squistion
Footballguy
Live stream of concession speech:
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/watch-live-hillary-clinton-makes-statement-804581955646
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/watch-live-hillary-clinton-makes-statement-804581955646
So typical. And she wonders why she lost.
Foundation donors I assume.So typical. And she wonders why she lost.
This.So typical. And she wonders why she lost.
Because she is and always has been a POS. The US dodged a HUGE bullet.This.
How on God's green earth she did not talk to her rally supporters last night and give a concession speech to all those die hards in NY is a clear picture of why she lost.
Shameful.
I don't think the Democrats are the ones with the long-term problem. They are still on the right side of every social trend and have the diverse coalition to thrive well into the next few decades. They also don't need to deal with the fallout of the Trump presidency... let's all pray that's figurative and not literal.24 hours ago, I was thinking the same thing. Except "they" were Republicans.
This is really an amazing reversal of political fortune, as horrible as the outcome is.
There were some good dialogues on this very subject, Obama / non-Hillary. Huge factor.Trump got 2 million fewer votes than Romney.
Hillary got 7 million fewer votes than Obama 12.
Stating the obvious but I think the polls were seriously flawed - people recognized a Trump candidacy was breaking a lot of rules/norms but in hinsight I think they missed the impact his running had on polling.She lost about 3 points on average after the letter. It mattered but it was the last straw not the only straw.
I've seen this a lot around here. Don't know that it's actually true, especially since that is a very subjective statement.I don't think the Democrats are the ones with the long-term problem. They are still on the right side of every social trend and have the diverse coalition to thrive well into the next few decades. They also don't need to deal with the fallout of the Trump presidency... let's all pray that's figurative and not literal.
Sure, but that doesn't mean we aren't getting hit by a YUUUGE bullet.Because she is and always has been a POS. The US dodged a HUGE bullet.
While accurate (or I assume it is since I don't have the numbers handy), I agree with NCC - it misses the mark. She ran against Donald freaking Trump, this shouldn't have been close.It's like 115k votes in those three states combined. Out of 13.5mill votes.
free dinner and a Best Buy gift cardIt will be very interesting to see what Bill, Hillary & Chelsea get for speaking fees now.
I'm guessing 250K-1MM is no longer ballpark.
Bill will be fine. His speaking fees doubled when Hillary was SoS, but they were pretty high even before then.free dinner and a Best Buy gift card
And a room at the red roof innfree dinner and a Best Buy gift card
Well, and to be fair, they need to stop calling them racists, sexists, homephobes, etc.. too.Then they will cease to exist as a national.party. Can't take working class whites for granted anymore..
To be fair more than a few are those things. The question is only how many. But certainly they exist.Well, and to be fair, they need to stop calling them racists, sexists, homephobes, etc.. too.
So the same kind of stuff Trump was saying about Mexicans and Muslims.Racist, uneducated, deplorable whites.
The time wasted listening to them is bad enough. Only a total sap would pay them to speak.It will be very interesting to see what Bill, Hillary & Chelsea get for speaking fees now.
I'm guessing 250K-1MM is no longer ballpark.
Yup, even yesterday during the day I thought she was gonna win big and bring a Democratic Senate majority with her. I thought it would be a failure if she just squeaked out a win. I didn't think a failure this size was even possible.While accurate (or I assume it is since I don't have the numbers handy), I agree with NCC - it misses the mark. She ran against Donald freaking Trump, this shouldn't have been close.
Nor did the DNC.Yup, even yesterday during the day I thought she was gonna win big and bring a Democratic Senate majority with her. I thought it would be a failure if she just squeaked out a win. I didn't think a failure this size was even possible.
We can only hope.So, she's done now right? No more running for office - please.
wait...what? What do you mean?Oops guess I was wrong about the whole Clinton winning thing. Holy ####
Tim, you keep going down this path with populism. Here's the reality of populism, whether you want to accept it or not. It's "rise" is a direct symptom of a larger problem. Populism itself isn't a manufactured problem (which is the only way I've seen you frame it ever here in this forum) If the government is listening to the people and reflecting the direction the people think things should be going, there's no need for a movement. As soon as a government is perceived to be going against the will of the people or appears to be "in the bag" for a small group of people, a void of distrust is opened and populism is allowed to fill that void. You don't want populism? I recommend behaving in a manner that doesn't allow the void to be open creating the opportunity for populism to fester.I think, long term, they were correct assumptions.I think some incorrect assumptions were made about demographics and what 2008 meant.
Here is a theory I have had for years: populism trumps all rules in politics. Populist surges on a national basis are pretty rare in this country (Andrew Jackson and Donald Trump and that might be it) but when they happen they are overwhelming. But they don't last. Many of the people who voted for Trump will return to indifference after this election cycle.
But the Obama coalition will essentially remain. 65% of Latinos voted for Hillary. That's a lower figure than I would have estimated but in a normal election it still represents an untenable result for Republicans. I compared this election earlier to Pete Wilson and Prop 187 and how that changed California. 187 passed and Wilson won re-election. That was a short term victory for Republicans but the negative consequences were long term and right around the corner. I expect the same result here, once the populism wave has passed.
The other side would have gloated, so quid quo pro, methinks is appropriate.Why pour it on? He's here. You went from "they're not here" to "you need to apologize", so what's next, shine your ####### shoes? Gloating is the name of the day after this crap show?
Just last month, Bryan Nishimura, a California Naval reservist, was sentenced to two years’ probation and a $7,500 fine after he pleaded guilty to removing classified material and downloading it to a personal electronic device. The FBI found no evidence he planned to distribute the material.Not really. Just because she wasn't charged doesn't mean that any other government employee wouldn't be. Consequences are different for those with power though.
Tim, one other thought on this.the Obama coalition
Great speech by Clinton. Well done and classy.
Speech of a career, imo.
@beavers, what is the reaction among the lesbian community, what with getting one of your own so close to the White House... but just falling short?
Clinton is a great leader and would be leaps and bounds better than Trump... But ... Who knew America was so sexist.I thought it was great speech by Clinton. I thought she hit all the right notes - and honestly, acted like the leader we all hope Trump will be.
She was not ready to face her supporters last night, and I can understand that - but she conceded early enough for me, given the state of the voting, and put the overall country ahead of her own interests in potentially challenging some of the results. That was not an easy decision to make - but she made it, and I think that deserves some recognition.
Did I miss something here?Trumps anti-gay stance
Lets not lose sight of the fact that Clinton, and the DNC made some huge mis-steps here. When you are looking to blame someone - start there. Hillary was a very flawed candidate - which is nothing new - but she never worked to address those weaknesses. That is a campaign problem - not a voter problem.Clinton is a great leader and would be leaps and bounds better than Trump... But ... Who knew America was so sexist.
Seems to be a big misconception that Donald is pro LGBT among a lot of folks ...Did I miss something here?
Aside from the NC bathroom issue, which I doubt Trump really seriously gives two thoughts about, what was Trump's stance on LGBT issues? Because I don't remember him ever mentioning aside from being generally supportive?
Not being facetious, there has just been very little policy talk in general.
Only the bad onesSo the same kind of stuff Trump was saying about Mexicans and Muslims.