The Juggernaut
The Man. The Myth
Take Matt Jones! Take Matt Jones! Take Matt Jones! Take Matt Jones!!!!!!!
This defeats the entire purpose of using a 3-4 D. The D's FOCUS is BLITZING to create a pass rush and confusion for the QB/Oline. Pitt is a set at DT as a 3-4 team can possible get as well. Have you forgoten about hampton (IMO the best 3-4 DT in the NFL) and Hoke? Hoke is more than a viable replacement for Hampton which we saw last year.I think the Steelers focus should be CB, T, DE, then WR and TE.top priority IMHO is to generate some pass rush without the blitz. that means an aggressive defense tackle who can come in and play the 3-4 right away. if we don't go D Line, then think O Line. the whole right side is gone--i think it deserves some attention.
Heath Miller almost the only pick they could make I would be disappointed with. Do they need a TE...yes. I would much rather have a TE in the 3rd or 4th though. Heath Miller will be a very good player, but he's not a good fit for the Steelers. The Steelers, despite what they might say, would fail to fully utilize him.Bloom mentioned Shaun Cody, I only slighty prefer him over Bass but I don't think he'll be there when they pick.I would thing the Steelers would go after Heath Miller if he's still there (probably not) or another DE before OLB type since they are a bit weak and old at DE.
Justin Miller just got arrested this weekend. I don't think the Steelers will touch him now.1)Justin Miller
2)Marlin Jackson
3)Matt Jones
Edit: They = SD. Gotcha. Thought you were hoping for williamson gto be there for PGh at 30. Misread.if the chargers take spears at 12, that greatly increases our shot at 30 falling to 30. if they take a WR (williamson?), then cody seems like a near lock to SD at 28.
Just curious, why Poole? I'm assuming you'd like him to take over for Chris Hope. I thought Hope did a fine job last year.Another guy who probably won't be there, but could be depending on how things shake out is Kalif Barnes. I'd didn't think there was a chance he'd be there, but looking at some mocks today, it may not be as remote as I first thought.I want Brodney Pool to be there at our pick. I think Matt Jones is over-hyped.
i think out of houston, carolina, at least one take an OT, and out of st louis and jax, again at least one will take an OT - then it becomes a question of whether at least one of each pass on an OT, and whether barnes gets past the BPA teams in the 20s.all in all i think its unlikely as OT is such a premium position and a great position for BPA teams to take.Just curious, why Poole? I'm assuming you'd like him to take over for Chris Hope. I thought Hope did a fine job last year.Another guy who probably won't be there, but could be depending on how things shake out is Kalif Barnes. I'd didn't think there was a chance he'd be there, but looking at some mocks today, it may not be as remote as I first thought.I want Brodney Pool to be there at our pick. I think Matt Jones is over-hyped.
i think pool goes to the pack at 24...I want Brodney Pool to be there at our pick. I think Matt Jones is over-hyped.
I completely agree with you. He shouldn't be there, just pointing out some of the mocks I've looked at today have him available at the Steelers pick. And have the Steelers passing on him. Edit to say...This may actually say more about the variability/inaccuracy of mocks than anything else.i think out of houston, carolina, at least one take an OT, and out of st louis and jax, again at least one will take an OT - then it becomes a question of whether at least one of each pass on an OT, and whether barnes gets past the BPA teams in the 20s.all in all i think its unlikely as OT is such a premium position and a great position for BPA teams to take.Just curious, why Poole? I'm assuming you'd like him to take over for Chris Hope. I thought Hope did a fine job last year.Another guy who probably won't be there, but could be depending on how things shake out is Kalif Barnes. I'd didn't think there was a chance he'd be there, but looking at some mocks today, it may not be as remote as I first thought.I want Brodney Pool to be there at our pick. I think Matt Jones is over-hyped.
Steelers interior O-Line:Alan Faneca, Steelers Pro Bowl Left Guard, 1st round pick 1998Um, have I been under a pile of rocks? Where did we get 2 first round picks and a high priced center?I know we have an old center with questionable knees coming to the end of his career and his contract is getting as big as it will ever get, but we definitely need to start thinking about his replacement.
If I have missed a whole lot of something please let me know.
I would rate the Steelers needs as follows:
T (Don't have any real info on Starks)
DE (Kimo has been really good, but is getting old)
WR (Need somebody tall who can catch the ball)
TE (Only really needed if they can't get a Burress replacement)
RB (Bettis has to retire soon and I don't see Duce far behind)
LB (No depth at all)
CB (A mixture of young and old question marks with solid potential)
But honestly, it is very hard to rank them. The only things we really don't need are safety's, fullbacks, quarterbacks, or defensive tackles (unless they project to move to DE)
All we need is another slash.....Take Matt Jones! Take Matt Jones! Take Matt Jones! Take Matt Jones!!!!!!!
That's exactly what we need. Another Slash, but one that doesn't have his heart set on being the QB.All we need is another slash.....
The word is, since Bettis will be back this year they don't have plans to draft a RB. Personnally I think that's a mistake. If they were to take a RB Cedrick Houston would be my preference.2nd - DE Chris Canty, Elton Brown (he's slipping some, will it be enough), Could one of the LB's be here (Thurman, Rudd, Crowder), Tackle Adam Terrywe already have other 'slash' players, notably Randle El.
how about some mid-round predictions? i like Kay Jay Harris out of West Virginia as a potential replacement for the Bus in 2006. he has similar skills and will probably be available at the end of the 3rd round. if he drops to the 4th, i hope we grab him.
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you meant that we had 2 first round picks this year. I will return to my rock pile now.Steelers interior O-Line:Alan Faneca, Steelers Pro Bowl Left Guard, 1st round pick 1998Um, have I been under a pile of rocks? Where did we get 2 first round picks and a high priced center?I know we have an old center with questionable knees coming to the end of his career and his contract is getting as big as it will ever get, but we definitely need to start thinking about his replacement.
If I have missed a whole lot of something please let me know.
I would rate the Steelers needs as follows:
T (Don't have any real info on Starks)
DE (Kimo has been really good, but is getting old)
WR (Need somebody tall who can catch the ball)
TE (Only really needed if they can't get a Burress replacement)
RB (Bettis has to retire soon and I don't see Duce far behind)
LB (No depth at all)
CB (A mixture of young and old question marks with solid potential)
But honestly, it is very hard to rank them. The only things we really don't need are safety's, fullbacks, quarterbacks, or defensive tackles (unless they project to move to DE)
Kendall Simmons, Steelers Right Guard, 1st round pick 2002
Jeff Hartings, Steelers Pro Bowl Center, 2005 Cap Hit $5.8 million, 2006 Cap Hit $6.3 million
Chucky Okobi, Steelers Back-up Center, 2005 Cap Hit $1 million, 2006 Cap Hit $2.2 million, 2007 Cap Hit $2.2 million
I'd think we would have to be all over this guy if he is there in the second round (62nd overall).mid round possibilities from oghma's needs:
...
RB
Eric Shelton, Louisville (all power backs that could be the heir to bettis)
Ditto for this kid if he's there in the 4th (assuming we didn't get Shelton).Thoughts?Kay Jay Harris, WVU
shelton in the 2nd, im not sure about, simply because that may be the pick for bartell - or an O-lineman if we dont go that way. the depth of the RB class makes taking one on the first day less of a priority. harris in the 4th makes complete sense.I'd think we would have to be all over this guy if he is there in the second round (62nd overall).mid round possibilities from oghma's needs:
...
RB
Eric Shelton, Louisville (all power backs that could be the heir to bettis)Ditto for this kid if he's there in the 4th (assuming we didn't get Shelton).Thoughts?Kay Jay Harris, WVU
it would definitely be exciting to see sproles in black and gold, but i think other teams will have him much higher than we will on their draft boards - i think its more important for us to take a power back to be the heir apparent to bettis than an elusive X-factor/return guy - if we were set on having that kind of player, i think jerome mathis makes more sense because we could use the WR depth.I think ARE will still be the return man, #2 WR or not - he's so dependable and is finally learning to turn it upfield right away instead running towards the sideline.Just wondering - Is ARE still the return guy if he is the #2 WR?
Does Colclough / Parker take the job?
Are they adequate?
I'm just trying to figure out where Darren Sprooles may land.
I know the Steelers don't see RB as a pressing need, so they may not draft Shelton/Harris. The main reason why I have been clamoring for an RB in this draft is the depth. A quality back can be had in rounds 4-5, which typically is more of a crapshoot - this is a deep RB draft, so why not take advantage of that and get a guy who may be your #1 in the future. Unless they think Haynes/Parker has that potential ?
parker has one good weapon - straight line speed. im happy to have him in the offensive as a chance of pace back and think he's perfect for draw plays and screen passes, but a future center of the rushing attack, he is not.
I'm with you here. I think Shelton, if by some miracle he's there in round 3, would be a good pick. Round 2 might be a bit early - the guy has never even been an every down back in college. He's big and pretty fast, but doesn't have the feet of a Bettis.parker has one good weapon - straight line speed. im happy to have him in the offensive as a chance of pace back and think he's perfect for draw plays and screen passes, but a future center of the rushing attack, he is not.
If the Steelers do not draft a RB this year, then I say that could be a good signal that they disagree with your assessment.Parker was a raw recruit last year - he's got some great mentors right now.parker has one good weapon - straight line speed. im happy to have him in the offensive as a chance of pace back and think he's perfect for draw plays and screen passes, but a future center of the rushing attack, he is not.
Willie Parker will never be a 25 carry a game RB but he could be great in tandem with a bullish back, maybe even Haynes. Let's not forget this kid put up 100+ at Buffalo last year in a game Buffalo needed desperately. Bottom line in my opinion if you have a very good O-line that is opening holes you don' t need LT running through them.If the Steelers do not draft a RB this year, then I say that could be a good signal that they disagree with your assessment.Parker was a raw recruit last year - he's got some great mentors right now.parker has one good weapon - straight line speed. im happy to have him in the offensive as a chance of pace back and think he's perfect for draw plays and screen passes, but a future center of the rushing attack, he is not.