What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Seattle NBA NHL teams placeholder*** (1 Viewer)

Fennis said:
David Stern sucks
Fennis said:
that ##### Stern is leaving soon.
I didnt listen to the press conference, so I just found out this gem by that dickwad. He started with this remark:
This is going to be short for me. I have a game to get to in Oklahoma City.
Saw that remark on twitter. The little ####stick couldn't resist himself. What hemroid that guy is.
 
Maloof is still playing the "it is not over card"

George Maloof quote after the vote:

“If it had to turn out this way, it’s fine with us,” he said, according to NBA.com. “But my loyalty’s to Chris because he stepped up. … [Johnson] did a great job. He put a great team together. We’ll see what happens. It’s not over.”

 
Maloof is still playing the "it is not over card"George Maloof quote after the vote:If it had to turn out this way, its fine with us, he said, according to NBA.com. But my loyaltys to Chris because he stepped up. [Johnson] did a great job. He put a great team together. Well see what happens. Its not over.
These guys love attention, which is why they will make things as difficult as possible for Sacramento. They will likely play Hansen for awhile as well.Interpreting this as "Seatte still has a shot" is grasping at straws though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And that is that. Maloofs not 100% out, but no longer control team

Maloofs, Sacramento group agree
Just a day after NBA owners officially rejected a bid to relocate the Sacramento Kings to Seattle, the team's owners have agreed to sell the Kings to a Sacramento-based group, sources told ESPN.com.

Software billionaire Vivek Ranadive came to an agreement to purchase 65 percent of the Kings from the Maloof family for approximately $348 million, sources said. The Kings' total valuation in the sale is $535 million, an NBA record.


An official announcement is expected Friday
 
And that is that. Maloofs not 100% out, but no longer control team

Maloofs, Sacramento group agree
Just a day after NBA owners officially rejected a bid to relocate the Sacramento Kings to Seattle, the team's owners have agreed to sell the Kings to a Sacramento-based group, sources told ESPN.com.

Software billionaire Vivek Ranadive came to an agreement to purchase 65 percent of the Kings from the Maloof family for approximately $348 million, sources said. The Kings' total valuation in the sale is $535 million, an NBA record.


An official announcement is expected Friday
:excited:

 
Seems like the typical you better get a deal done or the team is moving to Seattle BS to me.

Report: NHL has Plan B for Coyotes involving Seattle, Jeremy Roenick

Some day it will happen. There will be a resolution one way or the other in the Phoenix Coyotes saga. From indications at Gary Bettman's annual state of the union before Game 1 of the Cup, it seemed like that day is much closer than farther away at this point.

That's because Seattle is back in the picture as an honest threat, according to Hockey Night in Canada.

Bettman and his deputy commissioner Bill Daly would not make any guarantees the team will remain in Arizona next season, saying that one of the delays in next season's schedule is based on the Coyotes' uncertain future.

With an upcoming vote in Glendale to decide if the city will give $15 million annually to the Renaissance Sports & Entertainment group that is trying to finalize a purchase of the team to keep it in town -- where the talks stand now (via Fox Sports Arizona's Craig Morgan) -- it seemed like perhaps it was politicking, trying to get the new potential owners a little more support to try to get the measure passed.

But there might have been a shred of truth to it as well.

According to Elliotte Friedman and Glenn Healy of the CBC (video link here) on Saturday night, the NHL does have a Plan B at the moment, and it could come to fruition rather suddenly. If a deal is not reached with Glendale and RSE at the June 25 council meeting in Glendale, the Coyotes could finally be on the move. To Seattle.

According to Friedman and Healy, the Canucks had looked into moving their AHL franchise to Key Arena in Seattle, only to be rebuked. That's apparently because the NHL has a new investment team of Ray Bartoszek and Anthony Lanza ready to buy the team, and well above the asking price at $220 million. They would try to get a deal done with Glendale but if it didn't happen by July 2 -- which obviously isn't a lot of time -- then the team would move immediately to Seattle.

What's more is that if that Plan B were to play out, Jeremy Roenick would reportedly be involved in the process, specifically in the Hockey Ops department for the new team in Seattle. That would be interesting, now wouldn't it, especially since Roenick has been open about how much he enjoyed playing in Arizona.

Key Arena in Seattle is hardly ideal for hockey. It's a relatively old venue that has very poor site lines for the sport. You can see the seating chart here, an awkward layout to be sure.

It would be a short-term home, or that's the hope. Seattle native Chris Hansen has been leading an effort to build a new arena, but it hinges on getting an NBA team back in the market, and after they failed to land the NBA's Kings from Sacramento, that is an uncertain prospect. It's not clear if the arena would go forward with just an NHL team, but if it did it would cost the city of Seattle more.

Round and round she goes, and where this stops, nobody knows. But we should finally have a conclusion in the coming weeks. Stop me if you have heard that one before.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
More:

Chris Daniels‏@ChrisDaniels5

BREAKING: Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn acknowledges recent discussions with NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman

@ChrisDaniels5BREAKING: NHL investors also met with Seattle City Council members.
Chris Daniels‏@ChrisDaniels540m

BREAKING: McGinn says a Hansen rep introduced him to potential Seattle NHL investors two weeks ago.

Chris Daniels‏@ChrisDaniels5

BREAKING: McGinn “We believe we can support the NHL in Key Arena”.

Chris Daniels@ChrisDaniels5

NOW: I can also now confirm Lanza and Bartoszek are the two investors interested in bringing Coyotes to Seattle. #NHL

 
Fennis said:
More:

Chris Daniels‏@ChrisDaniels5

BREAKING: Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn acknowledges recent discussions with NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman

@ChrisDaniels5BREAKING: NHL investors also met with Seattle City Council members.
Chris Daniels‏@ChrisDaniels540m

BREAKING: McGinn says a Hansen rep introduced him to potential Seattle NHL investors two weeks ago.

Chris Daniels‏@ChrisDaniels5

BREAKING: McGinn “We believe we can support the NHL in Key Arena”.

Chris Daniels@ChrisDaniels5

NOW: I can also now confirm Lanza and Bartoszek are the two investors interested in bringing Coyotes to Seattle. #NHL
Alright, that is much better.

 
The Phoenix Coyotes have been bleeding money for years. They've been dead last in attendance over the last 5 years, with about 13,000 fans per night.

 
Quebec City, Toronto, and Seattle should be the top-3 cities to consider for relocating an NHL team. KC has the arena, but I don't believe the market can support an NHL team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Quebec City, Toronto, and Seattle should be the top-3 cities to consider for relocating an NHL team. KC has the arena, but I don't believe the market can support an NHL team.
All three cities you listed are more viable hockey markets than KC, including a second team in Toronto. Between the Chiefs and Royals, three D-1 football and 4 D-1 basketball programs within driving distance, an MLS team, the Speedway, and a ton of club sport participation, the KC sports market is saturated. And oddly, the arenas is doing great without an anchor tenant - been able to draw more concerts and multiple dates for shows with more weekend dates available and no urgency to turn over the layout to get the hockey ice ready.

The NHL has two teams in New York (with the New Jersey Devils also in the same media market) and two teams in Los Angeles. Why wouldn't Toronto be able to support two teams?

Would prefer to see the Sonics restored in Seattle over a hockey team, but the city is large enough to support an NHL team if they had one.
The MLS team in KC is wonderfully supported these days. I think they typically play to stand room only crowds in the gorgeous new stadium they built and this was after people said MLS would never work in KC after the Hunt's struggled with the franchise for so many years.

Do you feel an NHL team would struggle in KC or simply just not be as successful as other cities?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The NHL has two teams in New York (with the New Jersey Devils also in the same media market) and two teams in Los Angeles. Why wouldn't Toronto be able to support two teams?Would prefer to see the Sonics restored in Seattle over a hockey team, but the city is large enough to support an NHL team if they had one.
The Toronto market could easily support a 2nd and even a 3rd team. The Maple Leafs have fought against it every step of the way though because they love having a monopoly and all the revenue it helps them generate.

Markets like Vancouver and Montreal could probably both support a 2nd team as well.

some good info here from Nate Silver: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/31/why-cant-canada-win-the-stanley-cup/

Using his google search term criteria to identify hockey fans, he estimated about a quarter million in Seattle vs just 75,000 in Kansas City.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dave Pagnotta @thefourthperiod: Really seems like City of Glendale wants Jobing Arena to be a ghost barn in the near future. Not sounding promising for Coyotes. Again.

4:05pm - 21 Jun 13

 
The NHL has two teams in New York (with the New Jersey Devils also in the same media market) and two teams in Los Angeles. Why wouldn't Toronto be able to support two teams?Would prefer to see the Sonics restored in Seattle over a hockey team, but the city is large enough to support an NHL team if they had one.
The Toronto market could easily support a 2nd and even a 3rd team. The Maple Leafs have fought against it every step of the way though because they love having a monopoly and all the revenue it helps them generate.

Markets like Vancouver and Montreal could probably both support a 2nd team as well.

some good info here from Nate Silver: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/31/why-cant-canada-win-the-stanley-cup/

Using his google search term criteria to identify hockey fans, he estimated about a quarter million in Seattle vs just 75,000 in Kansas City.
Most (all?) of the warm weather teams are at the bottom along with Columbus. It's really time for the NHL to move these teams somewhere else.

 
What would have prevented IceArizona from taking the $15 million a year, then giving all their executives massive bonuses, then claiming that they didn't have enough money to pay it back?

 
So last night, Glendale threw in a 5 year out-clause similar to the buyers'.

This deal is DOA.

http://www.azcentral.com/community/glendale/articles/20130628coyotes-glendale-deal-peril.html
Sad to say but our desert dogs will be leaving town I agree...it's over.
Oh well, if Atlanta got another chance, maybe Phoenix will sometime down the road too when all of the recently built stadiums start to age and those teams need some leverage.

 
Chris Hansen has been bankrolling a signature drive to force a public vote on the Sacramento arena deal over the last few weeks- so much for "regretting" trying to steal the team. Will not look good when the NBA revisits the expansion issue. Maybe Ballmer will pick a different horse.

 
Here is more on the Hansen story.

=========

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/9575561/chris-hansen-gave-money-group-opposing-new-sacramento-kings-arena-documents-show

Weeks after his aggressive bid to buy and relocate the Sacramento Kings to Seattle failed, hedge fund manager Chris Hansen bankrolled an effort to undercut a deal the team's new owners made to build an arena in Sacramento, documents show.

The documents, filed Friday with the California Secretary of State, show that Hansen donated $100,000 on June 21 to a political action committee attempting to halt the $448 million deal to build the Kings a new downtown arena.

Hansen's clandestine support of a campaign against the project could be seen as an effort to derail the plans again.

Hansen said he "made a mistake" by giving a Los Angeles law firm $100,000. The firm secretly funneled $80,000 to a group gathering signatures to force a public vote on the arena plan, which would have at least $258 million in public money.

"While I'm sure everyone can appreciate how easy it is to get caught up the heat of battle, with the benefit of hindsight, this is clearly a decision I regret," Hansen said in a statement, noting the money came from him and not on behalf of the Seattle ownership group or its partners. "I wish the city of Sacramento and Kings fans the best in their efforts and they have my commitment not to have any involvement in their arena efforts in the future."

The Sacramento Bee first reported Hansen's donation, which was kept secret until a political watchdog group filed a lawsuit to compel the name of the donor to be made public this week.

In May, NBA owners rejected Hansen's record bid that would have valued the Kings at $625 million. That forced the Maloof family to sell the team to software mogul Ranadive for a valuation of $534 million. Ranadive made a deal with Sacramento officials to build the new arena without a public vote, a factor that pushed NBA owners to vote against Hansen's strong bid.

Ranadive's purchase closed on May 31, but three weeks later, documents show, Hansen made the $100,000 donation.

A group named the Sacramento Taxpayers Opposed to Pork (STOP), which organized a signature drive to get an issue on the ballot next June, said it wasn't aware of Hansen's aid.

"We were working independently, and another group of paid signature gatherers was working alongside us," STOP spokesman John Hyde said. "We didn't know who was funding it. We certainly weren't aware Chris Hansen had donated."

Hyde said the group has more than half of the 22,000 signatures needed to get the issue on the ballot, and it will continue to collect them independently before a December deadline. There is also a lawsuit that has been filed against the arena project over the land where the city plans to construct the arena.

 
Chris Hansen has been bankrolling a signature drive to force a public vote on the Sacramento arena deal over the last few weeks- so much for "regretting" trying to steal the team. Will not look good when the NBA revisits the expansion issue. Maybe Ballmer will pick a different horse.
"While I'm sure everyone can appreciate how easy it is to get caught up the heat of battle, with the benefit of hindsight, this is clearly a decision I regret," Hansen said in a statement, noting the money came from him and not on behalf of the Seattle ownership group or its partners. "I wish the city of Sacramento and Kings fans the best in their efforts and they have my commitment not to have any involvement in their arena efforts in the future."
You and Wooderson have reading comprehension issues or something?

Congrats on keeping the team.

 
Chris Hansen has been bankrolling a signature drive to force a public vote on the Sacramento arena deal over the last few weeks- so much for "regretting" trying to steal the team. Will not look good when the NBA revisits the expansion issue. Maybe Ballmer will pick a different horse.
"While I'm sure everyone can appreciate how easy it is to get caught up the heat of battle, with the benefit of hindsight, this is clearly a decision I regret," Hansen said in a statement, noting the money came from him and not on behalf of the Seattle ownership group or its partners. "I wish the city of Sacramento and Kings fans the best in their efforts and they have my commitment not to have any involvement in their arena efforts in the future."
You and Wooderson have reading comprehension issues or something?

Congrats on keeping the team.
I'm sure he regrets it. He regrets he got caught.

He didn't get a team so now no one should. What a baby.

 
Chris Hansen has been bankrolling a signature drive to force a public vote on the Sacramento arena deal over the last few weeks- so much for "regretting" trying to steal the team. Will not look good when the NBA revisits the expansion issue. Maybe Ballmer will pick a different horse.
"While I'm sure everyone can appreciate how easy it is to get caught up the heat of battle, with the benefit of hindsight, this is clearly a decision I regret," Hansen said in a statement, noting the money came from him and not on behalf of the Seattle ownership group or its partners. "I wish the city of Sacramento and Kings fans the best in their efforts and they have my commitment not to have any involvement in their arena efforts in the future."
You and Wooderson have reading comprehension issues or something?

Congrats on keeping the team.
I'm really excited to see how you spin this into a reading comprehension issue.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chris Hansen has been bankrolling a signature drive to force a public vote on the Sacramento arena deal over the last few weeks- so much for "regretting" trying to steal the team. Will not look good when the NBA revisits the expansion issue. Maybe Ballmer will pick a different horse.
"While I'm sure everyone can appreciate how easy it is to get caught up the heat of battle, with the benefit of hindsight, this is clearly a decision I regret," Hansen said in a statement, noting the money came from him and not on behalf of the Seattle ownership group or its partners. "I wish the city of Sacramento and Kings fans the best in their efforts and they have my commitment not to have any involvement in their arena efforts in the future."
You and Wooderson have reading comprehension issues or something?

Congrats on keeping the team.
I'm sure he regrets it. He regrets he got caught.

He didn't get a team so now no one should. What a baby.
He clearly didn't feel as bad about the effort as he told the press after he lost the BOG vote in May if he was continuing the fight behind the scenes.

 
It'll be nice when the Sacramento fans feel good enough about the fact that they kept the Kings that they don't have to come back to this thread anymore to rub it in.

Feel free to move on anytime, guys. :bye:

 
jonessed said:
It'll be nice when the Sacramento fans feel good enough about the fact that they kept the Kings that they don't have to come back to this thread anymore to rub it in.

Feel free to move on anytime, guys. :bye:
You are so bitter.
Alright. Let's roll with that.

As bitter as I am, I'm not the one bringing up perceived wrongs from months ago, starting an argument, then calling the other person names once I am engaged. So at least I've got that going for me.

 
jonessed said:
It'll be nice when the Sacramento fans feel good enough about the fact that they kept the Kings that they don't have to come back to this thread anymore to rub it in.

Feel free to move on anytime, guys. :bye:
You are so bitter.
Alright. Let's roll with that.

As bitter as I am, I'm not the one bringing up perceived wrongs from months ago, starting an argument, then calling the other person names once I am engaged. So at least I've got that going for me.
The donations may have occurred months ago, but the investigation into who was making the donations has been going on for some time. They were legally supposed to have been reported, but someone was hiding them.Now that it comes out Hansen was trying to sabotage the arena months after he lost the Kings it's been a pretty big news. This just happened so I fail to see how bringing it up now is it all strange. The group Hansen made the donations to is still out collecting signatures.

This is all very current news.

 
Last edited by a moderator:


Ranadive made a deal with Sacramento officials to build the new arena without a public vote, a factor that pushed NBA owners to vote against Hansen's strong bid.
So the Sacramento officials think that they could make a deal to spend 258 million of taxpayers money and not get called out on it?

 
Ranadive made a deal with Sacramento officials to build the new arena without a public vote, a factor that pushed NBA owners to vote against Hansen's strong bid.
So the Sacramento officials think that they could make a deal to spend 258 million of taxpayers money and not get called out on it?
Nothing to get called out on. Not all public expenditures require a public vote. The signature gatherers are the ones calling for special process here, City officials didn't circumvent anything.

 
Ranadive made a deal with Sacramento officials to build the new arena without a public vote, a factor that pushed NBA owners to vote against Hansen's strong bid.
So the Sacramento officials think that they could make a deal to spend 258 million of taxpayers money and not get called out on it?
Nothing to get called out on. Not all public expenditures require a public vote. The signature gatherers are the ones calling for special process here, City officials didn't circumvent anything.
Didn't mean to imply they were doing anything shady or wrong. But to say they will build a new arena with 258 mill of taxpayers money without a public vote is laughable.. They will get the required signatures and there will be a vote.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ranadive made a deal with Sacramento officials to build the new arena without a public vote, a factor that pushed NBA owners to vote against Hansen's strong bid.
So the Sacramento officials think that they could make a deal to spend 258 million of taxpayers money and not get called out on it?
Nothing to get called out on. Not all public expenditures require a public vote. The signature gatherers are the ones calling for special process here, City officials didn't circumvent anything.
Didn't mean to imply they were doing anything shady or wrong. But to say they will build a new arena with 258 mill of taxpayers money without a public vote is laughable.. They will get the required signatures and there will be a vote.
"Called out" implies they did something illegal, or procedurally improper. They didn't. I'm not sure if the signature drive will be successful or not. This Hansen thing has been quite the scandal and caused some of the local group's leaders to quit.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top