slight hesitation was to maybe wait until closer to the draft in case somebodies value pops at 1.03 but it kinda feels like the opposite is happening right now.
I usually prefer to wait until after the NFL draft but these are types of deals I love. Good move but would think it would have been available a little later too.
It's a risk type of move. Love it

Yep. Made the same kind of move last year in our old league and it netted me Bijan :)
Have to love it when a plan comes together.
 
FFPC superflex best ball

Gave: Chig Okonkwo, 2.05
Got: 1.11

He offered me six picks for Okonkwo, the best of which was 3.08. I like him more than that, and the other guy had eight of the first 23 picks in this draft, so I made the above offer, thinking he would counter. He accepted pretty quickly. Of course, now I'm wondering if I should've asked for his 1.08 or 1.09 instead.
 
FFPC superflex best ball

Gave: Chig Okonkwo, 2.05
Got: 1.11

He offered me six picks for Okonkwo, the best of which was 3.08. I like him more than that, and the other guy had eight of the first 23 picks in this draft, so I made the above offer, thinking he would counter. He accepted pretty quickly. Of course, now I'm wondering if I should've asked for his 1.08 or 1.09 instead.

A few hours later, the other guy traded my former 2.05 for Mac Jones. So he basically traded the 1.11 for Mac Jones and Okonkwo.
 
FFPC superflex best ball

Gave: Chig Okonkwo, 2.05
Got: 1.11

He offered me six picks for Okonkwo, the best of which was 3.08. I like him more than that, and the other guy had eight of the first 23 picks in this draft, so I made the above offer, thinking he would counter. He accepted pretty quickly. Of course, now I'm wondering if I should've asked for his 1.08 or 1.09 instead.
That’s a nice return provided you have a decent TE without him. I think it’s a nice buy on Chig as well.

That said, it’s a little odd to be buying Chig with so many draft picks and what looks like a potentially historic TE class. There’s like 4 TEs who look better than Mayer, and everyone thought he was the slam dunk TE1. Dude could just draft a top TE.

So nice work, if you can afford to deal Chig.
 
I recently trade for Davante Adams in another league but with this particular team build I shopped him and dealt him.

FFPC, 1QB
Gave: Davante Adams and 2.07
Got: Javonte Williams and 24 1st (likely mid)

I only had Dillon at RB am young and deep at WR. Might even try to move Williams bc I don’t love him but ultimately like the value I got for Adams.
 
I recently trade for Davante Adams in another league but with this particular team build I shopped him and dealt him.

FFPC, 1QB
Gave: Davante Adams and 2.07
Got: Javonte Williams and 24 1st (likely mid)

I only had Dillon at RB am young and deep at WR. Might even try to move Williams bc I don’t love him but ultimately like the value I got for Adams.

Super easy win for you and I’m not big on Javonte. It’s probably a draw without the 1st included.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top