What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Tax Reform Thread*** If it is good for Trump, it is good for America! (1 Viewer)

The Z Machine said:
A carbon tax would be interesting. I assume it would be for businesses and not individuals though.
I very strongly support a carbon tax.  But we need to be honest and recognize that a large share of that tax is going to be paid by individuals (which is the whole point, of course, if you want to change behavior as opposed to just raising revenue).  There will need to be some sort of off-setting reduction in personal income taxes or a rebate or something to keep personal after-tax incomes unchanged.

 
BobbyLayne said:
:shrug:

Because there is tax due on those profits? 

U.S. Corporations are taxed on global profits. That money has not been taxed anywhere.

Tax inversion is the practice of relocating a corporation's legal domicile to a lower-tax nation, or tax haven, usually while retaining its material operations in its higher-tax country of origin. One of the most common tax avoidance techniques is earnings stripping. Here's how it works:

  1. A U.S. corporation uses loans between different divisions of the same company to shift profits out of high-tax jurisdictions and into lower-tax ones.
  2. For example, an American subsidiary borrows money from a foreign parent company
  3. American sub then deducts the interest on that loan against its earnings.
  4. This allows U.S. companies to not only avoid tax on non-U.S. profits, inversion also allows them to avoid taxes on some domestic profits because it facilitates several techniques for re-allocating U.S. profits to lower-tax foreign jurisdictions.
  5. Most tax saving was generated by earnings stripping, not by avoiding tax on genuinely foreign profits.
The details never get discussed when people bring up "Let's have a Tax Holiday and bring that $2.5 trillion home!"

Several studies have shown the last tax holiday had little positive effect because they gave the companies such a huge break (35% reduced to 14%.) To be clear, the overseas profits have a tax due, but the current IRS code allows U.S. companies to defer foreign profits. It's a strong incentive for multinationals to hoard cash overseas and then negotiate a lower rate via a tax holiday.

Large U.S. multinational companies which are known to have significant untaxed profits

  • General Electric $110 billion profits abroad (as of 2013)
  • Microsoft $108.3 billion (2016)
  • Pfizer $69 billion(2013) On 23 November 2015, Pfizer and Irish Allergan, Plc announced their intention to merge for an approximate sum of $160 billion making this the largest pharmaceutical deal ever, and the third largest merger in history. The terms of the merger propose that the merged company will maintain Allergan's Irish Republic domicile, resulting in the new company being subject to corporation tax at the Irish rate of 12.5%.
  • Merck & Co $57.1 billion (2013)
  • Apple $215 billion (2016)
  • Abbott Labs, had $40 billion (as of 2011)
  • Johnson & Johnson, had $14.8 billion (as of 2012)
  • IBM 68.1 billion (2016)
  • Google 58.3 billion (2016)
  • Cisco 58.0 billion (2016)
  • Oracle 38.0 billion (2016)
  • Intel 26.9 billion (2016)
Thanks for expanding much more in depth the point i was trying to make .

 
I

Increase capital gains tax to 20% and 1% every year thereafter until it gets to 30%. Drop that carried interest thing immediately as well.

Also, these ideas are as likely as my potential marriage to Jessica Alba.

 
A review of his tax plan showed the wealthy would benefit the most simply due to the lowering of the highest bracket.  The poor wound pay more due to an increase to the lowest bracket and reduction in exemptions.   Oh, and he wants to do away with the estate tax and AMT.  Surely a boon to the poor those.  Trump's tax plan like him sucks. 
Looks good to me.  Now if we can only offset this by reducing entitlements he has hit a home run!

 
The us could buy a bunch of stuff atvbest buy and then return it within a month after they are done using it and get their money back. 

 
Lease hawaii to the japanese for 8 trillion over 8 years.  Lease alaska to the ruskies for $10 trillion over 8 years.  After 8 years, we get the land back and are up $18 trillion.   Perfect real estate move for T. 

 
I very strongly support a carbon tax.  But we need to be honest and recognize that a large share of that tax is going to be paid by individuals (which is the whole point, of course, if you want to change behavior as opposed to just raising revenue).  There will need to be some sort of off-setting reduction in personal income taxes or a rebate or something to keep personal after-tax incomes unchanged.
Have you heard of carbon fee and dividend?

http://citizensclimatelobby.org/basics-carbon-fee-dividend/

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You do realize that the US has been financing debt at around 2% interest for some time now.
Which would be great if we invested $$ at a higher rate.  It is a huge number every year.  Do think it is okay to borrow trillions because it is cheap?????  We should have a blanced budget imo.
You have the worlds greatest armed forces to show for it  - you should be proud.

 
WSJ report today that the tax reform proposal involves taking the corporate income tax rate down to 15%.  In a surprise twist, the difficult question about offsetting taxes/removal of deductions for paying for a rate reduction appears to be deemed not necessary to answer, which would mean increasing the deficit. That means best shot is something temporary versus permanent.

Trump Wants Tax Plan to Cut Corporate Rate to 15%
President tells staff he wants to prioritize reductions over deficit concerns

By Michael C. Bender,  Richard Rubin and Nick Timiraos
Updated April 24, 2017 2:25 p.m. ET
223 COMMENTS
WASHINGTON—President Donald Trump has ordered White House aides to accelerate efforts to draft a tax plan slashing the corporate rate to 15% and prioritizing cuts in tax rates over an attempt to not increase the deficit, according to a person familiar with the directive.

During a meeting inside the Oval Office last week, Mr. Trump told staff he wants a massive tax cut to sell to the American people, the person said. It was less important to him if the plan loses revenue. Mr. Trump told his team to “get it done,” in time to release a plan by Wednesday.

A White House spokesman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn are scheduled to meet Tuesday to discuss Mr. Trump’s tax proposals with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Speaker Paul Ryan, Senate Finance Chairman Orrin Hatch and House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady of Texas. The meeting comes in advance of a Wednesday announcement by Mr. Trump about his principles for tax policy.

“This is part of our continuing dialogue with the Trump administration on tax reform,” said AshLee Strong, a spokeswoman for Mr. Ryan.

Mr. Trump promised from the campaign trail to cut corporate rates to 15% from 35%. There likely aren’t enough business tax breaks that could be repealed to offset the fiscal cost, meaning such a move would increase budget deficits. Roughly, each percentage-point cut in the tax rate lowers federal revenue by $100 billion over a decade, so a 20-point cut would cost the government $2 trillion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation.

Any plan that adds to budget deficits would be difficult to advance on Capitol Hill, for both procedural and partisan reasons.

The president’s fellow Republicans, who control both the House and Senate, are aiming to pass a tax bill through a process known as reconciliation, which means they wouldn’t need votes from Democrats. However, bills passed under reconciliation can’t increase deficits beyond the typical 10-year time frame against which tax and spending policies are projected.

That makes it difficult if not impossible for Republicans to pass a deficit-financed tax cut that doesn’t expire without getting Democratic votes in the Senate. Democrats are against large tax cuts for corporations, especially at a time when Mr. Trump is proposing cuts to government spending programs they prioritize, like housing, arts and the environment.

 
Heavily tax the following:

1. Fat people. People are required to have their body fat percentage recorded annually and they pay more taxes with worse number. This saves money in the health care area too.

2. Smokers. See above.

3. Others?

 
WSJ report today that the tax reform proposal involves taking the corporate income tax rate down to 15%.  In a surprise twist, the difficult question about offsetting taxes/removal of deductions for paying for a rate reduction appears to be deemed not necessary to answer, which would mean increasing the deficit. That means best shot is something temporary versus permanent.
Article has been updated with some quotes.  Oh, good, it's going to pay for itself with economic growth.  The Laffer Curve is due to be right with a tax cut one of these times!

Asked Monday if the president’s tax plan would be revenue-neutral, meaning it wouldn’t add to the debt, Mr. Mnuchin told reporters that it would “pay for itself with economic growth.” By that he meant that the administration expects to be able to project faster growth due to tax cuts, which would in turn increase revenue and avert the risk of bigger budget deficits. Many economists doubt whether economic growth can ramp up on a sustained basis without a big pickup in productivity and labor-force growth, and it is uncertain the tax-policy changes would do that.

“They will lose a boatload of revenue that we can’t afford to lose and far more than this team will offset by closing loopholes,” said Jared Bernstein, who was an economic adviser to former Vice President Joe Biden. Cutting marginal tax rates for businesses could generate some economic growth, he said, but not nearly enough to pay for itself with increased revenue.

“These promises about all kinds of growth and investment that are going to be triggered by these tax cuts never appear, and the empirical historical record is clear on that,” Mr. Bernstein said.

 
let's have a few people come in and post the best ideas on how to tax "the rich" - i.e. anyone with more money than them...you know the "ones who can afford to pay more" 

And then let's make a bunch of irrelevant comments about how the rich should pay more, despite the top 1% paying more than the bottom 90%.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I

Increase capital gains tax to 20% and 1% every year thereafter until it gets to 30%. Drop that carried interest thing immediately as well.

Also, these ideas are as likely as my potential marriage to Jessica Alba.
####....it's already happening.

"I HAVE A GREAT IDEA!!! AFTER YOU PAY 40% TAX ON YOUR INCOME, AND THEN HELP OUT AMERICA BY RE-INVESTING IT, LET'S INCREASE THE TAX ON YOUR GAINS BECAUSE #### YOU FOR TRYING!!!

 
let's have a few people come in and post the best ideas on how to tax "the rich" - i.e. anyone with more money than them...you know the "ones who can afford to pay more" 

And then let's make a bunch of irrelevant comments about how the rich should pay more, despite the top 1% paying more than the bottom 90%.
Nah - let's instead reserve this thread for 1%ers whining about their financial hardships.  

 
Simplify tax code, get rid of the rich peoples tax breaks (good example is tax rate on distributions being significantly less than income tax which middle class is forced to pay),  reduce the size of government so that we don't need to pay so much tax, revamp Medicare so we don't bankrupt the country, balance the budget then institute an aggressive repayment plan of existing debt so we stop paying interest.  Really should be easy right?  I am going to have a beer because I just stressed myself out.
You do realize that income tax has already been paid on the money you used to purchase that investment, right? The "rich peoples" (lol) still pay the same income tax (higher actually) than what the middle class is "forced to pay"...then they pay the tax rate on distributions in addition to that.

Such a simple concept, but so hard for some to understand.

 
####....it's already happening.

"I HAVE A GREAT IDEA!!! AFTER YOU PAY 40% TAX ON YOUR INCOME, AND THEN HELP OUT AMERICA BY RE-INVESTING IT, LET'S INCREASE THE TAX ON YOUR GAINS BECAUSE #### YOU FOR TRYING!!!
Oh, thank you so much for investing to help your country and not for any other reason. :lmao:

 
You do realize that income tax has already been paid on the money you used to purchase that investment, right? The "rich peoples" (lol) still pay the same income tax (higher actually) than what the middle class is "forced to pay"...then they pay the tax rate on distributions in addition to that.

Such a simple concept, but so hard for some to understand.
Really? What percent of the money used to purchase stocks or other investments do you think are from straight up taxed income?

 
I think we really should all take a deep breath and be realistic here, okay?

As long as we get 27% GDP growth, this is going to be the greatest tax reform, ever!

 
lol - pointing out the stupidity of letting the financial UNSUCCESSFUL run the money is whining?  This explains a lot.
What about letting greedy people run the money?  That also seems problematic.

I'm not saying all wealthy people are greedy, but I'd similarly say that not all non-wealthy are incompetent at managing money.

 
"The tax code is way, way, way too complicated. We want to create a system where the average American can file a tax code on a big postcard," Mnuchin said.
You mean I got to paper file again?!

 
Can they do this "dynamic scoring" stuff and still pass it under budget reconciliation?  I didn't think they could.

 
Drop the corporate tax rate and remove loopholes that overwhelmingly support large companies to increase competition.

The personal rate is tougher, but I would like to see more high-level brackets, a higher rate on investment income, and a general cleaning up of all of the loopholes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drop the corporate tax rate and remove loopholes that overwhelmingly support large companies to increase competition.

The personal rate is tougher, but I would like to see more high-level brackets, a higher rate on investment income, and a general cleaning up of all of the loopholes.
If we drop the rate while removing loopholes to offset the rate drop, why bother in the first place if the net won't change?

 
If we drop the rate while removing loopholes to offset the rate drop, why bother in the first place if the net won't change?
A high rate with loopholes that are accessible only/mostly to large companies creates a high barrier to entry, which decreases competition.

 
A high rate with loopholes that are accessible only/mostly to large companies creates a high barrier to entry, which decreases competition.
So we're only getting rid of the loopholes that benefit large companies?  Leaving in the loopholes for small business?  

 
So we're only getting rid of the loopholes that benefit large companies?  Leaving in the loopholes for small business?  
Hell if I know what the plans are.  I was just answering your specific question.

Edit: Although I suspect that most loopholes are more/only accessible to larger companies, as those tend to be the companies with money to spend on lobbyists.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You do realize that income tax has already been paid on the money you used to purchase that investment, right? The "rich peoples" (lol) still pay the same income tax (higher actually) than what the middle class is "forced to pay"...then they pay the tax rate on distributions in addition to that.

Such a simple concept, but so hard for some to understand.
I think you are talking about a dividend, not a distribution.  Distributions are made from s-corps, llc's, etc.  Apparently not that simple of a concept for some.

 
I think you are talking about a dividend, not a distribution.  Distributions are made from s-corps, llc's, etc.  Apparently not that simple of a concept for some.
That is an unfair post. A dividend is just a distribution out of E&P. Section 301 is even entitled "Distributions of property." Link

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top