What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL SUPER BOWL LIII Thread - PATRIOTS vs. RAMS *** (2 Viewers)

From Saintsreport:

There was a point in the hame where it was 10-3.

Goff threw the ball to cooks and the defender grabbed his arm to keep him from catching the ball and there was no flag.if they threw the flag it would have been first and goal with the ball probably on the one. 

Couldn't have happened to a better team. If they get that call the most likely tie the game. The icing on the cake is that on the very next play goff threw a interception.

How about that?

 
Didn’t see anything. What did Pats do hat Saints didn’t? Lots of grabby DB play (the usual stop-a-good-offense technique)?
They got a ton of pressure on goff, they contained him when he tried to run a couple times to beat the pressure, gilmore was glue all night, that play where goff had cooks wide open in the end zone and mccourty came flying in from 20 plus yards away to break it up, the late interception, chung played great early and then broke his arm and they still only allowed 3 points.  They were super aggressive at times and they gambled like the play action where they played two deep safeties and sent the house. The linebackers brought some pressure but also kept the run game in check.  Just great team defense. And the offense did a great job keeping the ball away from them with sustained drives early even though they didn't get points on all of them they kept the d fresh.  

 
Yep.  Rams and Patriots were two of the highest scoring offenses this season.  Why are people complaining that their defenses played great today?
Because we have been treated to a lot of primetime high scoring defensive collapses this season and that’s what we are used to. 

 
0 clue what's up with Gurley, but their O seemed to take a decent hit when Kupp went down. 
Without question. 

But credit where credits due.  Both defenses played their heart out and if you’d told me to start the game that we would hold the Pats to 13 points I’d have been ecstatic. Belichick game planned a hell of a game.  

 
0 clue what's up with Gurley, but their O seemed to take a decent hit when Kupp went down. 
Not really buying this either. They looked like deer in headlights all night. Never making adjustments and looked scared to death to make a mistake. Where was the imaginative play calling? The game plan was Adam Gase-esque. 

 
Yep.  Rams and Patriots were two of the highest scoring offenses this season.  Why are people complaining that their defenses played great today?
maybe i didn't see it, but this was less excellent defense and more inept offense

 
maybe i didn't see it, but this was less excellent defense and more inept offense
The NFL flipped a switch around Thanksgiving. Referee “emphasis” switched up ... and suddenly a bunch of top offenses started struggling. Coincidence, I guess.

 
They def call the game differently in the playoffs. certainly "seems" like they keep the flags in the pockets more.

I didn't mind seeing a defensive performance.  Don't mind letting the DB's be a little more grabby either - tell the WR to get more open then?

 
If you told me that the Rams would not run a single play in the red zone I would have said you were on serious drugs. 

 
:lmao:  except when they put up 40 offensive points against the Chiefs, 41 against the 49ers, 30 a few times.  Do you even watch the Rams play?
 Not sure why I even dignify your trolling. But here’s an example just before the last two games against two of the worst teams in the league 49ers and AZ....

Goff's completion percentage has dropped from 70.5 percent with Kupp to 59 percent in his absence. His yards per attempt dipped from 9.9 to 7 and his touchdown-to-interception ratio has moved from 16-5 to 11-8.

But it hasn't been just Goff who has suffered from Kupp's absence. The entire offense has felt the effects. In 420 plays this season with Kupp, the Rams' third-down percentage was 47.1. In the 497 plays without him, it's down to 38.5.

 
I didn't mind seeing a defensive performance.  Don't mind letting the DB's be a little more grabby either - tell the WR to get more open then?
The pendulum has swung too far in the “legal PI” direction. Pick a rule set and apply it consistently.

 
Without question. 

But credit where credits due.  Both defenses played their heart out and if you’d told me to start the game that we would hold the Pats to 13 points I’d have been ecstatic. Belichick game planned a hell of a game.  
Losing Kupp is like Brady losing Edelman. Kupp was the man that kept it going.

 
If you told me that the Rams would not run a single play in the red zone I would have said you were on serious drugs. 
I can only remember 3 passes that reached the red zone.  Mccourty running in on cooks, the interception, and the one doug keeps talking about where there was contact but Gilmore made a play on the ball with his other hand.  

 
ehh maybe. watching last year's SB is a better indicator of a strong play on both sides
I can understand that, I won’t disagree. All I know is I was blown away by the play of both defenses, and I don’t believe that’s an indicator of the play of either offense. Not the most exciting Super Bowl we have seen this era, not the worst either, weird feeling. 

 
If you told me that the Rams would not run a single play in the red zone I would have said you were on serious drugs. 
 If you would’ve told me we hold the Brady and the Pats to 13 points I’m putting massive money down on the Rams 

 
I can only remember 3 passes that reached the red zone.  Mccourty running in on cooks, the interception, and the one doug keeps talking about where there was contact but Gilmore made a play on the ball with his other hand.  
Didn’t see it ... it was described elsewhere as a naked arm grab. 

 
Didn’t see it ... it was described elsewhere as a naked arm grab. 
 Should’ve been called but also should’ve been caught by Cooks so I put that on Cooks.  

There were a few really bad calls against us but at the end of the day no excuses, our offense got outplayed by their defense.  

 
 Not sure why I even dignify your trolling. But here’s an example just before the last two games against two of the worst teams in the league 49ers and AZ....

Goff's completion percentage has dropped from 70.5 percent with Kupp to 59 percent in his absence. His yards per attempt dipped from 9.9 to 7 and his touchdown-to-interception ratio has moved from 16-5 to 11-8.

But it hasn't been just Goff who has suffered from Kupp's absence. The entire offense has felt the effects. In 420 plays this season with Kupp, the Rams' third-down percentage was 47.1. In the 497 plays without him, it's down to 38.5.
Wait, so your first sample includes the games against two of the worst teams in the league SF and AZ, but your second sample doesn't include games against them.  :lmao:

Chicago was also the best defense they played all year and Goff has historically struggled in the cold.  It wouldn't have mattered if Kupp played or not.  That's why you dignify my trolling because I know more about the Rams than you do.  :thumbup:

 
Rams put up nearly 500 yards of offense and 40 points the week after Kupp went on IR, BUT THEIR OFFENSE STRUGGLED WITHOUT HIM

 
Losing Kupp is like Brady losing Edelman. Kupp was the man that kept it going.
Brady was 28/48 505yds, 3 TDs last year in the SB without Edelman.  Amendola had 8/152 in his absence.

Brady was 21/35 262, 0 TDs this year in the SB with Edelman.  Edelman had 10/141

Basically, Kupp is as worthless as Edelman.  Great analogy :thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gilmore definitely makes contact but also is turning to make a play on the ball as Harmon is getting there.
C'mon... Gilmore turned his head after he had no shot to do anything else - after he had already grabbed Cooks' arm... He was a spectator by the time he turned his head.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tom Brady 2017 without Edelman: 66.3% completion; 4577 yds; 32 TDs; 8 INT

Tom Brady 2018 with Edelman: 65.8% completion; 4355 yds; 29 TDs; 11 INT

Definitely can see why someone thinks Edelman is the man that keeps it going :thumbup:

 
Wait, so your first sample includes the games against two of the worst teams in the league SF and AZ, but your second sample doesn't include games against them.  :lmao:

Chicago was also the best defense they played all year and Goff has historically struggled in the cold.  It wouldn't have mattered if Kupp played or not.  That's why you dignify my trolling because I know more about the Rams than you do.  :thumbup:
https://giphy.com/gifs/MXApm8NraO5Jm

One day I learn....

 
Wish we had faced Brees and the Saints 

Cheers to the Pats fans here. 

Not really worried what anyone else thinks right now... it’s irrelevant. 

 
Really impressed with the Rams this year, but I was finally (for once) happy to see the Patriots win. It just didn't feel like the Rams deserved to be there. Not a Saints fan; it just felt like the wrong team was facing the Patriots. So I'm not sorry the Rams end up with nothing. 

Obviously we can't say they'll definitely be back, but they should be in the conversation for a few more seasons at least. Goff will only get better, as will McVay.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top