modogg
Footballguy
I don't know why these always crack me up. i think because Big Show is such a disliked character, that it is nice to know at least someone roots for himHell yeah! Big Show wins!
I don't know why these always crack me up. i think because Big Show is such a disliked character, that it is nice to know at least someone roots for himHell yeah! Big Show wins!
Dead. No pop for cena, Ziggler, etc.How is the show so far... what's the crowd like?
They are all high.Dead. No pop for cena, Ziggler, etc. Rollins and Ambrose got a roar.How is the show so far... what's the crowd like?
Usos and the divas match were quiet too.
Terrible. 2 good segments.How is the show so far... what's the crowd like?
Lana looked incredibleTerrible. 2 good segments.How is the show so far... what's the crowd like?
Main event was great. Three good segments.Lana looked incredibleTerrible. 2 good segments.How is the show so far... what's the crowd like?
Bray vs ziggler was great
Miz is killing it right now
Bray with a cryptic tease of Undertaker return?
Rollins vs Daniel Bryan main event
And Miz was great. And Rusev looked monstrous. Heck, Harper vs Ryback was dope.Main event was great. Three good segments. Ambrose segmentLana looked incredibleBray vs ziggler was greatTerrible. 2 good segments.How is the show so far... what's the crowd like?
Miz is killing it right now
Bray with a cryptic tease of Undertaker return?
Rollins vs Daniel Bryan main event
Wyatt vs Zigs
Bryan vs Rollins
Miz is killing it right nowTerrible. 2 good segments.How is the show so far... what's the crowd like?
Miz may never be a main event guy again, but the guy can unquestionably help guys he's working with get over.So Taker can have his final victory/retirement match? May be predictable but the fans would love it I'd imagine.Road to Mania begins tonight.
Big announcement by HHH
Undertaker coming back vs. Wyatt
Some (potentially) interesting story lines this evening.
I really hope they don't go that direction. There's a fine line between giving the fans what they want and letting them book the shows. I caught the first 15 mins of HHH on the Stone Cold podcast before work this morning and I thought HHH did a nice job explaining the challenges of booking in the "reality era" in which Kayfabe is dead. The 8 and 10 year old there with their parents wants something different than the 22 year smart mark sitting next to them. And the "grandpa" wants something different than both.Just too easy to put Bryan in the main event now.. Reigns isn't ready.. save him and make him come from underneath next year...
So, they should ignore what their paying customers want? I'm thinking that's not a great idea.I really hope they don't go that direction. There's a fine line between giving the fans what they want and letting them book the shows. I caught the first 15 mins of HHH on the Stone Cold podcast before work this morning and I thought HHH did a nice job explaining the challenges of booking in the "reality era" in which Kayfabe is dead. The 8 and 10 year old there with their parents wants something different than the 22 year smart mark sitting next to them. And the "grandpa" wants something different than both.Just too easy to put Bryan in the main event now.. Reigns isn't ready.. save him and make him come from underneath next year...
It seems like fans are no longer content to just have the story told to them. They want to steer the ship. And I'm not a fan of that at all.
IMO, they need to stay this course this year. They gave in last year, which was fine because they WAY missed the boat on Bautista. But they should not make that a habit. If they need to double turn to where Reigns is the heel and Lesnar the face, so be it. But don't give in to the fans just because they throw a hissy fit every time Daniel Bryan doesn't go over.
The problem is, the crowd is wrong most of the time. They boo Cena because he never loses...yet they boo whenever Bryan doesn't win. So...they want Bryan to be the new Superman who defeats all odds all of the time and never looks vulnerable? That would suck.So, they should ignore what their paying customers want? I'm thinking that's not a great idea.I really hope they don't go that direction. There's a fine line between giving the fans what they want and letting them book the shows. I caught the first 15 mins of HHH on the Stone Cold podcast before work this morning and I thought HHH did a nice job explaining the challenges of booking in the "reality era" in which Kayfabe is dead. The 8 and 10 year old there with their parents wants something different than the 22 year smart mark sitting next to them. And the "grandpa" wants something different than both.Just too easy to put Bryan in the main event now.. Reigns isn't ready.. save him and make him come from underneath next year...
It seems like fans are no longer content to just have the story told to them. They want to steer the ship. And I'm not a fan of that at all.
IMO, they need to stay this course this year. They gave in last year, which was fine because they WAY missed the boat on Bautista. But they should not make that a habit. If they need to double turn to where Reigns is the heel and Lesnar the face, so be it. But don't give in to the fans just because they throw a hissy fit every time Daniel Bryan doesn't go over.
Yeah, to me it's like an owner or GM signing a high priced free agent or resigning a player the fans love because that's what the fans demanded.The problem is, the crowd is wrong most of the time. They boo Cena because he never loses...yet they boo whenever Bryan doesn't win. So...they want Bryan to be the new Superman who defeats all odds all of the time and never looks vulnerable? That would suck.So, they should ignore what their paying customers want? I'm thinking that's not a great idea.I really hope they don't go that direction. There's a fine line between giving the fans what they want and letting them book the shows. I caught the first 15 mins of HHH on the Stone Cold podcast before work this morning and I thought HHH did a nice job explaining the challenges of booking in the "reality era" in which Kayfabe is dead. The 8 and 10 year old there with their parents wants something different than the 22 year smart mark sitting next to them. And the "grandpa" wants something different than both.Just too easy to put Bryan in the main event now.. Reigns isn't ready.. save him and make him come from underneath next year...
It seems like fans are no longer content to just have the story told to them. They want to steer the ship. And I'm not a fan of that at all.
IMO, they need to stay this course this year. They gave in last year, which was fine because they WAY missed the boat on Bautista. But they should not make that a habit. If they need to double turn to where Reigns is the heel and Lesnar the face, so be it. But don't give in to the fans just because they throw a hissy fit every time Daniel Bryan doesn't go over.
I also don't think they need to "turn" Reigns. Roman just needs to be Roman.
Absolutely. People will pay to see heels get beaten. It worked in the NWA for YEARS. WWE can alternate between face and heel champions as long as you can generate heat, people will pay.There is good money in pissing off the fans, however WWE made a mistake anointing Reigns the golden boy before he ever wrestled a singles match or got on the mic.
It's clear now that Ambrose and Rollins carried the shield in the ring.
I can't fathom a way that Reigns can carry a one on one WM main event this year. He's just not that good of an in ring worker. It would be awful for the product.
Now that Taker has lost, I don't think he's much of an attraction. And if Sting wrestles at 'mania I hope it's in a tag match, because I don't think he can handle a singles match on his own.Bray vs. Undertaker makes sense. Slow, plodding match full of mental games. Bray can protect Taker and doesn't get hurt at all putting Taker over.
Then next year in Dallas, Taker doesn't wrestle but you do an entrance and retirement speech in front of the home crowd.
Good wrestling promotions have always given the fans what they wanted. Heck, that's true for all good businesses - give the customers what they want... supply the demand. The only difference here is that the fans are much more vocal and immediate now with their disapproval... and I don't see anything wrong with that. And the WWE should prefer that as well as this gives them time to reshape the product before incurring significant damage (i.e., network cancellations and low PPV buy rates for their biggest event of the year).I really hope they don't go that direction. There's a fine line between giving the fans what they want and letting them book the shows. I caught the first 15 mins of HHH on the Stone Cold podcast before work this morning and I thought HHH did a nice job explaining the challenges of booking in the "reality era" in which Kayfabe is dead. The 8 and 10 year old there with their parents wants something different than the 22 year smart mark sitting next to them. And the "grandpa" wants something different than both.Just too easy to put Bryan in the main event now.. Reigns isn't ready.. save him and make him come from underneath next year...
It seems like fans are no longer content to just have the story told to them. They want to steer the ship. And I'm not a fan of that at all.
IMO, they need to stay this course this year. They gave in last year, which was fine because they WAY missed the boat on Bautista. But they should not make that a habit. If they need to double turn to where Reigns is the heel and Lesnar the face, so be it. But don't give in to the fans just because they throw a hissy fit every time Daniel Bryan doesn't go over.
The boos Cena and Reigns receive are for two very different reasons. The fans that don't like Cena still, for the most part, respect his ability... they are just tired of his gimmick and his run at the top. If Bryan had a 10-year reign, they would probably be tired of him as well. Bryan's run lasted all of 2 months after years of being kept down.The problem is, the crowd is wrong most of the time. They boo Cena because he never loses...yet they boo whenever Bryan doesn't win. So...they want Bryan to be the new Superman who defeats all odds all of the time and never looks vulnerable? That would suck.So, they should ignore what their paying customers want? I'm thinking that's not a great idea.I really hope they don't go that direction. There's a fine line between giving the fans what they want and letting them book the shows. I caught the first 15 mins of HHH on the Stone Cold podcast before work this morning and I thought HHH did a nice job explaining the challenges of booking in the "reality era" in which Kayfabe is dead. The 8 and 10 year old there with their parents wants something different than the 22 year smart mark sitting next to them. And the "grandpa" wants something different than both.Just too easy to put Bryan in the main event now.. Reigns isn't ready.. save him and make him come from underneath next year...
It seems like fans are no longer content to just have the story told to them. They want to steer the ship. And I'm not a fan of that at all.
IMO, they need to stay this course this year. They gave in last year, which was fine because they WAY missed the boat on Bautista. But they should not make that a habit. If they need to double turn to where Reigns is the heel and Lesnar the face, so be it. But don't give in to the fans just because they throw a hissy fit every time Daniel Bryan doesn't go over.
I also don't think they need to "turn" Reigns. Roman just needs to be Roman.
The sports GM analogy isn't accurate... real sports are judged in wins and losses. Pro wrestling is decided by how well the fans are entertained. The fans don't think Reigns is as entertaining as other guys on the roster.Yeah, to me it's like an owner or GM signing a high priced free agent or resigning a player the fans love because that's what the fans demanded.The problem is, the crowd is wrong most of the time. They boo Cena because he never loses...yet they boo whenever Bryan doesn't win. So...they want Bryan to be the new Superman who defeats all odds all of the time and never looks vulnerable? That would suck.So, they should ignore what their paying customers want? I'm thinking that's not a great idea.I really hope they don't go that direction. There's a fine line between giving the fans what they want and letting them book the shows. I caught the first 15 mins of HHH on the Stone Cold podcast before work this morning and I thought HHH did a nice job explaining the challenges of booking in the "reality era" in which Kayfabe is dead. The 8 and 10 year old there with their parents wants something different than the 22 year smart mark sitting next to them. And the "grandpa" wants something different than both.Just too easy to put Bryan in the main event now.. Reigns isn't ready.. save him and make him come from underneath next year...
It seems like fans are no longer content to just have the story told to them. They want to steer the ship. And I'm not a fan of that at all.
IMO, they need to stay this course this year. They gave in last year, which was fine because they WAY missed the boat on Bautista. But they should not make that a habit. If they need to double turn to where Reigns is the heel and Lesnar the face, so be it. But don't give in to the fans just because they throw a hissy fit every time Daniel Bryan doesn't go over.
I also don't think they need to "turn" Reigns. Roman just needs to be Roman.
Most Packers fans wanted Ted Thompson to bring Favre back in 2008. Some went so far as to organize protests, boycotts and circulate petitions. People that were interviewed felt like the Packers should listen to their fans instead of the smart football people that they hired. Let the experts do their job. They'll stumble once in a while, but most of the time they know what they're doing. If you listen to the fans, you'll soon be sitting in the crowd with them.
Besides, there's good money in pissing off the fans. Skip Bayless has made himself arguably the most powerful man at ESPN doing just that. People claim they've stopped watching, but the ratings say otherwise.
In wrestling you have to pick your spots. You can't just say "how high" every time the internet wrestling community says "jump". If they start doing that they're going to be in real trouble down the road.
Miz is kind of an updated version of Chris Jericho in that regard...helping getting guys over.Miz is killing it right nowTerrible. 2 good segments.How is the show so far... what's the crowd like?Miz may never be a main event guy again, but the guy can unquestionably help guys he's working with get over.
He had Alex Riley hot & then creative dropped Riley's push completely. He's doing the same with Mizdow right now. Same concern though -- what he'll do after he breaks up with Miz.
Sandow is actually on Jericho's podcast this week... he said he thinks he can turn the gimmick into something serious if need be. I'll believe it when I see it.Miz is kind of an updated version of Chris Jericho in that regard...helping getting guys over.Miz is killing it right nowTerrible. 2 good segments.How is the show so far... what's the crowd like?Miz may never be a main event guy again, but the guy can unquestionably help guys he's working with get over.
He had Alex Riley hot & then creative dropped Riley's push completely. He's doing the same with Mizdow right now. Same concern though -- what he'll do after he breaks up with Miz.
Not sure about what happens to Mizdow after the inevitable split with Miz. Maybe they rehash the Al Snow, gimmick a week routine.
I guess I don't share your scorn for Reigns. Is he any worse than say the Ultimate Warrior? He couldn't wrestle a lick and was incoherent on the mic. But he was a big star before he got too big for his britches. In the land of sports entertainment you can get by without being Brett Hart in the ring. He will need to get better on the mic, but he'll get there.OC Zed said:The sports GM analogy isn't accurate... real sports are judged in wins and losses. Pro wrestling is decided by how well the fans are entertained. The fans don't think Reigns is as entertaining as other guys on the roster.Jeremy said:Yeah, to me it's like an owner or GM signing a high priced free agent or resigning a player the fans love because that's what the fans demanded.JB Breakfast Club said:The problem is, the crowd is wrong most of the time. They boo Cena because he never loses...yet they boo whenever Bryan doesn't win. So...they want Bryan to be the new Superman who defeats all odds all of the time and never looks vulnerable? That would suck.GoFishTN said:So, they should ignore what their paying customers want? I'm thinking that's not a great idea.Jeremy said:I really hope they don't go that direction. There's a fine line between giving the fans what they want and letting them book the shows. I caught the first 15 mins of HHH on the Stone Cold podcast before work this morning and I thought HHH did a nice job explaining the challenges of booking in the "reality era" in which Kayfabe is dead. The 8 and 10 year old there with their parents wants something different than the 22 year smart mark sitting next to them. And the "grandpa" wants something different than both.Smack Tripper said:Just too easy to put Bryan in the main event now.. Reigns isn't ready.. save him and make him come from underneath next year...
It seems like fans are no longer content to just have the story told to them. They want to steer the ship. And I'm not a fan of that at all.
IMO, they need to stay this course this year. They gave in last year, which was fine because they WAY missed the boat on Bautista. But they should not make that a habit. If they need to double turn to where Reigns is the heel and Lesnar the face, so be it. But don't give in to the fans just because they throw a hissy fit every time Daniel Bryan doesn't go over.
I also don't think they need to "turn" Reigns. Roman just needs to be Roman.
Most Packers fans wanted Ted Thompson to bring Favre back in 2008. Some went so far as to organize protests, boycotts and circulate petitions. People that were interviewed felt like the Packers should listen to their fans instead of the smart football people that they hired. Let the experts do their job. They'll stumble once in a while, but most of the time they know what they're doing. If you listen to the fans, you'll soon be sitting in the crowd with them.
Besides, there's good money in pissing off the fans. Skip Bayless has made himself arguably the most powerful man at ESPN doing just that. People claim they've stopped watching, but the ratings say otherwise.
In wrestling you have to pick your spots. You can't just say "how high" every time the internet wrestling community says "jump". If they start doing that they're going to be in real trouble down the road.
And there is good money in pissing off the fans... that's what the heels are for. But heels being heels is a different concept altogether than giving the fans a bad product.
Bryan was supposed to face Sheamus in a rematch at last year's WM. They have no plans for him, except what the fans force on them.I guess I don't share your scorn for Reigns. Is he any worse than say the Ultimate Warrior? He couldn't wrestle a lick and was incoherent on the mic. But he was a big star before he got too big for his britches. In the land of sports entertainment you can get by without being Brett Hart in the ring. He will need to get better on the mic, but he'll get there.OC Zed said:The sports GM analogy isn't accurate... real sports are judged in wins and losses. Pro wrestling is decided by how well the fans are entertained. The fans don't think Reigns is as entertaining as other guys on the roster.Jeremy said:Yeah, to me it's like an owner or GM signing a high priced free agent or resigning a player the fans love because that's what the fans demanded.JB Breakfast Club said:The problem is, the crowd is wrong most of the time. They boo Cena because he never loses...yet they boo whenever Bryan doesn't win. So...they want Bryan to be the new Superman who defeats all odds all of the time and never looks vulnerable? That would suck.GoFishTN said:So, they should ignore what their paying customers want? I'm thinking that's not a great idea.Jeremy said:I really hope they don't go that direction. There's a fine line between giving the fans what they want and letting them book the shows. I caught the first 15 mins of HHH on the Stone Cold podcast before work this morning and I thought HHH did a nice job explaining the challenges of booking in the "reality era" in which Kayfabe is dead. The 8 and 10 year old there with their parents wants something different than the 22 year smart mark sitting next to them. And the "grandpa" wants something different than both.Smack Tripper said:Just too easy to put Bryan in the main event now.. Reigns isn't ready.. save him and make him come from underneath next year...
It seems like fans are no longer content to just have the story told to them. They want to steer the ship. And I'm not a fan of that at all.
IMO, they need to stay this course this year. They gave in last year, which was fine because they WAY missed the boat on Bautista. But they should not make that a habit. If they need to double turn to where Reigns is the heel and Lesnar the face, so be it. But don't give in to the fans just because they throw a hissy fit every time Daniel Bryan doesn't go over.
I also don't think they need to "turn" Reigns. Roman just needs to be Roman.
Most Packers fans wanted Ted Thompson to bring Favre back in 2008. Some went so far as to organize protests, boycotts and circulate petitions. People that were interviewed felt like the Packers should listen to their fans instead of the smart football people that they hired. Let the experts do their job. They'll stumble once in a while, but most of the time they know what they're doing. If you listen to the fans, you'll soon be sitting in the crowd with them.
Besides, there's good money in pissing off the fans. Skip Bayless has made himself arguably the most powerful man at ESPN doing just that. People claim they've stopped watching, but the ratings say otherwise.
In wrestling you have to pick your spots. You can't just say "how high" every time the internet wrestling community says "jump". If they start doing that they're going to be in real trouble down the road.
And there is good money in pissing off the fans... that's what the heels are for. But heels being heels is a different concept altogether than giving the fans a bad product.
I just don't like the fans having SO much power that they directly dictate what happens. Especially since not everyone wants the same things. Will there be another "cancel WWE Network" campaign if Cena should be given the belt again? Or if Ziggler doesn't get the push the internet fans think he deserves?
Maybe they have other long range plans for Bryan. Maybe his moment was planned for Summerslam. Maybe they feel after the long layoff that they need to re-establish him a little bit again like they didn't with Bautista.
I'm meh on Reigns - after all, I don't believe it's his fault he's being pushed like that (it would be interesting if you could get him to shoot what he'd say).I guess I don't share your scorn for Reigns. Is he any worse than say the Ultimate Warrior? He couldn't wrestle a lick and was incoherent on the mic. But he was a big star before he got too big for his britches. In the land of sports entertainment you can get by without being Brett Hart in the ring. He will need to get better on the mic, but he'll get there.
I just don't like the fans having SO much power that they directly dictate what happens. Especially since not everyone wants the same things. Will there be another "cancel WWE Network" campaign if Cena should be given the belt again? Or if Ziggler doesn't get the push the internet fans think he deserves?
Maybe they have other long range plans for Bryan. Maybe his moment was planned for Summerslam. Maybe they feel after the long layoff that they need to re-establish him a little bit again like they didn't with Bautista.
He was coming back to the WWE after filming Guardians of the Galaxy. He was booked to win the Royal Rumble and get the automatic title shot at WrestleMania. The crowd knew what was going to happen and they just crapped all over it.What's the details on this Bautista talk? Did they push him last year to the title or did they overpush him like Roman and change plans so to speak? I don't remember my son mentioning anything about this.
True. No matter how hard they try to replicate it, there will never be anything like Mulkeymania.Sometimes, it's just right place, right gimmick, right time.![]()
Given the circumstances, Reigns is worse than the Ultimate Warrior. Back in the late '80s, WWF fans had never seen great workers aside from Savage and Steamboat. All that changed when Hart and Michaels rose to prominence and there hasn't been a mega-face of the company since that couldn't put on a great match. Also, FWIW, I'd still say Warrior's intensity and goofball interviews still trump what we've seen from Reigns. And Warrior just looked out of this world (ya, it was steroids, but still). Reigns, in contrast, needs to wear a shirt/chest protector to the ring at all times.I guess I don't share your scorn for Reigns. Is he any worse than say the Ultimate Warrior? He couldn't wrestle a lick and was incoherent on the mic. But he was a big star before he got too big for his britches. In the land of sports entertainment you can get by without being Brett Hart in the ring. He will need to get better on the mic, but he'll get there.
I just don't like the fans having SO much power that they directly dictate what happens. Especially since not everyone wants the same things. Will there be another "cancel WWE Network" campaign if Cena should be given the belt again? Or if Ziggler doesn't get the push the internet fans think he deserves?
Maybe they have other long range plans for Bryan. Maybe his moment was planned for Summerslam. Maybe they feel after the long layoff that they need to re-establish him a little bit again like they didn't with Bautista.
UW's win over HTM and his feud with Rick Rude are what set him up for the title run. Those are the missing ingredients to Reigns here. He still needs to bake. He's not ready yet.I'm meh on Reigns - after all, I don't believe it's his fault he's being pushed like that (it would be interesting if you could get him to shoot what he'd say).I guess I don't share your scorn for Reigns. Is he any worse than say the Ultimate Warrior? He couldn't wrestle a lick and was incoherent on the mic. But he was a big star before he got too big for his britches. In the land of sports entertainment you can get by without being Brett Hart in the ring. He will need to get better on the mic, but he'll get there.
I just don't like the fans having SO much power that they directly dictate what happens. Especially since not everyone wants the same things. Will there be another "cancel WWE Network" campaign if Cena should be given the belt again? Or if Ziggler doesn't get the push the internet fans think he deserves?
Maybe they have other long range plans for Bryan. Maybe his moment was planned for Summerslam. Maybe they feel after the long layoff that they need to re-establish him a little bit again like they didn't with Bautista.
UW was kind of a case all his own. Dude had the entrance music, the energy and a wild style that fans grabbed onto. He was never going to make you forget Buddy Rogers, but if you re-watch that IC title match against the Honky Tonk Man (all 33 seconds of it), that crowd exploded with one of the largest pops I've ever heard.
Sometimes, it's just right place, right gimmick, right time.![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YHL3oxYcW4True. No matter how hard they try to replicate it, there will never be anything like Mulkeymania.Sometimes, it's just right place, right gimmick, right time.![]()
I don't think that they would waste Miz vs. Sandow as a dark match as Sandow is one of the most over gimmicks they have right now. Harper vs. Ryback also could be played up enough to be on the main card as well. The Usos vs. Ascension is more of a candidate for a dark match, IMO.Bryan beats roman at fast lane...
Mania's 7 matches:
Bryan v Brock (Rollins cashes after Bryan wins)
Rollins v Ambrose
Wyatt v taker
HHH and show v sting and roman
Cena v rusev
Ziggler v bnb
Usos v ascension
Miz v sindow (dark)
Harper v ryback (dark)
It will if sting is oldNo way will Triple H vs Sting not be a one on one.