What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (1 Viewer)

I'm following two live commentaries on the United game. Here's what they have to say about the penalty:

7 min Clark did get a foot in Young's way, but the winger fell theatrically to the ground to earn the spot kick. Much like he did against QPR last weekend. Probably just about the right call, though.
There is definite contact on Ashley Young, but it will cause controversy that one. He looked for contact you might say.
Both say that, under the laws, it was a penalty.
 
I'm following two live commentaries on the United game. Here's what they have to say about the penalty:

7 min Clark did get a foot in Young's way, but the winger fell theatrically to the ground to earn the spot kick. Much like he did against QPR last weekend. Probably just about the right call, though.
There is definite contact on Ashley Young, but it will cause controversy that one. He looked for contact you might say.
Both say that, under the laws, it was a penalty.
Are you even watching the game?
 
I'm following two live commentaries on the United game. Here's what they have to say about the penalty:

7 min Clark did get a foot in Young's way, but the winger fell theatrically to the ground to earn the spot kick. Much like he did against QPR last weekend. Probably just about the right call, though.
There is definite contact on Ashley Young, but it will cause controversy that one. He looked for contact you might say.
Both say that, under the laws, it was a penalty.
Are you even watching the game?
I know what I saw. And the second angle confirmed what I initially thought--dive.
 
I'm following two live commentaries on the United game. Here's what they have to say about the penalty:

7 min Clark did get a foot in Young's way, but the winger fell theatrically to the ground to earn the spot kick. Much like he did against QPR last weekend. Probably just about the right call, though.
There is definite contact on Ashley Young, but it will cause controversy that one. He looked for contact you might say.
Both say that, under the laws, it was a penalty.
Are you even watching the game?
No, I'm at work, which is why I'm following two British commentaries from two independent agencies, both of whom say it was the right call. Perhaps I should just follow the commentary from an ABU like yourself for a completely unbiased opinion.
 
I'm following two live commentaries on the United game. Here's what they have to say about the penalty:

7 min Clark did get a foot in Young's way, but the winger fell theatrically to the ground to earn the spot kick. Much like he did against QPR last weekend. Probably just about the right call, though.
There is definite contact on Ashley Young, but it will cause controversy that one. He looked for contact you might say.
Both say that, under the laws, it was a penalty.
Are you even watching the game?
No, I'm at work, which is why I'm following two British commentaries from two independent agencies, both of whom say it was the right call. Perhaps I should just follow the commentary from an ABU like yourself for a completely unbiased opinion.
Biased? Against what? Divers?Your second quote actually points to a dive. Why don't you watch the game and then come back and comment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'guru_007 said:
I'm following two live commentaries on the United game. Here's what they have to say about the penalty:

7 min Clark did get a foot in Young's way, but the winger fell theatrically to the ground to earn the spot kick. Much like he did against QPR last weekend. Probably just about the right call, though.
There is definite contact on Ashley Young, but it will cause controversy that one. He looked for contact you might say.
Both say that, under the laws, it was a penalty.
Are you even watching the game?
:rolleyes:
You do realize he's not actually watching the game right?
 
Was it a foul? yes

was it in the area? yes

does every player in the league go to down at the slightest bit of contact in the area? YES

 
Lichaj holding his own with a tough assignment against Valencia
It appears they are starting Lichaj on whichever side has the speedier winger. The last game I saw him he played on the right vs Cole/Sturridge and now left vs Valencia. He's not exactly getting the easy assignments but my guess is Mcleish is matching up based on speed. Honestly he's looked both quicker and faster than them all. Amazing for a guy his size.
 
Was it a foul? yeswas it in the area? yesdoes every player in the league go to down at the slightest bit of contact in the area? YES
:fishing:The last time you started this kind of fishing trip you felt that not only was the referee right, but Ferguson was wrong.
That's a tough call to make in the 89' minute, at Old Trafford.He had position, he has assistant referees, he immediately signaled play on.Good, definitive call, by an up and coming referee. :thumbup:
When you are caught out-spinning Ferguson your credibility goes :toilet:
 
Lichaj holding his own with a tough assignment against Valencia
It appears they are starting Lichaj on whichever side has the speedier winger. The last game I saw him he played on the right vs Cole/Sturridge and now left vs Valencia. He's not exactly getting the easy assignments but my guess is Mcleish is matching up based on speed. Honestly he's looked both quicker and faster than them all. Amazing for a guy his size.
That might benefit him for US placement as well as Klinsmann seems more flexible than Bradley. Bradley really only used him on the left as a last resort.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lichaj holding his own with a tough assignment against Valencia
That might benefit him for US placement as well as Klinsmann seems more flexible than Bradley. Bradley really only used him on the left as a last resort.
I agree. I have him as part of my 23 right now. Should be a good battle between him and Fabian for the starting left back slot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'guru_007 said:
I'm following two live commentaries on the United game. Here's what they have to say about the penalty:

7 min Clark did get a foot in Young's way, but the winger fell theatrically to the ground to earn the spot kick. Much like he did against QPR last weekend. Probably just about the right call, though.
There is definite contact on Ashley Young, but it will cause controversy that one. He looked for contact you might say.
Both say that, under the laws, it was a penalty.
Are you even watching the game?
:rolleyes:
You do realize he's not actually watching the game right?
I was posting two commentaries that said it was a penalty and/or it was controversial (which doesn't mean it wasn't). That's it, really.
 
US Final 23 and stand by speculation

Notes:

*I have removed Buddle from consideration as he is now being benched by LA. If he can find his form again, I will add him.

*Benny is back from injury and I will keep an eye on him

*Cooper and Wondo are going to give Klinsmann some extra choices. Might even see both of them get picked and bump Boyd

*I am getting nervous about Gooch. If he does not return to action by the end of April/early May I will remove him

Keeper:

1) Tim Howard

2) Brad Guzan

3) Nick Rimando

Right Back

4) Steve Cherundolo

5) Timmy Chandler

Right Center Back

6) Oguchi Onyewu

7) Clarence Goodson

Left Center Back

8) Carlos Bocanegra

9) Tim Ream

Left Back

10) Fabian Johnson

11) Eric Lichai

Utility defender

12) Jonathan Spector

Holding/Defensive/Central Midfielders

13) Michael Bradley

14) Jermaine Jones

15) Maurice Edu

Offensive midfielders/wide players

16) Clint Dempsey

17) Landon Donovan

18) Brek Shea

19) Jose Torres

Forwards

20) Jozy Altidore

21) Herculez Gomez

22) Terrance Boyd

23) The most in form of Chris Wondoloski/CJ Sappong/Kenny Cooper

JK also mentioned he will have a list of stand by players but won't call them into camp.

Stand By

Keeper: Bill Hamid

Defenders: Geoff Cameron/George John/Edgar Castillo/Michael Parkhurst

Midfielders: Sacha Kljestan/Kyle Beckerman/Freddy Adu/Danny Williams/Graham Zusi/Mix Diskerud

Forwards: See 23 above for whom ever is not picked as the last forward.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Poor ManU. SAF went to the bench and all he had was Nani, Berbatov and Cleverly.

Until they decide to implement a system where some of the talent is spread around, this game just will not be everything that it could be.

 
No, I'm at work, which is why I'm following two British commentaries from two independent agencies, both of whom say it was the right call. Perhaps I should just follow the commentary from an ABU like yourself for a completely unbiased opinion.
What's an "ABU"? :unsure:I didn't see the dive either, I was in the car. The Sirius/XM announcers didn't make it sound that bad, but they were pretty clearly biased in favor of United. I'll have to see it to judge for myself.
 
US Final 23 and stand by speculation

<removed for space>
I pretty much agree with all of this, my only real question is why Rimando ahead of Hamid? Hamid is the first potential successor to Howard that we've seen emerge, I think - why not bring him in for some experience? Is it because he looked poor in the Olympic qualifying? Is he still hurt from that injury (I don't actually know, though I'm guessing it's not serious cause you have him in the stand-by list)?I don't have a problem with Rimando, but he's a known commodity at this point and he's 32. If I were selecting a team to take to the World Cup today, I'd agree that Rimando should be in it. Just wondering your thoughts...

Also, I think it says a lot about the overall quality (which is to say - not very high quality at this point at the international level) of the USMNT strikers if you consider the volatility in the position. Altidore is and should be the top guy, and I'd think that Agudelo stays in the picture if healthy. But consider that 2 of the 4 strikers that the USMNT took to the 2010 Cup have barely featured at all for the USMNT since then (Findley, Buddle....Buddle has made some appearances, but has Findley? I honestly can't recall any caps for him since the Cup), and the 3rd (Gomez) was on the absolute fringe of the squad until going on a tear. Just a few months ago we were lamenting the lack of really ANY good strikers for the USMNT, and now heading into qualifying, the USMNT has 4 of the strikers in the best form that I can ever recall a group of strikers having at the same time (Altidore, Gomez, Cooper, Wondo). And after all that, you've got the ultimate wildcard in Boyd, who hasn't even featured for his club at the senior level yet might bump one of the 4 listed above.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, I'm at work, which is why I'm following two British commentaries from two independent agencies, both of whom say it was the right call. Perhaps I should just follow the commentary from an ABU like yourself for a completely unbiased opinion.
What's an "ABU"? :unsure:I didn't see the dive either, I was in the car. The Sirius/XM announcers didn't make it sound that bad, but they were pretty clearly biased in favor of United. I'll have to see it to judge for myself.
ABU = Anybody But United. Apart from being the best supported team in the world (with the exception of maybe Barca), they are also the most hated, by a country mile.
 
Also, the guys on the radio this morning had an interesting brief discussion at halftime of United/Villa. Chelsea have 4 games in 10 days against world-class competition (Spurs today, Barca, Arsenal, Barca). What do you do if you're the manager? The in-studio Chelsea fan/season-ticket holder says that he would play is best XI against Barcelona and that staying alive in the Champions League should be the top priority. What would you do? I know Christo in particular has stressed that he holds winning the league in higher regard than winning the Champions League. But Chelsea isn't going to win the league....but in all likelihood, they're not going to get past Barca anyway even if they play their best side. Tough decisions.

And as I type this, Drogba scores a great goal.

 
'Ursa M said:
'Steve Tasker said:
'Ursa M said:
No, I'm at work, which is why I'm following two British commentaries from two independent agencies, both of whom say it was the right call. Perhaps I should just follow the commentary from an ABU like yourself for a completely unbiased opinion.
What's an "ABU"? :unsure:I didn't see the dive either, I was in the car. The Sirius/XM announcers didn't make it sound that bad, but they were pretty clearly biased in favor of United. I'll have to see it to judge for myself.
ABU = Anybody But United. Apart from being the best supported team in the world (with the exception of maybe Barca), they are also the most hated, by a country mile.
I find it odd how as this topic has reared it's head for the second time in a week, this is the defense of homerism both times. There's really not a lot of hate here for anyone. A dive by any other name is still a dive and it has nothing to do with what color shirt the diver is wearing.
 
Also, the guys on the radio this morning had an interesting brief discussion at halftime of United/Villa. Chelsea have 4 games in 10 days against world-class competition (Spurs today, Barca, Arsenal, Barca). What do you do if you're the manager? The in-studio Chelsea fan/season-ticket holder says that he would play is best XI against Barcelona and that staying alive in the Champions League should be the top priority. What would you do? I know Christo in particular has stressed that he holds winning the league in higher regard than winning the Champions League. But Chelsea isn't going to win the league....but in all likelihood, they're not going to get past Barca anyway even if they play their best side. Tough decisions.And as I type this, Drogba scores a great goal.
They're out of the EPL race, an almost impossible task in CL. So put your best XI out today and then see if they've still got enough gas in the tank to get a result against Barca mid-week.
 
'Ursa M said:
'Steve Tasker said:
'Ursa M said:
No, I'm at work, which is why I'm following two British commentaries from two independent agencies, both of whom say it was the right call. Perhaps I should just follow the commentary from an ABU like yourself for a completely unbiased opinion.
What's an "ABU"? :unsure:I didn't see the dive either, I was in the car. The Sirius/XM announcers didn't make it sound that bad, but they were pretty clearly biased in favor of United. I'll have to see it to judge for myself.
ABU = Anybody But United. Apart from being the best supported team in the world (with the exception of maybe Barca), they are also the most hated, by a country mile.
You are going to come here and start calling people out as innately biased for an opinion on a play you haven't even seen? Do you have any idea how hypocritcal that sounds?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know Christo in particular has stressed that he holds winning the league in higher regard than winning the Champions League.
CL is the highest regarded trophy in the World.No team/manager/supporter holds a league title in higher regard than CL trophy.If Chelsea had their choice it would be:CL Trophy 1CL qualifying 2FA cup 3
 
I know Christo in particular has stressed that he holds winning the league in higher regard than winning the Champions League.
CL is the highest regarded trophy in the World.No team/manager/supporter holds a league title in higher regard than CL trophy.If Chelsea had their choice it would be:CL Trophy 1CL qualifying 2FA cup 3
the other side of the coin is that their odds of winning CL are very low. And it's entirely possible if you put all your eggs in the champions league basket you come up completely empty. You have to weigh your odds here. For this reason, I don't think it's a straightforward call. Personally given their form and the cup situation, I'd go for top 4/FA and punt CL this season. But Roman would have sacked me long ago.
 
Also, the guys on the radio this morning had an interesting brief discussion at halftime of United/Villa. Chelsea have 4 games in 10 days against world-class competition (Spurs today, Barca, Arsenal, Barca). What do you do if you're the manager? The in-studio Chelsea fan/season-ticket holder says that he would play is best XI against Barcelona and that staying alive in the Champions League should be the top priority. What would you do? I know Christo in particular has stressed that he holds winning the league in higher regard than winning the Champions League. But Chelsea isn't going to win the league....but in all likelihood, they're not going to get past Barca anyway even if they play their best side. Tough decisions.And as I type this, Drogba scores a great goal.
The fact that Terry is playing today with cracked ribs seems to indicate they like their odds here more than the Barca match.Their chances in CL are slim to none this year. I can't see how the League isn't first priority probably followed by the FA Cup.
 
I know Christo in particular has stressed that he holds winning the league in higher regard than winning the Champions League.
CL is the highest regarded trophy in the World.No team/manager/supporter holds a league title in higher regard than CL trophy.

If Chelsea had their choice it would be:

CL Trophy 1

CL qualifying 2

FA cup 3
I think I recall Christo saying this in this very thread (I don't mean to put words in his mouth if he didn't). I'd think you're right in that almost all people would hold the CL in higher regard than the league, and Chelsea has a chance (albeit very slim) to win the CL and no chance to win the league, so in that sense your decision makes sense. But finishing top 4 has a significant financial impact as well.

I was hoping that someone who has lived over there (Eephus, Christo [i think?], etc.) had an opinion on it. From an American standpoint, being removed from the actual "daily life" of European football, I view the CL as the ultimate title as well. Just wondering if others had a different perspective.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hate that rule but if Bale is not there, Cech is sent off yeah? Then shouldn't he be sent off anyway?
He went for the ball and Abedyor went over the core of his body - IMO if the arm went out to get him then yes - but Cech looked like he went straight for the ball - and actually got part of it.
 
I hate that rule but if Bale is not there, Cech is sent off yeah? Then shouldn't he be sent off anyway?
I dont even pretend to know half as much about soccer as most here, but this is what I thought...How does a goal disallow a sending off?Tottenham should get the option...penalty kick and a red card or take the goal and play on
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top