When is Ted Ginn going to make a big play? Had both hands on the ball for the win. What a waste of a Top 10 pick. Another Ohio State disappointment.
That's a silly sentence.mashers said:You must not have seen the defensive player's hands tugging on his uniform and hitting him before he caught the ball.
Ginn had a good game but as the broadcast team said big time players pull that down. He's just not elite.Fantaholic said:11 catches and I think I'm dropping him for Manningham tomorrow.
I'll have to watch the replay again, but I didn't think the defender got his hands up for that pass. It looked as if Ginn could've made the play if he would've held onto the ball. I'll go back and watch...not my thread, but just calling what I thought I saw.mashers said:You must not have seen the defensive player's hands in between Ginn's hands, breaking it up. Give credit instead of blame.
I didn't see that. I must have been watching a different game.mashers said:You must not have seen the defensive player's hands in between Ginn's hands, breaking it up. Give credit instead of blame.
Even better yet. Can't really blame Ginn on that one. The one in the first quarter in the back of the end zone - fine.mashers said:You must not have seen the defensive player's hands tugging on his uniform and hitting him before he caught the ball.
"Not" placed in front of elite gives an entirely different meaning you know.elite????is he even good???oh yeah, I forgot, he comes from a good family . . .
No, no, no. Fitz definitely makes that catch, of course. Can't blame Ginn for not being Fitz, but most good receivers make that play. If you give a top receiver both hands on the ball, they catch it. He had other drops, too. I'm amazed that, as poorly as they managed the clock, the Dolphins had a chance to take the lead that late. They just don't have a really good receiver. Fantasy-wise, Ginn has a nice stat line. But he let the team down, no doubt. The Dolphins need a #1.mashers said:You must not have seen the defensive player's hands in between Ginn's hands, breaking it up. Give credit instead of blame.
he siad that Ginn wasn't elite - like that's even up for debate . . ."Not" placed in front of elite gives an entirely different meaning you know.elite????is he even good???oh yeah, I forgot, he comes from a good family . . .
Clock management was brutal. No hurry up, confusion at the line, THEN they call a timeout losing about 15 seconds.No, no, no. Fitz definitely makes that catch, of course. Can't blame Ginn for not being Fitz, but most good receivers make that play. If you give a top receiver both hands on the ball, they catch it. He had other drops, too. I'm amazed that, as poorly as they managed the clock, the Dolphins had a chance to take the lead that late. They just don't have a really good receiver. Fantasy-wise, Ginn has a nice stat line. But he let the team down, no doubt. The Dolphins need a #1.mashers said:You must not have seen the defensive player's hands in between Ginn's hands, breaking it up. Give credit instead of blame.
I will say that Ted seems to have attended the Roy Williams school of disappointing first round receivers, not the Charles Rogers one.Ted dropped two different would be TDs passes tonight. Tonight was a good example of what sets him apart from the elite WRs.
He should have had this one. But how about last week where White and Pennington on two throws where he had beaten his man deep could not get him the throw? He is not elite yet but he isn't exactly put in alot of great situations. I would love to see him on IND with Peyton. Other than that TD miss he played a very good game tonight and clearly was getting open against one of the better CBs in the game.Even better yet. Can't really blame Ginn on that one. The one in the first quarter in the back of the end zone - fine.mashers said:You must not have seen the defensive player's hands tugging on his uniform and hitting him before he caught the ball.
I saw nothing wrong with Pennington tonight. He made plays and put the ball where it had to be. Sure, he's got a noodle, but he led the team down the field. He converted plenty of third downs.Pennington played just fine imo.I've always believed Ted Ginn could breakout, but I don't like his situation. That said, good WRs will make that play. However, Miami's O tends not to feature any one player. I'm sure they could care less about fantasy football, LOL. Same goes for Ronnie Brown. Both got used extensively tonight, so maybe things will change. I wouldn't hold my breath, though. In games where the Wildcat isn't working real well, Miami seems to struggle. Some people may disagree with me, but I believe part of the problem is Pennington, who simply can't make some of throws a lot of QBs can make (because of limited arm strength). I wonder if they would be better off with Henne right now.
Really? Just think how many more plays they could have had at the end if they hadn't wasted all of the time before the 2 minute warning. There is no excuse for that.I saw nothing wrong with Pennington tonight.
In real football, that means he didn't play a very good game tonight.Plus, I saw other drops (caught the game late and didn't even see the alleged TD drop in the 1st half). You have to come up big when the team needs you. They didn't need him to fight through double coverage and make a fingertip catch. They needed him to catch the ball when it was put in the right spot when it counted most.He should have had this one. But how about last week where White and Pennington on two throws where he had beaten his man deep could not get him the throw? He is not elite yet but he isn't exactly put in alot of great situations. I would love to see him on IND with Peyton. Other than that TD miss he played a very good game tonight and clearly was getting open against one of the better CBs in the game.Even better yet. Can't really blame Ginn on that one. The one in the first quarter in the back of the end zone - fine.mashers said:You must not have seen the defensive player's hands tugging on his uniform and hitting him before he caught the ball.
I agree. Pennington threw better than normal but his two minute drill was lethargic! There was no intensity and no sense of urgency.Pennington played like he had never run a two minute drill. That was the only issue with him tonight, though.
Personally, I blame coaching for drills like that. It's clear they don't practice it. He made the throws he had to make and called time out when it was clear the team wasn't ready for the snap. I don't put that on Pennington.Of course, he isn't asked to do too much in that offense, either. I'm not saying he kept them in the game or is the reason they had the lead late. But I didn't see anything wrong with his play tonight.Really? Just think how many more plays they could have had at the end if they hadn't wasted all of the time before the 2 minute warning. There is no excuse for that.I saw nothing wrong with Pennington tonight.
Well, we all notice the one he didn't make, but he caught alot of balls and looked good running with it. He isn't an elite WR but he is continuing to improve. I was impressed by his route running tonight and his ability to get open against a good CB.Regardless of whether he should have caught two potential TDs (he should have) or whether he could step up to be a bigger downfield threat (he won't), 10+ catches is something I will take from a flex player in a PPR. My question is, has he shown enough so far to be targeted 10+ times a game, and will Miami play a similar ball control kind of game against opponents all year, which only adds potential for more Ginn targets?
Go away LHUCKS.gcoast3 said:Another Ohio State disappointment.
Two games into his third season? Yes. Mike Williams wasn't even rostered in his third season--that's a bust. Charles Rogers was injured in his third season and on the sidelines. That's a bust. Ginn may never live up to the top ten pick expectations, but he is not a bust.If you watch the Dolphins games, you know that Ginn is pretty much open a good majority of the time. The problem is he consistently drops passes and does not make enough big plays. In 3 years he has yet to come up with a big catch. I know he had good stats tonight, but for a top 10 NFL draft pick its time for him to start making these huge plays when it counts. Is it to soon to start using the word bust?
I dont think he is a "bust", but he clearly is not a player worthy of being drafted 9th overall. He is a very servicable WR2/3, but he is by no means a 1, and does not appear as though he ever will be. Your 1 needs to make that catch 10 out of 10 times.Thats a devestating loss. To many missed tackles, and one huge drop.If you watch the Dolphins games, you know that Ginn is pretty much open a good majority of the time. The problem is he consistently drops passes and does not make enough big plays.
In 3 years he has yet to come up with a big catch. I know he had good stats tonight, but for a top 10 NFL draft pick its time for him to start making these huge plays when it counts. Is it to soon to start using the word bust?
I think a more fair standard is "will his second contract be worth more than his first?" For a young receiver it should be definitely, yes-- if you're good enough. Right now I'd say no. Even at his current rate of progress I'd say no. Maybe he'll turn it on later. Right now he looks like a less-reliable Randle-El. That's not a #1 WR to me. But like I said earlier, maybe we're being too critical. Perhaps he needs more time or a better situation.Two games into his third season? Yes. Mike Williams wasn't even rostered in his third season--that's a bust. Charles Rogers was injured in his third season and on the sidelines. That's a bust. Ginn may never live up to the top ten pick expectations, but he is not a bust.If you watch the Dolphins games, you know that Ginn is pretty much open a good majority of the time. The problem is he consistently drops passes and does not make enough big plays. In 3 years he has yet to come up with a big catch. I know he had good stats tonight, but for a top 10 NFL draft pick its time for him to start making these huge plays when it counts. Is it to soon to start using the word bust?
Week 1, he had only 2 catches off of 5 targets. It was Bess who was targeted more. My question isn't so much if Ginn can keep developing (I think he will) or if he looked crisp out there (I think he did). It's whether you think there is going to be enough consistency of opportunity for Ginn in this offense for him to be the primary receiver of targets for most games, or whether it will be catch as catch can between him, Bess, Hartline, Camarillo, Fasano, and even Ronnie and Ricky.Well, we all notice the one he didn't make, but he caught alot of balls and looked good running with it. He isn't an elite WR but he is continuing to improve. I was impressed by his route running tonight and his ability to get open against a good CB.Regardless of whether he should have caught two potential TDs (he should have) or whether he could step up to be a bigger downfield threat (he won't), 10+ catches is something I will take from a flex player in a PPR. My question is, has he shown enough so far to be targeted 10+ times a game, and will Miami play a similar ball control kind of game against opponents all year, which only adds potential for more Ginn targets?
agreed . . . the most overused word in NFL jargon is "dropped"sure, a TOP TEN NFL receiver should make that catch, but to the rest of the NFL that's a tough catch to make . . .That last "drop" was far from a gimme.
It's a catch every legitimate top receiver in the game makes. Heck, Braylon Edwards makes that catch 50% of the time.That last "drop" was far from a gimme.
So you got Laveranues Coles and not Larry Fitzgerald. There's worse ways to spend a first round pick.It's a catch every legitimate top receiver in the game makes. Heck, Braylon Edwards makes that catch 50% of the time.That last "drop" was far from a gimme.
You just insulted ColesSo you got Laveranues Coles and not Larry Fitzgerald. There's worse ways to spend a first round pick.It's a catch every legitimate top receiver in the game makes. Heck, Braylon Edwards makes that catch 50% of the time.That last "drop" was far from a gimme.
who ever suggested he was a "top" receiver ?It's a catch every legitimate top receiver in the game makes. Heck, Braylon Edwards makes that catch 50% of the time.That last "drop" was far from a gimme.
That's the premise of this thread. His draft position demands he be a top receiver. He is underperforming that status. He looks like a faster Brian Finneran.who ever suggested he was a "top" receiver ?