I'll give you this one, but.....
To call Rowand up and coming is silly. He was 28 at the time of the trade. And trust me, you weren't #####ing that he was gone last year when he hit .261/12/47
I still don't see this as being a bad move at the time when you talk Rowand v Thome 2005. The lineup needed a left handed power bat and that's what they got. They miscalculated on Brian Anderson and all teams make mistakes. Brian Anderson not performing allowed this to snowball into what could be considered a bad trade.
Ohhh up and coming means he has to be young? Even when your stubborn mind admits to NOT being wrong but seeing a different viewpoint you manipulate the facts to suit yourself. Deep down you know you wished that you had this guy back. It was one of the biggest blunders in the history of this team. Goldie locks was a bust as well as the others that he miscalculated all year long in 2007. You can go check the bullpen Limpy. Start with every name after Bobby Jenks. Besides we had FRANK and ROWAND and they both ran numbers around Thome and anything in center the last two seasons.
Who the #### in goldie locks? You have some seriosuly ######ed nicknames for these guys.
Would I love to see Rowand back with the White Sox? Yes, I've admitted it before and I'll admit it again. But let's be realisitic, Aaron Rowand has had 2 good seasons in his career and one of them happened to be this year. Jim Thome is a potential Hall of Famer, member of the 500 HR club and still puting up damn good numbers. Outside of the hole it left at CF, you can't tell me that 39HR/102RBIs you've gotten from Thome is worth nothing. Thome has out hit, out slugged, out OBPd and out performed Rowand in every offensive aspect of the game except your beloved SBs. Frank is gone. Frank is history. Why? Because he tried burning the bridge so many times management finally let him do it. He was not coming back to this team no matter what. You can blame it on whoever you want, but the fact is he was never playing another game for this team because of
his actions, not someone elses.
FLAT OUT WRONG!!!!!!
Mags could be on his 3rd MVP season in Detroit and it still would have been a good move to not sign him considering all of the circumstances involved with the mystery knee surgery and being told no to giving him a physical.
But we move into the 2007 season with Erstad and Crede being nothing but liabilities as well as Pods? Flat out wrong? BS. You can have Dye and I will take Mags. You want to stretch numbers go for it. I will use last year as my indicator. Go post a poll on who anyone would rather have Mags or Dye and watch that thing be 98% in favor of Mags. Church is out on this debate...
Church is not out. It was not a bad move. It was a bush league move by Mags and his representation to not allow a physical. End of story. Also, convienent of you to cut and splice all of the gory details that show how wrong you are on this. You go ahead and live in 2007. I live in the reality of the time Mags left and what his replacement has done over that timespan.
Wrong And any other trade you want to mention being bad that led to a player, or players, that contributed to them winning it all in 2005 will also be wrong.
It was not a bad trade. It got Pods, it got Vizcaino (convienent of you to forget that. Hell, you probably didn't know it in the first place so how could you forget it?) and it got rid of a clubhouse cancer that was going to cost about 8X what Pods does alone when his FA year came up. The idea is to win, and win now and that trade made 2005 possible. A banner that says World Series Champion is up at The Cell because of it. You also can't predict injuries and injuries have been a big time problem with Pods over the last 2 years.
Ohhh yeah I knew that got Vizcaino but where is he at these days? What has he done for you lately? Nothing- just like Pods and he knew that he was an injury risk before making that trade. Clubhouse cancer? You ought to know because you are in the clubhouse all day every day know it all. Just like you know that Frank is a clubhouse cancer. While I concede that we won a WS Championship and Pods was a big part of OZZIE BALL I cared very little about that trade and if all we needed was a cheap player that can steal bases it sure did come at a high price. For a guy that ripped me a new one for OZZIE BALL you sure come a running to defend it. Again- who would you rather have Lee or Pods on the WS? I will take Lee.
And what has Lee done for the Brewers lately? Look at the trade for what it was at the time and how the teams actually involved in the trade faired because of it. Lee's on his 3rd team post WS. I wonder why. (note the lack of a ? there) Meanwhile, the WS have a World Series. One that was by a team that Kenny Williams constructed in a large part to this trade.
I'd also take a healthy Pods over Lee any day. Especially with the way this team is built. The last thing we need is another swing for the fence, station to station guy on this team. Who's going to hit leadoff for you? Who'd going to set the table for the big boppers? Again, the last thing we need is another big bat in this lineup.
.
And you'll have zero World Championships.
How do you know? I thought you said that you cannot predict the future and you look into a crystal ball more than a fortune-teller. Two of these 4 guys were on a WS Championship team for the 2005 Chicago White Sox. Maybe with these guys we lose 70 games instead of 90. Maybe we can have a guy- just one guy in the lineup that can hit over .300. He gutted the system and the proof is in a 90-loss season.
What, there's no proof in the 7 .500 or better seasons leading up to this year? Jesus H Christ are you dim. It's one season out of 8. Do you know how many teams haven't had a 90 loss season in the last 8 years?
WRONG AGAIN!!!!
Technically this was a Ron Schueler move, but thanks for showing how little you know, again.
Arrogance will get you no where and this is why you take a beating up and down these boards. You defend a 90-loss season like your life depends on it. I am laughing hard about this one. Why just yesterday- you proudly posted Kenny Boy’s tenure all over the place like a gushing bride but now TECHNICALLY it was Ron Schueler that made this move. OK- it sure has all the ear-marks of a man that wants to deal a quality center fielder away to get a slow footed DH. So is it Kenny or is it Ron? You must know. I will give this one to you.
But, A wash? Dear god, you really are this dumb, aren't you? While a fine fielder, Cameron has always had terrible plate discipline and is a lifetime .250 hitter. Meanwhile, Konerko has averaged about .285 with 30 HRs a year while with the WS, played gold glove caliber 1B, and been an anchor for this team for almost a decade. Cameron for Konerko was a flat out steal.
Flat out steal? One player can steal and one player runs like he has flat feet. We have no center fielder but we have the slowest MLB player in the history of the game. Mr. Double play. 9 years of HRs in the bottom of the 8th when we are getting blown out and 1 year in which we won it all. I see a huge GAP between .250 and .285 just massive! The same with the HRs per average 22 vs 30 is a huge gap but wait know it all- you seem to have forgotten about STOLEN BASES! And ohhhh the Gold Gloves. Who has 3 and who has none?
"Arrogance will get you no where" Yeah, and ignorance is doing wonders for yourself.
If you don't see a massive gap between .250 and .285, you're a idiot. And since when are power hitting corner infielders expected to steal as many bases as a CF? And if you're going to use the timings of Konerko's HRs as a defense, please give exact details instead of some BS statement like that. It makes you look even more foolish than you are.
You pointed out 4 players that you think were bad moves by Kenny Williams. I've proven, with facts, that you were wrong on 3 of them.
Will you realize this or just rant and rave some more? I'm guessing its the latter.
You proved with facts that I was wrong on none of these. But the main thing is we have a banner and there will be no way in heck to say that if these guys were here then that we could have won it all. But the point here is that Kenny gutted the talent here and you proved that he may have not had a hand in the Cam/Paulie deal but I think that he did. I will tell you that with Lee, Thomas, Rowand and Mags this team is a powerhouse for years but the main thrust of this team’s ability to win was always in the pitching and timely or power hitting. Certainly a combo of all three to win it all with OZZIE BALL but now we are old, broken and filled with young players that are not ready. A season in which Kenny BOY said that we were not going to be rebuilding. This is a 90 LOSS SEASON PAL! DEFEND IT until you are blue in the face.
Keep trying to prove to me that some of the best players in MLB are not the victims of Kenny gutting the system. Keep telling me that stiffs like Danks, Goldie Locks, that stinky bull pen (which smells like a shimp scooner in August) and Uribe are the answer. 90 losses pal. You can keep trying. I hope that I am wrong next year with this guy. I will eat crow all day long but I just do not see it unless he breaks the bank!