What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***OFFICIAL*** FFA MLB Draft (1 Viewer)

Hoyt Wilhelm - surprised I got him when I did. The first reliever ever inducted in to the Hall of Fame, 3rd all time in adjusted ERA. The strategy question of when to take a reliever comes in to play of course, but if you want one there's no doubt Hoyt's the man.

 
Besides for OBP, HR, and IP I don't know what the sim values. I think its safe to say that some of the guys are deliberately overvalued and some undervalued, but I have no idea how they do it. More than anything, it'll be interesting to see what it does with the pitching since some of the traditional measures don't seem to be rewarded in the salaries.

 
depending on how his sim takes these numbers into account, he could kick the crap out of some of our teams using modern hitters.
After playing around with Whatif's sim matchup, I'm pretty sure they don't adjust numbers for eras even the slightest bit.Which is why I stopped caring about the sim awhile ago.
Koya seems to think they take all kinds of things into consideration, but I agree, they don't. Salary=wins. Things like ballpark and match-ups matter a little bit, but everything a player is/was (defense/speed/etc) is taken into account and reflected in the salary.Normally, the way it works is, teams just compile a club using a salary cap. (80M I think). Either way, I think it's be interesting to see how it shakes out. I still think the sim is much more important than the vote though. The sim lasts two months, the vote lasts one day. And in the vote, most are going to vote for two reasons: they like the team owner or they recognize more players on a certain team. Look at the NBA draft results for clues. Not knocking either team that made the finals (because they were both better than mine), but they had the most modern players. Spock, Harrier etc...have little chance in the vote, but I'd think either could win the sim going away.
 
Koya seems to think they take all kinds of things into consideration, but I agree, they don't. Salary=wins.
For releif pitchers, too? How are salaries for long relievers and set-up guys determined?
 
11 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 1 Anonymous Users)9 Members: Politician Spock, Funkley, NOC, Sammy3469, oso diablo, Doug B, Giant Wooden Badger, Mr. Pickles, BonezerelliDamnit! Where'd he go? :shrug:

 
Koya seems to think they take all kinds of things into consideration, but I agree, they don't. Salary=wins.
For releif pitchers, too? How are salaries for long relievers and set-up guys determined?
They way I saw it was the salary was pro-rated to the amount of innings pitched. If a closer has a $5M salary and you can multiply that times whatever percentage of innings it would take him to be a full time starter. I'm not sure that made sense mathmatically, but do you get my point?
 
11 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 1 Anonymous Users)9 Members: Politician Spock, Funkley, NOC, Sammy3469, oso diablo, Doug B, Giant Wooden Badger, Mr. Pickles, BonezerelliDamnit! Where'd he go? :shrug:
He's still on the big list at the bottom of the board.Probably yelling about dragons or Jesus or something.
 
Koya seems to think they take all kinds of things into consideration, but I agree, they don't.  Salary=wins.
For releif pitchers, too? How are salaries for long relievers and set-up guys determined?
They way I saw it was the salary was pro-rated to the amount of innings pitched. If a closer has a $5M salary and you can multiply that times whatever percentage of innings it would take him to be a full time starter. I'm not sure that made sense mathmatically, but do you get my point?
That's what I got out of it as well. I read in their forums they do take into account eras when simming things out though (something about comparing the guys numbers to "MLB" average for that year and "normalizing" his stats) but don't take things into account like the guys home ball park or even league (NL or AL). The hitters salaries seem to be atleast slightly weighted towards hr's to me. You can get a batting champ much cheaper than a HR champ, but I haven't actually crunched the numbers. The defensive rankings I have no clue. Most of them looked pretty good/accurate, but some really came out of left field.
 
Koya seems to think they take all kinds of things into consideration, but I agree, they don't.  Salary=wins.
For releif pitchers, too? How are salaries for long relievers and set-up guys determined?
They way I saw it was the salary was pro-rated to the amount of innings pitched. If a closer has a $5M salary and you can multiply that times whatever percentage of innings it would take him to be a full time starter. I'm not sure that made sense mathmatically, but do you get my point?
Just by eye-balling the numbers most closers appear to be 45% to 60% of what a good starter is.
 
11 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 1 Anonymous Users)9 Members: Politician Spock, Funkley, NOC, Sammy3469, oso diablo, Doug B, Giant Wooden Badger, Mr. Pickles, BonezerelliDamnit! Where'd he go? :shrug:
He's still on the big list at the bottom of the board.Probably yelling about dragons or Jesus or something.
Did you watch the J. Johnson thing? That was pretty cool. Still interested in starting a boxing draft 6 months or so from now when this is all done.
 
depending on how his sim takes these numbers into account, he could kick the crap out of some of our teams using modern hitters.
After playing around with Whatif's sim matchup, I'm pretty sure they don't adjust numbers for eras even the slightest bit.Which is why I stopped caring about the sim awhile ago.
really? so Chuck Klein grades out as more valuable than, say Reggie Jackson or Willie Stargell, just to take one example?Or, Rube Waddell, with his 2.16 ERA in the height of the dead-ball era is more valuable than, say, Lefty Grove, who had a 3.06 ERA in the height of the offensive explosion of late 20s / early 30s?Maybe those extreme examples don't turn out to be true in the sim, but not adjusting for era is silly when it comes to baseball.Edit: never mind, just saw UCONN's post above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Koya seems to think they take all kinds of things into consideration, but I agree, they don't.  Salary=wins.
For releif pitchers, too? How are salaries for long relievers and set-up guys determined?
They way I saw it was the salary was pro-rated to the amount of innings pitched. If a closer has a $5M salary and you can multiply that times whatever percentage of innings it would take him to be a full time starter. I'm not sure that made sense mathmatically, but do you get my point?
Just by eye-balling the numbers most closers appear to be 45% to 60% of what a good starter is.
Something like that, for the top guys, a bit less for the others....
 
Koya seems to think they take all kinds of things into consideration, but I agree, they don't.  Salary=wins.
For releif pitchers, too? How are salaries for long relievers and set-up guys determined?
They way I saw it was the salary was pro-rated to the amount of innings pitched. If a closer has a $5M salary and you can multiply that times whatever percentage of innings it would take him to be a full time starter. I'm not sure that made sense mathmatically, but do you get my point?
Just by eye-balling the numbers most closers appear to be 45% to 60% of what a good starter is.
That's cool for closers, because at least you have a stat (saves) to hang your hat on.But for long and middle relievers, and set-up specialists ... if they don't go by WHIP or ERA or something, some very good role pitchers might get the shaft.And you can't use starters as relievers, right? Didn't I read that above? So the WIS.com baseball world has only starters and closers?.
 
Koya seems to think they take all kinds of things into consideration, but I agree, they don't. Salary=wins.
For releif pitchers, too? How are salaries for long relievers and set-up guys determined?
I dont think I ever claimed to know how the sim works, I dont. I have some idea and things I have heard/read, is all and am willing to share that.I do remember reading that for pitchers, the most important stat that is ties to salary is Innings pitched. The idea being a pitcher who is "as good" as another but pitchers twice as many innings is twice as good.If this is correct, then a pitcher who has a lot of average innings will cost a lot more than a very good or great pitcher with less innings. Since the guys in the old days would go 500 innings and some ridiculous stats, that is reflected in a much better salary.As far as equating for era, I do believe the sim takes this into effect, but that is not my concern. In my own mind I compensate because I KNOW todays numbers are too high, while the dead ball era was too low (for power at least). That being neither here nor there, I am fairly confident the sim adjusts year by year. If it does not, then the sim = a waste of time completely (though I will participate either way, but a baseball sim that only takes the raw numbers isnt worth ####).Anyways, you can choose whomever you want for whatever reason. I know I am with a few others trying to draft the best team, and thats that.
 
depending on how his sim takes these numbers into account, he could kick the crap out of some of our teams using modern hitters.
After playing around with Whatif's sim matchup, I'm pretty sure they don't adjust numbers for eras even the slightest bit.Which is why I stopped caring about the sim awhile ago.
really? so Chuck Klein grades out as more valuable than, say Reggie Jackson or Willie Stargell, just to take one example?Or, Rube Waddell, with his 2.16 ERA in the height of the dead-ball era is more valuable than, say, Lefty Grove, who had a 3.06 ERA in the height of the offensive explosion of late 20s / early 30s?Maybe those extreme examples don't turn out to be true in the sim, but not adjusting for era is silly when it comes to baseball.
I've played the sims..it DOES NOT just take best stats into account..I don't know how they do, they just do.It's far deeper than Spartans seems to give it credit for.Seriously.
 
I have looked through the last 3 pages quick, have any choices been made today, ive only seen one.
Funk - FiskMe - Vida BlueUCONN - FernandoSpartans - WilhelmLarry - ON THE CLOCK
Thanks Kraft. At the time, I was in a meeting and did not know if it would ever end! WTF is larry?
 
depending on how his sim takes these numbers into account, he could kick the crap out of some of our teams using modern hitters.
After playing around with Whatif's sim matchup, I'm pretty sure they don't adjust numbers for eras even the slightest bit.Which is why I stopped caring about the sim awhile ago.
really? so Chuck Klein grades out as more valuable than, say Reggie Jackson or Willie Stargell, just to take one example?Or, Rube Waddell, with his 2.16 ERA in the height of the dead-ball era is more valuable than, say, Lefty Grove, who had a 3.06 ERA in the height of the offensive explosion of late 20s / early 30s?Maybe those extreme examples don't turn out to be true in the sim, but not adjusting for era is silly when it comes to baseball.Edit: never mind, just saw UCONN's post above.
This is the kind of stuff we'll find out about I guess. I'll be rooting for Waddell though.
 
Koya seems to think they take all kinds of things into consideration, but I agree, they don't.  Salary=wins.
For releif pitchers, too? How are salaries for long relievers and set-up guys determined?
They way I saw it was the salary was pro-rated to the amount of innings pitched. If a closer has a $5M salary and you can multiply that times whatever percentage of innings it would take him to be a full time starter. I'm not sure that made sense mathmatically, but do you get my point?
Just by eye-balling the numbers most closers appear to be 45% to 60% of what a good starter is.
That's cool for closers, because at least you have a stat (saves) to hang your hat on.But for long and middle relievers, and set-up specialists ... if they don't go by WHIP or ERA or something, some very good role pitchers might get the shaft.And you can't use starters as relievers, right? Didn't I read that above? So the WIS.com baseball world has only starters and closers?.
It looked like it was pretty flexible. I don't know about a starter "penalty" for coming out of the pen, but they certainly let you fill your roster w/ starters....10 spots for pitchers and 7 of them can be starters.
 
I've played the sims..it DOES NOT just take best stats into account..I don't know how they do, they just do.It's far deeper than Spartans seems to give it credit for.Seriously.
i'm with you now. was hard to believe that there was no era-adjustment. that's pretty basic stuff these days.would also be surprised that there are no park effects. Dodger Stadium vs. Coors Field anyone?
 
depending on how his sim takes these numbers into account, he could kick the crap out of some of our teams using modern hitters.
After playing around with Whatif's sim matchup, I'm pretty sure they don't adjust numbers for eras even the slightest bit.Which is why I stopped caring about the sim awhile ago.
really? so Chuck Klein grades out as more valuable than, say Reggie Jackson or Willie Stargell, just to take one example?Or, Rube Waddell, with his 2.16 ERA in the height of the dead-ball era is more valuable than, say, Lefty Grove, who had a 3.06 ERA in the height of the offensive explosion of late 20s / early 30s?Maybe those extreme examples don't turn out to be true in the sim, but not adjusting for era is silly when it comes to baseball.
I've played the sims..it DOES NOT just take best stats into account..I don't know how they do, they just do.It's far deeper than Spartans seems to give it credit for.Seriously.
From everything I have heard/read, Cap is right.C. Kleins numbers will hurt, especially in the wrong park. Mike Piazza's will suffer from his era, but will be greatly helped by his ball park. Gibsons miracle season will still be great, but it will be great in the context of a great pitching year. This is what I understand it to be... I have no idea how it actually plays out.
 
And you can't use starters as relievers, right? Didn't I read that above? So the WIS.com baseball world has only starters and closers?.
I'm assuming no.
At WIS, like in real baseball, you are allowed to use a starter as a reliever. I believe you get one slot for a starter only, and then a bunch of slots for "starter/relievers" and maybe a couple more for relievers only (not sure, I dont remember).
 
Gibsons miracle season will still be great, but it will be great in the context of a great pitching year.
How can this season matter at all when it's not being used? You're assuming the site takes into consideration a players career. If that was the case, why are we using only specific years? Why not just draft players and let the sim sort everything out. I think you're off base a bit here...
 
I've played the sims..it DOES NOT just take best stats into account..I don't know how they do, they just do.It's far deeper than Spartans seems to give it credit for.Seriously.
i'm with you now. was hard to believe that there was no era-adjustment. that's pretty basic stuff these days.would also be surprised that there are no park effects. Dodger Stadium vs. Coors Field anyone?
that and the no AL/NL effect were the things that suprised me. They have forums for discussion and everything I read (which wasn't much) seemed to say adjustment for era, :yes: ...adjustment for home park or league (for example most people believe and equal ERA in the post-DH AL is better than NL and obviously the Coors vs Dodger Stadium thing), :no: ...
 
And you can't use starters as relievers, right? Didn't I read that above? So the WIS.com baseball world has only starters and closers?.
I'm assuming no.
At WIS, like in real baseball, you are allowed to use a starter as a reliever. I believe you get one slot for a starter only, and then a bunch of slots for "starter/relievers" and maybe a couple more for relievers only (not sure, I dont remember).
The starting lineup for pitching in the 'free team' section is:SPSP/RPSP/RPSP/RPSP/RPSP/RPSP/RPRPRPRP
 
personally, I loved his style of play, and he put up some pretty outstanding seasons.
Nothing wrong with the pick. I just don't like the guy.
oh.I do think he's scum.Shame too, when I growing up, Gary Carter was my favorite player, but I probably read more on Rose than anybody else. Always was interested in the guy.Shame he was a moron.
Why Gary Carter? Just curious. Mine was Reggie Jackson. Don't remember why....probably from seeing him on TV but for a Mpls kid to like Reggie more than Rod Carew was strange around here.
I wish I had a hero like Carter or Jackson. My favorite players growing up were Scott Fletcher and Charlie Hough.Man the Rangers sucked in the late 80's.
this will sound kind of corny, but I imagine it's similar to how most people find favorite teams or players in towns where there is no professional team.I grew up in St. Pete, which back in the 80s obviously didn't have the Rays. But we did have great Spring Training..the Mets and Cards, both in one stadium, both at their best. Damn good teams.My dad started taking me when I was young, and he was a big Cardinals fan. So to be contrary, I started pulling for the Mets. Gary Carter always was signing autographs (I must have like 9 of them, dumb kid) and always seemed to be smiling. Plus he played catcher, which I played in little league, since I was so bad anywhere else in the field. So like any kid, it doesn't take much to get a favorite team or player so I latched onto the Mutts and Carter. Gigantic Strawberry and Gooden fans as well. Gooden actually used to have a home next to my Uncle, which didn't hurt my fandom.Still pull for the Mutts and the Cards to do well, to this day. Mets left St. Pete in the late 80s/early 90s, so I eventually grew more interested in the Cards. Like to see them both do well, but it's certainly not life or death.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just by eye-balling the numbers most closers appear to be 45% to 60% of what a good starter is.
That's cool for closers, because at least you have a stat (saves) to hang your hat on.But for long and middle relievers, and set-up specialists ... if they don't go by WHIP or ERA or something, some very good role pitchers might get the shaft.And you can't use starters as relievers, right? Didn't I read that above? So the WIS.com baseball world has only starters and closers?
It looked like it was pretty flexible. I don't know about a starter "penalty" for coming out of the pen, but they certainly let you fill your roster w/ starters....10 spots for pitchers and 7 of them can be starters.
Yeah, I saw that when I did the free sim.I also noticed that my team usually got waxed when I had to use multiple pitchers in a game. I drafted the freebie team to make copious use of situational matchups in relief, and I drafted dedicated middle relievers with specialist roles (long, middle, RH setup, LH setup, etc.). Didn't seem to help much -- when my starters went 8+ innings, my team cruised. When we had to go to the pen, we got shelled, and couldn't get the bleeding stopped.
 
and I drafted dedicated middle relievers with specialist roles (long, middle, RH setup, LH setup, etc.). Didn't seem to help much -- when my starters went 8+ innings, my team cruised. When we had to go to the pen, we got shelled, and couldn't get the bleeding stopped.
poor Nipsey. :own3d:
 
and I drafted dedicated middle relievers with specialist roles (long, middle, RH setup, LH setup, etc.). Didn't seem to help much -- when my starters went 8+ innings, my team cruised. When we had to go to the pen, we got shelled, and couldn't get the bleeding stopped.
poor Nipsey. :own3d:
I was gonna say the same thing.YOU LOSE, sir.
 
and I drafted dedicated middle relievers with specialist roles (long, middle, RH setup, LH setup, etc.). Didn't seem to help much -- when my starters went 8+ innings, my team cruised. When we had to go to the pen, we got shelled, and couldn't get the bleeding stopped.
poor Nipsey. :own3d:
:lol:Based on this information, everyone except Nipsey will be filling their bullpens in rounds 20-25.
 
and I drafted dedicated middle relievers with specialist roles (long, middle, RH setup, LH setup, etc.). Didn't seem to help much -- when my starters went 8+ innings, my team cruised. When we had to go to the pen, we got shelled, and couldn't get the bleeding stopped.
poor Nipsey. :own3d:
Well, I don't know if Nipsey is right or wrong. I've only got the ten free games to go by as a sample. And maybe I just picked the wrong relievers. Don't know for sure.
 
and I drafted dedicated middle relievers with specialist roles (long, middle, RH setup, LH setup, etc.). Didn't seem to help much -- when my starters went 8+ innings, my team cruised. When we had to go to the pen, we got shelled, and couldn't get the bleeding stopped.
poor Nipsey. :own3d:
Well, I don't know if Nipsey is right or wrong. I've only got the ten free games to go by as a sample. And maybe I just picked the wrong relievers. Don't know for sure.
it's funnier to rub it in nipsey's face, work with me here Doug.nice sig spock :lol:

 
and I drafted dedicated middle relievers with specialist roles (long, middle, RH setup, LH setup, etc.). Didn't seem to help much -- when my starters went 8+ innings, my team cruised. When we had to go to the pen, we got shelled, and couldn't get the bleeding stopped.
poor Nipsey. :own3d:
Well, I don't know if Nipsey is right or wrong. I've only got the ten free games to go by as a sample. And maybe I just picked the wrong relievers. Don't know for sure.
What happens after you sim your free team? Do you lose access to the draft center? Was worried about that so I haven't simmed a team yet.
 
How do you show up so late to the game and then have no idea that it was your turn, then go spend an hour researching picks? Didn't you have a list or something going, LB? Or just figure that you might have to make a pick at some point?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top