Buckeyes aren’t exactly known for their high moral standards. Hell they’ll probably give him a contract extensionIs Urban gonna get fired?
Rose withdrew fyiLowry -160 o Palmer(-156 at DSI)
Hoge -135 o Barnes
rose -155 o spieth
DJ -160 over tiger
Kuchar -120 over phil
Simpson -120 over leishman
58% in HOF, WEek 1 and week 2 gamesAngry Beavers said:Since 2004 in the pre season, the over is 120-96-5 (56%) in all low-total games (35 or fewer points).
You shut your whore mouthAngels should probably just shut Trout down...no need to risk further damage to that wrist
Wind blowing out @ 14 mphThoughts on Red Sox / Yankees F5 U6, -110
What would this line be if Aaron Judge was playing? 6.5? 7?
What would this line be if Sabathia wasn't the pitcher? 6.5? 7?
Meanwhile, the game is a pick em'. Something isn't right here. 58% of the money is on the over. What I am having difficulty determining is whether this is a situation where:
A.) These two teams are so volatile that F5 - O/U 6 is a given.
B.) The public will blindly bet overs when these two teams play, so Vegas sets the line at O/U 6 regardless of the variables.
I get that.Wind blowing out @ 14 mph
Felt pretty disgusted that MLB is off the front page at BOL now.and then dude gets tripped up by the 15 yard line. already sick of football.
Several years ago I lost around 14k on preseason teasers and it was also my daughters bday, quite a mix of emotionspre season rules.
Don't know if this rule is transferable from boxing, but man do not #### with those Eastern Europeans.
Man, sorry. Didn't mean anything negative. Just makes meSeveral years ago I lost around 14k on preseason teasers and it was also my daughters bday, quite a mix of emotions
, of all the meaningless pre season games HoF is easily the most worthless. Over worth the price of admission.Don't be sorry, winning is the best, losing is 2nd, not gambling is 3rdMan, sorry. Didn't mean anything negative. Just makes me, of all the meaningless pre season games HoF is easily the most worthless. Over worth the price of admission.
Did you come up with this? This is genius.Don't be sorry, winning is the best, losing is 2nd, not gambling is 3rd
that's roughly 5.4/89.75/1.83 a week. Good god, that is unreal.If Bears tie this, the whole thing is supicious. 1H Ravens were -1 and many books didn't offer ML, lol.Congrats under backers
I am genuinely curious, why I ask. Is there a +EV angle to 1H/F5 vs full game? Its hard enough to cap a full game, so I've always wondered if half is more profitable that full game.If Bears tie this, the whole thing is supicious. 1H Ravens were -1 and many books didn't offer ML, lol.
22 tds on 65 catchesI'm likely younger than a lot of you guys, so excuse my :mindblown: here. Broadcast showing Jerry Rice vs Randy Moss career receiving TDs sent me down a pro football reference hole. 1987 he played 12 games, and had a 65/1077/22 season.that's roughly 5.4/89.75/1.83 a week. Good god, that is unreal.
I figured he was injured that year playing only 12 games. Turns out it was a strike season. What could have been, JFC.22 tds on 65 catches![]()
I'm not sure. I know I find them more beatable myself but I don't think have any substance behind it. I think it's a huge advantage to get more action in and leverage your profit/loss and knowledge based on the results of the 1st half.I am genuinely curious, why I ask. Is there a +EV angle to 1H/F5 vs full game? Its hard enough to cap a full game, so I've always wondered if half is more profitable that full game.