What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Packers Could Have Had Tony Gonzalez (1 Viewer)

Ookie Pringle

Footballguy
Have at it Thompson Supporters and tell us why this was a good move for the Packers.

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=806267

Bid to land Gonzalez falls short

Chiefs were willing to deal star tight end for second-round pick

By BOB McGINN

bmcginn@journalsentinel.com

Posted: Oct. 15, 2008

Green Bay - The Green Bay Packers could have acquired tight end Tony Gonzalez from the Kansas City Chiefs on Tuesday but they refused to part with a second-round draft choice.

A source familiar with negotiations told the Journal Sentinel that Chiefs President Carl Peterson ultimately decided to retain Gonzalez after turning down the best offer from Green Bay, which was a third-round selection. The source said Peterson wanted a second-rounder to make the deal.

The decision by general manager Ted Thompson not to send the second-round pick to Kansas City was made just minutes before the National Football League trading deadline of 3 p.m.

During a day of talks between Green Bay and Kansas City, the Packers increased their compensation offer several times. A source said Gonzalez had told the Chiefs that he would accept a trade to the Packers, and planned to play three more seasons.

This was another example of Thompson’s unwillingness to pull the trigger on a blockbuster trade to obtain another weapon on offense.

In 2006, Thompson had the chance to send a high draft choice to San Diego Chargers for running back Michael Turner.

A year later, Thompson didn’t push hard enough to get wide receiver Randy Moss under contract and watched the New England Patriots acquire him from the Oakland Raiders for a fourth-round selection.

Adam Schefter of the NFL Network reported that Philadelphia, the New York Giants and Buffalo also were negotiating with the Chiefs. He reported that one team offered a third-round pick, another team offered a fourth-round pick and another team offered an unidentified choice plus a player.

An NFL source told the Journal Sentinel that the Bills weren’t a factor because Gonzalez didn’t want to play for them.

According to the source, Gonzalez was livid that the rebuilding Chiefs (1-4), for whom he has caught tight-end record totals of 841 passes for 10,075 yards and 68 touchdowns, refused to let him go for a third-round pick.

Gonzalez, who made the Pro Bowl for a record ninth straight time last season, was highly regarded by coach Mike McCarthy and several members of his staff in Green Bay.

McCarthy coached quarterbacks in Kansas City in 1997 and ’98, Gonzalez’s first two seasons there. Several of his coaches, including Tom Clements, Mike Stock, Carl Hairston and Kurt Schottenheimer, also spent time in Kansas City during Gonzalez’s career, as did vice president Russ Ball and personnel director John Schneider.

As it stands now, the Packers will have their seven choices in the 2009 draft plus a sixth-round pick from New Orleans and no worse than a fourth-round pick from the New York Jets in the trade for Brett Favre.

The compensation for Favre reportedly will increase to a third if Favre plays at least 50% of the snaps, and to a second if he plays at least 70% and the Jets reach the playoffs.

If the trade with Green Bay had been consummated, the Packers would have picked up the final 3½ years of Gonzalez’s contract, or a total amount of $19.397 million.

This year, Green Bay would have had to pay 11/17ths of his guaranteed $1 million base salary, or $647,059. His contract included base salaries of $4 million in 2009 (all guaranteed), $4.5 million in 2010 ($1.75 million guaranteed) and $5.75 million in 2011, and roster bonuses of $500,000 in ’09, $2 million in ’10 and $2 million in ’11.

The Packers currently stand $20.05 million beneath the salary cap, a total exceeded by only Tampa Bay and Kansas City among the 32 teams.

By adding Gonzalez, the Packers’ weapons on offense would have compared favorably with any team in the NFL. His ability to make clutch possession catches and stretch the field was evident last season in Week 8, when he caught 10 passes for 109 yards and one touchdown against Green Bay.

Gonzalez recently requested a trade from the Chiefs because he wanted the chance to play for a playoff contender.

“I’m winding down in my career and I’m thinking this is not what I signed on for last year when I redid my deal,” Gonzalez said in August. “I haven’t even won a playoff game. You can look back and say you had a pretty good career, but I want to be able to say I went to the playoffs, I won some playoff games and I went to the Super Bowl.”

The Packers signed tight end Donald Lee to a four-year, $11.88 million deal last November when he was an integral part of their passing game. But Lee has been less involved with Aaron Rodgers at quarterback.

Tory Humphrey is the No. 2 tight end and rookie Jermichael Finley, a third-round draft choice, is No. 3. Finley has been slow to develop and doesn’t have a reception.

Under Thompson, the Packers have drafted eight players in the second round. The list include Nick Collins, Terrence Murphy, Daryn Colledge, Greg Jennings, Brandon Jackson, Jordy Nelson, Brian Brohm and Pat Lee.

Tom Silverstein of the Journal Sentinel staff contributed to this report.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Posted it in the Tony G thread.

But here you go. While I would have liked having him in...and a 2nd does not seem that high really. Its telling that no other team was willing to do it...that the article states GBs 3rd round offer was the highest one. That Tony G thought they were asking too much. That he was pissed they did not deal him for a 2nd.

In addition...are the problems of the Packers solved right now if they would have traded for a TE? Is Tony going to convert to an Olineman? Is he going to rush the passer? Is he going to plug the holes in the rush defense?

Its a nice on paper move for the offense...but really does not do much to help the team right now in where they need help.

Oh...and the conflicting side of the report was Mort saying Tony G did not want to go there either. So some sources say he would have...others say no.

Im more pissed Thompson was not active trying to find some help on the Dline.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unbelievable.

The Moss thing worked out OK for the Packers last season because their WRs were pretty damn good. But there is no way in hell Donald Lee will be as good or even close to as good as Gonzalez.

The Packers have MAJOR issues defensively right now. One could argue their best chance to get to the Super Bowl (which sure as hell better be the goal this year) is to become a strong offensive-minded team and give Rodgers as many weapons as possible. Gonzalez would have been a major upgrade at TE and given the team another standout option to utilize.

It's hard to argue with Thompson's track record. But the guy hoards draft picks and cap room like they're pennies and I simply don't get it.

 
Posted it in the Tony G thread.But here you go. While I would have liked having him in...and a 2nd does not seem that high really. Its telling that no other team was willing to do it...that the article states GBs 3rd round offer was the highest one. That Tony G thought they were asking too much. That he was pissed they did not deal him for a 2nd. In addition...are the problems of the Packers solved right now if they would have traded for a TE? Is Tony going to convert to an Olineman? Is he going to rush the passer? Is he going to plug the holes in the rush defense?Its a nice on paper move for the offense...but really does not do much to help the team right now in where they need help.Oh...and the conflicting side of the report was Mort saying Tony G did not want to go there either. So some sources say he would have...others say no.Im more pissed Thompson was not active trying to find some help on the Dline.
Mort was on ESPN radio this morning and stated Gonzo had no issues going to GB. He didn't want to go to Buffalo.
 
Posted it in the Tony G thread.But here you go. While I would have liked having him in...and a 2nd does not seem that high really. Its telling that no other team was willing to do it...that the article states GBs 3rd round offer was the highest one. That Tony G thought they were asking too much. That he was pissed they did not deal him for a 2nd. In addition...are the problems of the Packers solved right now if they would have traded for a TE? Is Tony going to convert to an Olineman? Is he going to rush the passer? Is he going to plug the holes in the rush defense?Its a nice on paper move for the offense...but really does not do much to help the team right now in where they need help.Oh...and the conflicting side of the report was Mort saying Tony G did not want to go there either. So some sources say he would have...others say no.Im more pissed Thompson was not active trying to find some help on the Dline.
Mort was on ESPN radio this morning and stated Gonzo had no issues going to GB. He didn't want to go to Buffalo.
K...was not sure...had read a few places saying Mort said it the other way...no issue there.As I said, I would have liked him, and a 2nd does not seem too bad for the guy. But IMO...Dline is where TT has screwed up. I think he is still holding on to hope that Harrell can be the guy. But with Pickett dinged up now too...can't have too much on the Dline to me. Even if he thought Harrell would be fine at DT...they need more help at DE too. Freakin KGB is done. I have been on the KGB is overpaid bandwagon for some time. Was one of the people pushing them to go after Jason Taylor so they could get rid of KGB.As it stands...Sanders better keep finding creative ways to blitz...and better do some good disguising of coverage...because if he just sits back in his normal man to man bump and run crap, Indy will kill them.
 
I'm comfortable with this. The Packers have a wealth of passing weapons. They need buttressing of their Oline and thier defense due to injuries. The reason there has been some fall off this year in T.E. production is that they are increasingly keeping their T.E. in to block because the Oline has been in some disarray.

Jennings, Driver, Jones, Nelson, and Lee are enough weapons. They do not need Gonzales. They need health along their line and the line to gel with time working together. A second rounder for Gonzales at this stage of his career is too much for a team with needs elsewhere, IMO.

 
Posted it in the Tony G thread.But here you go. While I would have liked having him in...and a 2nd does not seem that high really. Its telling that no other team was willing to do it...that the article states GBs 3rd round offer was the highest one. That Tony G thought they were asking too much. That he was pissed they did not deal him for a 2nd. In addition...are the problems of the Packers solved right now if they would have traded for a TE? Is Tony going to convert to an Olineman? Is he going to rush the passer? Is he going to plug the holes in the rush defense?Its a nice on paper move for the offense...but really does not do much to help the team right now in where they need help.Oh...and the conflicting side of the report was Mort saying Tony G did not want to go there either. So some sources say he would have...others say no.Im more pissed Thompson was not active trying to find some help on the Dline.
Mort was on ESPN radio this morning and stated Gonzo had no issues going to GB. He didn't want to go to Buffalo.
K...was not sure...had read a few places saying Mort said it the other way...no issue there.As I said, I would have liked him, and a 2nd does not seem too bad for the guy. But IMO...Dline is where TT has screwed up. I think he is still holding on to hope that Harrell can be the guy. But with Pickett dinged up now too...can't have too much on the Dline to me. Even if he thought Harrell would be fine at DT...they need more help at DE too. Freakin KGB is done. I have been on the KGB is overpaid bandwagon for some time. Was one of the people pushing them to go after Jason Taylor so they could get rid of KGB.As it stands...Sanders better keep finding creative ways to blitz...and better do some good disguising of coverage...because if he just sits back in his normal man to man bump and run crap, Indy will kill them.
I don't think Sanders knows how to spell the word blitz. :shock:
 
Offense isn't the problem over there... and a 2nd rounder in the draft still gets u a good player.

I can't kill them for not giving it up...

 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents. Its unfortunate he couldn't hit another home run like Woodson, Pickett or Grant, but those opportunities are obviously pretty rare.

 
Big deal. Green Bay made the best offer, it's not like they got outbid.

This is a case of the KC GM holding on too tightly when they should be looking to blow it up and rebuild. I understand getting all you can, but if this was the best offer, why wouldn't you take it?

 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
Which is completely ridiculous.
I disagree. I think McGinn has done a good job in the past of presenting this argument. He referenced it again in this article.
 
Posted it in the Tony G thread.But here you go. While I would have liked having him in...and a 2nd does not seem that high really. Its telling that no other team was willing to do it...that the article states GBs 3rd round offer was the highest one. That Tony G thought they were asking too much. That he was pissed they did not deal him for a 2nd. In addition...are the problems of the Packers solved right now if they would have traded for a TE? Is Tony going to convert to an Olineman? Is he going to rush the passer? Is he going to plug the holes in the rush defense?Its a nice on paper move for the offense...but really does not do much to help the team right now in where they need help.Oh...and the conflicting side of the report was Mort saying Tony G did not want to go there either. So some sources say he would have...others say no.Im more pissed Thompson was not active trying to find some help on the Dline.
Mort was on ESPN radio this morning and stated Gonzo had no issues going to GB. He didn't want to go to Buffalo.
K...was not sure...had read a few places saying Mort said it the other way...no issue there.As I said, I would have liked him, and a 2nd does not seem too bad for the guy. But IMO...Dline is where TT has screwed up. I think he is still holding on to hope that Harrell can be the guy. But with Pickett dinged up now too...can't have too much on the Dline to me. Even if he thought Harrell would be fine at DT...they need more help at DE too. Freakin KGB is done. I have been on the KGB is overpaid bandwagon for some time. Was one of the people pushing them to go after Jason Taylor so they could get rid of KGB.As it stands...Sanders better keep finding creative ways to blitz...and better do some good disguising of coverage...because if he just sits back in his normal man to man bump and run crap, Indy will kill them.
I don't think Sanders knows how to spell the word blitz. :clyde:
True...though, Woodson even came on one this past weekend.
 
For what he would have done for the Packers' offense, I think this is a major blunder by Thompson. (And I have been a stalwart Thompson defender)

 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
Which is completely ridiculous.
I disagree. I think McGinn has done a good job in the past of presenting this argument. He referenced it again in this article.
Though, he misrepresented the facts a bit.Just claiming that Turner could have been had for a high draft pick is not being totally honest.The Titans were about to ship a 1st rounder to the Chargers for him...they balked and wanted 2 first rounders (by all accounts).
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
If you think Gonzo was going to put this team over the top you are mistaken. Why would any team give high draft choice for an aging TE. Oh, I guess they didn't. Every team had a shot at Gonzo and no one took him but TT is the one getting hammered. I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clueThis is not FF people..
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
Which is completely ridiculous.
I disagree. I think McGinn has done a good job in the past of presenting this argument. He referenced it again in this article.
This was another example of Thompson’s unwillingness to pull the trigger on a blockbuster trade to obtain another weapon on offense.That's what the article says. Fact is, they have weapons on offense. Offensive weapons are not the problem. I don't know why this isn't clear to anyone. I would've been happy to have Tony G., but they made the best offer in the NFL for him and KC GM didn't take it. What would you like Thompson to do here?
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
An elite TE would give Rodgers another strong weapon to utilize. And as I said before - if this team is going to get to the Super Bowl the it will probably have to do it by trying to score a ton of points every game. So having a standout TE would be a huge addition to this team. It would basically make every skill position on the field a major strength (assuming Grant gets going which I believe will happen).
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
If you think Gonzo was going to put this team over the top you are mistaken. Why would any team give high draft choice for an aging TE. Oh, I guess they didn't. Every team had a shot at Gonzo and no one took him but TT is the one getting hammered. I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clueThis is not FF people..
Just like every team had a chance to go after Moss...and the Packers were getting blasted by people for even being interested in him. Only 2 teams showed any interest in Moss...and suddenly Ted Thompson was the big fool of it all for not getting him after the fact.But many who were killing the Packers for even being interested tried showing up with an "I told you so" later.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
Which is completely ridiculous.
I disagree. I think McGinn has done a good job in the past of presenting this argument. He referenced it again in this article.
This was another example of Thompson's unwillingness to pull the trigger on a blockbuster trade to obtain another weapon on offense.That's what the article says. Fact is, they have weapons on offense. Offensive weapons are not the problem. I don't know why this isn't clear to anyone. I would've been happy to have Tony G., but they made the best offer in the NFL for him and KC GM didn't take it. What would you like Thompson to do here?
Give them the second rounder. But I guess it would be better spent on a third string QB...(Ok ok that part isn't fair. I'm just grumpy :rolleyes: )
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
That offensive line was dominant.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
And that was a big-time TE who wanted no part of playing for the Packers and refused to play for them for several weeks. But Wolf didn't care. He identified a player who could help the team win and he aggressively pursued him. Thompson has done a lot of good things. No question about that. But I don't think he has Wolf's aggressive, go-for-the-throat mentality when it comes to personnel moves.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
An elite TE would give Rodgers another strong weapon to utilize. And as I said before - if this team is going to get to the Super Bowl the it will probably have to do it by trying to score a ton of points every game. So having a standout TE would be a huge addition to this team. It would basically make every skill position on the field a major strength (assuming Grant gets going which I believe will happen).
AS had been mentioned...the TE has been having to stay back and block alot this year because of the line struggles. They did not do that as much last year as the line played better.As I said, I would have liked it...and a 2nd was not that bad...but I fault him much more for not going after some help on the Dline given the current injuries and play there.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
You gotta be kidding? What was the difference on that TEAM? Oh, how about Reggie White, Sean Jones, Leroy Butler. Got any of of those type of players around here on D? Didn't think so.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
That offensive line was dominant.
Um, the starting left tackle had to be replaced by a jourymen halfway through the season. Dominant it was not.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
Which is completely ridiculous.
I disagree. I think McGinn has done a good job in the past of presenting this argument. He referenced it again in this article.
This was another example of Thompson’s unwillingness to pull the trigger on a blockbuster trade to obtain another weapon on offense.That's what the article says. Fact is, they have weapons on offense. Offensive weapons are not the problem. I don't know why this isn't clear to anyone.

I would've been happy to have Tony G., but they made the best offer in the NFL for him and KC GM didn't take it. What would you like Thompson to do here?
Maybe they should have offered a 1st, 3rd, and 7th.
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
Is this a joke?
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
You gotta be kidding? What was the difference on that TEAM? Oh, how about Reggie White, Sean Jones, Leroy Butler. Got anyo of those type of players around here on D? Didn't think so.
Ask Favre how much difference Jackson meant to that 96 team.And the funny thing is the Packers didn't NEED a TE then. They already had a good one in Chmura. But Wolf didn't care. He wanted to give Favre as many weapons as possible. He understood that when an opportunity to be great presents itself, you go for the throat and make the necessary moves to make sure it happens. I just question at times whether Thompson has the same mentality. This is one of those times.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
Blind devotion my ###. When the guy makes bad moves, I am perfectly happy to call them out. Wahle leaving. Bad move. Not adequately replacing the guards on the O line. Bad moves. This particular move was not bad. Nor was not trading for Moss.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
You gotta be kidding? What was the difference on that TEAM? Oh, how about Reggie White, Sean Jones, Leroy Butler. Got any of of those type of players around here on D? Didn't think so.
Um, the question was about the offense. But ok - I'll play along. What do you think an unstoppable offense does for a struggling defense? That's right! It scores points and wins games! It possesses the ball and keeps your struggling defense off the field! Thanks for playing.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
Blind devotion?Because they did not go get a TE when the major team need is not a TE right now?How about the blind bashing of the guy for every move he does not make...no matter if the move really makes sense or not?
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
It seems to me Packer fans just like to complained. They complained when they went 13-3 last year. The ones that complain don't seem to have allot of football knowledge either.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
You gotta be kidding? What was the difference on that TEAM? Oh, how about Reggie White, Sean Jones, Leroy Butler. Got anyo of those type of players around here on D? Didn't think so.
Ask Favre how much difference Jackson meant to that 96 team.And the funny thing is the Packers didn't NEED a TE then. They already had a good one in Chmura. But Wolf didn't care. He wanted to give Favre as many weapons as possible. He understood that when an opportunity to be great presents itself, you go for the throat and make the necessary moves to make sure it happens. I just question at times whether Thompson has the same mentality. This is one of those times.
Between this and his refusal to trade his first round pick to the Browns two years ago so he could draft Justin Harrell, well, I think it's safe to say Thompson will never dare to be great. He'll only hope to be great. Which is fine. Just think this is a complete waste of an opportunity.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
You gotta be kidding? What was the difference on that TEAM? Oh, how about Reggie White, Sean Jones, Leroy Butler. Got any of of those type of players around here on D? Didn't think so.
Um, the question was about the offense. But ok - I'll play along. What do you think an unstoppable offense does for a struggling defense? That's right! It scores points and wins games! It possesses the ball and keeps your struggling defense off the field! Thanks for playing.
There are some real thick headed people hanging around. This offense is just fine the way it is, and Rodger's level of play right now is all the evidence we need.If you want to lay into Thompson, then talk about how thin the D line is right now. At least then your argument might make a lick of sense.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
Blind devotion?Because they did not go get a TE when the major team need is not a TE right now?How about the blind bashing of the guy for every move he does not make...no matter if the move really makes sense or not?
I don't see any blind bashing. What I see is people being critical of Thompson's continued reluctance to make a major move to help his team win. What I find curious is that whenever someone brings up these legitimate criticisms Thompson is defended as if he's perfect. Hell, Ron Wolf was a damn good GM but he made mistakes. No GM is infallible but in this forum it sure as hell seems like Thompson is.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
You gotta be kidding? What was the difference on that TEAM? Oh, how about Reggie White, Sean Jones, Leroy Butler. Got any of of those type of players around here on D? Didn't think so.
Um, the question was about the offense. But ok - I'll play along. What do you think an unstoppable offense does for a struggling defense? That's right! It scores points and wins games! It possesses the ball and keeps your struggling defense off the field! Thanks for playing.
Assuming Gonzo would make this offense unstoppable shows how far off base your arguement is. You better get in the game so you can play along.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
It seems to me Packer fans just like to complained. They complained when they went 13-3 last year. The ones that complain don't seem to have allot of football knowledge either.
If that's a shot at me, it's weak but knock yourself out. All I'm doing is presenting a legitimate point of view. It's one that's been expressed by McGinn, who's considered one of the finest beat writers in the country. It's a point that's been expressed by very knowledgeable people. The fact you disagree doesn't make them ignorant and you intelligent. It just means their points of view differ from yours.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
Blind devotion?Because they did not go get a TE when the major team need is not a TE right now?How about the blind bashing of the guy for every move he does not make...no matter if the move really makes sense or not?
I don't see any blind bashing. What I see is people being critical of Thompson's continued reluctance to make a major move to help his team win. What I find curious is that whenever someone brings up these legitimate criticisms Thompson is defended as if he's perfect. Hell, Ron Wolf was a damn good GM but he made mistakes. No GM is infallible but in this forum it sure as hell seems like Thompson is.
HELLO! No other team would give up a #2 for Gonzo, why pick on TT?
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
It seems to me Packer fans just like to complained. They complained when they went 13-3 last year. The ones that complain don't seem to have allot of football knowledge either.
If that's a shot at me, it's weak but knock yourself out. All I'm doing is presenting a legitimate point of view. It's one that's been expressed by McGinn, who's considered one of the finest beat writers in the country. It's a point that's been expressed by very knowledgeable people. The fact you disagree doesn't make them ignorant and you intelligent. It just means their points of view differ from yours.
It wasn't a shot at any one individual.Beat writers have an agenda, to sell their articles. Saying TT was correct would not generate much revenue. At least I agree with 32 other NFL teams, you agree with a guy trying to sell you something.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
You gotta be kidding? What was the difference on that TEAM? Oh, how about Reggie White, Sean Jones, Leroy Butler. Got any of of those type of players around here on D? Didn't think so.
Um, the question was about the offense. But ok - I'll play along. What do you think an unstoppable offense does for a struggling defense? That's right! It scores points and wins games! It possesses the ball and keeps your struggling defense off the field! Thanks for playing.
Assuming Gonzo would make this offense unstoppable shows how far off base your arguement is. You better get in the game so you can play along.
Thanks, I'll do my best. You may want to check out the history of the West Coast offense with two pass catching tight ends, nevermind a first ballot Hall of Famer. I'll stick with 'unstoppable', thanks.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
That offensive line was dominant.
Um, the starting left tackle had to be replaced by a jourymen halfway through the season. Dominant it was not.
Yes...because Keith Jackson's 13 receptions in 1995 really put them over the top right?He was great in 96 for sure...but to claim that was the difference in those years vs the many other things on that team...come on.The lines back in the days were better than the current Oline...allowing the team to actually use Jackson and Chmura as receivers.Also aiding in those numbers were the injuries to the WRs which is why they had to also go out and get Andre Rison in 96.That line made Edgar Bennet and Dorsey Levens look good.Though, I was mistaken...the line was not dominant at that point. I was off a few years when the line got really really good.But between the defense, the special teams, Favre's play...to try and claim that the difference in those years was just Keith Jackson.Please...the WRs now are much better than then...Id say even the great Keith Jackson would not have had those numbers with these WRs and this Oline.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
It seems to me Packer fans just like to complained. They complained when they went 13-3 last year. The ones that complain don't seem to have allot of football knowledge either.
If that's a shot at me, it's weak but knock yourself out. All I'm doing is presenting a legitimate point of view. It's one that's been expressed by McGinn, who's considered one of the finest beat writers in the country. It's a point that's been expressed by very knowledgeable people. The fact you disagree doesn't make them ignorant and you intelligent. It just means their points of view differ from yours.
It wasn't a shot at any one individual.Beat writers have an agenda, to sell their articles. Saying TT was correct would not generate much revenue. At least I agree with 32 other NFL teams, you agree with a guy trying to sell you something.
All 32 teams, even the Chiefs, were bidding on Gonzalez? And just because no one pulled the trigger doesn't 'prove' it's the right move. Shockey was traded for a 2nd and a 5th and Gonzalez for three years isn't worth a 2nd? Please. Chris Chambers was traded for a second, but Gonzalez isn't worth the same? Puh-lease.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
I am really starting to think Packer fans don't have a clue
You and me both.
The blind devotion to Thompson has me wondering the same thing.
Blind devotion?Because they did not go get a TE when the major team need is not a TE right now?How about the blind bashing of the guy for every move he does not make...no matter if the move really makes sense or not?
I don't see any blind bashing. What I see is people being critical of Thompson's continued reluctance to make a major move to help his team win. What I find curious is that whenever someone brings up these legitimate criticisms Thompson is defended as if he's perfect. Hell, Ron Wolf was a damn good GM but he made mistakes. No GM is infallible but in this forum it sure as hell seems like Thompson is.
Because he did not give up a 2nd rounder...which the player himself says was too steep...for an older TE when TE is not this team's problem?Look...nobody here is just blindly saying...good non-move. Everyone of the posts seems to say the same thing...that its just not what is needed for this team. Thats not blind devotion...thats people actually thinking that the team has other big needs...and I have said Im more pissed that nothing was done to shore up the Dline right now.I don't think any single person has gotten even close to claiming Thompson is infallibale.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
That offensive line was dominant.
Um, the starting left tackle had to be replaced by a jourymen halfway through the season. Dominant it was not.
Yes...because Keith Jackson's 13 receptions in 1995 really put them over the top right?He was great in 96 for sure...but to claim that was the difference in those years vs the many other things on that team...come on.The lines back in the days were better than the current Oline...allowing the team to actually use Jackson and Chmura as receivers.Also aiding in those numbers were the injuries to the WRs which is why they had to also go out and get Andre Rison in 96.That line made Edgar Bennet and Dorsey Levens look good.Though, I was mistaken...the line was not dominant at that point. I was off a few years when the line got really really good.But between the defense, the special teams, Favre's play...to try and claim that the difference in those years was just Keith Jackson.Please...the WRs now are much better than then...Id say even the great Keith Jackson would not have had those numbers with these WRs and this Oline.
I'll concede that there were several components, many which you state here. Just think Jackson was bigger key than you're giving him credit for. And to say the offensive line 'made Dorsey Levens look good' is a joke. Bennett - yes, he was an above average back. Levens was a beast.
 
This should put to rest the banal comments from the peanut gallery that Thompson doesn't aggressively pursue free agents.
Not sure how. This adds more fuel to the fire that Thompson, unlike his mentor, isn't willing to make that one big aggressive move that could put his team over the top.
A TE would put this team over the top?
How much better was the Packer offense from '95 to '96? What was the biggest difference?
You gotta be kidding? What was the difference on that TEAM? Oh, how about Reggie White, Sean Jones, Leroy Butler. Got any of of those type of players around here on D? Didn't think so.
Um, the question was about the offense. But ok - I'll play along. What do you think an unstoppable offense does for a struggling defense? That's right! It scores points and wins games! It possesses the ball and keeps your struggling defense off the field! Thanks for playing.
Assuming Gonzo would make this offense unstoppable shows how far off base your arguement is. You better get in the game so you can play along.
Thanks, I'll do my best. You may want to check out the history of the West Coast offense with two pass catching tight ends, nevermind a first ballot Hall of Famer. I'll stick with 'unstoppable', thanks.
And some of you might want to realize McCarthy is not running your grandpa's version of the WCO and 2 passing catching TEs only keep your 4 very good WRS off the field and get the QB killed with the Oline they currently have.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top