What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

On the IDP cheatsheets why.... (1 Viewer)

scooterthecat

Footballguy
...is Kieth Brooking, LB, Ten, rated so low this week a #9??? Ten at Dallas.

Mike Peterson, LB, Jax is rated higher at #4.. Jax @ Was.

WHAT DO YOU GUYS KNOW THAT I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THIS SITUATION??

Thx,

StheC

 
...is Kieth Brooking, LB, Ten, rated so low this week a #9??? Ten at Dallas.Mike Peterson, LB, Jax is rated higher at #4.. Jax @ Was.WHAT DO YOU GUYS KNOW THAT I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THIS SITUATION??Thx,StheC
CC hit it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
...is Kieth Brooking, LB, Ten, rated so low this week a #9??? Ten at Dallas.Mike Peterson, LB, Jax is rated higher at #4.. Jax @ Was.WHAT DO YOU GUYS KNOW THAT I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THIS SITUATION??Thx,StheC
Nothing really. I'll assume you mean Bulluck.They are essentially the same play. The cheatsheets run from Norton's projections. We won't do this with every request, but here is the subscriber content in question.4/ Mike Peterson: (8-2-1) -- 12 points12/ Keith Brooking: (8-4-0), 0.2 INT -- 10.8 pointsDrop a tackle here, a sack or PD there and this is essentially the same projection. I think the Washington matchup (better running game, short passing game) is a better matchup than the Dallas matchup (slightly worse running game, more vertical passing game) so I'd probably start Peterson over Bulluck in a vacuum. But it's a very close call this week.The tiers of IDP projections get really close on a cheatsheet. It's much different than the #4 WR who may be projected to get 25 yds/0.5TD more than the #12 WR and 5.5 more points.BTW: If you are talking about Brooking, just substitute his name for Bulluck above. It's essentially the same answer, except Arizona's running game is maybe a bit better than the Cowboys.HTH
 
Yes, it is Bulluck. Sorry.

In the league I am in, we get high points for both INT and sacks. 4 points each. 1 point for each solo tackle. 1 for PD.

Bulluck has been steady money so far with all his solo tackles. So if you are not really predicting a breakout for Mike Peterson, who is running at 60% of Bulluck's production, maybe I should stay with Bulluck.....

......unless you think Peterson will get a couple of sacks or an INT??? Bulluck is just plain solo tackles.

Also, thanks for translating my jibber-jabber back into english....

StheC

 
Will Brooking be the MLB all year? If Hartwell doesn't make it back do they have anyone else?

He is 11.2 in the updated sheets. 12(Peterson) VS 11.2.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Will Brooking be the MLB all year? If Hartwell doesn't make it back do they have anyone else?He is 11.2 in the updated sheets. 12(Peterson) VS 11.2.
Hartwell will be back this year. He practiced Wednesday, but the knee swelled. So he's out this week and resting, but in a week or two, three max, he'll be back in the middle, Brooking WLB. :2cents:
 
Will Brooking be the MLB all year? If Hartwell doesn't make it back do they have anyone else?He is 11.2 in the updated sheets. 12(Peterson) VS 11.2.
Hartwell will be back this year. He practiced Wednesday, but the knee swelled. So he's out this week and resting, but in a week or two, three max, he'll be back in the middle, Brooking WLB. :2cents:
I hope so but kid of doubt Hartwell's health at the moment. I'm not so sure he can last the season.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top