What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

****OFFICIAL DYNASTY TRADES**** (24 Viewers)

I’ve never been in any IDP league where LBs (and not elite ones) hold that kind of value. Is there some funky scoring? Seems crazy.
He was the #1 IDP in all my leagues and he's what 27?  28?  He's actually a pretty good player so he's on the field every play and racks up the tackles.  All of these leagues are similarly tackle-heavy-ish so big time LB's do go for heavy premiums.  You gotta figure rookie studs like Bush last year start going late 1st so plug in maybe 1.08 for Hicks' equivalent value.  $40 is a lot of tacos in those leagues.  I'm not in his but depending on FT rules that might net you a tier 2 stud like Drake in RFA.   So Drake and 1.08 for 1.04 and 2.04.

 
He was the #1 IDP in all my leagues and he's what 27?  28?  He's actually a pretty good player so he's on the field every play and racks up the tackles.  All of these leagues are similarly tackle-heavy-ish so big time LB's do go for heavy premiums.  You gotta figure rookie studs like Bush last year start going late 1st so plug in maybe 1.08 for Hicks' equivalent value.  $40 is a lot of tacos in those leagues.  I'm not in his but depending on FT rules that might net you a tier 2 stud like Drake in RFA.   So Drake and 1.08 for 1.04 and 2.04.
Makes sense. I just know in my leagues you might get a late first for Leonard....maybe. Guys don’t tend to place that kind of value on the position since you can often get good production out of waiver wire guys. 

 
Please tell me the Adams owner is the worst team in the league and Adams is his only good piece so he "got what he could", and he's also an idiot?  
No, he's deep at WR with M. Thomas as his #1 WR and he has a pretty good team he finished #3 in scoring last year.

Tex

 
non ppr 14 team league

Team A gives

OBJ

2020 1.04

2020 2.04

Team B gives

Derrick Henry

2020 1.11

2020 3.06

2020 3.07

 
non ppr 14 team league

Team A gives

OBJ

2020 1.04

2020 2.04

Team B gives

Derrick Henry

2020 1.11

2020 3.06

2020 3.07
Non-PPR makes this pretty close I'd imagine.  I don't play that format but I go OBJ side.  

10 team 22 man roster 1 QB 2 RB 2 WR 1 TE 1 Flex 1 K 1 DEF

Team A gave 1.09, Guice, K. Hunt

Team B gave 1.01
Pretty even deal but I'm higher on Guice than most.  I like 1.01 personally though.

 
10 team ppr 1 QB  2 RB 3 WR 1 TE 2 FLEX

Team A (me) gets:

Hopkins

A.j. Brown

Team B gets:

Godwin

Fournette

Kirk

My current team is

Wr: sutton, allen robinson, lockett, landry, edelman

Rb: D. Freeman, white, carson, guice

 
10 team PPR 1 QB 2 RB 3 WR 1 TE 2 FLEX

Team A (me) gets:

Hopkins and A.J. Brown

Team B gets: godwin, fournette, kirk

 
Just had a team deal picks 10, 12, 28, and 42 for the 1. He also has the 2. Doesn't have much else on the team except Jacobs and some good IDP. But he has many picks.

 
12 team .5 PPR (not included):

Team A gave Devin Singletary

Team B gave Allen Robinson

Steep price for A-Rob when you only have Fournette, Mack, Sanders, and Snell at RB now.
In a vacuum I would probably still take Arob there. Now if the Bills don’t spend a decent pick on a running back, then it may shift the other way. 

 
10 team 22 man roster 1 QB 2 RB 2 WR 1 TE 1 Flex 1 K 1 DEF

Team A gave 1.09, Guice, K. Hunt

Team B gave 1.01
Between this trade and that Adams for 1.10...I think I'm in the wrong type of leagues. I need more suckers in my dynasty leagues so I can get these type of trades  ;)

 
Gave 1.10 pick

Got D. Adams

Tex
If I saw this in one of my leagues I would honestly assume collusion.  Not saying that's the case here but this is a ridiculous trade.

12 team .5 PPR (not included):

Team A gave Devin Singletary

Team B gave Allen Robinson

Steep price for A-Rob when you only have Fournette, Mack, Sanders, and Snell at RB now.
Steep price for a 26 year old that just finished as WR8 overall despite playing with one of the worst QB situations in the league?

I think this is fair because it's only 0.5 PPR (in full PPR I would take ARob pretty easily), though I still prefer the ARob side by a bit.

 
took over a rebuild with only two pieces (Jackson and Kupp) and somehow finished well enough to get 1.06, etc.

12 team graded PPR (0.5, 1.0, 1.5)

Sent Kupp

Got 1.07. 2.07, Washington (Pit) and Cohen (i have Montgomery)

 
took over a rebuild with only two pieces (Jackson and Kupp) and somehow finished well enough to get 1.06, etc.

12 team graded PPR (0.5, 1.0, 1.5)

Sent Kupp

Got 1.07. 2.07, Washington (Pit) and Cohen (i have Montgomery)
IMHO, these draft picks just became much more useless than before the NFL draft! RBs going to committees, WRs not going where they could be most helpful (think Green Bay), poor TE class. Be careful here folks.

 
i do like Kupp, but my team is a couple years out so i need to stock pile youth. Winning in 2020 is a bad thing on a rebuild.

I will say that my opinion on this draft class has gone from high, to average, to high again with the landing spots on day 2. Prior to the draft, i saw a top 18-20. Now it might be a top 26-8 that i like

 
FFPC

I traded 1.10 and Daniel Jones

I got 1.06

I have 1.02 and 2.02 as well so I viewed 2.02 as the same as 1.10 basically and I can easily get whoever slips there since I probably won't be the guy reaching for a WR there.  1.02 and 1.06 should be enough to get 2 RB's.  I hope.  

 
10 team 22 man roster 1 QB 2 RB 2 WR 1 TE 1 Flex 1 K 1 DEF

Team A gave 1.09, Guice, K. Hunt

Team B gave 1.01
This trade should serve as a warning about trading picks before the draft.   On 4/23 most of us assumed there were 5 top backs and 2-3 WRs, and given how an average draft shakes out it's likely that 1 of those 8 would fall to 1.09, which makes the Guice/Hunt side much more palatable.   Post draft rounds 1-3 it's 1.01, and it's not close.

 
FFPC

I traded 1.10 and Daniel Jones

I got 1.06

I have 1.02 and 2.02 as well so I viewed 2.02 as the same as 1.10 basically and I can easily get whoever slips there since I probably won't be the guy reaching for a WR there.  1.02 and 1.06 should be enough to get 2 RB's.  I hope.  
I don't think Jones made it through cuts in any of my non-SF FFPC leagues so I'd take 1.06 pretty easily here even as someone that thinks Jones is underrated.

This trade should serve as a warning about trading picks before the draft.   On 4/23 most of us assumed there were 5 top backs and 2-3 WRs, and given how an average draft shakes out it's likely that 1 of those 8 would fall to 1.09, which makes the Guice/Hunt side much more palatable.   Post draft rounds 1-3 it's 1.01, and it's not close.
This was 1.01 easily both before and after the draft, but I think the draft shook out pretty much exactly the way you're describing.  5 RBs then Jeudy/Lamb and maybe Raegor/Jefferson goes right into that 1.09 range.

If anything I think the value of 1.09 is slightly up after the draft.

 
I don't think Jones made it through cuts in any of my non-SF FFPC leagues so I'd take 1.06 pretty easily here even as someone that thinks Jones is underrated.
I actually traded a 6th for him before cuts.  Easy flip for me, figured I could sell the 2nd year, rushing ability, lots of talent around him narrative to a team with no future QB.  Turns out I was right.  I have Russell Wilson as my starter.  

 
This was 1.01 easily both before and after the draft, but I think the draft shook out pretty much exactly the way you're describing.  5 RBs then Jeudy/Lamb and maybe Raegor/Jefferson goes right into that 1.09 range.

If anything I think the value of 1.09 is slightly up after the draft.
I didn't state my position very well; I preferred the 1.01 before the draft as well, but I could see some owners might think to roll the dice on the Guice/Hunt side of things.   I think it should be clear to everyone now that the 1.01 is the obvious choice.

 
I didn't state my position very well; I preferred the 1.01 before the draft as well, but I could see some owners might think to roll the dice on the Guice/Hunt side of things.   I think it should be clear to everyone now that the 1.01 is the obvious choice.
I think it was a clear win for 1.01 before the draft and a clear win after. But I think the depth and quality of the draft has improved the 1.09 side of the trade. I still think it's not close, though.

 
FFPC:

Gave: Josh Jacobs, 6.1

Got: 1.1

I will be picking CEH. Risky business giving up young and fairly proven for unproven, especially when I really like Jacobs but this was shot I wanted to take.

 
12 team IDP PPR 1.5 TE

1.01 + Beckham

for

1.03 + 1.07 + 2.07 + 2021 1st
On one hand I want to say 1.01 and Beckham easily.  On the other hand I know it's been a while since Beckham has done anything worth writing home about.  I still take 1.01/Bechkam though.  

 
12 team IDP PPR 1.5 TE

1.01 + Beckham

for

1.03 + 1.07 + 2.07 + 2021 1st
The way rookie drafts are shaking out, there's not a ton of difference between 1.01 and 1.03 IMO. So I'll take the picks because there's no way OBJ is worth the rest.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top