What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** FFA WAGERING THREAD - Merry Christmas!!! (14 Viewers)

7-5 (58.33%), +$142.98

A few near misses, could have easily been a 66.66%, +$300 or better day. It's going to take a few weeks to get the NBA ripper machine running at full capacity.

The 75% days and plus money winners will come. Went 2-0 on EVEN money plays, but those barely get my blood pumping. Much easier to catch a dog winning a quarter than a full game.

Detailed results:

Q1 - Raptors -4, -115 (L)
Q1 - Knicks / Hawks U54, -115 (W)
Q1 - Pistons -1.5, -120 (L)
1H - Rockets -4, -115 (L)
1H - Pistons -3, -110 (L)
Q3 - Bucks / Hornets U57, -110 (W)
Q3 - Pacers ML, EVEN (W)
Q3 - Pistons -2, -110 (W)
1H - Jazz / Kings O99.5, -110 (W)
Q1 - Jazz -3, -110 (L)
1H - Suns ML, EVEN (W)
Nuggets ML, -120 (W)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Q1 - Wizards -1.5, -120
1H - Wizards -3, -110
Bulls / 76ers U220, -110

Red Sox / Astros U26 HRE, -115

Broncos -9.5, +275
Demaryius Thomas longest reception U25.5, -115

 
Stuart Ullman said:
See, here's the thing. Your post gets 3 likes but I called him Brian Westbrook on purpose as I've done in the past.

They think you're funny, but really it's my joke. In a round about way, they are showing appreciation for my joke.
Click to expand...
Serious question: Do you really count the likes?

I ask, because I wonder if this is a generational thing (I do not know your age). If it truly makes you feel better and builds your self esteem I will press that little button for you every day. 

 
Pucks:

Leafs TT O3.5 (-110)
Bolts TT O3.5 (-125)
Sabres (+200)

I could certainly make an argument for the straight total on the Pitt/Tor game but I really don't trust Pens right now. Kind of same thing with
Det/TB. I feel pretty confident Bolts do their part but will the Wings do theirs. I'm not feeling AZ like NL, until I see any offense out of them hard
to keep riding that train, even with a potentially rusty Crow back in net. I like the Hawks but I'm not laying 160 to see. Same with Jackets. I really
should have locked that in at the open last night because it was much lower than 160 but I went to bed instead. A Hawks/Jackets parlay is
certainly worth a stab IMO if you are in to that sort of thing.

 
pack100 said:
Serious question: Do you really count the likes?

I ask, because I wonder if this is a generational thing (I do not know your age). If it truly makes you feel better and builds your self esteem I will press that little button for you every day. 
Click to expand...
It's a social dynamic thing for me at this point. I've fully come to terms with turned fact that I'm viewed as a 1980s wrestling heel in here.

It's just funny that a guy uses my own schtick verbatim and gets 4 likes in under 10 minutes.

Where as, it takes me calling an 80+ point NFL game to get the same admiration. It used to be about validation, but I have nothing left to prove. Now, it's more about having fun exposing the haters and frauds since I'm in a unique position to do so.

Even @gussy, one of my harshest critics in here will admit to you that I know my stuff in the NBA. He is an objective minded person. You need to be objective to be a winning sports bettor.

So when somebody in here comes after me, it generally means that they're not an objective thinker. They're emotional. Which means they're probably a lousy gambler, which means it's easy pickings for me.

I'll take a shot at their ego and win every time. It's like lining up a 5 ft 8 defensive back against Megatron. No matter how good you think you are, I'm still damn near a foot taller than you.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
gussy said:
Pucks:

Leafs TT O3.5 (-110)
Bolts TT O3.5 (-125)
Sabres (+200)

I could certainly make an argument for the straight total on the Pitt/Tor game but I really don't trust Pens right now.
Click to expand...
I have no idea how either Murray or Andersen will be coming off injury and both are so fragile which makes that one tough.

I keep coming back to Edmonton +105 against Boston. Boston back to back off a loss, Halak in net, Edmonton looked to have found something last game... plus McDavid. My head says Boston will bounce back but numbers suggest the Oilers have nice value and should maybe even be the favourite.

Instead of making that call, I'm going to hopefully take a piece of McDavid with his linemate (now on the top PP) and add Tyler Rattie O 0.5 points +105

 
Northern Voice said:
I have no idea how either Murray or Andersen will be coming off injury and both are so fragile which makes that one tough.

I keep coming back to Edmonton +105 against Boston. Boston back to back off a loss, Halak in net, Edmonton looked to have found something last game... plus McDavid. My head says Boston will bounce back but numbers suggest the Oilers have nice value and should maybe even be the favourite.

Instead of making that call, I'm going to hopefully take a piece of McDavid with his linemate (now on the top PP) and add Tyler Rattie O 0.5 points +105
Click to expand...
I'm never a big fan of teams on home openers, although I agree, ED has looked better.

 
I believe betonline player prop interface now auto moves when i wager AND my prop limits in the DSI main book got cut today, not a good day

example kirk u4.5 is -114 , when i try to bet it moves to -130, i can't bet it at -114

 
Last edited by a moderator:
lumpy19 said:
I believe betonline player prop interface now auto moves when i wager AND my prop limits in the DSI main book got cut today, not a good day

example kirk u4.5 is -114 , when i try to bet it moves to -130, i can't bet it at -114
Click to expand...
It wouldnt allow me to bet Fitzgerald unders this morning.. Said i was at the max but had $0 in there.. 

 
most profitable NFL fade

  • Opposing teams 18-8 SU and 17-6-3 ATS L26 vs Denver (11-1 SU and ATS home).
  • The home teams went 11-0-1 17±6 ppg in the 1H with an average 1H margin of 11±6 ppg.
 
The Broncos defense allowed 270 rushing yards to the Rams in Week 6. The week before they allowed 323 rushing yards in a loss to the Jets. That’s not going to get the job done. Denver now has the worst rushing defense in the league, and a four-game losing streak to match.
Click to expand...
Opposing teams 17-1 SU and 16-1-1 ATS L18 versus Denver when they rush for more than 70 yards as a team.

 
Man, I don't get it. The Broncos almost beat the Rams last week and now are a pick em against a 1 win Cardinals team lead by a rookie.

Worse yet, people are biting on the Cardinals ML. You stack the box and put your best man defender on Christian Kirk. Let the rookie beat you (he won't). Cardinals lucky to score 13 points.

No reason the Broncos can't do what the Vikings did to the Cardinals last week, imo.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

⚡
Options for watching NFL Games in 2025
Replies
49
Views
8K
InDitkaWeTrust
InDitkaWeTrust
snellman
Class of 2026 support thread.
Replies
16
Views
516
FarFromHome
FarFromHome
Max Power
Most Embarrassing Thing Someone in Your Family Does?
2 3
Replies
108
Views
3K
Zow
Zow

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)
Back
Top