What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** Official Marvels Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D (1 Viewer)

The writers have to kill off Ward before the end of the season don't they? I mean, he knows where the team's new, underground, super top-secret headquarters is located. Seems like Coulson and the gang will be using that place as a base of operations moving forward, and I don't think you can have one of the big bad guys walking around knowing the location of your secret headquarters...
Not necessarily. They don't have to use that place as HQ. And they could always capture him and jail him, which would lead to a future possibility of him excaping, or the inevitable scenario where Coulson needs some info so they go to Ward for help (very likely imo. Rather common theme in Marvel to have the good guys and bad guys have a common enemy and work together)

 
finally caught up....

Two eps in a row, Ward makes a reference to following orders...no matter what....

also bizarre that there was clearly some crazy stuff going on in "the fridge"

I can't imagine anybody good giving an order that kills so many...I'm wondering who will be the real bad guy behind all of this mayhem...I'm expecting another twist...just not sure which way they'll go.....

 
Just caught up with the last three - - I was stockpiling until we could see Cap 2 (which we thought was outstanding).

I really like the direction in which they've gone. I don't think they had any choice but to do MOTW-type stories early in the season (although even those had some significant mytharc elements like Mike Peterson, Raina, etc.), because they were in a holding pattern until CA: TWS came out. Now they can go full-bore in the direction they may have wanted all along. I love the show.

As far as its long-term prospects, it is on Disney's main TV channel and they own (most of) the Marvel rights, so it's sort of hard for me to see them cancelling it anytime soon. Moreover, the ratings are actually pretty decent, they've been improving, and ABC is not exactly Successful Drama Central; this is not CBS where there always seem to be two or three quality new drama pilots every season or at least every other season. So I think the show will be given every chance to succeed. It's hard to see Disney pulling it after anything less than a four-season run. (One interesting note is that it will not have two MCU movies to play off of in S2, though - - in fact, unless they stretch for a Guardians tie-in, there won't be any.)

And now the important stuff - - I think Skye is pretty close to beautiful, a word I don't use often. However, Simmons is actually hotter, probably in part because of the accent. My only wish for Simmons is that she would tweeze the eyebrows just a touch to make them less thick. But she's adorable. May is no slouch either - - hot for any age, but she's 50!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The writers have to kill off Ward before the end of the season don't they?
Seems to me like it's the only logical conclusion to his story given all the SHIELD agents he's now killed. However, I find it hard to believe the plan all along was to turn him evil and kill him off. I know Joss Whedon's not the showrunner but he has a history of keeping his bad guys around and ultimately turning them into good guys. He did it twice on Buffy - Angel went from good to bad to good again and Spike went from bad to good. Like Rove said they're planting seeds which paint a picture of Ward being conflicted to some degree. I doubt that's just there for window dressing.

 
The writers have to kill off Ward before the end of the season don't they?
Seems to me like it's the only logical conclusion to his story given all the SHIELD agents he's now killed. However, I find it hard to believe the plan all along was to turn him evil and kill him off. I know Joss Whedon's not the showrunner but he has a history of keeping his bad guys around and ultimately turning them into good guys. He did it twice on Buffy - Angel went from good to bad to good again and Spike went from bad to good. Like Rove said they're planting seeds which paint a picture of Ward being conflicted to some degree. I doubt that's just there for window dressing.
But on the flip side, during the "Browncoats unite - Firefly reunion" show a while back, Joss mentioned that he had no qualms with killing a main character should they prove to be unpopular with the show's audience (with Jayne being the most likely choice as filming started. This led to Baldwin going for a sort of lovable lug character portrayal with Jayne)

 
The writers have to kill off Ward before the end of the season don't they?
Seems to me like it's the only logical conclusion to his story given all the SHIELD agents he's now killed. However, I find it hard to believe the plan all along was to turn him evil and kill him off. I know Joss Whedon's not the showrunner but he has a history of keeping his bad guys around and ultimately turning them into good guys. He did it twice on Buffy - Angel went from good to bad to good again and Spike went from bad to good. Like Rove said they're planting seeds which paint a picture of Ward being conflicted to some degree. I doubt that's just there for window dressing.
But on the flip side, during the "Browncoats unite - Firefly reunion" show a while back, Joss mentioned that he had no qualms with killing a main character should they prove to be unpopular with the show's audience (with Jayne being the most likely choice as filming started. This led to Baldwin going for a sort of lovable lug character portrayal with Jayne)
Good point. I know many/most here don't like Ward but is he disliked by most of the fan base? He is the second male lead behind Coulson.

ETA - I could see Ward pulling a Darth Vader thing, saving the group and/or Skye in some fashion while dying in the process, thus being redeemed in the eyes of the group (and the fans) but not surviving and being forced to deal with all the evil he committed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The writers have to kill off Ward before the end of the season don't they?
Seems to me like it's the only logical conclusion to his story given all the SHIELD agents he's now killed. However, I find it hard to believe the plan all along was to turn him evil and kill him off. I know Joss Whedon's not the showrunner but he has a history of keeping his bad guys around and ultimately turning them into good guys. He did it twice on Buffy - Angel went from good to bad to good again and Spike went from bad to good. Like Rove said they're planting seeds which paint a picture of Ward being conflicted to some degree. I doubt that's just there for window dressing.
But on the flip side, during the "Browncoats unite - Firefly reunion" show a while back, Joss mentioned that he had no qualms with killing a main character should they prove to be unpopular with the show's audience (with Jayne being the most likely choice as filming started. This led to Baldwin going for a sort of lovable lug character portrayal with Jayne)
Good point. I know many/most here don't like Ward but is he disliked by most of the fan base? He is the second male lead behind Coulson.
Yes, at least as far as people reviewing/blogging about the show. He's been really unpopular right from the beginning.

 
Awesome twist at the end there.

Really digging the show.

edit: The only bad part is that they kinda dropped some hints for a Ward redemption story. That would be bad. We're well past that point.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Awesome twist at the end there.

Really digging the show.

edit: The only bad part is that they kinda dropped some hints for a Ward redemption story. That would be bad. We're well past that point.
They've been dropping them all along.

I loved the twist at the end too.

The only criticism I have (and it's a minor one because I think this show has gotten really good down the stretch) is a lot of this storyline seems tied into the Captain America sequel. I haven't seen it yet so I feel like I'm missing out on a lot of info that would deepen the storyline. I get why that's being done but if I'm correct in my assumption I'm not sure it's a good idea to force people into seeing something other than the show itself to get a complete picture of the story being told. Hope that makes sense.

 
Just caught up with the last three - - I was stockpiling until we could see Cap 2 (which we thought was outstanding).

I really like the direction in which they've gone. I don't think they had any choice but to do MOTW-type stories early in the season (although even those had some significant mytharc elements like Mike Peterson, Raina, etc.), because they were in a holding pattern until CA: TWS came out. Now they can go full-bore in the direction they may have wanted all along. I love the show.

As far as its long-term prospects, it is on Disney's main TV channel and they own (most of) the Marvel rights, so it's sort of hard for me to see them cancelling it anytime soon. Moreover, the ratings are actually pretty decent, they've been improving, and ABC is not exactly Successful Drama Central; this is not CBS where there always seem to be two or three quality new drama pilots every season or at least every other season. So I think the show will be given every chance to succeed. It's hard to see Disney pulling it after anything less than a four-season run. (One interesting note is that it will not have two MCU movies to play off of in S2, though - - in fact, unless they stretch for a Guardians tie-in, there won't be any.)

And now the important stuff - - I think Skye is pretty close to beautiful, a word I don't use often. However, Simmons is actually hotter, probably in part because of the accent. My only wish for Simmons is that she would tweeze the eyebrows just a touch to make them less thick. But she's adorable. May is no slouch either - - hot for any age, but she's 50!!
no, but they will be able to build toward the May 1, 2015 release of Avengers 2: Age of Ultron in S2 which should provide some interesting possibilities....

From last nights ep...

Loved all the references to Iron Man in this ep:

Talking to Pepper on the phone

Poking fun at Hill going to work for Stark

Coulson asking Hill to tell Stark I said h.. oh wait he thinks I'm dead
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Awesome twist at the end there.

Really digging the show.

edit: The only bad part is that they kinda dropped some hints for a Ward redemption story. That would be bad. We're well past that point.
They've been dropping them all along.

I loved the twist at the end too.

The only criticism I have (and it's a minor one because I think this show has gotten really good down the stretch) is a lot of this storyline seems tied into the Captain America sequel. I haven't seen it yet so I feel like I'm missing out on a lot of info that would deepen the storyline. I get why that's being done but if I'm correct in my assumption I'm not sure it's a good idea to force people into seeing something other than the show itself to get a complete picture of the story being told. Hope that makes sense.
I also have not seen The Winter Soldier, but I think my perspective is 100% different than yours. If you're going to set a show in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, then the things that happen in other movies in the Marvel Cinematic Universe should absolutely affect that show.

I don't remember anyone complaining that you had to be familiar with Iron Man to recognized the significance of Howard Stark in the first Captain America movie. Without the depth of the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Agents of SHIELD is just a generic special agent show.

I also don't think I miss much (but then again, I never avoid spoilers about movies or tv shows).

 
Awesome twist at the end there.

Really digging the show.

edit: The only bad part is that they kinda dropped some hints for a Ward redemption story. That would be bad. We're well past that point.
They've been dropping them all along.

I loved the twist at the end too.

The only criticism I have (and it's a minor one because I think this show has gotten really good down the stretch) is a lot of this storyline seems tied into the Captain America sequel. I haven't seen it yet so I feel like I'm missing out on a lot of info that would deepen the storyline. I get why that's being done but if I'm correct in my assumption I'm not sure it's a good idea to force people into seeing something other than the show itself to get a complete picture of the story being told. Hope that makes sense.
I also have not seen The Winter Soldier, but I think my perspective is 100% different than yours. If you're going to set a show in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, then the things that happen in other movies in the Marvel Cinematic Universe should absolutely affect that show.

I don't remember anyone complaining that you had to be familiar with Iron Man to recognized the significance of Howard Stark in the first Captain America movie. Without the depth of the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Agents of SHIELD is just a generic special agent show.

I also don't think I miss much (but then again, I never avoid spoilers about movies or tv shows).
Good points and the more I thought about my post the more conflicted I was with how I felt. I agree a show set in this universe needs to have tie-ins (and possibly significant ones like we're seeing here) with the other entities in the universe. That's one of the potential advantages the TV show has and it should be utilized. Maybe I'm just upset at myself for not having seen Winter Soldier yet. :)

 
Excellent episode last night. Glad I stuck with this show, it's paying dividends now. Hope they finish the season strong - an hour long episode of how Ward got to be a jerk and a Hydra agent doesn't sound all that compelling.

 
I thought last night continued an excellent run of episodes also. The car scene was awkward, although the payoff was decent once they landed.

The last two weeks I've been impressed with Chloe Bennet (Skye) as an actor, which I really didn't see coming at the start of the season. The scene with Ward in the diner was particularly strong.

Still digging Tripp, such an upgrade from Ward in terms of team dynamics.

Classic Coulson at the end after watching that video. Clark Gregg is really at his best when he's the most minimal with Coulson.

 
I thought both actors were in strong form during the diner scene. That was really well done.

And Clark Gregg just rocks. Amazing how he has taken a minor role in the first Iron Man film and made the character so unique and memorable.

 
Excellent episode last night. Glad I stuck with this show, it's paying dividends now. Hope they finish the season strong - an hour long episode of how Ward got to be a jerk and a Hydra agent doesn't sound all that compelling.
Agree with the posts above, good scene at the diner although I hate when they pan away from Ward and he comes out just fine. He was getting held by two cops with another 4+ right there. I figured once he got grabbed that he was going down.

If they go really dark on Ward, that could be a good episode, but he is still my least favorite character. The door opening for him to turn good just makes me cringe. Also, no idea why Skye let him live at that point.

 
Excellent episode last night. Glad I stuck with this show, it's paying dividends now. Hope they finish the season strong - an hour long episode of how Ward got to be a jerk and a Hydra agent doesn't sound all that compelling.
Agree with the posts above, good scene at the diner although I hate when they pan away from Ward and he comes out just fine. He was getting held by two cops with another 4+ right there. I figured once he got grabbed that he was going down.

If they go really dark on Ward, that could be a good episode, but he is still my least favorite character. The door opening for him to turn good just makes me cringe. Also, no idea why Skye let him live at that point.
I thought that scene was ridiculous, when he was like, "The question is are YOU a murderer?" If she let him die right there, she was NOT a murderer imo, not even close.

 
Excellent episode last night. Glad I stuck with this show, it's paying dividends now. Hope they finish the season strong - an hour long episode of how Ward got to be a jerk and a Hydra agent doesn't sound all that compelling.
Agree with the posts above, good scene at the diner although I hate when they pan away from Ward and he comes out just fine. He was getting held by two cops with another 4+ right there. I figured once he got grabbed that he was going down.

If they go really dark on Ward, that could be a good episode, but he is still my least favorite character. The door opening for him to turn good just makes me cringe. Also, no idea why Skye let him live at that point.
She's ultimately a good person. She can't bring herself to let someone she knows die - even someone she knows has become evil. Plus, she obviously cared about Ward a lot and I doubt all of those feelings are completely gone.

I thought it was a smart move by Garrett to put Ward in danger like that. Sure he risked losing Ward but he's just a pawn in Garrett's game anyway. He was banking on Skye's good-heartedness to get him what he wanted and he played it right.

 
Excellent episode last night. Glad I stuck with this show, it's paying dividends now. Hope they finish the season strong - an hour long episode of how Ward got to be a jerk and a Hydra agent doesn't sound all that compelling.
Agree with the posts above, good scene at the diner although I hate when they pan away from Ward and he comes out just fine. He was getting held by two cops with another 4+ right there. I figured once he got grabbed that he was going down.

If they go really dark on Ward, that could be a good episode, but he is still my least favorite character. The door opening for him to turn good just makes me cringe. Also, no idea why Skye let him live at that point.
I thought that scene was ridiculous, when he was like, "The question is are YOU a murderer?" If she let him die right there, she was NOT a murderer imo, not even close.
:goodposting:

The show had a chance to really shine by giving her a realistic moral perspective and respond "well, I won't be the one murdering him - that would be YOU." Instead they went all cliché.

Ward was at his best in the whole series last night and it was when he was acting evil imo. I really hope that's the path they take with Ward - not only is he not redeemable, he's way sicker than anyone has seen yet. That's the only Ward I get excited about seeing at this point.

 
Ward too often makes me think of a cardboard cutout that is capable of motion.

Just not a very good casting choice IMHO. I had a hard time caring about him as a good guy, and he leaves me pretty ambivalent as a bad guy. His rendition of quiet stoic guy is just too boring for me.

Still love the series overall though. Not like he ruins it. I just hope he's not a major plot point going forward very far.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a question about the ending.

Please correct my misinterpretation. This is how I understood it.

* Colson was assigned to figure out a way to bring an Avenger back from the dead if needed

* That led to the Tahiti program and experimenting with alien blood

* Colson's final report to Fury on the project was that it was a failure and should never be used. The only way around the issues was to wipe out some memory.

If the above is correct, why is it even a question to wipe out a small portion of someones memory to bring them back to life? It seems like such a basic tradeoff that I obviously missed something
Thanks!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Awesome twist at the end there.

Really digging the show.

edit: The only bad part is that they kinda dropped some hints for a Ward redemption story. That would be bad. We're well past that point.
They've been dropping them all along. I loved the twist at the end too.

The only criticism I have (and it's a minor one because I think this show has gotten really good down the stretch) is a lot of this storyline seems tied into the Captain America sequel. I haven't seen it yet so I feel like I'm missing out on a lot of info that would deepen the storyline.
You were warned :)

http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=688623&p=16693315

 
I have a question about the ending.

Please correct my misinterpretation. This is how I understood it.

* Colson was assigned to figure out a way to bring an Avenger back from the dead if needed

* That led to the Tahiti program and experimenting with alien blood

* Colson's final report to Fury on the project was that it was a failure and should never be used. The only way around the issues was to wipe out some memory.

If the above is correct, why is it even a question to wipe out a small portion of someones memory to bring them back to life? It seems like such a basic tradeoff that I obviously missed something
Thanks!

I think he had concerns that the work around would bring other issues.

 
I have a question about the ending.

Please correct my misinterpretation. This is how I understood it.

* Colson was assigned to figure out a way to bring an Avenger back from the dead if needed

* That led to the Tahiti program and experimenting with alien blood

* Colson's final report to Fury on the project was that it was a failure and should never be used. The only way around the issues was to wipe out some memory.

If the above is correct, why is it even a question to wipe out a small portion of someones memory to bring them back to life? It seems like such a basic tradeoff that I obviously missed something
Thanks!

I think he had concerns that the work around would bring other issues.
It certainly ties up any lingering doubts about why Fury had May trying to make sure Colson never remembered anything, or to report if he did. It is also clear that the memory "wipe" was not nearly as full as they had hoped, so only a relatively temporary solution. That said, I really doubt that is dealt with in the finale this season, seems like a nice carry-over to a future season.

 
Awesome twist at the end there.

Really digging the show.

edit: The only bad part is that they kinda dropped some hints for a Ward redemption story. That would be bad. We're well past that point.
They've been dropping them all along.

I loved the twist at the end too.

The only criticism I have (and it's a minor one because I think this show has gotten really good down the stretch) is a lot of this storyline seems tied into the Captain America sequel. I haven't seen it yet so I feel like I'm missing out on a lot of info that would deepen the storyline. I get why that's being done but if I'm correct in my assumption I'm not sure it's a good idea to force people into seeing something other than the show itself to get a complete picture of the story being told. Hope that makes sense.
I also have not seen The Winter Soldier, but I think my perspective is 100% different than yours. If you're going to set a show in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, then the things that happen in other movies in the Marvel Cinematic Universe should absolutely affect that show.

I don't remember anyone complaining that you had to be familiar with Iron Man to recognized the significance of Howard Stark in the first Captain America movie. Without the depth of the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Agents of SHIELD is just a generic special agent show.

I also don't think I miss much (but then again, I never avoid spoilers about movies or tv shows).
Good points and the more I thought about my post the more conflicted I was with how I felt. I agree a show set in this universe needs to have tie-ins (and possibly significant ones like we're seeing here) with the other entities in the universe. That's one of the potential advantages the TV show has and it should be utilized. Maybe I'm just upset at myself for not having seen Winter Soldier yet. :)
Stop posting and go see it already. WTH? :)

 
FUBAR said:
NewlyRetired said:
I have a question about the ending.

Please correct my misinterpretation. This is how I understood it.

* Colson was assigned to figure out a way to bring an Avenger back from the dead if needed

* That led to the Tahiti program and experimenting with alien blood

* Colson's final report to Fury on the project was that it was a failure and should never be used. The only way around the issues was to wipe out some memory.

If the above is correct, why is it even a question to wipe out a small portion of someones memory to bring them back to life? It seems like such a basic tradeoff that I obviously missed something
Thanks!

I think he had concerns that the work around would bring other issues.
:yes: He stated that even those with the memory wipe still developed other problems. Now we know why he kept saying "please let me die" when he was being operated on.

 
FUBAR said:
NewlyRetired said:
I have a question about the ending.

Please correct my misinterpretation. This is how I understood it.

* Colson was assigned to figure out a way to bring an Avenger back from the dead if needed

* That led to the Tahiti program and experimenting with alien blood

* Colson's final report to Fury on the project was that it was a failure and should never be used. The only way around the issues was to wipe out some memory.

If the above is correct, why is it even a question to wipe out a small portion of someones memory to bring them back to life? It seems like such a basic tradeoff that I obviously missed something
Thanks!

I think he had concerns that the work around would bring other issues.
:yes: He stated that even those with the memory wipe still developed other problems. Now we know why he kept saying "please let me die" when he was being operated on.
Wait, I thought he said that the problems were taken care of with a memory wipe of the process. I thought the side affects were due to not doing memory wipes and that doing a wipe took care of those issues, but that he still thought it was too much of a risk, probably since they have to do a memory wipe and probably because that isn't 100% effective. Coulson has remembered what happened now, so maybe he will start to degrade and that was the risk he mentioned.

 
FUBAR said:
NewlyRetired said:
I have a question about the ending.

Please correct my misinterpretation. This is how I understood it.

* Colson was assigned to figure out a way to bring an Avenger back from the dead if needed

* That led to the Tahiti program and experimenting with alien blood

* Colson's final report to Fury on the project was that it was a failure and should never be used. The only way around the issues was to wipe out some memory.

If the above is correct, why is it even a question to wipe out a small portion of someones memory to bring them back to life? It seems like such a basic tradeoff that I obviously missed something
Thanks!

I think he had concerns that the work around would bring other issues.
:yes: He stated that even those with the memory wipe still developed other problems. Now we know why he kept saying "please let me die" when he was being operated on.
Wait, I thought he said that the problems were taken care of with a memory wipe of the process. I thought the side affects were due to not doing memory wipes and that doing a wipe took care of those issues, but that he still thought it was too much of a risk, probably since they have to do a memory wipe and probably because that isn't 100% effective. Coulson has remembered what happened now, so maybe he will start to degrade and that was the risk he mentioned.
If you remember the episode where they went to Quinn's island, May actually reported to (a then unknown) Fury that Coulson was experiencing some fine motor skill degradation.

 
FUBAR said:
NewlyRetired said:
I have a question about the ending.

Please correct my misinterpretation. This is how I understood it.

* Colson was assigned to figure out a way to bring an Avenger back from the dead if needed

* That led to the Tahiti program and experimenting with alien blood

* Colson's final report to Fury on the project was that it was a failure and should never be used. The only way around the issues was to wipe out some memory.

If the above is correct, why is it even a question to wipe out a small portion of someones memory to bring them back to life? It seems like such a basic tradeoff that I obviously missed something
Thanks!

I think he had concerns that the work around would bring other issues.
:yes: He stated that even those with the memory wipe still developed other problems. Now we know why he kept saying "please let me die" when he was being operated on.
Wait, I thought he said that the problems were taken care of with a memory wipe of the process. I thought the side affects were due to not doing memory wipes and that doing a wipe took care of those issues, but that he still thought it was too much of a risk, probably since they have to do a memory wipe and probably because that isn't 100% effective. Coulson has remembered what happened now, so maybe he will start to degrade and that was the risk he mentioned.
If you remember the episode where they went to Quinn's island, May actually reported to (a then unknown) Fury that Coulson was experiencing some fine motor skill degradation.
Plus recall what May said about forming the team. Something along the lines of needing specialists to work on his mental capacity and specialists who could put him down if needed. The risk is apparent even if we don't know the specifics.

 
Any speculation on line as to what the new development might mean in terms of the Coulson's possible development into any known heroes (or villains :( )?

 
Iron Man was on last night. Really is fun how far Coulson has come and become more a part of the MCU.

These interactions did strike me as odd with all we know now...

Agent Phil Coulson: I'm Agent Phil Coulson with the Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: That's quite a mouthful.

Agent Phil Coulson: I know. We're working on it.

Later

Agent Phil Coulson: Mr. Stark.

Tony Stark: Yeah?

Agent Phil Coulson: Agent Coulson.

Tony Stark: Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, the guy from the...

Agent Phil Coulson: Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Tony Stark: Whew! God, you really need a new name for that.

Agent Phil Coulson: Yeah, I hear that a lot.

Then finally at the end

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: Agent Coulson, I just wanted to say thank you very much for all of your help.

Agent Phil Coulson: That's what we do. You'll be hearing from us.

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: From the Strategic Homeland...

Agent Phil Coulson: [interrupting] Just call us SHIELD.

I guess they needed to intro SHIELD for this universe but it seems a bit out of place looking back with us now knowing was around since just after WW2 and Stark's dad being a founder.... Not sure why just something that made me go hmm.

 
Iron Man was on last night. Really is fun how far Coulson has come and become more a part of the MCU.

These interactions did strike me as odd with all we know now...

Agent Phil Coulson: I'm Agent Phil Coulson with the Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: That's quite a mouthful.

Agent Phil Coulson: I know. We're working on it.

Later

Agent Phil Coulson: Mr. Stark.

Tony Stark: Yeah?

Agent Phil Coulson: Agent Coulson.

Tony Stark: Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, the guy from the...

Agent Phil Coulson: Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Tony Stark: Whew! God, you really need a new name for that.

Agent Phil Coulson: Yeah, I hear that a lot.

Then finally at the end

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: Agent Coulson, I just wanted to say thank you very much for all of your help.

Agent Phil Coulson: That's what we do. You'll be hearing from us.

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: From the Strategic Homeland...

Agent Phil Coulson: [interrupting] Just call us SHIELD.

I guess they needed to intro SHIELD for this universe but it seems a bit out of place looking back with us now knowing was around since just after WW2 and Stark's dad being a founder.... Not sure why just something that made me go hmm.
You can expect some level of inconsistency. After all, we get this exchange in the pilot.

Hill: What does S.H.I.E.L.D. stand for Agent Ward?

Ward: Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Hill: And what does that mean to you?

Ward: That someone really wanted our initials to spell SHIELD.
 
Iron Man was on last night. Really is fun how far Coulson has come and become more a part of the MCU.

These interactions did strike me as odd with all we know now...

Agent Phil Coulson: I'm Agent Phil Coulson with the Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: That's quite a mouthful.

Agent Phil Coulson: I know. We're working on it.

Later

Agent Phil Coulson: Mr. Stark.

Tony Stark: Yeah?

Agent Phil Coulson: Agent Coulson.

Tony Stark: Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, the guy from the...

Agent Phil Coulson: Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Tony Stark: Whew! God, you really need a new name for that.

Agent Phil Coulson: Yeah, I hear that a lot.

Then finally at the end

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: Agent Coulson, I just wanted to say thank you very much for all of your help.

Agent Phil Coulson: That's what we do. You'll be hearing from us.

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: From the Strategic Homeland...

Agent Phil Coulson: [interrupting] Just call us SHIELD.

I guess they needed to intro SHIELD for this universe but it seems a bit out of place looking back with us now knowing was around since just after WW2 and Stark's dad being a founder.... Not sure why just something that made me go hmm.
You can expect some level of inconsistency. After all, we get this exchange in the pilot.

Hill: What does S.H.I.E.L.D. stand for Agent Ward?

Ward: Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Hill: And what does that mean to you?

Ward: That someone really wanted our initials to spell SHIELD.
that was a good exchange though.

And yes there will be some inconsistencies and its not a big deal, just something I noticed going back to what is essentially the beginning.

 
Iron Man was on last night. Really is fun how far Coulson has come and become more a part of the MCU.

These interactions did strike me as odd with all we know now...

Agent Phil Coulson: I'm Agent Phil Coulson with the Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: That's quite a mouthful.

Agent Phil Coulson: I know. We're working on it.

Later

Agent Phil Coulson: Mr. Stark.

Tony Stark: Yeah?

Agent Phil Coulson: Agent Coulson.

Tony Stark: Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, the guy from the...

Agent Phil Coulson: Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Tony Stark: Whew! God, you really need a new name for that.

Agent Phil Coulson: Yeah, I hear that a lot.

Then finally at the end

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: Agent Coulson, I just wanted to say thank you very much for all of your help.

Agent Phil Coulson: That's what we do. You'll be hearing from us.

Virginia 'Pepper' Potts: From the Strategic Homeland...

Agent Phil Coulson: [interrupting] Just call us SHIELD.

I guess they needed to intro SHIELD for this universe but it seems a bit out of place looking back with us now knowing was around since just after WW2 and Stark's dad being a founder.... Not sure why just something that made me go hmm.
You can expect some level of inconsistency. After all, we get this exchange in the pilot.

Hill: What does S.H.I.E.L.D. stand for Agent Ward?

Ward: Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.

Hill: And what does that mean to you?

Ward: That someone really wanted our initials to spell SHIELD.
Fun fact, SHIELD originally stood for Supreme Headquarters, International Espionage, Law-Enforcement Division. In the 90's it became the Strategic Hazard Intervention Espionage Logistics Directorate.

 
I guess they needed to intro SHIELD for this universe but it seems a bit out of place looking back with us now knowing was around since just after WW2 and Stark's dad being a founder.... Not sure why just something that made me go hmm.
In the movie universe, Stark is not close to his dad and at this time (IM1) had no knowledge of Shield nor his dads involvement in it.

In Iron Man 2, Nick Fury tells Stark about his dads connection to Shield.

Tony's lack of knowledge of Shield in IM1 I think is consistent in the movie universe.

 
I guess they needed to intro SHIELD for this universe but it seems a bit out of place looking back with us now knowing was around since just after WW2 and Stark's dad being a founder.... Not sure why just something that made me go hmm.
In the movie universe, Stark is not close to his dad and at this time (IM1) had no knowledge of Shield nor his dads involvement in it.

In Iron Man 2, Nick Fury tells Stark about his dads connection to Shield.

Tony's lack of knowledge of Shield in IM1 I think is consistent in the movie universe.
Not only that, but it was a super duper top secret project. Not exactly something you talk about with your party animal son.

 
I guess they needed to intro SHIELD for this universe but it seems a bit out of place looking back with us now knowing was around since just after WW2 and Stark's dad being a founder.... Not sure why just something that made me go hmm.
In the movie universe, Stark is not close to his dad and at this time (IM1) had no knowledge of Shield nor his dads involvement in it.

In Iron Man 2, Nick Fury tells Stark about his dads connection to Shield.

Tony's lack of knowledge of Shield in IM1 I think is consistent in the movie universe.
Not only that, but it was a super duper top secret project. Not exactly something you talk about with your party animal son.
All true. I guess it seemed odd to me that they didnt seem to call themselves SHIELD until the end of the movie when its been around for so long. I guess as I think about it, must just be how they wanted to intro SHIELD in a memorable way. Looks like it struck me as odd and shouldnt have.

Ok, back to your regularly scheduled program....

I agree the season has improved as it went along. Glad I stuck with it. hopefully this next ep is more then just Ward's background and why he is who he is. Cant wait for the finale......

 
I guess they needed to intro SHIELD for this universe but it seems a bit out of place looking back with us now knowing was around since just after WW2 and Stark's dad being a founder.... Not sure why just something that made me go hmm.
In the movie universe, Stark is not close to his dad and at this time (IM1) had no knowledge of Shield nor his dads involvement in it.

In Iron Man 2, Nick Fury tells Stark about his dads connection to Shield.

Tony's lack of knowledge of Shield in IM1 I think is consistent in the movie universe.
Not only that, but it was a super duper top secret project. Not exactly something you talk about with your party animal son.
All true. I guess it seemed odd to me that they didnt seem to call themselves SHIELD until the end of the movie when its been around for so long. I guess as I think about it, must just be how they wanted to intro SHIELD in a memorable way. Looks like it struck me as odd and shouldnt have.

Ok, back to your regularly scheduled program....

I agree the season has improved as it went along. Glad I stuck with it. hopefully this next ep is more then just Ward's background and why he is who he is. Cant wait for the finale......
I'm not so sure that I conclude from the IM dialogue that it wasn't called Shield all along. Coulson has a wry sense of humor and Stark wasn't familiar with it: both good reasons to leave the acronym out of it until later.

I don't expect that the very first time someone is introduced to the NSA or the ATF or the FBI that they would be just given the acronym, if I pretend that these weren't all already well known government organizations.

 
Bubble shows: http://www.tv.com/news/bubble-shows-2014-renewed-canceled-139758012354/

THE SITUATION: The biggest show in the history of anything has performed... just okay.S.H.I.E.L.D. isn't the mammoth hit ABC hoped it would be, but in its defense, it's been battling forces much more formidable than HYDRA: NCIS and The Voice, two rivals that knocked Coulson and his team down a few notches after a dazzling debut. S.H.I.E.L.D.'s premiere episode drew 12.12 million viewers and a 4.7 rating in the 18- to 49-year-old demographic. The April 8 episode drew 5.37 million viewers and a 1.9 rating in the 18- to 49-year-old demographic. In recent weeks, the series has shown signs of turning itself around creatively, and our own Kaitlin Thomas thinks it's in a good position to become something great. But the biggest reason that S.H.I.E.L.D. will likely return comes down to hubris. Would ABC really cancel the series and admit the failure of a project that's supposed to be a model for future synergy between Disney, ABC, and Marvel? (Or, say, Disney, ABC, and Star Wars?) Hell no.

OUR GUESS: S.H.I.E.L.D. gets a regular-sized second season, and ABC continues trying to work out the show's kinks. Maybe Disney should add a S.H.I.E.L.D. film to its assembly line of Marvel movies, too.

 
So I think we may get some more hints this week as to whether they intend to turn Ward back good (which I continue to think would be a huge mistake).

If the backstory is that he was abused or something out of his control happened as a kid that helped he become this way, then I fear that is another indication they may turn him.

If however, they simply show him as defective (kind of like how Dexter was represented as a kid) then I might have more hope for the story line.

 
After dropping Fitz and Simmons into the ocean they have to kill off Ward now, don't they?
notice he didn't kill them.
No but he dropped them into the ocean in a big box without any signs (that I could see anyway) of getting out. He's clearly torn by his loyalty to Garrett and his feelings for the SHIELD gang but I'm not sure there's any coming back from this for him now. He basically left Fitz and Simmons to drown in the ocean.

Unless they pull a "There's a secret way to get out of this big box that only Ward and us knew about" bit in the finale I think he has to go at this point.

I don't think Fitz and Simmons are gonna drown for what it's worth. I think they will get out of the big box somehow.

 
After dropping Fitz and Simmons into the ocean they have to kill off Ward now, don't they?
Meh. IMO they just lamely started the 'Redemption of Ward' plotline.



He couldn't kill the dog (hey, Ward really has a heart!) and they deliberately make it vague that he intended to kill Fitz and Simmons. We all know they aren't really dead, so they can spin it that Ward dropped them in the ocean to save them (again, Ward has a heart!). I'm seeing a 'Ward dies to save everyone' story in the finale
 
After dropping Fitz and Simmons into the ocean they have to kill off Ward now, don't they?
notice he didn't kill them.
No but he dropped them into the ocean in a big box without any signs (that I could see anyway) of getting out. He's clearly torn by his loyalty to Garrett and his feelings for the SHIELD gang but I'm not sure there's any coming back from this for him now. He basically left Fitz and Simmons to drown in the ocean.Unless they pull a "There's a secret way to get out of this big box that only Ward and us knew about" bit in the finale I think he has to go at this point.

I don't think Fitz and Simmons are gonna drown for what it's worth. I think they will get out of the big box somehow.
Um, they can open the door. Remember they went in there and locked the door, which is why Ward kept yelling at them to open the door.In regards to your other question, I don't think Ward gets killed (Villains rarely die in the comics) And yes, they probably are going for a redemption story line with Ward. But that said I do suspect that his reign as a regular on the show is over. He'll go to prison, Howling Commando Grandson takes his spot, and they just roll Ward out whenever they need info about some Hydra activity.

I do think it was a good episode last night and not focusing too much on Ward's back story.

 
Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but he did kill the dog.

He couldn't kill it point blank, but they later showed him sighting it through his sniper scope.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top