Darth Cheney
Footballguy
as far as the "no babies on the island"....weren't they trying to infer that that radioactivity from Jughead was the reason?
Anyone else get a little nervous that Ben was in the background when Jack was telling Hurley how he should be / deserved to be the next protector of the island and passed the responsibility? Was thinking Ben would jump in at some point to say or do something to say it should be him. But maybe that was to illustrate him letting go of his jealousy that he mentioned to Locke in the sideways world. Also nice to see him risk his life to save Hurley's when the tree fell.Was still a little nervous for Hurley at that point when Jack was getting the water ready, you never know with Ben.
It's kind of along the lines of Donnie Darko.... Jack lays down in the exact place he woke up in and the end shows the wreckage of the plane. I don't think it's it....but I can understand why people would think it.The island being a dream makes no sense, and I can't figure out why so many today think that's what happened.
Read Stephen Kings The Dark Tower series and then the other books that splinter off. Then go back and watch LOST and you will see how much LOST is similar if not connected to Kings world.I agree - but I did like it better than the Sopranos where you have no clue whatsoever despite that $#@# Chase saying "its all there" - this finale gave enough hints in the last 10 minutes to put things together while still leaving it open to some interpretation - the more I think about it the more I like it....Have the creators given any serious interviews yet> Wonder if they will explain their vision or just leave it open ala ChaseWhat is it about a TV show you love wrapping up that leaves you so empty the next day....the older I get it hits me harder.I think this sums it up and, for me, what makes this such a great show. Getting people to talk around the water cooler about a TV show usually means good things for the program. It sure has accomplished that.Everyone has their own ideas, and no one can really prove which one is correct.
I think their take was that they are not mutually exclusive, and you need both.But that is my take as well, so that just might be my POV speakingOne thing that I think is going to tick off a segment of the viewing public for this show was the "Faith Vs. Science" setup they created where Faith "won".
I agree. Whereas "The Sopranos" was muddled and ineffective, "Lost" was clear, concise and fitting. I think everything was spelled out very clearly, unlike "The Sopranos" ending which in my opinion was a bit of a convoluted mess.I agree - but I did like it better than the Sopranos where you have no clue whatsoever despite that $#@# Chase saying "its all there"
Lindeloff Tweeted last night. They've said they plan on embarking upon some "radio silence" for awhile but both have said they'll probably end up doing interviews about it at some point. I also hope they talk more as opposed to how Chase has handled it.Have the creators given any serious interviews yet
Seeing that plane fly out made Jack feel like what he had done had real merit, and his actions on "the island" had a good consequences?Alot of people are saying that. But I totally disagree. As Jack was dying, he saw the plane that held Sawyer and Kate fly overhead. If he was in reality just laying there after the plane crash, that plane makes no sense. Also, as he was laying there he was grabbing his side where he was stabbed.The island being a dream makes no sense, and I can't figure out why so many today think that's what happened.
He also saw the plane leave the island and he looks older than he did at the beginning.It's kind of along the lines of Donnie Darko.... Jack lays down in the exact place he woke up in and the end shows the wreckage of the plane. I don't think it's it....but I can understand why people would think it.The island being a dream makes no sense, and I can't figure out why so many today think that's what happened.
Desmond only gave her that dress, where did she get those high heels? We need answers!?!Kate was SMOKING hot in that black dress. good god.and it shouldn't have been Shannon with Sayid. Shoulda been Nadia. They crow barred Shannon in because they had to get Sayid to remember.
I'm "Ok" with it too. I don't need answers or spelled out explanations for all those things and it was clear for years that those weren't coming. Just a little closure. Not addressing a big part of the show was disappointing. I'm sticking with my "finale was half great, half horrible" take.I'm actually OK with a lot of this. *snip*They just decided that Walt, Widmore, Farraday, time travel, The Others, the Smoke Monster, the numbers, the polar bear…they ALLL were meaningless. Didn’t matter. Has no bearing on anything.
?? So he imagined the whole thing and saw an imaginary plane flying overhead that allowed his "fake actions" to make him feel good before he died?If Jack imagined the whole thing, then none of them really knew each other and what was the point of the entire show?I don't buy it. It makes no sense.Seeing that plane fly out made Jack feel like what he had done had real merit, and his actions on "the island" had a good consequences?Alot of people are saying that. But I totally disagree. As Jack was dying, he saw the plane that held Sawyer and Kate fly overhead. If he was in reality just laying there after the plane crash, that plane makes no sense. Also, as he was laying there he was grabbing his side where he was stabbed.The island being a dream makes no sense, and I can't figure out why so many today think that's what happened.
I can see why people want to believe that but the writers specifically told us the island's events were real. People can believe what they want but when the writers provide us with a clear answer I'm not going to disregard it.The island being a dream makes no sense, and I can't figure out why so many today think that's what happened.
Bingo. Having it all be in Jack's imagination negates everything the finale was telling us and had told us for six seasons. The show wasn't about Jack. It was about all of them. The finale spelled that out in big, bold letters.If Jack imagined the whole thing, then none of them really knew each other and what was the point of the entire show?
If I was Sawyer, I would have given her a thorough good bye ####### in a confessional booth."no, leave the heels on baby"Desmond only gave her that dress, where did she get those high heels? We need answers!?!Kate was SMOKING hot in that black dress. good god.and it shouldn't have been Shannon with Sayid. Shoulda been Nadia. They crow barred Shannon in because they had to get Sayid to remember.
LOL. Good point. You can do this with most science fiction. Science fiction writers aren't required to tell you in detail HOW the amazing things happen. They just do and you accept it and enjoy the story.Another thought floating around in my head regarding the unresolved threads.
I am reading Stoker's Dracula right now. There is a ton of stuff in there that I could throw out questions about... where did Dracula come from? Why does drinking his blood turn people into vampires? Why does garlic ward him off? How can he read the thoughts of his minions? Etc, etc.
But Stoker never led his audience to believe that all that stuff would be resolved. Whether on purpose or on accident, the writers of Lost did lead their audience in that direction. For me, I can let go (pun intended) and treat the series as a novel... some stuff is just there, and that is just the way it is.
Internal inconsistencies are another matter, which I chalk over to sloppy writing or the creative TV process... you can't go back and rewrite portions of the story to tighten it up as you can do with a novel.
It is not a great impact but it is a show that is better, to me, than The Wire (never seen it).

Lapidus, Ilona, Walt, Eko, Miles, Arzt, Widmore, etc. Apparently none will ever be ready to move on because as Jack's dad put it, time doesnt matter there.Jack has a made-up son to help him find the other people who meant most to him, a completely fictional son... but Jin and Sun don't even get a placeholder child after all Sun went through? And Aaron is trapped as a baby and has to go to (heaven/reincarnation/whatever the bright light is) without even growing up to the toddler we KNOW he was before? Was the island the most important thing for Aaron too? Does he even remember it? Is Lost giving us a subtly pro-life message by indicating that the fetus Sun is carrying is actually a viable substitute for the little girl she hugged and played with? Puh-lease.Why are there new characters in "heaven" reality? You're not gonna convince me that Jack's kid was just another creation of fantasy, but apparently that's what the show would have us believe: that all the new characters are red herring "filler" for an alternate reality.Apparently the heaven reality was designed for one purpose: to pull the wool over your eyes. There's no other reason for it. It's a meaningless sidetrack. Really, what was the import of it? Nope. It's just a mechanism for a twist-an unexpected reveal at the end, and nothing more. Lame. I'm disappointed. Was that last twist necessary? Why couldn't they have left that out and simply acknowledged that this was a separate reality, where people who once lived another life came together under happier circumstances, then close curtain. Sometimes the simple happy ending is best. There's no need to reinvent the Sixth Sense.Who wasn't there? All of the survivors were there who were ready to move on. Michael wasn't there because he was stuck in limbo on the island. That's been addressed. Walt wasn't there because Michael wasn't there. That seems pretty clear to me. Not sure who else you think should have been there.As far as the Sideways world, that was also explained quite clearly and it worked for me.No they werent all there. And it still doesnt explain the ridiculous sideways narrative.
watI will rewatch the show, not right away, but I will because of the impact it has had on my life. It is not a great impact but it is a show that is better, to me, than The Wire (never seen it). And, that is the point of the show I think.
This thought occured to me too. The pilot of the plane, among all the other people, died so that Jacob could bring in a few candidates to the island for his own purposes? He said the candidates were selected because they had issues in their lives and they needed the island like it needed them. Those bystanders who died as collateral damage were just in the wrong place at the wrong time? If Jacob was special why couldn't he make it where the candidates were the only ones on the plane? The detective who arrested Kate, etc. I guess sacrifices were made, but it sucks to be them.There were a lot of other people on the plane. Where were they?
Ilona? You're upset with the finale because she wasn't there? Honestly? All of the characters you mentioned are peripheral characters except for Walt (more on him in a bit). They played their parts but they weren't pivotal in the lives of the survivors' ability to move on. Of the primary characters, the only one on your list who wasn't there was Walt and we can explain that logically by saying the actor who plays him now looks like he's about 30 and it would skew the story to bring him back. Or we can explain it within the story confines by saying that he wasn't there because Michael wasn't there. Either way works for me. As far as the others, I honestly think you're nitpicking and you're reaching to find flaws.Lapidus, Ilona, Walt, Eko, Miles, Arzt, Widmore, etc. Apparently none will ever be ready to move on because as Jack's dad put it, time doesnt matter there.
I agree. This was my take last night immediately after the show:I'm "Ok" with it too. I don't need answers or spelled out explanations for all those things and it was clear for years that those weren't coming. Just a little closure. Not addressing a big part of the show was disappointing. I'm sticking with my "finale was half great, half horrible" take.I'm actually OK with a lot of this. *snip*They just decided that Walt, Widmore, Farraday, time travel, The Others, the Smoke Monster, the numbers, the polar bear…they ALLL were meaningless. Didn’t matter. Has no bearing on anything.
This was one of the more entertaining two hours and twenty minutes of Lost since seasons one and two. It's those final ten minutes that are fairly important. If you enjoyed the last couple seasons for what it was - a bunch of relatively entertaining hullaballoo with characters that you'd kind of lost track of - then this was a very entertaining episode, just like the last few seasons. If you watched the last couple seasons feeling like you were frustrated and watching a story build to some final conclusion that was really important, then you judge it on the last ten minutes, because they were the most important of all of the thousands and thousands of minutes of the rest of the show. The lasting point of the show was the fact that they were moving on. Is that satisfying? I think it can be. Season one, we were introduced to these characters, and we found them likable, but learned about how flawed they all were. We saw them fighting through adversity together, watched some of them fall in love, and watched a story develop. We learned that Kate would light the house on fire or shoot someone in the back to save the people she loved, but she needed to stop running. We learned that Hurley lacked faith in himself, and that he was a good, lovable person for who he was. We learned that Jack was a fixer, and very capable of being a leader, but he always had his father, or the island, or jacob, or fate, or something hanging over him. Hurley explicitly talked about Sayid being a good person, and that he wasn't what people told him he was. All of them had to move past those issues before they could move on. Whether the island was real, or was a symbol for real life, we're all flawed people and maybe we all need to work past some things before we can move on. But here's the thing that I can't get past. Why the #### did there need to be any kind of time travel involved in this story? I get a lot of the mysteries being left open - things like babies not being born into purgatory (if that's what it was) or the island really being a physical place and the real things that happened on it were all part of them keeping hell from being unleashed on earth, or each other, or whatever you think it is based on your interpretation of the show. There's a lot of good stuff that could be interpreted different ways and I'm sure people will rewatch it and come up with their various theories and all those little unanswered questions that came up will be pushed and twisted into whatever storyline they choose to believe. That's pretty cool. But while I appreciate the need to tell a non-linear story, and I enjoyed parts of the storytelling throughout, I will remember this show as a decent but not spectacular overall storyline of characters movin on, with fantastic storytelling in seasons one and two, and unnecessarily complicated and sometimes difficult to enjoy storytelling for the next few seasons after that. There were some good episodes in between, but a lot of the episodes that I was willing to live with because they advanced the plot seem to have been rendered irrelevant because the plot, as it turns out, was irrelevant. Maybe on second watch, I'll see some secret meaning to them. I said before the finale that I would judge the whole series based on this finale. I think that's what happened. It was good. I will probably rewatch bits and pieces, but I'm not in a huge hurry, and I may never go back through all of it. I don't feel cheated. I liked it. But it didn't live up to the hopes I'd had, either. It was a good show. Sad to see it over.
It is not a great impact but it is a show that is better, to me, than The Wire (never seen it).

Simply put, The Wire means nothing to me. Don't watch it, don't care for the content, will not dwell on it when it leaves. That is the point. People Flocke to similar interests. Like Chris Rock said, "a drug dealer and a religious person in a relationship will not work out." The island, the plane crash, that is what bonded these people and why reconnecting with them is the most important part of their life... even if/when in death.It is not a great impact but it is a show that is better, to me, than The Wire (never seen it).![]()
One explanation - also Jacob loses candidates when they become a mom - I thought that may have been an explanation as well.as far as the "no babies on the island"....weren't they trying to infer that that radioactivity from Jughead was the reason?
It is not a great impact but it is a show that is better, to me, than The Wire (never seen it).![]()
Either you do not get the point of the show as well as the concept of it or you are trying to be funny and not even understand the show. Not sure which is which so move along now.There is waaaay too much to make fun of here.It was a great show with a good ending. The ending fit and was nice to see more explained. I will have to rewatch it to grasp the whole show again though.
I won't say much about the show but if people are interested, I quickly thought of two other pieces of work that involve similar aspects to LOST, now that we know the ending to it.
First, Six Feet Under came to mind as I was watching the show. The overall theme of that show is not hidden nor do they try to hide it, but the themes for both are similar and done very well. Each show makes you examine relationships and the important parts of life rather than the mundane drudgery we all go through yet no one will ever understand our lives because they are our lives. That is what Jack went through. The Smoke Monster is/was Jack's manifestation with his unknown. His personal demons and he took the form of Locke for Jack's own reasons. Maybe Locke was Jack's last patient he did fix in real life, maybe Locke's words hit home to Jack in real life, or maybe Locke was the last patient that died on the surgery table that Jack operated on. The point is we do not know nor understand it because that is Jack's life and we can only evaluate it by what we see as we cannot feel what Jack felt. We can empathize with Jack based on our own experiences but that is still not to the level of what Jack feels. In that regard, I am thinking of Bruce Lee in the movie Dragon and how they depict his own demons.
Second, there is a real important couple chapters in the third book of His Dark Materials that brought similar feelings to me as I watched LOST. Not to give too much away but that series also dove into relationships and how important they were... on a much more micro scale as the books are intended for pre-teen/teenager audience. The chapters are very powerful and attempt to explain death, relationships, and how people are in a way that fit that story. Needless to say, that series also depicted the afterlife as a wayward journey until there was some meaning put into it.
I will rewatch the show, not right away, but I will because of the impact it has had on my life. It is not a great impact but it is a show that is better, to me, than The Wire (never seen it). And, that is the point of the show I think. LOST brought millions of people from around the globe together for an hour or so a week and we all could share something together yet we all interpreted things differently. Smoke monsters, Egyptian Gods, hatches, boats, whatever... they are all pointless in our mundane lives but we all could share them. That is what the Losties did in the church at the end. They went through their lives, if they lived, and cared for whomever they cared for but the shared experiences they had were what grounded them, what kept them who they were, what showed them who they were, and gave them aspects of life that no one could ever imagine unless they went through it. Much like WWII vets, Vietnam vets, and so on.
Six Feet Under did a great job with death on an interpersonal level and LOST did a great job with death in a group, struggle with reality type of way. Great series and a great way to end it.
Need I quote your posts to point at and laugh as well? Sorry you do not understand the concept of the show. Move along.There is waaaay too much to make fun of here.
Just checked on the progess of Abrams, Cuse, and Lindelof on this and unfortunately...From WikiThe LOST writers did a great job of bringing Stephen King's Dark Tower series to TV.
But...Film adaptation
IGN Movies has reported that a film adaptation was in the works; whether it was for a movie or a television series still is unknown. J. J. Abrams, co-creator of the television show Lost, was supposedly attached to produce and direct.[11] Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof, who co-created the show Lost with J. J. Abrams, optioned the Dark Tower series from King for a reported nineteen dollars, a number that mysteriously recurs throughout the Dark Tower series of novels.[12] According to issue #923 of Entertainment Weekly, King "is an ardent supporter of the desert-island show and trusts Abrams to translate his vision" into a film franchise with Lindelof being "the leading candidate to write the screenplay for the first installment."[13] In a July 2009 interview with C21 Media, Lindelof revealed that he and Cuse had indeed optioned The Dark Tower's rights, but said he was wary about committing to such an ambitious project: "The idea of taking on something that massive again after having done six seasons of Lost is intimidating and slightly frightening, to say the least." [14]
King also reported that he had turned down long-time collaborator Frank Darabont, creator of such films as The Green Mile and The Shawshank Redemption, after he had asked to do the film.
Roland as depicted in the opening credits of another Stephen King movie, The Mist.Multiple mock trailers have appeared on YouTube. Also, the official Grand Prize winner of Simon & Schuster's (King's Publisher) American Gunslinger contest,[15] "Roland Meets Brown",[16] by Robert David Cochrane,[17] can be found there.
In King's 2007 film The Mist, the main character, David Drayton, can be seen painting a movie poster with Roland in the center, standing in front of a trans-dimensional Ghostwood door, with a rose and the dark tower to each side.
In April 2009, both Abrams and Lindelof revealed that they would most likely begin adapting the series when Lost concludes in 2010.[18][19]
In May 2009, rumours emerged that Christian Bale was the top contender to play Roland.[20]
In November 2009, Abrams stated that he would not be adapting the series. During an interview with MTV, Abrams made the following comments: "The Dark Tower thing is tricky. The truth is that Damon and I are not looking at that right now." Furthermore, in an interview with USA Today, Damon Lindelof stated that "After working six years on 'Lost,' the last thing I want to do is spend the next seven years adapting one of my favorite books of all time. I'm such a massive Stephen King fan that I'm terrified of screwing it up. I'd do anything to see those movies written by someone else. My guess is they will get made because they're so incredible. But not by me."[21]
In April 2010, it was announced that the books will be adapted into a trilogy that will be written by Akiva Goldsman and directed and produced by Ron Howard.[22][23]
Imagine Entertainment and Universal are currently working out the details of producing a trilogy from the seven volume "Dark Tower" series of books. Ron Howard is set to direct.
It brought me together with you for an hour a week. You can never take that away from me.Need I quote your posts to point at and laugh as well? Sorry you do not understand the concept of the show. Move along.There is waaaay too much to make fun of here.
What does that have to do with The Wire (never seen it)?Simply put, The Wire means nothing to me. Don't watch it, don't care for the content, will not dwell on it when it leaves. That is the point. People Flocke to similar interests. Like Chris Rock said, "a drug dealer and a religious person in a relationship will not work out." The island, the plane crash, that is what bonded these people and why reconnecting with them is the most important part of their life... even if/when in death.It is not a great impact but it is a show that is better, to me, than The Wire (never seen it).![]()
This was all actually touched on already, when Locke saw him leaving school, and said he didn't need to go back, he had already had enough of the island and should be allowed to live his life. That people kept waiting for him to come back and feel that he is "unresolved" is quite comical.Ilona? You're upset with the finale because she wasn't there? Honestly? All of the characters you mentioned are peripheral characters except for Walt (more on him in a bit). They played their parts but they weren't pivotal in the lives of the survivors' ability to move on. Of the primary characters, the only one on your list who wasn't there was Walt and we can explain that logically by saying the actor who plays him now looks like he's about 30 and it would skew the story to bring him back. Or we can explain it within the story confines by saying that he wasn't there because Michael wasn't there. Either way works for me. As far as the others, I honestly think you're nitpicking and you're reaching to find flaws.Lapidus, Ilona, Walt, Eko, Miles, Arzt, Widmore, etc. Apparently none will ever be ready to move on because as Jack's dad put it, time doesnt matter there.
I like Cheerios much better than Raisin Bran. Though, I've never had Raisin Bran.It is not a great impact but it is a show that is better, to me, than The Wire (never seen it).![]()
Either you do not get the point of the show as well as the concept of it or you are trying to be funny and not even understand the show. Not sure which is which so move along now.
First off, I think anyone who enjoyed LOST should check out the Dark Tower books.Second (and without any spoilers or put in tags) which ending did you think was better / more satisfying? LOST or Dark Tower?Read Stephen Kings The Dark Tower series and then the other books that splinter off. Then go back and watch LOST and you will see how much LOST is similar if not connected to Kings world.
Why can't they make babies? - Because it introduces Juliet as an interesting character.Why time travel? - Because it shuffles the deck and puts the characters in a differently interesting situation.A MacGuffin (sometimes McGuffin or maguffin) is "a plot element that catches the viewers' attention or drives the plot of a work of fiction".[1] The defining aspect of a MacGuffin is that the major players in the story are (at least initially) willing to do and sacrifice almost anything to obtain it, regardless of what the MacGuffin actually is. In fact, the specific nature of the MacGuffin may be ambiguous, undefined, generic, left open to interpretation or otherwise completely unimportant to the plot. (Examples might include money, victory/glory, survival, a source of power, a potential threat, etc....or something entirely unexplained.)
will try to get to barnes and nobles todayFirst off, I think anyone who enjoyed LOST should check out the Dark Tower books.Second (and without any spoilers or put in tags) which ending did you think was better / more satisfying? LOST or Dark Tower?Read Stephen Kings The Dark Tower series and then the other books that splinter off. Then go back and watch LOST and you will see how much LOST is similar if not connected to Kings world.
BUT I CAN'T LET GO!Again, move along.
Good point. Walt's story already had ended. What's impressive to me is how little ambiguity there really was with the characters. The island itself still has many unsolved mysteries and as I posted last night I'm fine with that. Doesn't bother me in the least. But the characters and their relationships all were clear and the finale resolved them for us. That's one of the many things I loved about the episode. It laid it all out and didn't intentionally dodge any important answers about who these people were and why they were important to one another.This was all actually touched on already, when Locke saw him leaving school, and said he didn't need to go back, he had already had enough of the island and should be allowed to live his life. That people kept waiting for him to come back and feel that he is "unresolved" is quite comical.Ilona? You're upset with the finale because she wasn't there? Honestly? All of the characters you mentioned are peripheral characters except for Walt (more on him in a bit). They played their parts but they weren't pivotal in the lives of the survivors' ability to move on. Of the primary characters, the only one on your list who wasn't there was Walt and we can explain that logically by saying the actor who plays him now looks like he's about 30 and it would skew the story to bring him back. Or we can explain it within the story confines by saying that he wasn't there because Michael wasn't there. Either way works for me. As far as the others, I honestly think you're nitpicking and you're reaching to find flaws.Lapidus, Ilona, Walt, Eko, Miles, Arzt, Widmore, etc. Apparently none will ever be ready to move on because as Jack's dad put it, time doesnt matter there.
Over the years I have told my wife time and time again that LOST was nothing more than a rip off of the Dark Tower series and after seeing the ending last night, that pretty much confirmed it. I knew JJ was a huge fan of King and I thought he would do a great job at doing DT since he had six years to practice on LOST.Just checked on the progess of Abrams, Cuse, and Lindelof on this and unfortunately...From WikiThe LOST writers did a great job of bringing Stephen King's Dark Tower series to TV.
But...Film adaptation
IGN Movies has reported that a film adaptation was in the works; whether it was for a movie or a television series still is unknown. J. J. Abrams, co-creator of the television show Lost, was supposedly attached to produce and direct.[11] Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof, who co-created the show Lost with J. J. Abrams, optioned the Dark Tower series from King for a reported nineteen dollars, a number that mysteriously recurs throughout the Dark Tower series of novels.[12] According to issue #923 of Entertainment Weekly, King "is an ardent supporter of the desert-island show and trusts Abrams to translate his vision" into a film franchise with Lindelof being "the leading candidate to write the screenplay for the first installment."[13] In a July 2009 interview with C21 Media, Lindelof revealed that he and Cuse had indeed optioned The Dark Tower's rights, but said he was wary about committing to such an ambitious project: "The idea of taking on something that massive again after having done six seasons of Lost is intimidating and slightly frightening, to say the least." [14]
King also reported that he had turned down long-time collaborator Frank Darabont, creator of such films as The Green Mile and The Shawshank Redemption, after he had asked to do the film.
Roland as depicted in the opening credits of another Stephen King movie, The Mist.Multiple mock trailers have appeared on YouTube. Also, the official Grand Prize winner of Simon & Schuster's (King's Publisher) American Gunslinger contest,[15] "Roland Meets Brown",[16] by Robert David Cochrane,[17] can be found there.
In King's 2007 film The Mist, the main character, David Drayton, can be seen painting a movie poster with Roland in the center, standing in front of a trans-dimensional Ghostwood door, with a rose and the dark tower to each side.
In April 2009, both Abrams and Lindelof revealed that they would most likely begin adapting the series when Lost concludes in 2010.[18][19]
In May 2009, rumours emerged that Christian Bale was the top contender to play Roland.[20]
In November 2009, Abrams stated that he would not be adapting the series. During an interview with MTV, Abrams made the following comments: "The Dark Tower thing is tricky. The truth is that Damon and I are not looking at that right now." Furthermore, in an interview with USA Today, Damon Lindelof stated that "After working six years on 'Lost,' the last thing I want to do is spend the next seven years adapting one of my favorite books of all time. I'm such a massive Stephen King fan that I'm terrified of screwing it up. I'd do anything to see those movies written by someone else. My guess is they will get made because they're so incredible. But not by me."[21]In April 2010, it was announced that the books will be adapted into a trilogy that will be written by Akiva Goldsman and directed and produced by Ron Howard.[22][23]
Imagine Entertainment and Universal are currently working out the details of producing a trilogy from the seven volume "Dark Tower" series of books. Ron Howard is set to direct.