comfortably numb said:
Zow said:
I gotta admit, my lone skepticism after the first show is that I thought the show was going to mail it in on all realism of its courtroom scenes (i.e. Law and Order: SVU where all trial scenes are a complete bastardization of how actual trials go and how the rules of evidence are applied). Without getting into the nuts and bolts of it, basically Saul's closing in the necro case was clearly objectionable (a defense attorney absolutely cannot argue potential consequences or openly seek nullification). It was also completely stupid strategy because there's no way any attorney would completely ignore the fact that the boys had sex with a corpse (although the prosecutor's response of merely playing the video was awesome). So, I was a little worried that the show would totally screw up actual criminal courtroom reality.
However, that montage was ####### awesome and totally killed any worry I had. Any solo practitioner banking on a public defense contract to make ends meet can relate to every scene in that montage. From the crappy courthouse bought coffee to the walking in the halls plea negotiations to the "yeah you're going to say none of that and sentencing and just apologize", it was just great.
Isn't there a thread for your people?
Don't be afraid to turn your brain off for an hour when you watch BCS.
I just have a sheer hatred for shows which portray this stuff really poorly.
I have had similar exchanges to these:
Woz (to Defendant's family): So, procedurally speaking, the state will likely make an offer in the next week or two...
Defendant's wife: They will? When does he get to meet with the prosecutor and the cop who arrested him? He wants to tell them a few things and we want to be there.
Woz: That's a terrible idea and isn't going to happen.
Defendant's wife: But that's how they always do it on Law and Order. Those are his rights.
Woz: That's a TV show.
Defendant's wife:
Woz:
Defendant's father: I want you to bring up the fact that the cop testifying against has been divorced twice and is rumored to drink a lot.
Woz: The rules of evidence won't allow me to do that and I'd get in trouble. Plus that looks really petty.
Defendant's father: Can't you just ask it and quickly withdraw it when the prosecutor objects?
Woz:
Defendant's mother: I want you to tell the jury how going to jail will cause a huge inconvenience in my son's life and that he's not a bad guy and is really sorry.
Woz: I can't argue anything about his potential punishment. The rules won't allow it. Also, I'm not going to apologize for him because that's basically an admission that he committed the crime. Which is all the jury is going to be instructed that they have to decide. So I'd be the worse lawyer ever if I apologize on his behalf in closing.
Defendant's mother: But Saul did it and he's awesome!
Any time I see stuff on TV which promotes or plants these ridiculous notions in people's heads, I can't help but get perturbed.