This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Gotta love that story about Berger.
The Rich story is well established.
The Rich story is "well established"- that's not the same as proven. As I recall, Bill wrote an Op-Ed defending it. In any case, that's Bill, not her.
Let's stick with your specific question.
Saints, are you advocating that spouses cannot work in the same state as elected officials?
msommer said:
Yes, be satisfied in winning and perpetuating corrupt politicians and our broken system. It's all about winning afterall. To hell with the consequences. A great message for our youth. Bunch of stupid idealists.
New to posting in 2016. And I lurk here and there.
In the Trump thread you said you were "new here".
Which is it?
I'll need citations. In other words, I showed my work, show yours.
Actually, a lot of the reasons I'm for Hillary is because I am an idealist. I want the Supreme Court to take a liberal turn. I want amnesty for illegal immigrants. I want something done about climate change. I want institutionalized racism in our police forces to end. I want early childhood education to be stressed. I want our infrastructure repaired. I want economic growth through trade agreements. I want economic prosperity. I want a responsible person to continue Obama's wise foreign policies.
I'm sure we agree that the Teapot Dome Scandal was corruption, right?I never have been.
1. No it didn't. If you watched Hillary's testimony, you already know that is not the case. Initially intelligence sources told the White House that the videotape was not the source of the attack. Then, only a few hours later, they changed their minds. Then a few days later they changed their minds again.
In comparison to Hillary, Trump is easily the liberal choice for those who care about Minorities, Women, The Poor, Unions, and many other groups/issues. See all right here in my post. Detailed Analysis. Also, feel free to give comments on things that don't work and need improvement, I'm open to what you have to say and I'm still ironing some things out.
I'm not surprised that you brought up Teapot Dome right after Madison Guaranty. They're both about as old and equally relevant to 2016.
On 2. that's the federal FOIA case, the security review and FBI criminal investigation are off limits.
Corruption is a definable thing, Tim. Making money off public office is as old as money and public office.
I'm not impressed by your examples. Everything you've brought up has been examined at length (sometimes for years) and debunked. As squistion has pointed out numerous times, Hillary has never been charged with anything.Tim you asked for examples, you got examples.
I think to Bernie's credit he does not drag Hillary through the streets. I guess it's unseemly in the public square, leave it to the reporters and voters to discuss. I've been occasionally frustrated but I have come to admire his long game on this, the transcripts have been a thing to behold.
This is what Hillary supporters are wheeling out? "Hey the race is over guys? Stop trying to play Woodward and Bernstein..." Bananafish gave a terrific detailed breakdown of the major reasons why she's Crooked Hillary. The Bernie supporters here are easily some of the brightest and more well thought out posters of all the campaigns. To think they'll just go Borg into the Hillary machine is an insult to their moral code and intelligence. They deserve a response other then "well it's the 4th quarter which means the game is almost over so I don't feel like running out the defense guys".
But thatr would mean the the spouse of any governor or state senator could not work in the state where they live, because all companies in the state would be regulated by them. Or a mayor's spouse could only work in the next municipality over.
Not really, that's not necessary. - I think my example was a good one. I think Hillary's examples are really good ones. Hillary was hired at Rose after her husband became Attorney General. Then she was promoted to partner after he became governor. Hillary became a rain maker for the Rose law firm as she and they were hired by companies with large business before the state, three different examples - Madison, WalMart & Tyson. At Madison she also got involved in a real estate venture with the owners, at WalMart she ended up with enough stock to end up on their board (at least $100K, but how much does it take to land on WalMart's board really?), and Tyson she got a magically rare futures tip. All three skirted regulation really effectively too as it so happens. - How many government regulated clients and how many lucky stock and land deals is your hypothetical spouse getting again?
Sure, ok, all kinds of companies, but this is Wal-Mart in Arkansas and Hillary was documented to have at least $100,000 stock.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-03-10-clinton-walmart_x.htm
Listen, I'm not saying Hillary is not corrupt. IDK if she is. Could be, could even be likely. But this is not the smoking gun you seem to think it is.
Maybe she should apologize directly to the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
Oh I wouldn't call it that either, it's just pay to play IMO. No I don't think there are envelopes being exchanged for briefcases in the dead of night here.
I'm with ya. It's hilarious that people can't give a scholarly, source cited response to this.
There never is a smoking gun, just insinuations and innuendo.
I agree it's a shame these baseless accusations have been flung against a woman who has a shining history of moral integrity. I'm tired of all these attacks being thrown against her for absolutely zero reasons beyond systematic sexism and vengeful conspiracies from the right wing.
You have:
And the FBI has a 94% success rate.
