What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Pasquino ranking (1 Viewer)

eefflrat

Footballguy
Just renewed and was looking at qb dynasty rankings. See Pasquino ranked Cam as the number 14 dynasty qb. I can't fathom any scenario where that guy would be the 14th qb, is that a mistake, and if not where is the reasoning? I'm lost.

 
Just renewed and was looking at qb dynasty rankings. See Pasquino ranked Cam as the number 14 dynasty qb. I can't fathom any scenario where that guy would be the 14th qb, is that a mistake, and if not where is the reasoning? I'm lost.
Behind Eli, Ben and flacco. Haha
 
If you can't fathom any scenario where this ranking makes sense then why should he waste his time explaining himself? :hophead: :whistle: :rolleyes:

 
He's also consistently ranked DWill as a Top 20 Dynasty RB for the past three years. In other words, take his rankings with a grain of salt.

 
For years Pasquino's rankings always have had an outlier quality to me - his head is in a different place then mine with an overemphasis on older players IMO, to the point that they seem more redraft rankings to me than Dynasty. Obviously a different approach to Dynasty than I have (which if fine) and maybe a better strategy. :shrug:

This is not the first thread to bring this up and it won't change any of his future rankings, so if it really bothers you, best to do what I do and just check the "exclude" box.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i've always disliked these threads... so you disagree with someone elses outlook on a player? just move on!! why the need to make a thread about it? dynasty rankings are so subjective... i've never seen a ranking list that i agree with completely. pasquino is putting his opinion out there, it's an attempt to predict the future. there's no right or wrong, good or bad. he could end up being spot on about newton!!!

 
I emailed him about this issue a couple of times in the past he says he's working on it. Well he's been working on it 2 years running.

 
If you can't fathom any scenario where this ranking makes sense then why should he waste his time explaining himself? :hophead: :whistle: :rolleyes:
He'd have be one of the most convincing people on the planet to justify how Witten is a higher rated dynasty TE than Gronk.
Some of the staffers here have an affection for Witten that is not shared by the masses. I remember, a year or two ago someone linked a start up draft in which Waldman took Jason Witten at 1.01. It was a very TE friendly league with something like 1.5 points per reception, but still everyone's reaction was :unsure: Some board regulars here think Gronk is poison (see EBF) so while I don't agree with this particular ranking, I can understand it, given the love some have for Witten and the lack of enthusiasm others do for Gronk.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i've always disliked these threads... so you disagree with someone elses outlook on a player? just move on!! why the need to make a thread about it? dynasty rankings are so subjective... i've never seen a ranking list that i agree with completely. pasquino is putting his opinion out there, it's an attempt to predict the future. there's no right or wrong, good or bad. he could end up being spot on about newton!!!
Well, I just I just renewed and have the right to ask a question, and I'm not bashing anything, it was the first thing I noticed when I checked out rankings and it seemed absolutely bizarre that anyone could truly feel Cam Newton is the 14 th best dynasty qb. It has to come into question.While we are at it, why don't the rankings have a PPR dynasty ranking, since they have redraft.
 
What I would like to know is why anyone looks at these guys ranking at all, other than to just make doing your own easier cause all the names are right there.

I mean, no matter who's rankings you look at, you will adjust what you disagree with.

 
What I would like to know is why anyone looks at these guys ranking at all, other than to just make doing your own easier cause all the names are right there.I mean, no matter who's rankings you look at, you will adjust what you disagree with.
My own rankings are already done. These are just a cross check to point out where I may have missed the mark. Sometimes I have a player too high or too low. When it is out of sync with the rankings here, then I go back to square one and research things again to see if my initial analysis was correct or not.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top