What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (11 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's really sad that so many Sanders fans, and the Sanders campaign itself, has joined the Republicans with these false charges of corruption. Bernie was asked again by Dana Bash over the weekend to name a single example of how Hillary was influenced by corporate sponsors. He could not, because there isn't any. I know that I'm not the only Clinton fan who's sick of this. I watched Barney Frank tonight on TV and he was really pissed off about it. He basically called the Sanders campaign "a bunch of damn liars", and I gotta say there's something to this. 

 
It's really sad that so many Sanders fans, and the Sanders campaign itself, has joined the Republicans with these false charges of corruption. Bernie was asked again by Dana Bash over the weekend to name a single example of how Hillary was influenced by corporate sponsors. He could not, because there isn't any. I know that I'm not the only Clinton fan who's sick of this. I watched Barney Frank tonight on TV and he was really pissed off about it. He basically called the Sanders campaign "a bunch of damn liars", and I gotta say there's something to this. 
Oh, well if Barney Frank says so.

 
It's really sad that so many Sanders fans, and the Sanders campaign itself, has joined the Republicans with these false charges of corruption. Bernie was asked again by Dana Bash over the weekend to name a single example of how Hillary was influenced by corporate sponsors. He could not, because there isn't any. I know that I'm not the only Clinton fan who's sick of this. I watched Barney Frank tonight on TV and he was really pissed off about it. He basically called the Sanders campaign "a bunch of damn liars", and I gotta say there's something to this. 
Marc Rich.

Lobbyists and bundlers she appointed at State.

That's two. Should we keep going?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Marc Rich.

Lobbyists and bundles she appointed at State.
Marc Rich was pardoned by Bill in 2000. Neither that, nor her vote on Iraq, nor the banking bill that Warren wrote about and that Bernie fans love to bring up, is at all representative of her career. Surely you have something more recent than that? 

At State she did what every other Secretary of State does: appoint experts. The experts almost ALWAYS work as lobbyists because that's where the money is. There is nothing corrupt about any of it. 

 
Marc Rich was pardoned by Bill in 2000. Neither that, nor her vote on Iraq, nor the banking bill that Warren wrote about and that Bernie fans love to bring up, is at all representative of her career. Surely you have something more recent than that? 

At State she did what every other Secretary of State does: appoint experts. The experts almost ALWAYS work as lobbyists because that's where the money is. There is nothing corrupt about any of it. 
Hillary got the money for Rich.

The experts in this case were actual industry employees.

Want more examples?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bernie says the system is corrupt and that's fine, that's a legitimate argument. But he specifically targeting Hillary Clinton as especially corrupt and that's not fine. If he's going to make that charge then he needs to back it up. The fact that she took money for speaking fees as a private citizen is not proof of corruption. 

 
Bernie says the system is corrupt and that's fine, that's a legitimate argument. But he specifically targeting Hillary Clinton as especially corrupt and that's not fine. If he's going to make that charge then he needs to back it up. The fact that she took money for speaking fees as a private citizen is not proof of corruption. 
Hillary's possibly the most corrupt person we've seen run for president since Harding.

 
From Fox News: 

http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/04/16/experts-cast-doubt-hillary-indictment

Don't expect an indictment of Hillary Clinton anytime soon, according to experts. Recommendations by the FBI to indict a person over the mishandling of classified information usually come only as a result of the most flagrant violations of law, a Monday report said.

If you look at the history of what they pursued, you really had to have a slam-bam case that met all the elements," one former senior FBI official said for the report in Politico. Of 30 cases in which investigators recommended a misdemeanor charge for mishandling classified information between 2011 and 2015, prosecutors pursued charges in just six.

Those dynamics suggest that in order to recommend an indictment for Clinton over the more than 2,100 classified messages she stored on a private server as secretary of state, the FBI will likely need to discover relatively sensational violations of the law.

Cases that are prosecuted, one former federal prosecutor said, "always involve some 'plus' factor. Sometimes that 'plus' factor may reach its way into the public record, but more likely it won't."

 
Hillary's possibly the most corrupt person we've seen run for president since Harding.
Oh she is not.

You have spent the last two years in this thread, and before that the Benghazi thread, trying to come up with evidence of Hillary's supposed corruption. You have posted every rumor, every report, every piece of half evidence or suggested evidence or loose tie to evidence. Your links have been exhaustive. And the sum total of what you've come up with is...NOTHING. There is no evidence that Hillary is corrupt at all. And to claim that she is more corrupt than the list of crooked politicians that we've had since Harding- it's absurd. 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top