What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Packers Make Push to Keep Ahman Green (1 Viewer)

Fla\/\/ed

Footballguy
Rushing to the forefront

Green's recovery brings contract push from Packers

By TOM SILVERSTEIN

tsilverstein@journalsentinel.com

Posted: Mar. 3, 2006

Confident that running back Ahman Green is on track to make a full recovery from a torn right thigh tendon, the Green Bay Packers are making a strong push to re-sign their second all-time leading rusher.

According to National Football League sources who have been monitoring Green's status as he prepares to enter the free-agent market, the Packers are aware that Green could command a deal worth more than $2 million per year even though his status for next season won't be known until the start of training camp.

As a result, they have been having regular talks with agent David Dunn and could complete a deal before the start of free agency.

After Green suffered his injury in an Oct. 23 game at Minnesota, there was some thought that the Packers would re-sign him for only a minimum wage deal before the start of next season. But Green has piqued the interest of a couple of teams that would prefer a less expensive option to unrestricted free agents Shawn Alexander, Edgerrin James, Jamal Lewis and DeShaun Foster.

As a result, the Packers appear committed to spending more than $2 million to bring Green back as their starting running back. Even though they are impressed with rookie Samkon Gado, who filled in when Green and others were hurt last year, the 29-year-old Green would be their projected starter going into training camp if he re-signs.

Green has made it clear to his agent and the Packers that he would like to remain in Green Bay, where he put together five consecutive 1,000-yard seasons from 2000 to 2004 and appeared in the Pro Bowl four times. But he also would like a multi-year contract, according to sources, and is pushing the Packers to fill that desire.

"I'm hopeful," Packers coach Mike McCarthy said. "But those are things in the end, depend on other people. But I'm hopeful it could happen."

Dunn said last week that the two sides were aggressively working on a deal that would allow Green to continue a Packers career that started in 2000, when he was acquired in a trade with the Seattle Seahawks. He would not predict what the market would be if Green were to make it to unrestricted free agency, but teams like Minnesota, San Francisco and possibly the New York Jets are thought to have a strong interest in him.

Last year, Green was paid a base salary of $4.375 million as part of a five-year, $21.5 million deal he signed before the 2001 season. Before he got hurt, he was seeking a blockbuster deal that would reward him for being the most productive runner in the NFL from 2000-'04, when he gained 6,848 rushing yards.

There aren't a lot of running backs who are known to have come back from ruptured thigh tendons, but Green, who underwent surgery Oct. 25 to repair a full-blown tear, is almost two months ahead of schedule in his rehabilitation, Dunn said, and making better progress than most had predicted.

McCarthy said Green has been rehabilitating at the Packers facility so there is no shroud of secrecy regarding his health and the Packers know better than anyone else how much progress he has made. The fact Green showed up at McCarthy's introductory news conference and seems interested in playing for the new coach increases the chances of the two sides completing a deal.

"Absolutely," McCarthy said. "I think it's important when guys are here (working out). I've seen him two or three times in the weight room and I've actually missed him one or two times because I've been in a meeting. He's been around. I feel very optimistic and positive about his contribution to our team next year."

Green's value on the open market is affected somewhat by the domestic violence arrests in his past. Because of those, his injury and decreased production before he got hurt, it's possible he won't receive anything more than a one-year deal from an interested club.

One personnel director said his owner didn't allow the team to sign players with Green's off-the-field history and it's possible other teams could feel the same way. Another factor that could affect Green's worth in the market is the number of attractive running back prospects coming out in the college draft.

Either way, the Packers still think Green can be an effective player, even as they make the transformation to a zone running scheme. Over the past five years, the Packers have employed a power-gap scheme that blocks the opponent a different way.

McCarthy thinks Green and Gado will have no problem adjusting.

"The biggest thing about the system is you're looking for the type of runner who puts his foot down and goes," he said. "You're not making a bunch of moves at the line of scrimmage. I think from what I've seen on film, both guys will be a fit for that style of running. It's not a matter of whether they've run it; the reads will be similar to what they've done before. There will be more emphasis on one cut, one decision."

Regardless of what happens with Green, McCarthy said Gado was still in the team's plans. It's harder to predict whether an undrafted rookie who went from the practice squad to the starting lineup will be capable of handling a full-time load better than someone with Green's experience.

"I think when you're dealing with the running back position and even the quarterback position, the toll that individual takes, you never have enough good running backs," McCarthy said. "What Ahman has done in the past obviously speaks for itself. Until you've done it for a full 16 games, you never know. Monday morning there are few guys who feel worse than a running back."

 
Good to hear that Green is getting better and is rehabbing under GB's watchful eyes - if they can strike a deal, both sides know exactly what they get.

 
I remember reading (and posting) a similar article like a month ago. No coffee yet I saw Ahman Green in the title and figured they changed their mind. Boy are they taking their sweet time getting this done

 
Boy are they taking their sweet time getting this done
Huh?1. The Packers probably want to see how Green is recovering.

2. Don't you think the current labor talks may have something to do with Green not being signed yet?

 
I think this is a very smart move.

I will also say I have to believe Favre has to like this move as well.

:thumbup:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Boy are they taking their sweet time getting this done
Huh?1. The Packers probably want to see how Green is recovering.

2. Don't you think the current labor talks may have something to do with Green not being signed yet?
I don't know anymore. We've noticed some teams signing their players already. It doesn't seem he's looking for "break the bank" money so...I don't know
 
This would probably be the best move for Gado as well. Competing vs. a RB in decline with a recent injury history would be better than competing vs. Chester Taylor, Jamal Lewis, or a top 5 rookie RB.

 
snarfsnarf Posted Today, 01:10 PM This would probably be the best move for Gado as well. Competing vs. a RB in decline with a recent injury history would be better than competing vs. Chester Taylor, Jamal Lewis, or a top 5 rookie RB.
Sounds like someone is a GADO owner.When A. Green signs with Green Bay, Gado is headed back to the bench. Write it down - Gado will never be a featured back in the NFL.RAPTURE
 
snarfsnarf Posted Today, 01:10 PM

  This would probably be the best move for Gado as well. Competing vs. a RB in decline with a recent injury history would be better than competing vs. Chester Taylor, Jamal Lewis, or a top 5 rookie RB.
Sounds like someone is a GADO owner.When A. Green signs with Green Bay, Gado is headed back to the bench. Write it down - Gado will never be a featured back in the NFL.

RAPTURE
I'm not sure about that. The player who performs best will end up seeing the field the majority of the time. Last year Gado was clearly the superior player.
 
I'm not sure about that. The player who performs best will end up seeing the field the majority of the time. Last year Gado was clearly the superior player.
Gado was the best when Green wasn't around. When Green was there he was just a kid with promise. It'll be different, much different, this summer if Green re-signs.Green will be better at picking up blitzes, Gado will be the young legs etc.

 
This would probably be the best move for Gado as well. Competing vs. a RB in decline with a recent injury history would be better than competing vs. Chester Taylor, Jamal Lewis, or a top 5 rookie RB.
:goodposting:
 
I'm not sure about that. The player who performs best will end up seeing the field the majority of the time. Last year Gado was clearly the superior player.
Gado was the best when Green wasn't around. When Green was there he was just a kid with promise. It'll be different, much different, this summer if Green re-signs.Green will be better at picking up blitzes, Gado will be the young legs etc.
Gado was a flat out a better runner than Green last year. It was night and day after Green got hurt.
 
I'm not sure about that. The player who performs best will end up seeing the field the majority of the time. Last year Gado was clearly the superior player.
Gado was the best when Green wasn't around. When Green was there he was just a kid with promise. It'll be different, much different, this summer if Green re-signs.Green will be better at picking up blitzes, Gado will be the young legs etc.
Gado was a flat out a better runner than Green last year. It was night and day after Green got hurt.
Although after Gado got hurt they were comparable.....think it is easy running with a broken tendon?

Lets not compare apples with oranges

 
Gado was a flat out a better runner than Green last year. It was night and day after Green got hurt.
Let's keep things in perspective for a moment. Last year the Packers were a complete mess, especially in the second half of the season. Without Green and Walker, the offense was abysmal. IIRC, they had a few other injuries at WR, too. Opposing defenses gladly let Gado try and beat them instead of Favre & Driver, so let's not get too carried away on what a fourth string RB did in a bunch of meaningless games as the Packers played out the string.Remember that Green has a 4.6 career average (as compared to Gado's 4.1). Green is a former pro-bowler who is a proven commodity, while Gado was the 2005 version of Nick Goings.

One other important thing to point out when Green signs, he caught 19 balls in five games (as compared to Gado's 10 catches in eight) so PPR guys might want to factor that into their rankings this summer.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just a question.

My informal survey shows that 98.2% of players rehabbing after an injury are ahead of schedule.

Do 98.2% work that hard, or perhaps, just maybe, there is a lot of smoke drifting in the air?

 
I'm not sure about that. The player who performs best will end up seeing the field the majority of the time. Last year Gado was clearly the superior player.
Gado was the best when Green wasn't around. When Green was there he was just a kid with promise. It'll be different, much different, this summer if Green re-signs.Green will be better at picking up blitzes, Gado will be the young legs etc.
Gado was a flat out a better runner than Green last year. It was night and day after Green got hurt.
Although after Gado got hurt they were comparable.....think it is easy running with a broken tendon?

Lets not compare apples with oranges
Broken tendon? Ahman's been lousy way before he hurt himself. This stretches back to the middle of last season.
 
From Fox Sports:Samkon Gado's defiantly spectacular emergence as an undrafted rookie the last two months may have been the feel-good story of the Packers' atrocious 4-12 season in 2005.Yet the newly appointed coaching staff apparently isn't sold on turning the featured-back role over to Gado from the get-go next season. Offensive coordinator Jeff Jagodzinski, one of first-year coach Mike McCarthy's more significant hires, indicated that Ahman Green stands to get the starting nod if the team re-signs the veteran free agent."If he's back, obviously it would probably be him. He's a Pro Bowl player," Jagodzinski said. "I'm not going to pigeon-hole anybody. That's Mike's decision on who's the guy. But I would imagine if he's back, as a Pro Bowl player, that's the kind of guy I'd want in there."Whether or not quarterback Brett Favre returns for another season, both McCarthy and Jagodzinski have made it clear that a greater commitment will be made to the running game. Jagodzinski will rely heavily on a zone-blocking scheme that is a departure from the gap-oriented concepts run by the Packers offense in recent years under previous coach Mike Sherman.Jagodzinski was Atlanta's offensive line coach last season, learning the intricacies of zone blocking from Alex Gibbs, who was a master innovator of the scheme for many years with Denver. Jagodzinski said the Falcons were exclusively a zone-blocking offense, which they parlayed into a league-high average of 159.1 rushing yards per game.The Packers, in sharp contrast, ranked 30th with an average of 84.5 yards.Only two years earlier, they set a franchise record by churning out 2,558 yards on the ground for a per-game clip of 159.9, good for third in the league. Jagodzinski saw the devastation wrought that season first-hand, his fifth and final year as tight ends coach in his first go-around with the Packers. The lasting image for Jagodzinski was Green running his way to the forefront of the storied team's annals with 1,883 yards, along with 15 touchdowns."I remember seeing him run down the sidelines. The guy's a stallion," Jagodzinski said.One of the burning off-season questions for a team in transition is whether Green, who turned 29 on Feb. 16, can regain the formidable horsepower that escaped him last year in an injury-shortened season. He sustained a torn quadriceps tendon in just the sixth game and subsequently underwent surgery. Green is said to be ahead of schedule with his recovery, but there's a chance he won't be ready for the start of training camp in July. Jagodzinski, though, isn't fretting such a scenario."He was one of the hardest workers on the team," said Jagodzinski, harking back to his previous association with Green. "That's what's going to enable him to keep on playing."While Green might have some drawing power as a four-time Pro Bowl player, the health concerns should play into the Packers' favor for retaining him. Green has expressed an interest in returning and probably will be open to accepting a one-year, minimum-salary contract laden with incentives.Jagodzinski envisions a competition between Green and Gado for the lead role. Gado, a former practice-squad player out of Division I-AA Liberty, starred as the team's fifth starting back of last season before incurring a season-ending sprained knee in the third-to-last week.Jagodzinski was on the opposite sideline when Gado made his presence felt with 103 yards and two touchdowns on the ground in the Packers' upset win at Atlanta on Nov. 13."He looked pretty dang good," Jagodzinski said. "This kid obviously has some ability."
 
Broken tendon? Ahman's been lousy way before he hurt himself. This stretches back to the middle of last season.
:confused: If you want to post something of value, use facts to support and back-up your opinion.

Since Green didn't play the middle of last season, we can assume that you mean 2004. Here are Green's stats last eight games of 2004 (which include Week 17 when he only had four carries):

124 Carries

514 Yards

4.1 YPC

3 TD's

21 catches (again PPR guys take notice)

177 yards

Gado's numbers last season are extremely similar, just a few more TD's and half the receptions

143 carries

582 yards

4.1 YPC

7 TD's

10 catches

77 Yards

Green has been a 20 TD single season producer, so don't tell me that Gado is better than him in that area. TD's are the only thing Gado's limited experience favor him when compared to one of Green's weaker segments of output.

 
Just a question.

My informal survey shows that 98.2% of players rehabbing after an injury are ahead of schedule.

Do 98.2% work that hard, or perhaps, just maybe, there is a lot of smoke drifting in the air?
I think just about the only player not ahead of schedule is KWIIpuff puff

 
Ahman Green reminds me of Curtis Martin, circa 2003 when he managed to score only two touchdowns and it appeared the writing was written in perma-ink on the wall. He responded with an incredible 2004 season.

Green is not yet 30 years old and has had five seasons as a top-thirteen fantasy performer. He's still got game and he will still perform well no matter where he plays.

 
I'm not sure about that. The player who performs best will end up seeing the field the majority of the time. Last year Gado was clearly the superior player.
Gado was the best when Green wasn't around. When Green was there he was just a kid with promise. It'll be different, much different, this summer if Green re-signs.Green will be better at picking up blitzes, Gado will be the young legs etc.
Gado was a flat out a better runner than Green last year. It was night and day after Green got hurt.
Although after Gado got hurt they were comparable.....think it is easy running with a broken tendon?

Lets not compare apples with oranges
Broken tendon? Ahman's been lousy way before he hurt himself. This stretches back to the middle of last season.
The whole team was struggling. To ignore what Ahman did the previous 4 years when he lead the league is rushing and recieving combined is ridiculous.
 
snarfsnarf Posted Today, 01:10 PM

  This would probably be the best move for Gado as well. Competing vs. a RB in decline with a recent injury history would be better than competing vs. Chester Taylor, Jamal Lewis, or a top 5 rookie RB.
Sounds like someone is a GADO owner.When A. Green signs with Green Bay, Gado is headed back to the bench. Write it down - Gado will never be a featured back in the NFL.

RAPTURE
I wasn't implying that Gado was going to win the rushing title or even start for GB this year. What I said was that competing vs. Green would be much better than competing vs. the other players or rookie RB's I listed.
 
Green and Gado aren't even in the same league.

Green >>>>>>>> Gado at every single phase of the game. Blocking, running, receiving, etc.

If Green is healthy and signed there is no RB competition in GB, it's Greens job.

Ahman was looking good before he got injured last year, the team was in shambles, it wasn't his fault.

 
Just a question.

My informal survey shows that 98.2% of players rehabbing after an injury are ahead of schedule.

Do 98.2% work that hard, or perhaps, just maybe, there is a lot of smoke drifting in the air?
initial rehab exercises are simple then as they get harder proprioception becomes more of an issue and it makes everything skewed
 
-- Packers Working Hard to Re-Sign Green --

Sat Mar 4, 2006 --from FFMastermind.com

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports confident that RB Ahman Green is on track to make a full recovery from a torn right thigh tendon, the Green Bay Packers are making a strong push to re-sign their second all-time leading rusher. According to National Football League sources who have been monitoring Green's status as he prepares to enter the free-agent market, the Packers are aware that Green could command a deal worth more than $2 million per year even though his status for next season won't be known until the start of training camp. As a result, they have been having regular talks with agent David Dunn and could complete a deal before the start of free agency. Green has piqued the interest of a couple of teams that would prefer a less expensive option to unrestricted free agents RB Shawn Alexander, RB Edgerrin James, RB Jamal Lewis and RB DeShaun Foster. As a result, the Packers appear committed to spending more than $2 million to bring Green back as their starting running back. Even though they are impressed with rookie RB Samkon Gado, who filled in when Green and others were hurt last year, the 29-year-old Green would be their projected starter going into training camp if he re-signs.

It looks like the Packers have some faith in Ahman Green's rehabilitation......all you pessimists out there. Ahman Green is going to resign with the Packers, and will start week 1. All the owners who have Gado will just have to sit on him or do some sort of fire sale - take your pick.

RAPTURE

 
Green Bays new OC, Jeff Jagodzinski, says two things about Green & Gado.

Offensive coordinator Jeff Jagodzinski, one of first-year coach Mike McCarthy's more significant hires, indicated that Ahman Green stands to get the starting nod if the team re-signs the veteran free agent.

"If he's back, obviously it would probably be him. He's a Pro Bowl player," Jagodzinski said. "I'm not going to pigeon-hole anybody. That's Mike's decision on who's the guy. But I would imagine if he's back, as a Pro Bowl player, that's the kind of guy I'd want in there."
Jagodzinski envisions a competition between Green and Gado for the lead role. Gado, a former practice-squad player out of Division I-AA Liberty, starred as the team's fifth starting back of last season before incurring a season-ending sprained knee in the third-to-last week.

Jagodzinski was on the opposite sideline when Gado made his presence felt with 103 yards and two touchdowns on the ground in the Packers' upset win at Atlanta on Nov. 13.

"He looked pretty dang good," Jagodzinski said. "This kid obviously has some ability."
It'll be interesting however it eventually pans out.
 
Green and Gado aren't even in the same league.

Green >>>>>>>> Gado at every single phase of the game. Blocking, running, receiving, etc.

If Green is healthy and signed there is no RB competition in GB, it's Greens job.

Ahman was looking good before he got injured last year, the team was in shambles, it wasn't his fault.
Ahman was looking good? Did you watch any GB games?
 
Green and Gado aren't even in the same league.

Green >>>>>>>> Gado at every single phase of the game.  Blocking, running, receiving, etc.

If Green is healthy and signed there is no RB competition in GB, it's Greens job.

Ahman was looking good before he got injured last year, the team was in shambles, it wasn't his fault.
Ahman was looking good? Did you watch any GB games?
I was going to say the same thing fruity pebbles.
 
Green and Gado aren't even in the same league.

Green >>>>>>>> Gado at every single phase of the game. Blocking, running, receiving, etc.

If Green is healthy and signed there is no RB competition in GB, it's Greens job.

Ahman was looking good before he got injured last year, the team was in shambles, it wasn't his fault.
Ahman was looking good? Did you watch any GB games?
Every single one, you?
 
Broken tendon? Ahman's been lousy way before he hurt himself. This stretches back to the middle of last season.
:confused: If you want to post something of value, use facts to support and back-up your opinion.

Since Green didn't play the middle of last season, we can assume that you mean 2004. Here are Green's stats last eight games of 2004 (which include Week 17 when he only had four carries):

124 Carries

514 Yards

4.1 YPC

3 TD's

21 catches (again PPR guys take notice)

177 yards

Gado's numbers last season are extremely similar, just a few more TD's and half the receptions

143 carries

582 yards

4.1 YPC

7 TD's

10 catches

77 Yards

Green has been a 20 TD single season producer, so don't tell me that Gado is better than him in that area. TD's are the only thing Gado's limited experience favor him when compared to one of Green's weaker segments of output.
Woohoo fun with numbers. Since I said since the middle of last year, it would be customary to include this season numbers in Ahman's stats. Over his last 13 regular season games.201 carries

769 yards

3.8 YPC

3 TDs

Gado:

143 carries

582 yards

4.1 YPC

7 TDs

 
Green and Gado aren't even in the same league.

Green >>>>>>>> Gado at every single phase of the game.  Blocking, running, receiving, etc.

If Green is healthy and signed there is no RB competition in GB, it's Greens job.

Ahman was looking good before he got injured last year, the team was in shambles, it wasn't his fault.
Ahman was looking good? Did you watch any GB games?
Every single one, you?
Yeah a couple with Green, a couple with Gado. Gado looked better.
 
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.

 
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.
Davenport looked like he was going to bust open the game he started and that was at the beginning of the season. The difference in the running game was very apparent.
 
Broken tendon? Ahman's been lousy way before he hurt himself. This stretches back to the middle of last season.
:confused: If you want to post something of value, use facts to support and back-up your opinion.

Since Green didn't play the middle of last season, we can assume that you mean 2004. Here are Green's stats last eight games of 2004 (which include Week 17 when he only had four carries):

124 Carries

514 Yards

4.1 YPC

3 TD's

21 catches (again PPR guys take notice)

177 yards

Gado's numbers last season are extremely similar, just a few more TD's and half the receptions

143 carries

582 yards

4.1 YPC

7 TD's

10 catches

77 Yards

Green has been a 20 TD single season producer, so don't tell me that Gado is better than him in that area. TD's are the only thing Gado's limited experience favor him when compared to one of Green's weaker segments of output.
Woohoo fun with numbers. Since I said since the middle of last year, it would be customary to include this season numbers in Ahman's stats. Over his last 13 regular season games.201 carries

769 yards

3.8 YPC

3 TDs

Gado:

143 carries

582 yards

4.1 YPC

7 TDs
:lmao: Excellent job leaving out the receiving numbers :thumbup:
 
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.
Davenport looked like he was going to bust open the game he started and that was at the beginning of the season. The difference in the running game was very apparent.
:lmao: It was week 5 against the SAINTS! :lmao: Go look at how Davenport performed prior to that against Tampa Bay and Carolina.

 
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.
Davenport looked like he was going to bust open the game he started and that was at the beginning of the season. The difference in the running game was very apparent.
:lmao: It was week 5 against the SAINTS! :lmao: Go look at how Davenport performed prior to that against Tampa Bay and Carolina.
Easy there big fella, fruity pebbles doesn't take too kindly to logic! ;)
 
Broken tendon? Ahman's been lousy way before he hurt himself. This stretches back to the middle of last season.
:confused: If you want to post something of value, use facts to support and back-up your opinion.

Since Green didn't play the middle of last season, we can assume that you mean 2004. Here are Green's stats last eight games of 2004 (which include Week 17 when he only had four carries):

124 Carries

514 Yards

4.1 YPC

3 TD's

21 catches (again PPR guys take notice)

177 yards

Gado's numbers last season are extremely similar, just a few more TD's and half the receptions

143 carries

582 yards

4.1 YPC

7 TD's

10 catches

77 Yards

Green has been a 20 TD single season producer, so don't tell me that Gado is better than him in that area. TD's are the only thing Gado's limited experience favor him when compared to one of Green's weaker segments of output.
Woohoo fun with numbers. Since I said since the middle of last year, it would be customary to include this season numbers in Ahman's stats. Over his last 13 regular season games.201 carries

769 yards

3.8 YPC

3 TDs

Gado:

143 carries

582 yards

4.1 YPC

7 TDs
:lmao: Excellent job leaving out the receiving numbers :thumbup:
Cool, Ahman can be the third down back :thumbup:
 
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.
Davenport looked like he was going to bust open the game he started and that was at the beginning of the season. The difference in the running game was very apparent.
:lmao: It was week 5 against the SAINTS! :lmao: Go look at how Davenport performed prior to that against Tampa Bay and Carolina.
Easy there big fella, fruity pebbles doesn't take too kindly to logic! ;)
Najeh looked pretty strong in that half. ;) IMHO, it will be RBBC in Green Bay. Ahman surely deserves the first chance, but as an owner last year, I saw little to make me think he's still a premier RB. Serviceable, but not quite the same. Of course if the OL improved, who knows?

 
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.
Davenport looked like he was going to bust open the game he started and that was at the beginning of the season. The difference in the running game was very apparent.
:lmao: It was week 5 against the SAINTS! :lmao: Go look at how Davenport performed prior to that against Tampa Bay and Carolina.
Easy there big fella, fruity pebbles doesn't take too kindly to logic! ;)
I need to remember he is a FFToday refugee.
 
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.
Davenport looked like he was going to bust open the game he started and that was at the beginning of the season. The difference in the running game was very apparent.
:lmao: It was week 5 against the SAINTS! :lmao: Go look at how Davenport performed prior to that against Tampa Bay and Carolina.
He only got a couple carries in the TB and Carolina games. True it was the Saints but anyone who watched the game could see that he was on his way to a 150 yard performance. Then the next week Ahman came back and stunk it up against the vikings who aren't much better against the run. Also stunk it up against Cleveland, who's just as bad, if not worse, than the Saints.
 
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.
Davenport looked like he was going to bust open the game he started and that was at the beginning of the season. The difference in the running game was very apparent.
:lmao: It was week 5 against the SAINTS! :lmao: Go look at how Davenport performed prior to that against Tampa Bay and Carolina.
Easy there big fella, fruity pebbles doesn't take too kindly to logic! ;)
I need to remember he is a FFToday refugee.
:thumbup:
 
Just a question.

My informal survey shows that 98.2% of players rehabbing after an injury are ahead of schedule. 

Do 98.2% work that hard, or perhaps, just maybe, there is a lot of smoke drifting in the air?
There is always someone looking at the glass as half full. If the player is under contract then the organization is blowing smoke. If the player is a free agent then his agent is blowing smoke. It shouldn't be very difficult for the Packers to sign Ahman Green. He wants to be in Green Bay and his health status is cloudy. I can't imagine too many other teams throwing significant jack in his direction.

:banned:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.
Davenport looked like he was going to bust open the game he started and that was at the beginning of the season. The difference in the running game was very apparent.
:lmao: It was week 5 against the SAINTS! :lmao: Go look at how Davenport performed prior to that against Tampa Bay and Carolina.
He only got a couple carries in the TB and Carolina games. True it was the Saints but anyone who watched the game could see that he was on his way to a 150 yard performance. Then the next week Ahman came back and stunk it up against the vikings who aren't much better against the run. Also stunk it up against Cleveland, who's just as bad, if not worse, than the Saints.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
 
I need to remember he is a FFToday refugee.
Is that what's going on with all these kids posting here now? Did they raise the age limit for membership to 16 or something?
 
Gado did not look better than Green last year. The difference was the offensive line. Losing Wahle and Rivera hurt the overall offensive line play especially early in the season. They were out of sync and it was very apparent to anyone that followed the team. As the season progressed the offensive line play improved and the beneficiary of that was Gado. Gado did a great job when he had to take over as the featured back but I do hope you Gado lovers can get your sense of reality back when it comes to Gado starting over Ahman Green.
Davenport looked like he was going to bust open the game he started and that was at the beginning of the season. The difference in the running game was very apparent.
:lmao: It was week 5 against the SAINTS! :lmao: Go look at how Davenport performed prior to that against Tampa Bay and Carolina.
He only got a couple carries in the TB and Carolina games. True it was the Saints but anyone who watched the game could see that he was on his way to a 150 yard performance. Then the next week Ahman came back and stunk it up against the vikings who aren't much better against the run. Also stunk it up against Cleveland, who's just as bad, if not worse, than the Saints.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
How so? BTW great argument.
 
I need to remember he is a FFToday refugee.
Is that what's going on with all these kids posting here now? Did they raise the age limit for membership to 16 or something?
Is that what you geniuses are saying now when you have no argument left? Cool.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I need to remember he is a FFToday refugee.
Is that what's going on with all these kids posting here now? Did they raise the age limit for membership to 16 or something?
They shut the boards down there and this is what we get.
Why would they shut the boards down? Thanks to this brilliant dialogue I am now able to feel confident in ranking Gado as my fifth RB overall, right behind LT2, LJ, SAlex, and Edge. Hell, if Alexander and Edge go to new teams, Gado could move up to three!
 
I need to remember he is a FFToday refugee.
Is that what's going on with all these kids posting here now? Did they raise the age limit for membership to 16 or something?
They shut the boards down there and this is what we get.
Why would they shut the boards down? Thanks to this brilliant dialogue I am now able to feel confident in ranking Gado as my fifth RB overall, right behind LT2, LJ, SAlex, and Edge. Hell, if Alexander and Edge go to new teams, Gado could move up to three!
He'd be right behind Ahman at 3 since you feel he's vastly superior right now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top