As I've stated before, I firmly believe that your biggest problem is that you want/expect the QB to carry the team, instead of letting him be a part of the team. The QB you want (expect????) is so rare that you can count those QB's on one hand....for all of NFL history.McNabb is a good QB. He'll probably be a HOFer when it's all said and done, but he's not Unitas reborn. I can live with that.BuddyKnuckles said:alright, i'm done for now. We all deal with tragedies in our own ways. I lash out. Especially at choke artists...damn, sorry, i am going to try not to do that anymore. Lets see what the draft looks like and who is around on Feb 27 when FA starts. This truly was a complete team loss. I texted a friend in the 1st half and said "i didnt know a whole team could choke". You all know how i feel about 5. Hopefully the FO can make enough moves to cover his deficiencies.renesauz said:BK...enough is enough. Most of us #5 supporters have already acknowledged that McNabb wasn't awesome today. He didn't pick the team up when we needed him to and carry us to the promised land.
But, you gotta admit, i can get some people riled up.Just point me to the nearest Cowgirls/Deadskins/Gnats message board when a little venom is needed.
It's a team game, and the team lost. Lewis dropped a decent deep ball. Curtis dropped the critical 4th and 10. The defense was all over the map, and forced ZERO turnovers in a game where we all expected at least a couple from them. OUr rookie safety attempted a shoulder-tackle at the 3 yard line on a critical 3rd down play, costing 4 points. Akers missed a relatively easy FG AND AND XP! Multiple defenders missed tackles they normally make.
Yep...there were 5 or 6 McNabb passes that were off target, and could have been big plays. The thing is...there are ALWAYS 5 or 6 McNabb passes like that. But the guy makes a lot of big plays. How many interceptions does he throw on these "bad passes? I mean...most QB's with accuracy problems throw a ton of picks, but not #5.
He escapes sacks other QB's wouldn't. He is capable of one of the sweetest (if not THE sweetest) deep balls in the NFL. It's his ability to buy time which has made it possible for AR and Co. to get away with sub-par receivers year after year. He wins games.
McNabb will never carry us to a championship. We agree there. BUT...he is more then good enough to win one with. He made enough plays to win yesterday, even if he left one or two on the field. You put waaaaaay too much at his feet.
Just point me to the nearest Cowgirls/Deadskins/Gnats message board when a little venom is needed.
Just point me to the nearest Cowgirls/Deadskins/Gnats message board when a little venom is needed.
In the earlier NFC championship games, the Eagles running game was sound, but that crappy WR's held the offense back. (remember having Duce, Buck, and Westy?). Then we had a stud #1WR and we all know where that got us. Now the WR's are at least serviceable, but the Eagles can't run the ball well enough. It could be because Westy was hurt, or the line was hurt, or they just need another RB, but it definitely needs to be addressed.
i imagine we'll never know...unless DH can give us some inside scoop.My guess/opinion (cause you know i'd have one): Reid and Co knew that having an elite QB meant years of success and most likely a SB ring or two. So, they take McNabb, see his potential, and are then wow'd by his performance early in his career. They decide somewhere in yr 2 or 3 that he is the one. He is Montana, he is Elway, he is Favre. From that point on, they build the team relying on McNabb to carry them to the promised land, all while making Lurie as much $$$ as possible. And now they are either too proud to admit they were wrong, or still have 100% faith in him as an ultra-elite QB. its almost as if by goign out and getting a stud WR now, they admit they were wrong all along.