What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (5 Viewers)

If Suarez does go, he'd miss only one meaningful game....the Tottenham game. Maybe away to Swansea, too....

H-Villa

A-Fulham

H-Tottenham

A-Sunderlan

H-Stoke

A-Swansea

 
CletiusMaximus said:
T Bell said:
Here's what I don't understand about the 40M offer for Suarez-

As I understand it, if a bid in the amount of a release clause is made, then the club currently owning the player is obligated to accept that and the would-be buyer then sees if they can't hammer out a contract with the player. If another club comes in and bids more, then that offer could in turn be accepted by the selling club, but if nobody else does, they're sort of out of luck.

That would mean that Liverpool can't reject Arsenal's bid for Suarez. Is that not the way this works?
They didn't trigger his release clause. You would be correct if they had, then it would be out of Liverpools hands.
The Gator said:
T Bell said:
Here's what I don't understand about the 40M offer for Suarez-

As I understand it, if a bid in the amount of a release clause is made, then the club currently owning the player is obligated to accept that and the would-be buyer then sees if they can't hammer out a contract with the player. If another club comes in and bids more, then that offer could in turn be accepted by the selling club, but if nobody else does, they're sort of out of luck.

That would mean that Liverpool can't reject Arsenal's bid for Suarez. Is that not the way this works?
It's not a buy out clause. It's a clause that once reached, the club have to inform the player that they have received an official bid.

Tony Barrett, in The Times (subscription)

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/sport/football/clubs/arsenal/article3823768.ece

Arsenal have failed in their latest attempt to sign Luis Suárez despite making an extraordinary offer of £40,000,001 that they had hoped would force Liverpool to sell the Uruguay forward.

The eye-catching figure was formulated by Suárezs agent, Pere Guardiola, who believed that Liverpool would have to allow his client to leave in the event of any interested party offering in excess of £40 million.

Liverpool have always held a different interpretation of the relevant clause in the former Ajax players contract, however, insisting that they need only to consider such a offer, and their conviction that is the case resulted in a swift rejection of Arsenals latest bid.

Liverpool officials were bemused by the nature of Arsenals latest attempt to acquire Suárez, particularly after Ian Ayre, the Anfield clubs managing director, informed Ivan Gazidis, the Arsenal chief executive, over a fortnight ago that £40 million would not be enough to buy the 26-year-old regardless of whatever encouragement Guardiola was offering them.

That came in the immediate aftermath of Arsenals initial £30 million offer, which they claimed would be their first and only bid. Arsène Wengers growing belief that Suárez is willing to join Arsenal, however, encouraged the North London club to submit an improved offer. After Liverpool also gave that proposal short shrift, they will have to decide whether or not to continue their pursuit.

In keeping with their own analysis of Suárezs contract, Liverpool will inform the player of Arsenals latest offer after their pre-season friendly against Melbourne Victory today.
Yeah, I saw that. So WTF is the purpose of this "inform clause"? It seems like an awfully toothless clause to have in there, no?
Agreed, who knows with these agents, though. Maybe it's just there to get a play unsettled and keep the club from denying bids if things get that high.
My first thought was maybe his Ajax contract is written in Dutch, and there's a translation issue between "consider" and "accept".

 
CletiusMaximus said:
T Bell said:
Here's what I don't understand about the 40M offer for Suarez-

As I understand it, if a bid in the amount of a release clause is made, then the club currently owning the player is obligated to accept that and the would-be buyer then sees if they can't hammer out a contract with the player. If another club comes in and bids more, then that offer could in turn be accepted by the selling club, but if nobody else does, they're sort of out of luck.

That would mean that Liverpool can't reject Arsenal's bid for Suarez. Is that not the way this works?
They didn't trigger his release clause. You would be correct if they had, then it would be out of Liverpools hands.
The Gator said:
T Bell said:
Here's what I don't understand about the 40M offer for Suarez-

As I understand it, if a bid in the amount of a release clause is made, then the club currently owning the player is obligated to accept that and the would-be buyer then sees if they can't hammer out a contract with the player. If another club comes in and bids more, then that offer could in turn be accepted by the selling club, but if nobody else does, they're sort of out of luck.

That would mean that Liverpool can't reject Arsenal's bid for Suarez. Is that not the way this works?
It's not a buy out clause. It's a clause that once reached, the club have to inform the player that they have received an official bid.

Tony Barrett, in The Times (subscription)http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/sport/football/clubs/arsenal/article3823768.eceArsenal have failed in their latest attempt to sign Luis Suárez despite making an extraordinary offer of £40,000,001 that they had hoped would force Liverpool to sell the Uruguay forward.

The eye-catching figure was formulated by Suárez’s agent, Pere Guardiola, who believed that Liverpool would have to allow his client to leave in the event of any interested party offering in excess of £40 million.Liverpool have always held a different interpretation of the relevant clause in the former Ajax player’s contract, however, insisting that they need only to consider such a offer, and their conviction that is the case resulted in a swift rejection of Arsenal’s latest bid.

Liverpool officials were bemused by the nature of Arsenal’s latest attempt to acquire Suárez, particularly after Ian Ayre, the Anfield club’s managing director, informed Ivan Gazidis, the Arsenal chief executive, over a fortnight ago that £40 million would not be enough to buy the 26-year-old regardless of whatever encouragement Guardiola was offering them.

That came in the immediate aftermath of Arsenal’s initial £30 million offer, which they claimed would be their first and only bid. Arsène Wenger’s growing belief that Suárez is willing to join Arsenal, however, encouraged the North London club to submit an improved offer. After Liverpool also gave that proposal short shrift, they will have to decide whether or not to continue their pursuit.In keeping with their own analysis of Suárez’s contract, Liverpool will inform the player of Arsenal’s latest offer after their pre-season friendly against Melbourne Victory today.
Yeah, I saw that. So WTF is the purpose of this "inform clause"? It seems like an awfully toothless clause to have in there, no?
Agreed, who knows with these agents, though. Maybe it's just there to get a player unsettled and keep the club from denying bids if things get that high.
Guardiola again. :lol:

 
If Suarez does go, he'd miss only one meaningful game....the Tottenham game. Maybe away to Swansea, too....

H-Villa

A-Fulham

H-Tottenham

A-Sunderlan

H-Stoke

A-Swansea
There'd also be some League Cup matches to eat up some of the suspension as well.

 
I'm going to redouble my efforts to follow the Swans this year.

#### YOU CARDIFF. :hot:
I'll take the bluebirds since they switched their colors from blue to red :upgrade: #####theblues :banned:

another reason i want to follow this is because as soon as the schedule came put there were complaints about the late game time start. They don't want people getting pissed and killing each other.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This quote is pretty much the story of my life.

Cardiff fans are notorious for drinking rather than causing trouble, but the problem is it tends to lead to that when people have had all day to spend in the pub beforehand.
 
What's the shark move for Gold Cup final tickets? Buy now and risk a loss to Honduras or wait until Wednesday night and risk a big price jump? It seems I can get decent seats for me and my son for approx 100-125 per right now.
Cost doesn't skyrocket if the US wins, it skyrockets if Mexico wins.

 
From an Arsenal board:

"Wenger has rubbished reports of having bid 40.000.000 and 1 pound for Suarez! The one pound was atually for Downing!" :lol:

 
Hendo shouldn't be included in there...he'd keep everyone but Wilshire on the bench at Arsenal
Shtick?

Henderson is a fine player, but I'd rather have Wilshere, Cazorla, Arteta, Ramsey, Diaby*, and perhaps Rosicky ahead of him if I were putting a team together to play a game today. And I'm far from some "Arsenal's players are all amazing OMG championship so good" apologist fanboy.

* assuming he's healthy

 
MARCA insisting that Higuain to Napoli is almost done, for real this time you guys, I mean if another team were interested they could still jump into the bidding, but they'd better hurry because it's suuuuper close to being done. HINT HINT ARSENE.

 
MARCA insisting that Higuain to Napoli is almost done, for real this time you guys, I mean if another team were interested they could still jump into the bidding, but they'd better hurry because it's suuuuper close to being done. HINT HINT ARSENE.
I don't care if RM initially agreed on a lower number for Higuain before Ancelotti pulled the rug out from under it when he arrived - 32M for Higuain is a steal given what other, older (some far older) strikers have gone for, and given the 40M+ it would cost for them to land Suarez (if that's even possible*).

This is so, so stupid if they've allowed this to slip through their fingers.

*Liverpool's posturing not to sell, and the irony is that RM may now use their Higuain money to become a player in the Suarez sweepstakes further increasing his price.

 
Hendo shouldn't be included in there...he'd keep everyone but Wilshire on the bench at Arsenal
:lol: He couldn't carry Cazorla's jock.
Yep, it sure sounds like Arsenal's lack of activity in the market (what a surprise) is sure making the natives restless.

Oops

 
Hendo shouldn't be included in there...he'd keep everyone but Wilshire on the bench at Arsenal
:lol: He couldn't carry Cazorla's jock.
Yep, it sure sounds like Arsenal's lack of activity in the market (what a surprise) is sure making the natives restless.

Oops
When was Liverpool's last trophy? Just curious.

 
Hendo shouldn't be included in there...he'd keep everyone but Wilshire on the bench at Arsenal
:lol: He couldn't carry Cazorla's jock.
Yep, it sure sounds like Arsenal's lack of activity in the market (what a surprise) is sure making the natives restless.

Oops
I'm definitely a Gooner, but I have no illusions about what they need to do and I'm VERY disappointed today about news of the Higuain signing with Napoli being finalized. I can't for the life of me see how getting him for 32M isn't a huge steal, particularly when it's going to require as much as 50% more than that number to get Suarez.

So yeah, I'm one of the restless natives, but it's not so much for the "8 years without a trophy" as it is with the ineptitude with which they seem to be going about their business this summer when they've got an opportunity to become a serious contender for the PL title. I don't understand what they're doing.

 
Hendo shouldn't be included in there...he'd keep everyone but Wilshire on the bench at Arsenal
:lol: He couldn't carry Cazorla's jock.
Yep, it sure sounds like Arsenal's lack of activity in the market (what a surprise) is sure making the natives restless.

Oops
When was Liverpool's last trophy? Just curious.
2012. Same as Tahiti.

 
Hendo shouldn't be included in there...he'd keep everyone but Wilshire on the bench at Arsenal
:lol: He couldn't carry Cazorla's jock.
Yep, it sure sounds like Arsenal's lack of activity in the market (what a surprise) is sure making the natives restless.

Oops
When was Liverpool's last trophy? Just curious.
2012. Same as Tahiti.
FA Cup?

 
Yeah, I don't care about trophy droughts. I certainly don't think winning the Oceania Cup means anything more than winning the dumb Emirates Cup in preseason.

In terms of the health of the club, Arsene is right. "Fourth place" is a more significant trophy than the F.A. Cup. And it's a lot more significant than the League Cup. Arsenal got over 40 million from being in the Champions League last year.

I want Arsenal to win, or at least to strongly compete in, the EPL and the CL. Which means not finishing 20 + points behind the champs. I don't care about anything else. Arsene can start Gedion Zelaylem against Bradford City in the League Cup. If it works, fine. If not, I won't lose any sleep.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top