This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
The way this class looks I'd rather sit on the 11/16 but can easily see how some separation I'm not currently seeing between the 7 and 11 becomes evident when all is said and done.
I don’t mind the overpay - the ‘24 1st is a bit much. I could see getting this done without it since you’re giving the 1.08
Good move in standard if you don’t love the options that will be there at 7.
People have different tier breaks and perceived depth of the draft, so it depends. Personally I’d rather have the 1.7. Better risk management.
It’s a mixed bag.
Exactly this. It all depends on whether one believes there’s a drop-off after 1.06, and another tier that goes to 16, in which case this is a 2 for 1.
Actually that was my bad - I read too quickly and didn’t see he got Wilson also.
That, to me, is the biggest risk.
I’m not a Pittman guy, but I feel like that’s the winning side of this deal.
It’s good to see Hock is finally undervalued. Probably a fair deal but if you’re contending that’s a perfect deal for you.
Seems about right. I have Bateman in one league and would swap him for Pittman. Probably would throw something in around a 3rd.
I feel like that’s a bargain for Hock.
What round is the 2023 (early)?
Oops, my bad. I edited the original post. Its a 3rd. I would put that team as a bottom 4-5 team. They could sneak into the playoff, but I would think not.
I write down 3-4 teams I target for their future 1st. He was one of them. Now, his team isn't terrible so its not obvious to be an early pick but starting roster of:
Ok, so 1.12, a 24 2nd, & a 23 3rd for a 24 early-to-mid 1st?
I agree, but if this is the same league with the short bench, drafting a 2nd and 3rd just gives him two more players to choose who to drop.
And there’s always the chance that LJax has an MVP season - I could see that roster having a great season or completely tanking.
Two roster cloggers. May as well take the draft pick.
agreed that if things fall right he could be close to playoff team. Evans post Brady would scare me. Mixon I don't have much faith in with offseason and probably cut. D. Cook looked like he lost a step. I like Etienne.
This, in addition to Evans’ likely drop-off, is where this team definitely worries me.
Pittman is probably a mid WR2 in fantasy at best, but a “roster clogger” is unnecessarily harsh - unless you have really short benches.
Maybe - but I don’t get it then. I’m not seeing the humor.
I’m hoping, but not necessarily expecting for Evans to be traded.
That was my expectation as well.
Granted, my perspective is swayed by him and Brady winning the trophy for me when they finally put it together for one week.
What would you spend on him in redraft?
Don’t really know, I don’t plan on doing any redrafts this year. I’d guess a 6th but that’s a total WAG
Lol yeah sorry. Definitely harsh/hyperbole. I wouldn’t cut those guys, or anything like that. I just see them both as interchangeable and not difference makers.
I would probably entertain paying that for Fields if I was a QB away from serious contention. He’s capable of 50 PPG, as we saw last year. Very few players have that sort of ceiling.
Terrible honestly
14 team SF tho. Context matters. I’m in a 16 team SF looking for a QB & I get it.
With that format I’d take Fields.
